Skip to main content
Log in

The Neural Separability of Emotion Reactivity and Regulation

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Affective Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One foundational distinction in affective science is between emotion reactivity and regulation. This conceptual distinction has long been assumed to be instantiated in spatially separable brain systems (a typical example: amygdala/insula for reactivity and frontoparietal areas for regulation). In this research, we begin by reviewing previous findings that support and contradict the neural separability hypothesis concerning emotional reactivity and regulation. Further, we conduct a direct test of this hypothesis with empirical data. In five studies involving healthy and clinical samples (total n = 336), we assessed neural responses using fMRI while participants were asked to either react naturally or regulate their emotions (using reappraisal) while viewing emotionally evocative stimuli. Across five studies, we failed to find support for the neural separability hypothesis. In univariate analyses, both presumptive “reactivity” and “regulation” brain regions demonstrated equal or greater activation for the reactivity contrast than for the regulation contrast. In multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA), classifiers decoded reactivity (vs. neutral) trials more accurately than regulation (vs. reactivity) trials using multivoxel data in both presumptive “reactivity” and “regulation” regions. These findings suggest that emotion reactivity and regulation—as measured via fMRI—may not be as spatially separable in the brain as previously assumed. Our secondary whole-brain analyses revealed largely consistent results. We discuss the two theoretical possibilities regarding the neural separability hypothesis and offer thoughts for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the neural separability hypothesis would predict decreased activation in “reactivity” regions during down-regulation which can be useful information to perform the regulation classification above chance, its performance should still be lower than the performance for the reactivity classification.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Xiao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by National Institute of Health (NIH) grants CA197282 and MH092416.

Competing Interests

We declare no competing interests.

Data and Code Availability

The data and analysis scripts of all studies are available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/w75a9/).

Author Contribution

JXZ, MLD, and JJG conceptualized the research. JXZ analyzed and visualized the data. JXZ wrote the original draft. All authors provided critical revisions.

Ethics Approval

In studies involving data collection, the research protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board at Stanford University. We certify that the studies were performed to ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

In studies involving data collection, written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Open Practices Statement

We share data and code on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/w75a9/). The study was not pre-registered.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Michelle (Lani) Shiota

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 2.03 MB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, JX., Dixon, M.L., Goldin, P.R. et al. The Neural Separability of Emotion Reactivity and Regulation. Affec Sci 4, 617–629 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00227-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00227-9

Keywords

Navigation