Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reflective socio-ecological practice

  • REFLECTIVE Essay
  • Published:
Socio-Ecological Practice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

This autobiographical reflection traces my work in land suitability analysis and plan-making. The suitability practice has resulted in two rating systems: the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Land Evaluation and Site Assessment System and Green Business Certification Inc.’s SITES Rating System. Plans have been made for US counties, cities, and towns; Italian provinces; regions and watersheds; and university campuses. My practice is grounded in human ecology. I have attempted to address the issues people face with an especial focus on environmental quality and social equity. Examples of work from Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington, Idaho, Colorado, Arizona, and Texas in the United States as well as Italy and Mexico are noted. I explore how reflection, often with collaborators and students, has informed my practice and how it can help advance the fields of planning and landscape architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source Steiner (1981, p. 101)

Fig. 3

Source National Gallery of Art

Fig. 4

Source Jim Choate via Flickr

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Source © OLIN / Karl-Rainer Blumenthal

Fig. 7

Source Studio Balcones. Photograph by Patrick Wong

Fig. 8

Source Flavio Vallenari

Fig. 9

Source Steiner (2000a, p. 238)

Fig. 10

Source Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan (2012)

Fig. 11

Source PWP Landscape Architecture

Fig. 12

Source (c) Sahar Coston-Hardy

Fig. 13

Source Bob Daemmrich/ZUMA Wire/Alamy Live News

Fig. 14

Source Eric Sucar

Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 16 November 2022

    "p." is added for better presentation for an in-text citation.

References

Download references

Funding

Funding for the color illustrations in the print version of this article was provided by the Weitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Frederick Steiner conceived and wrote this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick R. Steiner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Frederick Steiner is an advisory board member of Socio-Ecological Practice Research. He was not involved in the peer-review or handling of the manuscript, and has no other competing interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steiner, F.R. Reflective socio-ecological practice. Socio Ecol Pract Res 4, 417–429 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00130-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00130-w

Keywords

Navigation