Skip to main content

The role of information infrastructure for climate change adaptation in the socio-ecological system of the Central Himalaya: availability, utility, and gaps


The present study intends to understand and disclose the role of information infrastructure in climate change adaptation and its underlying barriers in the communities of socio-ecological system (SES) in the Central Himalaya. The study makes use of primary data in its research methodology which comprises the use of questionnaires, oral interviews, and review of relevant literature. The data were collected using a questionnaire-based survey from 85 households in 11 villages. The study results show that road accessibility and irrigation facilities remarkably influence the educational, professional, and economic conditions of the communities. The research reveals how the flow of information through television, newspapers, village elders, and mobile phones influences perceptions of climate change in a different order. Information infrastructure availability is higher with the communities having access to the road network and irrigation facilities. The study concludes that in SES a good information infrastructure is highly relevant for reducing the current and future vulnerability of SESs to climate change. The study also provides recommendations for the dissemination of information on climate adaptation that suit the needs and demands of the Himalayan SESs and thus could help to close existing information gaps and barriers.

Climate change and socio-ecological systems of the mountains

Climate change affects daily life and economic activities such as agriculture, impacting the livelihood of communities in their given social and ecological domains (WMO 2011, p.43; IPCC 2014). Therefore, climate data and knowledge from any reliable source are useful for local communities to take decisions on agricultural activities, natural resource management, preventing disease outbreaks, developing livelihoods, etc. (WMO 2011, p.26). Moreover, the consequence of climate change on socio-ecological systems (SESs) is being realized at the local level, leading to additional vulnerabilities, especially in food security, livelihood options, and risk and hazards (WMO 2011, p.26). Owing to a combination of factors such as awareness about climate, impacts of climate change, and other climate issues, the demand for climate information is increasing but at a moderate growth (WMO 2011, p.43). With such importance of climate-related information, World Metrological Organization (WMO) initiated the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) to develop climate information services for all nations. The climate services aim to make provision by a generation of a wide range of information on past, present, and future climate for the facilitation of improved understanding of climate and its impacts on natural and human systems to equip policymakers for decision-making at all levels of society (WMO and GFCS 2016, p.10). Thus, the need for climate-related information becomes quite essential for mountain communities due to their high degree of exposure to climate change.

Mountains provide vital ecosystem services to the communities in the region as well as in plains (Joshi and Joshi 2019, p.785). These fragile ecosystems are exposed to multiple environmental stressors such as natural disasters, and non-environmental stressors such as socio-economic development and growing populations (Macchi 2010, p.1). The multiple stressors are interlinked and increase the existing pressure on the ecosystem services and natural resources and thus have severe repercussions on SESs (UNEP 2011, p.8). The emergence of climate change adds to the list of stressors and is affecting complex SESs in a variety of ways (Beniston 2003, p.8) and therefore is detrimental to the ability of the local community for coping and adaptive capacity (Macchi 2010, p.18). With changing climate, the possibility to avoid serious harms posed by climate change is almost nonexistent even with a strong ability to adapt to the changes (He 2017, p.110). Such abilities are often challenged due to the absence of appropriate and timely information about the dimension and intensity of changes (Biesbroek et al. 2010, p.445). Now, the integration of science-based evidence and information with adaptation strategies is being discussed to be better equipped to combat the impacts of climate change (Hoppe et al. 2014, p.13).

Information infrastructure in the SESs and the research questions

Information infrastructure in the SESs

Information about the impact of climate change on mountainous SESs is limited; thereby, the ability of mountain communities to cope and adapt is not appropriately understood (Macchi 2011, p.9). The lack of proper information about climate change impacts and in recognizing local needs and gaps in existing policies and institutional arrangements restricts the decision- and policymakers to form site-specific policies. Therefore, it is imperative to understand communities’ response for assessing climate change conditions and increasing policy responses for adaptation (Adger and Vincent 2005, p.401; Smit and Wandel 2006, p.286). Lack of information and effective communication is widely recognized as a limiting factor in socio-economic and ecological development and is one of the major barriers for planning and implementation of strategies (Crabbe and Robin 2006, p.119; Tribbia and Moser 2008, p.316; Lowe et al. 2009, p.4; Carter and Culp 2010, p.36; Archie et al. 2012, Pandey et al. 2018, p.28). Accessibility to relevant information to address the negative impacts of climate change is more important to facilitate adaptation planning (Cruce 2007, p.1, Archie et al. 2012). At the same time, knowing about barriers to access existing information is also important for adaptation planning.

Availability of information does not necessarily mean its successful utilization for decision-making (Pandey et al. 2018, p.28). Information can be split into two parts, supply which includes knowledge and demand which is created by the use of knowledge. Although these two components are highly disconnected in practice for decision-making and adaptation planning (Sarewitz and Pielke 2007, p.6; Dilling 2007, p.49; Dilling and Lemos, 2011, p.681, Archie et al. 2014, p.398). Information infrastructure is defined in a variety of ways depending on the discipline and context (Hanseth 2010, p.123, Pironti, 2006, p.53). Here information infrastructure refers to a technology-enabled foundation or framework that supports the communicative interaction among local communities, stakeholders, policymakers, and the governance at large. Information from the supply side should be scientifically tested, precise, relevant, and easy to communicate so that the demand side understands and uses it appropriately for the desired purpose. The demand side should be well equipped with the mechanism to access and use the available valid information purposefully. Infrastructure like road connectivity, irrigation, institutions, communications mediums, and mechanisms of accessibility for information is traditionally weak and, in most cases, nonexistent at the rural level in the mountains and therefore undermines the flow of information, leading to the development of rural communities (Pandey et al. 2018, p.28). These overall components of information and infrastructure make the information infrastructure for the adaptation planning. Moreover, information supply and demand are context-specific and should be used with caution. The accessibility of information and communication is further challenged due to a variety of reasons such as language, education, and infrastructure (Pandey et al. 2018, p.28). The barriers in many forms from either the demand side or the supply side need to be identified and removed for effective communication and attaining the goal of adaptation to climate change (Scherer and Verburg 2017, p.2). Information about climate change and applicable adaptation strategies is key to address climate change in the Himalayan SESs (Mishra et al. 2019, p.459). The role and barrier of information availability and accessibility to mountain communities are often specific to the regional terms of marginality, remoteness, and high dependence on natural resources (Gerlitz et al. 2017, p.127). Information is a critical factor in the daily life activities and livelihoods of all people and to the development of a community in an SES. The efficacy of decisions made by households and communities to manage the effects of climate variability and change by adapting is critically dependent upon the availability and utility of information (WMO 2011, p.43). The knowledge gained from utilizing the information through different channels and mediums helps in efficient planning of adaptation in both aspects of SES, i.e., socio-economic (such as agriculture, livelihood, and infrastructure) and ecological (such as forest conservation, wildlife management, and natural disaster risks and hazards) to cope with the impacts of climate change.

Research questions

Thus, the main objective of the study was to better understand and disclose the role of information infrastructure in climate change adaptation and its underlying barriers in the communities of SES in the Central Himalaya. With a participatory approach to gain insights through mutual learning and exchange with the communities of SES, the study sought to answer the following research questions: (a) What are the socio-economic profiles of the community and the community’s perception of climate variability in the SES? (b) How is the availability and utility of information infrastructure in SES for adaptation planning? (c) What are the possible barriers or gaps to climate change adaptation faced by the households? The outcomes will provide pathways to ensure a suitable mechanism for the generation, dissemination, and application of information for climate change adaptation and policy reforms to minimize climate change vulnerability.

The setting of SESs in the Himalaya

The Himalayan mountains, situated in Asia, are prominent for high-altitude settlements which have distinct physical settings and patterns besides various cultural, structural, and ecological dimensions (Kumar et al. 2021, p.2). The Himalayan region in the last few decades has been facing climate change impacts across the biophysical and social systems (Gerlitz et al. 2017, p.124). The geography and socio-economic settings add to regional vulnerability to various risks and hazards such as climate change with additional stress caused by over-exploitation of natural resources and increased population pressures (Ning et al. 2013, p.4; Singh and Thadani 2015, p.402; ICIMOD 2009, p.1; Ray et al. 2011, p.2; Gupta et al. 2020). Over the last few decades, a rapid increase in intensity and frequency of occurrences of extreme weather events such as increased temperature, altered precipitation patterns, cloudburst, and recurrent episodes of drought has been observed in the Himalaya (Negi et al. 2012, p.347; Xu et al. 2009, p.522; Madhura et al. 2014, p.1158; UAPCC 2014). The forecasted net increase in temperature in the Himalayan region in the 2030s is reported to increase between 1.7 and 2.2 °C with respect to the 1970s (INCCA 2010, p.41; UAPCC 2014). These environmental changes have already been posing severe threats to water (Pandey et al. 2015, p.1472), agriculture, biodiversity, food security, and human health (Chaudhary and Bawa 2011, p.767; Pandey and Jha 2012, p.490). Specific knowledge and data on human well-being in the rural areas of the Himalaya are limited. However, the climate change effects will be apparent for the communities of SESs in their health, livelihoods, and the availability of natural resources (Sharma et al. 2009, p.2).

With these characteristics in view, the study focused on the village communities of SES in the Central Himalayan and was carried out in the Bageshwar District of Uttarakhand State of India. This area spreads over 2,302 sq km and lies at the outer ranges of the Central Himalaya between latitudes 29° 40′ to 30° 20′N and longitudes 79° 25′ to 80° 10′E. Topographically, the district is characterized by rugged mountains and undulating hills with large areas covered with forest and barren land. The climate is temperate to sub-humid, and the northern part of the district experiences sub-zero temperature almost throughout the year, while the central and southern parts are relatively warm and humid.

The area has a total population of 259, 898 (2.58% of the total Uttarakhand State population) with a population density of 116 per sq. Km (Census of India 2011). Out of the entire district population, 96.51% are living in villages. The district has a sex ratio of 1093 females for every 1000 males, with a literacy rate of 80.01%. The region has sparsely populated small settlements which have a high dependence on rain-fed agriculture and adjoining forests for natural resources. The agricultural sector is dominated by subsistence farming and is the primary source of livelihood to 68.85% engaged as cultivators and 7.27% as agricultural laborers. The high dependency of the communities on natural resources in the region is owing to a lack of access to basic facilities, services, and institutions. For understanding the role of information infrastructure in adaptation planning for climate change, villages were divided into four major categories (Fig. 1). The categories are (1) villages with access to road and having an irrigation facility, (2) villages with access to road and not having an irrigation facility, (3) villages with no access to road and having an irrigation facility, and (4) villages with no access to road and not having an irrigation facility. In total, 11 villages were selected with their geographical location and other spatial information listed in Table 1 (see Fig A1 for the profile of the surveyed villages in Appendix-I). Although situated at different altitudes, these villages have similar challenges, are remotely located, practice similar types of cultivation, have few employment opportunities, and have high forest dependency.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Surveyed rural villages of the Bageshwar District, Uttarakhand. The villages were divided into four major categories: (1) villages with access to road not having an irrigation facility, (2) villages with access to road and having an irrigation facility, (3) villages with no access to road and not having an irrigation facility, and (4) villages with no access to road and having an irrigation facility

Table 1 Spatial details of the surveyed villages


Sampling, questionnaire, and data collection

A surveyFootnote 1 was conducted using a questionnaire, taking references from previous studies on information-based climate change adaptation planning and implementation (Tribbia and Moser 2008, p.318; Theoharides et al. 2009, p.26; Archie et al. 2012; Pandey et al. 2018, p.30), to collect data on the role of information infrastructure for adaptation planning in the district (see questionnaire in Appendix-II). The investigation began with sharing the objectives of the study and obtaining the informed consent of respondents. Villages in this region contain between 20 and 70 households, and the survey covered approximately about 30% of the households from each village using stratified random sampling. In all, 85 households were surveyed from 11 villages situated between altitude 1000 m and 1500 m in different parts of the region. The questionnaire included 36 questions which were close-ended, open-ended, Likert scale, and check-all options. It was divided into four different sections to obtain data on the socio-economic profiles of households, climate change perceptions, household-level decision-making, and information demand. It was also pretested with local people to ensure relevance and ease of comprehension by respondents in the language and structure. The additional data for perception about the change in climate and their response as a means of coping and adaptation practices were collected in the same questionnaire. The heads of households were interviewed, and whenever the household head was not available, the next senior-most member of the household was interviewed as survey respondents because of their acquaintance with the prevailing mechanism and livelihood options. Each interview lasted between 30 and 45 min, and the answers were recorded on the questionnaire sheet by the interviewer.

Data analysis

The data obtained were coded and analyzed using R-software using the “factoextra” and “ggplot2” packages for statistical analysis and data visualization for frequency distribution and correlation. Analysis of qualitative data from the in-depth interviews involved field notes, audio recordings, and coding and then linking these to theoretical concepts as per the research objectives. To present the complex view of interview participants on the research objectives, some verbatim statements of the study participants were directly quoted from the transcripts. Some responses were quantified and were converted into frequency scores and calculated into a percentage among the different village categories.

Answers to the research questions

Community profile and perceptions

Community profile

The survey result showed that 55.3% of respondents were male and 44.7% female. The sex ratio was 0.92 in the household members. The maximum and minimum age of the household respondent was 68 and 19 years old, respectively. The status of education was poor as 30% of illiteracy was reported among the households in the villages which have no access to roads and those without irrigation facilities. In the mountainous region, family size is generally large as it ensures the availability of family labor. In this region, the mean family size was 6.34 (± 0.396).

Generally, households in the region have more than one livelihood option for achieving subsistence livelihood and the majority of them, i.e., 80%, are practicing agriculture as their primary profession. Villages having irrigation facilities have 78% of households practicing agriculture. Labor works account for 36% of the villages which lack connectivity to road and irrigation. Labor work indicates the low economic conditions of the community. Forty-seven percent of the land is unirrigated, 10% of the land is uncultivated, and only 43% of the land is irrigated properly, as reported by respondents. Cultivable land accounts more in the villages where irrigation is available and feasible. Traditional varieties of crops are facing a high risk as a change in climate causing low production.

Perception of community on climate change on key sectors and associated risks

In the survey, 96% of the respondents reported that the pattern of the weather is changing when respondents were asked about whether the pattern of weather is changing or not. Out of these, only 33% of villagers understand climate change. Furthermore, they reported the different changes in the surrounding environment by adjudging the changes in climatic parameters (Table 2).

Table 2 Perception of communities on the environmental changes

Key challenges faced by the mountain communities

For identifying the significant socio-economic and ecological challenges currently faced by the community, respondents were asked to know about villager’s perspectives on climate change (Table 3). In the socio-economic challenges, lack of political will and economic issues were the most prevalent challenges faced by the community. In ecological challenges, change in precipitation, water quality and quantity, and forest fire were the most common issues.

Table 3 Socio-ecological challenges faced by the mountain communities

According to 92% of respondents, the negative impact of change in climate on the community was more than the positive impact. Also, the consequences of climate change were broader in many aspects including cultivation. To accurately assess the perceptions of the vulnerability of the local community to climate change, respondents were asked to rate the degree of potential key impacts of climate change on their community. The villagers reported that there is a high possibility of negative impacts on forest ecosystem, resulting in less rainfall, negative impact on wildlife and increase in the frequency of wildlife conflict, negative impact on water quantity and quality, increase in local air temperature, and a decrease in snowfall (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Degree of impacts of climate change on (a) local forest ecosystem, (b) local rainfall/cloudburst, (c) local wildlife, (d) local water quality/quantity, (e) local potential for forest fire, (f) local air temperature, (g) agriculture practices, (h) livestock, (i) snowfall, (j) snow runoff/melting time, [A without access to road, B with access to road; (1) without irrigation, (2) with irrigation] reported by the community

Information infrastructure

Availability and utility of information infrastructure

The villagers use information in a differential manner (Fig. 3). The available infrastructure for information dissemination solely depends on the availability of information products and services (i.e., information sources). The information sources in the study area are newspaper, television, radio, mobile, Krishi Vigyan KendraFootnote 2 (agriculture extension center—KVK), village elders, gram sabhas [a body constituting of persons whose names are included in the electoral rolls of the Panchayat (a village council in India) at the village level], nearby villagers, governmental officials, and the Internet. Availability of information infrastructure and its utility varied remarkably in the different communities. The availability of information infrastructure was more in villages with road accessibility than in villages without road accessibility. When comparing availability based on the irrigation facility, villages with irrigation have better availability of information than those without irrigation. Information utility is more in the villages which have road connectivity showing the use of information for the adaptation planning and in their daily life activities. The demand for information was more in the villages which lack infrastructural facilities. Information infrastructure for these villages was mostly unavailable and was not being utilized. One of the most promising sources for getting information nowadays is mobile phones. It was found during the survey that almost every household has a mobile phone. Mobile phones allow villagers to obtain information useful for them using specific helplines, Short Message Service (SMS), and the Internet. Though their availability was more, their utility for getting information was very low in the study area due to low awareness and illiteracy.

Nowadays the information is available through multiple sources but people do not know how to utilize that information in their daily life activities due to low literacy and awareness. Mobile phones are now becoming the major source of information. Government policies should focus more on the application of provided information.”—Shrikrishna Joshi—a respondent from Lesani village.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Information infrastructure availability and utility by the community: (a) newspaper, (b) television, (c) satellite dish/cable, (d) radio, (e) mobile, (f) Internet, (g) KVK; [A without access to road, B with access to road; (1) without irrigation, (2) with irrigation]. The availability and utility of information infrastructure were more in villages with road accessibility and irrigation facility

Information infrastructure application in adaptation

Eighty-seven percent of the respondents reported that they need information for adaptation strategies, and 97% reported that the local information scale is useful in planning for adaptation. 79.5% of respondents from all categories reported that information provided by the nearby communities sometimes affects their decision-making. The use of alternate energy, structural reinforcement, and increased forest protection are the three most common responses received by households in response to climate change (Fig. 4). Increased forest protection was more in the villages without irrigation facility, indicating that forest was of immense value for them. Structural reinforcement and use of alternate energy are seen more in the villages with road connectivity which indicates easy availability of required resources. (Few examples of changes by the community in response to climate change are shown in Fig. A2 in Appendix-I.)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Changes by the community in response to climate change [A without access to road, B with access to road; (1) without irrigation, (2) with irrigation]. The majority of the changes were reported in the villages with road accessibility and irrigation facilities

Barriers in adaptation planning

The major barriers identified in information demand and flow are lack of awareness or understanding, insufficient time to get information about or plan for potential changes, lack of access to information, low priority in community and household, lack of social acceptability of information that takes climate change into account, opposition from neighbors, lack of money and illiteracy. Overall, lack of access to information, lack of money, and lack of awareness or poor understanding were identified as the three most common barriers in information demand and flow among all the communities (Fig. 5). Lack of unity and literacy were also listed as two important barriers for communities for the availability and utility of information for adapting to climate change.

Awareness programs can substantially help local communities to gain information and knowledge towards climate change adaptation. The lack of information is mainly due to low awareness in the people. The number and frequency of awareness program is very limited and generally escapes our participation due to their low visibility.”—Pratap Ram, a respondent from Nau Ghar village

Fig. 5
figure 5

Major barriers identified in information demand and flow. Lack of information, awareness, and money are the major barriers in adaptation planning by the communities

Impacts of information infrastructure

Current scenario

Although these villages were located at different altitudes, they all have identical challenges such as remote location, few livelihood opportunities, and practicing homogenous cultivation and were highly dependent on forests (Gerlitz et al. 2017, p.135; Chakraborty et al. 2018, p.504). They were different with respect to the available facilities and infrastructure. These infrastructure facilities (road connectivity, irrigation, institutions, and communications) can drive the adaptive capacity of the communities to climate change to high or low according to their availability (Barua et al. 2014, p.274; Kelkar et al. 2008, p.571). It is a strange paradox that in Uttarakhand, a mountain state, with only 10% of the land as agricultural land (in hills 6% and foothills 4%), over 70% of the population is engaged in agricultural activities as cultivators and laborers (Census of India 2011). Irrigation was available only in half of the villages surveyed, mostly by canals and pipeline. These facilities were never being utilized at their full capacity due to poor management and low water availability (Scott et al. 2019, p.277). Most climate change discussions in these villages focused on change in precipitation pattern and decrease in water quantity. While weather change is not a new experience, and people are coping and adapting to these changes, they are not able to list the measures being taken. Hence, there is limited information on their responses to such changes, sources of information, and utilization of resources to minimize climatic risks. Moreover, there is a lack of information on the socio-economic factors that enhance or inhibit people’s capacities to adapt (Roncoli et al. 2002, p.410; Ziervogel et al. 2005, p.2; Hansen et al. 2009, p.80). It is compelling to understand the adaptation strategies practice by the households given their low education status and lack of information (Pandey et al. 2018, p.33). Village communities in the Central Himalaya have witnessed changes in climate in the last 20–25 years (Tewari et al. 2017, p.2). Mainly, the respondents consider a change in the local weather conditions as climate change. Knowledge of climate change was more in villages with better information infrastructure. In all, the majority of the respondents lack knowledge about climate change. However, the respondents do not truly understand these changes like climate change, but they are aware of the problems and the implications. The communities are aware that changes in local temperature and precipitation can be attributed to human activities such as deforestation and pollution. The major socio-economic and ecological challenges faced by the communities imply that there is a lack of resources, which further have direct impacts on information infrastructure. Good governance, i.e., how public institutions conduct public affairs and manage public resources in a preferred way, and good economic condition will assist to increase information availability and its meaningful utility through local institutional networks (Gerlitz et al. 2017, p.135; Pandey and Jha, 2012, p.504; Macchi et al. 2014, p.10). Water availability is a major problem due to deforestation for development projects, and such ecological challenges cause an indirect effect on information demand and its flow, resulting in low adaptive capacity (Kelkar et al. 2008, p.570; Munsi et al. 2012, p.620; Reddy et al. 2013, p.1493; Ogra and Badola 2015, p.520).

Does information promote adaptation?

There is ample literature that suggests information alone does not necessarily promote changes in adaptation as to how the information is communicated and utilized is extremely important (Andersson and Keskitalo 2018, p.82). Information is mainly used for daily activities, but still, it is required and used by communities for climate change adaptation planning (Pandey et al. 2018, p.33). It is because the villagers need climate-related information for planning, developing, and creating a framework for adaptation. The adaptation planning generally revolves around the cultivation and rearing of livestock for Himalayan communities. The use of information for adaptation planning was more in the villages with better resource availability and better connectivity through the road. Usage of information was very low in the villages without road connectivity. It indicates that road connectivity plays a vital role in adaptation planning as the information and the resources required are readily available in those villages (Pandey et al. 2018, p.29). Moreover, the non-availability of roads restricts transportation, leading to low plying of vehicles and thereby undermining the connectivity with the nearest market or information contained locations. The low road connectivity refrains community members to interact with each other, therefore restricting the information sharing among themselves.

Despite information infrastructure availability, its utility is more important for the communities to cope up with climate change. Information infrastructure is present in the communities for providing information, but only a few respondents knew how to retrieve and access the information from the existing information infrastructure. Barriers to the access of information would prevent proper communication and information flow. They reported that information is present in the community, but somehow it is not accessible for usage. These challenges are more in communities where road connectivity is not present, resulting in poor one-to-one interaction. Information accessibility requires specific knowledge so that it can be utilized efficiently for adaptation planning. Most of the villagers are not equipped with such knowledge due to their poor education levels. The changes made by the community to climate change were very similar to what Pandey et al. (2018) reported for adaptation planning in the Uttarakhand Himalayan state. Earlier studies have highlighted that decisions regarding the adaptation can be contagious which results from flowing information (Fussel 2007, p.268; Archie 2013, p.583). Precise, timely, and reliable information is vital for both the development of the individuals and the community at large. Correct, comprehensive, and conveniently usable information helps an individual to plan work properly and execute it timely. Moreover, improving access to climate information to rural people is an effective strategy for improving livelihood under the impacts of climate change (Mengistu 2011, p.144). Climate change requires increasing the resistivity and adaptive capacity of communities and ecosystems for making them adapt to these multi-dimensional changes (Tompkins and Adger 2004), more so, because climate variability and changes have substantial impacts on the natural resources and fragile ecosystems of mountains (Tse-ring et al. 2010, p.15).

Lesson learned

The study was undertaken to assess the availability and utility of information infrastructure and to identify the barriers in information demand and flow. The findings of this study reveal that there are remarkable differences in the villages based on road accessibility and irrigation facility. The differences were observed in the literacy levels (low education status in the villages with no road connectivity and no irrigation), profession (mostly agriculture in the villages with irrigation facility), agriculture practices, and production (good production was observed in the villages with road connectivity and irrigation facility), livestock (more in villages with no road connectivity and no irrigation), and economic conditions of communities (low-income group in the villages with no road connectivity and no irrigation). These communities also showed different opinions and perceptions of climate change. Road connectivity plays a major role in information infrastructure development and efficient utilization of information in adaptation planning. Road-accessible villages had good information infrastructure as the road is used as a channel for easy availability of resources. Furthermore, irrigation also has an indirect effect on information available for adaptation planning. Villages with better irrigation facilities had excellent agricultural production which provides good resources to build up information infrastructure. Communities which lack road accessibility and irrigation are vulnerable to climate change and require a basic information infrastructure. Information demand was more in those villages, but its availability was very low.

While assessing the availability and utility of information infrastructure, it was found that information in the villages is mostly available through television, mobile, newspaper, and village elders. Its availability and utility were more in villages with road connectivity and irrigation facilities. The importance of information infrastructure cannot be over-emphasized since the prevalent profession of these communities is agriculture and livestock farming, which is climate-sensitive. Hence, the production quality, quantity, and economic condition of these villages lie in how well they can access suitable information and adapt to climate change.


This study has emphasized the role of information infrastructure and barriers in adaptation planning as well as resolving the precarious condition of communities, specifically for climatic and livelihood parameters of the Central Himalaya. The resulting framework (Fig. 6) could be adopted in the entire Himalayan region and for other mountain ecosystems of the world. The high exposure of these systems to climate-related risks and hazards urgently needs to decrease their vulnerability for a sustainable livelihood. Information can bridge the gap between adaptation strategies and planning at the community or household levels to address the criticality of climate change, resulting in reducing the vulnerability of an exposed system as deduced from the study. The information for adaptation planning can be of different types such as technology, awareness, education of climate change, or innovative ideas. The adaptive capacity increases and sensitivity decreases with an increase in information flow. Sufficient information infrastructure at a micro-level like households can act as a major tool for an un-informed exposed system to become a less vulnerable informed system to climate change. It has also been reiterated that climate risk information should be based on the daily activities of rural communities to make information meaningful and relevant (Mengistu 2011, p.144). Indigenous, local, and traditional knowledge systems and practices, including indigenous peoples’ holistic view of community and environment, are a major resource for adapting to climate change. Natural resource-dependent communities have a long history of adapting to highly variable and changing social and ecological conditions. Integrating such forms of knowledge with existing practices with the use of information increases the effectiveness of adaptation. Therefore, it would be desired that policy perspective must revolve around the development of basic information infrastructural facilities which helps in providing information for adapting to the changes.

Fig. 6
figure 6

(Adapted from Pandey et al. 2018)

Role of information infrastructure on the un-informed system. Availability of information infrastructure decreases the sensitivity and increases the adaptive capacity of a system


  1. A written informed consent was taken from each respondent for the interview. All interviews were conducted in local language Hindi.

  2. Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) is an agricultural extension center in India. These centers are associated with a local agricultural university and serve as the ultimate link between the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and farmers and aim to apply agricultural research in a practical, localized setting.


  • Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. CR Geosci 337(4):399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson E, Keskitalo ECH (2018) Adaptation to climate change? Why business as usual remains the logical choice in Swedish forestry. Glob Environ Chang 48:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Archie KM (2013) Mountain communities and climate change adaptation: barriers to planning and hurdles to implementation in the Southern Rocky Mountain Region of North America. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 19(5):569–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Archie KM, Dilling L, Milford JB, Pampel F (2012) Climate change and western public lands: a survey of U.S. federal land managers on the status of adaptation efforts. Ecol Soc 17(4):20

    Google Scholar 

  • Archie KM, Dilling L, Milford JB, Pampel FC (2014) Unpacking the “information barrier”: comparing perspectives on information as a barrier to climate change adaptation in the interior mountain west. Ecol Lett 133:397–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua A, Katyaini S, Mili B, Gooch P (2014) Climate change and poverty: building resilience of rural mountain communities in south Sikkim, eastern Himalaya, India. Reg Environ Change 14(1):267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Beniston M (2003) Climatic change in mountain regions: a review of possible impacts. Clim Change 59:5–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T, Mela H, Morecroft MD, Rey D (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Change 20(3):440–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter R, Culp S (2010) Planning for climate change in the west. Lincoln Institute of Land Use Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Census of India (2011) Office of the registrar general and census commissioner. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty A, Joshi PK, Sachdeva K (2018) Capturing forest dependency in the central Himalayan region: variations between Oak (Quercus spp.) and Pine (Pinus spp.) dominated forest landscapes. Ambio 47(4):504–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary P, Bawa KS (2011) Local perceptions of climate change validated by scientific evidence in the Himalayas. Biol Lett 7(5):767–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabbe P, Robin M (2006) Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in eastern Ontario. Clim Change 78:103–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruce TL (2007) Adaptation Planning: What U.S. States and Localities Are Doing? Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA

  • Dilling L (2007) Towards science in support of decision making: characterizing the supply of carbon cycle science. Environ Sci Policy 10:48–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Change 21(2):680–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussel HM (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2(2):265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz J-Y, Macchi M, Brooks N, Pandey R, Banerjee S, Jha SK (2017) The Multidimensional Livelihood Vulnerability Index—an instrument to measure livelihood vulnerability to change in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. Clim Dev 9(2):124–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta KA, Negi M, Nandy S, Kumar M, Singh V, Donatella V, Petrosillo I, Pandey R (2020) Mapping socio-environmental vulnerability to climate change in different altitude zones in the Indian Himalayas. Ecol Indic 109(2020):105787

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JW, Mishra A, Rao KPC, Indeje M, Ngugi RK (2009) Potential value of GCM-based seasonal rainfall forecasts for maize management in semiarid Kenya. Agric Syst 101:80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth O (2010) From systems and tools to networks and infrastructures-from design to cultivation: towards a design theory of information infrastructures. In: Industrial informatics design, use and innovation: perspectives and services, pp 122–156

  • He XJ (2017) Information on impacts of climate change and adaptation in China. J Environ Inf 29(2):110–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe T, van den Berg MM, Coenen FH (2014) Reflections on the uptake of climate change policies by local governments: facing the challenges of mitigation and adaptation. Energy Sustain Soc 4:8

    Google Scholar 

  • ICIMOD (2009) The changing Himalayas: impact of climate change on water resources and livelihoods in the Greater Himalayas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • INCCA (2010) Climate change and India: A 4×4 assessment. A sectoral and regional analysis for 2030S. Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India, New Delhi

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AK, Joshi PK (2019) Forest ecosystem services in the Central Himalaya: local benefits and global relevance. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 89:785–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar U, Narula KK, Sharma VP, Chandna U (2008) Vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability and water stress in Uttarakhand State, India. Glob Environ Change 18(4):564–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Fürst C, Joshi PK (2021) Socio-ecological systems (SESs)—identification and spatial mapping in the Central Himalaya. Sustainability 13:7525

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe A, Foster J, Winkelman S (2009) Ask the climate question: adapting to climate change impacts in urban regions. Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Macchi M (2010) Mountains of the world—ecosystem services in a time of global and climate change. ICIMOD, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Macchi M (2011) Framework for community-based climate vulnerability and capacity assessment in mountain areas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Macchi M, Gurung AM, Hoermann B (2014) Community perceptions and responses to climate variability and change in the Himalayas. Climate and Development, (November), pp 37–41

  • Madhura RK, Krishnan R, Revadekar JV, Mujumdar M, Goswami BN (2014) Changes in western disturbances over the western Himalayas in a warming environment. Clim Dyn 44(3–4):1157–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengistu DK (2011) Farmers’ perception and knowledge on climate change and their coping strategies to the related hazards: case study from Adiha, central Tigray, Ethiopia. Agric Sci 2:138–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A et al (2019) Adaptation to climate change in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: stronger action urgently needed. In: Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha A (eds) The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment: mountains, climate change, sustainability and people. Springer, Berlin, pp 457–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsi M, Areendran G, Joshi PK (2012) Modeling spatio-temporal change patterns of forest cover: a case study from the Himalayan foothills (India). Reg Environ Change 12(3):619–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi GCS, Samal PK, Kuniyal JC, Kothyari BP, Sharma RK, Dhyani PP (2012) Impact of climate change on the western Himalayan mountain ecosystems: an overview. Trop Ecol 53(3):345–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning W, Rawat GS, Joshi S, Ismail M, Sharma E (2013) High-altitude rangelands and their interfaces in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogra MV, Badola R (2015) Gender and climate change in the Indian Himalayas: global threats, local vulnerabilities, and livelihood diversification at the Nanda Devi biosphere reserve. Earth Syst Dyn 6(2):505–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey R, Jha SK (2012) Climate vulnerability index—measure of climate change vulnerability to communities: a case of rural Lower Himalaya, India. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 17(6):487–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey R, Kala S, Pandey VP (2015) Assessing climate change vulnerability of water at household level. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 20(8):1471–1485

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey R, Kumar P, Archie KM, Gupta AK, Joshi PK, Valente D, Petrosillo I (2018) Climate change adaptation in the western-Himalayas: household level perspectives on impacts and barriers. Ecol Ind 84:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Pironti JP (2006) Key elements of a threat and vulnerability management program. Inf Syst Audit Control 3:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray M, Doshi N, Alag N, Sreedhar R (2011) Climate vulnerability in North Western Himalayas. Indian Network on Ethics and Climate Change (INECC), Visakhapatnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy C, Dutta K, Jha CS (2013) Analysing the gross and net deforestation rates in India. Curr Sci 105(11):1492–1500

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncoli C, Ingram K, Kirshen P (2002) Reading the rains: local knowledge and rainfall forecasting in Burkina Faso. Soc Nat Resour 15:409–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D, Pielke RA Jr (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 10:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer L, Verburg PH (2017) Mapping and linking supply- and demand-side measures in climate-smart agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 37:66

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott CA, Zhang F, Mukherji A, Immerzeel W, Mustafa D, Bharati L (2019) Water in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. In: Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha AB (eds) The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment: mountains, climate change, sustainability and people. Springer, Berlin, pp 257–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Chettri N, Tse-ring K, Shrestha AB, Jing F, Mool P, Eriksson M (2009) Climate change impacts and vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Thadani R (2015) Complexities and controversies in Himalayan research: a call for collaboration and rigor for better data. Mt Res Dev 35(4):401–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari VP, Verma RK, von Gadow K (2017) Climate change effects in the Western Himalayan ecosystems of India: evidence and strategies. For Ecosyst 4:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Theoharides K, Barnhart G, Glick P (2009) A survey of federal and state agencies, conservation organizations and academic institutions in the United States. The association of fish and wildlife agencies, defenders of wildlife, the nature conservancy, and the national wildlife federation, Washington, DC, p 61

  • Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2004) Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecol Soc 9(2):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribbia J, Moser SC (2008) More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change. Environ Sci Policy 11(4):315–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse-ring K, Sharma E, Chettri N, Shrestha A (eds) (2010) Climate change vulnerability of mountain ecosystems in the Eastern Himalayas; Climate change impact and vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas—synthesis report. ICIMOD, Kathmandu

  • UAPCC (2014) Uttarakhand State action plan for climate change. Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Environment Programme (2011) Livelihood security: climate change, migration and conflict in the Sahel. UNEP, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (2011) Climate knowledge for action: a global framework for climate services—empowering the most vulnerable. In: WMO-No. 1065, report of the high-level taskforce towards the global framework for climate services. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Geneva

  • WMO, GFCS (2016) Climate services for supporting climate change adaptation: supplement to the technical guidelines for the national adaptation plan process. WMO-No. 1170, WMO, Switzerland

  • Xu J, Grumbine RE, Shrestha A, Eriksson M, Yang X, Wang YUN, Wikes A (2009) The melting Himalayas: cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conserv Biol 23(3):520–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziervogel G, Bithell M, Washington R, Downing T (2005) Agent-based social simulation: a method for assessing the impact of seasonal climate forecast applications among smallholder farmers. Agric Syst 83:1–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1041 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 141 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Pandey, R., Fürst, C. et al. The role of information infrastructure for climate change adaptation in the socio-ecological system of the Central Himalaya: availability, utility, and gaps. Socio Ecol Pract Res 3, 397–410 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Adaptation
  • Coping strategy
  • Information barrier
  • Information infrastructure