Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating Strength Anisotropy of Plain and Steel Fiber Reinforced Shotcrete

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shotcrete is a key initial rock support component used in underground mining and civil projects. The strength of shotcrete plays a vital role in providing and deciding the support adequacy. The strength of shotcrete is evaluated by its uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) test that is usually conducted on extracted core samples. Shotcrete cores are commonly extracted from the test panels along the direction of its application; thus, its strength perpendicular to the direction of application is often neglected. The true bearing strength of shotcrete is thereby ignored despite the fact that higher stresses act normal to the direction of its application. Although the anisotropic behavior of shotcrete is well reported, no study has reported extensive testing of this scale and nature. This study reports extensive testing of shotcrete cores extracted from tunnels of a mega hydroelectric project in Pakistan. The study reports 7- and 28-days strength tests of shotcrete cores. The research also investigates the anisotropic behavior of steel fiber reinforced shotcrete and suggests that shotcrete exhibits higher strength perpendicular to the direction of its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A820M-16 AA (2016) Standard specification for steel fibers for fiber-reinforced concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.orghttps://doi.org/10.1520/A0820_A0820M-16

  2. ACI-Committee (1994) Guide for the Evaluation of Shotcrete (ACI 506.4R-94) American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI

  3. Aire C, Aguilar L (2021) Ensayos de control del concreto lanzado con fibras en el túnel de la línea 12 del metro de la CDMX. Revista ALCONPAT 11, no. 1 pp 73–87. https://revistaalconpat.org/index.php/RA/article/download/493/884

  4. Babaie R, Abolfazli M, Fahimifar A (2019) Mechanical properties of steel and polymer fiber reinforced concrete. J Mech Behav Mater 28:119–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2019-0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bamonte P, Gambarova PG, Nafarieh A (2012) Hot and residual behavior of steel fiber-reinforced structural shotcrete exposed to high temperature. In high performance fiber reinforced cement composites 6. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2436-5-22

  6. Bernard ES (2009) Early-age re-entry under fresh fibre reinforced shotcrete. In: Knut F Garshol BCC, LLF, USA (ed) Shotcrete for underground support XI, ECI symposium series, Felix Amberg, SIA, Switzerland

  7. Bernardo G, Guida A, Mecca I (2015) Advancements in shotcrete technology. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment 153:591–602. https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/STR15/STR15049FU1.pdf

  8. Boldini D, Lackner R, Mang Herbert A (2005) Ground-shotcrete interaction of natm tunnels with high overburden. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:886–897. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:7(886)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bryne LE, Ansell A, Holmgren J (2014) Laboratory testing of early age bond strength of shotcrete on hard rock. Tunnel Underground Space Technol 41:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C42M-20 AC (2020) Standard test method for obtaining and testing drilled cores and sawed beams of concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.orghttps://doi.org/10.1520/C0042_C0042M-20

  11. C617M-15 AC (2015) Standard practice for capping cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, www.astm.orghttps://doi.org/10.1520/C0617_C0617M-15

  12. Celestino TB, Bortolucci AA, Re G, Ferreira A (2001) Diametral compression tests for determination of shotcrete anisotropic elastic constants. In: Shotcrete for Underground Support VIII. ASCE, pp 27–35

  13. Celestino TB, de Castro GR, Vessaro P, Bortolucci AA, Santos OJ (2006) Strength and deformability anisotropy of fiber-reinforced shotcrete. In: Shotcrete for underground support X. pp 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1061/40885(215)13

  14. De Belie N, Grosse CU, Kurz J, Reinhardt HW (2005) Ultrasound monitoring of the influence of different accelerating admixtures and cement types for shotcrete on setting and hardening behaviour. Cement Concrete Res 35:2087–2094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukui K, Okubo S, Yang Q, Ochi T (1996) Mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced shotcrete in uniaxial tension. Journal-Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan 112:69–74. https://doi.org/10.2473/shigentosozai.112.69

  16. Galan I, Baldermann A, Kusterle W, Dietzel M, Mittermayr F (2019) Durability of shotcrete for underground support– Review and update. Construct Build Mater 202:465–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galan I, Briendl L, Thumann M, Steindl F, Röck R, Kusterle W, Mittermayr F (2019) Filler effect in shotcrete. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ginouse N, Reny S, Jolin M (2015) Engineered fiber reinforced shotcrete for efficient and fast ground support installation. In: Shotcrete for underground support XII proceedings. https://dc.engconfintl.org/shotcrete_xii/16

  19. Harrison JP, Hudson JA (2000) Engineering rock mechanics: questions 16.1–16.10: rock rein-forcement and rock support. In: Engineering rock mechanics part II. Pergamon, Oxford

  20. Hubáček A, Brožovský J, Hela R (2013) Comparison of properties of shotcrete tested using destructive and non-destructive methods. Procedia Eng 65:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hubacek A, Hela R, Helan T (2012) Research of properties of Sprayed Concrete prepared in Laboratory. 19th Concrete days. Czech Republic, Hradec Kralove, pp 575–579

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jiabin W, Ditao N, Zhanping S (2016) Damage layer thickness and formation mechanism of shotcrete with and without steel fiber under sulfate corrosion of dry–wet cycles by ultrasound plane testing method. Construct Build Materials 123:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keyter GJ, Drescher K (2001) Test results on compressive strength anisotropy in steel fibre reinforced shotcrete. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 101:183–187. https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA0038223X_2669

  24. Lemay JD, Jolin M, Gagné R (2014) Ultra rapid strength development in dry-mix shotcrete for ultra rapid support in challenging mining conditions. In: deep mining 2014: proceedings of the seventh international conference on deep and high stress mining. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, pp 271–279. https://papers.acg.uwa.edu.au/p/1410_17_Lemay/

  25. Leung CKY, Lai R, Lee AYF (2005) Properties of wet-mixed fiber reinforced shotcrete and fiber reinforced concrete with similar composition. Cement Concrete Res 35:788–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin LA, Clark CC, Seymour JB, Stepan MA (2015) Shotcrete design and installation compliance testing: early strength, load capacity, toughness, adhesion strength, and applied quality centers for disease control and prevention. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Spokane, WA

  27. Pappas DM, Barton TM, Eric SW (2003) The long-term performance of surface support liners for ground control in a underground limestone mine. In: 3rd International seminar on surface support liners: thin spray-on liners, shotcrete and mesh, Quebec City, Canada. (Sect. 22). https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/76847111/tltpo-libre.pdf?1639936133=&response-contentdisposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_Long_Term_Performance_of_Surface_Sup.pdf&Expires=1671650058&Signature=KMTh0HaZbCx3cl3vpCTutoLDDXKUfzK-8P3eMUF7x0olGf59KJ0~xIp66zHs5JzzVse5vh08puyBUslP3KwtRG8RgkvtX~pPv~3sxoJ4xXy7JHNRw4SRBC7JCt4aY03bG1KYvC8XJIkVI93q7WvoAzgpRaNCNQKcanCwM~wHdguaywfcYH1YosK1Hl5fWRDZmTxi-2AXEOl2DjEMwD8zbWelHCNcey-aNE6RaOQL2e8mLH4frpOy5DkXnggNqmpUBDHvZgtvt25bpv86KlzvvoHELW6Xul0Y7AlApAd4C7gWhwzFYHzkuMf9jsmtBKDB2803RFUcyc0zIxqKIY42g__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

  28. Reny S, Ginouse N (2014) Development of a rapid strength gain dry-mix shotcrete using calcium sulfo-aluminate cement for mining and tunnelling applications. In: deep mining 2014: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, pp 281–290

  29. Yan X, Liu L-m, Zhang J-p, Li Y-h, Wang H (2018) Experimental study on basic mechanical properties of steel fiber-reinforced siliceous wet shotcrete. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:1637261. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1637261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu H, Wu L, Liu WV, Pourrahimian Y (2018) Effects of fibers on expansive shotcrete mixtures consisting of calcium sulfoaluminate cement, ordinary Portland cement, and calcium sulfate. J Rock Mechan Geotechn Eng 10:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yun K-K, Choi S, Ha T, Kim SK, Hossain MS, Han S (2021) Long-term compressive strength development of steel fiber shotcrete from cores based on accelerator types at tunnel site. Materials (Basel) 14:580. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14030580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Lackner R (2018) Stability analysis of shotcrete supported crown of NATM tunnels with discontinuity layout optimization. Int J Numer Analyt Methods Geomechan 42:1199–1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao J, Meng X, Chen L, Liu G, Zhang Z, Xu Q (2021) Correlation between the mechanical properties and the fiber breaking morphology of fiber reinforced shotcrete (FRS). Compos Struct 277:114641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114641

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful for the contributions of all field engineers and laboratory staff who participated in data collection and other facilitation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Usman Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables

Table 4 Plain shotcrete UCS tests results after 7 and 28 days

4,

Table 5 Average UCS of plane shotcrete

5,

Table 6 SFR shotcrete UCS tests results after 7 and 28 days

6,

Table 7 Average compressive strength test results of SFR shotcrete

7

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, M.U., Tahir, M.U., Emad, M.Z. et al. Investigating Strength Anisotropy of Plain and Steel Fiber Reinforced Shotcrete. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 40, 291–303 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-022-00715-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-022-00715-9

Keywords

Navigation