Abstract
This paper documents data for global, regional (EU-27), and country-specific (G20 member countries) energy and emission pathways required to achieve a defined carbon budget of between 400 GtCO2 and 500 GtCO2, developed to limit the mean global temperature rise to 1.5 °C, over 50% likelihood. The data were calculated with the 1.5 °C sectorial pathways of the One Earth Climate Model—an integrated energy assessment model devised at the University of Technology Sydney. The data consist of the following six zip-folder datasets (refer to Sect. 2 for an explanation of the data): (1) Appendix folder: Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the overall 1.5 °C scenario. (2) Sector folder (XLSX): Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the industry sectors analysed. (3) Sector folder (CSV): The data contained are the same as those described in point 2. (4) Sector emissions folder: Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions for each industry sector. (5) Scope emissions folder (XLSX): Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions for each industry sector—with the additional specificity of emission scope. (6) Scope emissions folder (CSV): The data contained are the same as those described in point 5.
Article Highlights
-
Scope 1, 2 and 3 emission data for 16 industry sectors—data format was developed with the financial industry specifically for Net-Zero target setting.
-
Industry specific mission data for all G20 member countries, one region (EU27) and globally.
-
Detailled country specific 1.5 °C decabonization pathways for all G20 member countries.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Objective
This paper documents data for the global, regional (EU-27), and country-specific (G20 member countries) energy and emissions pathways required to achieve a defined carbon budget of between 400 GtCO2 and 500 GtCO2, developed to limit the global mean temperature rise to 1.5 °C, with over 50% likelihood. A total of 21 assessments were made: for the G20 countries, and an additional model of global emissions. The energy and emissions data were calculated with the 1.5 °C sectorial pathways of the One Earth Climate Model (OECM)—an integrated energy assessment tool from the University of Technology Sydney (UTS; Sydney, Australia). The pathways developed represent credible scenarios under which the increase in temperature is limited to 1.5 °C, so the OECM data support the use of investment benchmarks for the major industries classified in the Global Industry Classification System (GICS) to achieve the targets of the Paris Climate Agreement, and also allow the UN-convened Net Zero Asset Owners Alliance to set science-based investment targets. The energy scenarios were developed on the basis of statistical data from the International Energy Agency [1] and were calculated with the One Earth Climate Model 2.0 [2,3,4,5].
The OECM was developed by the Institute for Sustainable Futures (ISF) at UTS in close co-operation with institutional investors, based on the German Aerospace Center (DLR) Energy System Model, as an integrated energy assessment tool for industry-specific 1.5 °C pathways, with high technical resolution [2]. The assumed carbon budget between 2020 and 2050 of between 400 GtCO2 and 500 GtCO2, is based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC AR6) [6]. Energy generation pathways that include all currently available renewable generation technologies are developed based on projections of industry-specific energy demands, with high technical resolution. The detailed methodology and energy model architecture of the OECM 2.0 release has been documented in various scientific article [3, 4]. In addition to industry-sector-specific energy demands and generation pathways, the OECM also calculates Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. Scope 1 and 3 emissions are calculated with a new methodology described in [5]. More details of the emission scopes are presented in Sect. 2.
Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions: In addition to direct energy-related CO2 emissions, companies progressively report those of other greenhouse gases (GHGs)—direct and indirect emissions that occur in supply chains upstream and downstream. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol, a global standard for accounting and reporting greenhouse gases for companies [7], distinguishes between three “scope areas”:
-
Scope 1 emissions—direct emissions from owned or controlled sources;
-
Scope 2 emissions—indirect emissions from the generation of purchased energy;
-
Scope 3 emissions—all indirect emissions not included in Scope 2 that occur in the reporting company’s value chain, including both upstream and downstream emissions. The reported Scope 3 emissions are limited to the GICS sector specific emissions documented in various scientific article [4, 5].
2 Data description
The data consist of the following six zipped dataset folders, each containing 21 separate files for each of the areas assessed.
-
1.
Appendix zip folder: contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the overall 1.5 °C scenario. This tab is called the ‘Appendix’ and contains: electricity generation (TWh/a), transport—final energy (PJ/a), heat supply and air conditioning (PJ/a), installed capacity (GW), final energy demand (PJ/a), energy-related CO2 emissions (million tons/a), and primary energy demand (PJ/a).
-
2.
Sector zip folder (XLSX): contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the industry sectors analysed. Key industry metrics are provided, such as the energy and carbon intensities of the GICS sectors analysed. Due to industry specificity—and the choice of methodology—the units of data vary between the different sectors.
-
3.
Sector zip folder (CSV): contains 21 CSV files. The data contained are the same as those described in point 2. However, the data have been organized in a database layout and saved in the CSV file format, significantly improving data parsing.
-
4.
Sector emission zip folder: contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions (MtCO2/a) for each industry sector.
-
5.
Scope emissions zip folder (XLSX): contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions (MtCO2/a) for each industry sector—and specifies the emission scopes. This tab also provides an additional breakdown of emissions into the categories of CO2 and total GHG emissions. Two accounting methodologies are presented: (i) the OECM approach, which defines Scope 1 emissions as those related to heat and energy use; and (ii) the production-centric approach, which places the emission burden of other non-energy and Scope 3 emissions on the producer, because they are categorized as Scope 1 emissions.
-
6.
Scope emissions zip folder (CSV): contains 21 CSV files. The data contained are the same as those described in point 5. However, the data have been organized in a database layout and saved in the CSV file format to improve data parsing.
The six datasets are summarized in Table 1, with further information on the data presented in the following sub-sections.
2.1 Description of data parameters
The datasets contain the following scenario input parameters:
-
1.
Market development: current and assumed development of the demand by sector, such as cement produced, passenger kilometres travelled, or assumed market volume in US$2015 gross domestic product (GDP).
-
2.
Energy intensity—activity based: energy use per unit of service and/or product; for example, in megajoules (MJ) per passenger kilometres travelled (MJ/pkm), MJ per ton of steel (MJ/ton steel), aluminium, or cement.
-
3.
Energy intensity—finance based: energy use per unit of investment in MJ per US$ GDP (MJ/$GDP) contributed by, for example, the forestry or agricultural sector.
The dataset contains the following scenario output parameters:
-
4.
Carbon intensity: current and future carbon intensities per unit of product or service; for example, in tons of CO2 per ton of steel produced (tCO2/ton steel) or grams of carbon dioxide per passenger kilometer (gCO2/pkm).
-
5.
Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions: datasets for each of the industry sectors and countries analysed. In addition to the emissions data, the deviations of the emissions from those of the year 2019 are provided.
-
6.
Country scenarios: complete country scenario datasets of historical data (2012, 2015–2020) and future projections (2025–2050 in 5-year increments). Energy demand and supply data by technology, fuel, and sector are provided, including the overall energy and carbon emissions balance of the country analysed.
2.2 Geographic resolution: country data provided
The dataset contains data for the following 21 countries and regions:
-
Regions: global, EU-27
-
Countries: G20 member countries—Canada, USA, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Turkey, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Indonesia, India, China, Japan, South Korea, and Australia
2.3 Sectorial resolution: industry sector data provided
The dataset contains data for the following industry sectors:
-
Agriculture & food processing, forestry & wood products, chemical industry, aluminium industry, construction and buildings, water utilities, textile & leather industry, steel industry, cement industry, transport sector (aviation: freight & passenger transport; shipping: freight & passenger transport; and road transport: freight & passenger transport).
2.4 Time resolution
The scenario data are provided for the years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045, and 2050.
3 Limitations
Industry-specific energy intensities and energy demands are not available for all industries. Therefore, GDP-based calculations were used when industry-specific production-based energy intensities were not available. Although energy intensities can be estimated based on the data available, the input parameters can be derived from various sources, and their estimation may not follow the same methodology. Energy intensities based on GDP, for example, can be calculated with either nominal GDP, real GDP, or purchasing power parity GDP. Moreover, energy intensities can be provided as the final energy or primary energy. In some cases, this information is not available at all. A database of industry-specific energy demands and energy intensities, calculated with a consistent methodology, would improve the accuracy of calculations in future research. The non-energy greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) for the agriculture and the forestry sector are based on statistics for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The scenario system boundaries are based on the Global Industry Classification System (GICS) and calculated with statistics of the International Energy Agency (IEA), and the AFOLU emissions are based on FAO statistical data which can lead to statistical inaccuracies.
Data availability
Availability of data material statement reading: The data described in this data note can be freely and openly accessed on ‘datadryad.org’ under doi: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cz8w9gj82. Please see Table 1 and references for details and links to the data.
Abbreviations
- CO2 :
-
Carbon dioxide
- °C:
-
Degree celsius
- DLR:
-
German aerospace center (Deutsches Luft- und Raumfahrt Zentrum)
- ECF:
-
European climate foundation
- ESM:
-
Energy system model
- EU-27:
-
European Union (27)
- G20:
-
The group of twenty: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and the European Union
- gCO2 :
-
Gram CO2
- GDP:
-
Gross domestic product
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gas
- GICS:
-
Global industry classification system
- Gt:
-
Gigatons
- IPCC:
-
Intergovernmental panel on climate change
- ISF:
-
Institute for sustainable futures
- m2 :
-
Square meter
- m3 :
-
Cubic meter
- MJ:
-
Mega joule
- OECM:
-
One earth climate model
- pkm:
-
Passenger kilometres
- PRI:
-
Principles for responsible investment
- tCO2 :
-
Tons of carbon dioxide
- UN:
-
United nations
- UNEP:
-
United nations environment programme
- US$:
-
US dollar
- USA:
-
United States of America
- UTS:
-
University of Technology Sydney
- WBCSD:
-
World business council for sustainable development
- WRI:
-
World Resource Institute
References
International Energy Agency (2022) World Energy Balances. Paris, France. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/world-energy-statistics-and-balances. Accessed 27 June 2023
Teske S et al (2019) Methodology. In: Teske S (ed) Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals: Global and Regional 100% Renewable Energy Scenarios with Non-energy GHG Pathways for +1.5 °C and +2 °C. Springer, Cham, pp 25–78
Teske S, Guerrero J (2022) One earth climate model—integrated energy assessment model to develop industry-specific 1.5 °C pathways with high technical resolution for the finance sector. Energies 15(9):3289. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15093289
Teske S, Niklas S, Talwar S, Atherton A (2022) 1.5 °C pathways for the Global Industry Classification (GICS) sectors chemicals, aluminium, and steel. SN Appl Sci 5:35. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42452-022-05004-0
Teske S, Nagrath K (2022) Global sector-specific Scope 1, 2, and 3 analyses for setting net-zero targets: agriculture, forestry, and processing harvested products. SN Appl Sci 4(8):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42452-022-05111-Y
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021) Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf
World Resource Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Greenhouse gas protocol (2021) Greenhouse gas protocol. https://ghgprotocol.org/. Accessed 27 June 2023
Teske S et al (2019) Achieving the Paris climate agreement goals global and regional 100% renewable energy scenarios with non-energy GHG pathways for + 1.5 °C and + 2 °C. Springer, Cham
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Chendan Yan and Anna Irmisch of the European Climate Foundation and members of the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance, especially Elke Pfeiffer, Jessica Andrews, Veronika Neumeier, and Markus Zimmer. We would also like to thank Thomas Pregger, Sonja Simon, and Tobias Naegler, at the German Aerospace Center Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Energy Systems Analysis, for on-going support.
Funding
This research was funded by the European Climate Foundation, 23 Rue de la Science, 1040 Brussels, Belgium (Grant number 2101-61369).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ST: project and scenario development lead, development of manuscript concept, and paper writing. JR: model improvement and review, modelling individual country scenarios, paper writing, and paper editing. SN: project management; collection of data on steel, aluminium, cement, and water utilities sectors; lead; paper writing. MF: technical lead for the development of the synthetic fuels and chemical industry sector; modelling individual country scenarios; model improvement; paper writing. SM: modelling individual country scenarios; designing computer programs for efficient file modification; reviewing and editing the paper. ST: country scenario research; data research and collection. SM: country scenario research; methodology development; and data collection for AFOLU sector.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Ethical approval
The UN-convened Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance (the Alliance) is a Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI)- and UNEP FI-supported initiative, which commissioned the Institute for Sustainable Futures (ISF) at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) to utilize their 1.5 °C One Earth Climate Model (OECM) (Teske et al. [8]) to derive decarbonization pathways.
Research involving human and animal rights
This research involved no human participant or animal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Teske, S., Rispler, J., Niklas, S. et al. Net-zero 1.5 °C sectorial pathways for G20 countries: energy and emissions data to inform science-based decarbonization targets. SN Appl. Sci. 5, 252 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05481-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05481-x