Abstract
The present study revealed for the first time the removal of hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) with a high efficiency using an eco-friendly composite beads of alginate with the green alga Ulva fasciata compared to calcium alginate beads. This conclusion was reached in this study from the comparison of the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) by the well-known biosorbent material, calcium alginate (CA) with the studied calcium alginate/Ulva fasciata (CA/UF) biocomposite beads. The characterization of the prepared beads was achieved using several techniques such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray (EDAX). The Brunauer, Emmett, Teller (BET) and Barrett, Joyner, Halenda (BJH) analyses were also employed which indicated a three-fold increase in the surface area, a mean pore diameter of 2.3-fold and a total pore volume of 14-fold for calcium alginate/Ulva fasciata composite compared to calcium alginate beads. The results of batch experiments demonstrated the fast complete removal of Cr(VI) by the CA/UF composite compared to the maximum removal (75%) by CA. The Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm model reflected the physical pore volume filling of Cr(VI) rather than adsorption on the pore walls, giving an adsorption mean free energy (2.24 kJ/mol) for CA/UF greater than that of CA (0.13 kJ/mol). Furthermore, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller isotherm reflected the multilayer adsorption for CA and CA/UF. Flory–Huggins isotherm model showed the more spontaneous adsorption for CA/UF than CA, with negative Gibbs free energy ΔG0 values of − 4.76 and − 6.91 kJ/mol, respectively. Whereas, Temkin isotherm model showed a higher adsorption binding energy of Cr(VI) on CA/UF than CA beads. In this study, the Langmuir model of Cr(VI) adsorption on CA/UF beads was the least applied among all studied adsorption isotherm models, which also revealed the multilayer adsorption mechanism of Cr(VI) ions. The Intra-particle diffusion model was applied for CA/UF composite beads, and this application suggested that the intra-particle diffusion is a part of the rate-limiting steps. The regeneration study showed a decrease in the adsorption efficiency of CA/UF composite from 97.4 to 82.3% for three consecutive cycles.
Article Highlights
-
Evaluation of the biosorption potential of calcium alginate and calcium alginate/Ulva fasciata composite beads.
-
The surface morphology and elemental analysis of calcium alginate and calcium alginate/Ulva fasciata composite.
-
Promising efficiency of calcium alginate/Ulva fasciata composite for removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Rapid industrialization has led to unregulated disposal of industrial wastes into the environment. Globally, 80% of wastewater is dumped into water bodies and industry is responsible for discharging millions of tons of heavy metals [1]. The effluents from most industries are directly discharged into the aquatic environment without any kind of treatment which leads to pollution and destruction of the ecosystem [1]. Among other pollutants, heavy metals are known for their toxicity, non-biodegradability, stability and tendency to accumulate in seawater, river, groundwater, lake, soil and sediment. Aquatic heavy metal pollution usually displays high levels of chromium (Cr), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni) etc. in the water system [1].
Chromium exists in two stable forms namely, hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) and trivalent chromium Cr(III). Hexavalent chromium usually appears in waste from cement, stainless steel, electroplating, dyeing, and leather tanning industries as well as in wood preservation processes [2]. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has identified Cr(VI) as one of the seventeen chemicals that pose a threat to humans including liver dysfunction, cancer, kidney necrosis, mutagenic risks, and even death [1, 2].
The maximum acceptable concentration of chromium in drinking water is 0.05 mg/L according to the World Health Organization [3], and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [4]. The US Environmental Protection Agency has also regulated the maximum acceptable discharge into the aquatic environment to be 0.1 mg/L [5].
Various physical and chemical methods such as electrodialysis, photocatalysis, coagulation, ion exchange, membrane separation, and chemical precipitation have been used to remove chromium from water and wastewater [2, 6,7,8]. Nevertheless, some of these methods have high operating costs, high energy consumption, secondary pollutant production and the difficulties in removing residual heavy metal sludge [8]. Therefore, researchers looked for alternative, sustainable, clean, eco-friendly, and green methods to sequester Cr(VI) from industrial effluents [9,10,11].
Biosorption is an eco-friendly technology, in which a biomaterial or a biopolymer is used as adsorbent material. It is one of the widely used methods for removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions, due to its simplicity, high efficiency and more economical technology without forming any harmful by-products [9,10,11,12]. Biosorbent materials commonly used to remove metal ions include marine algae, fungi, bacteria, agricultural residues, and biopolymers [12,13,14,15,16]. Biosorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions such as industrial effluents, polluted wastewater etc. can be obtained using algal biomass [7, 17,18,19].
It has been reported that the organic substances from untreated algae are leached out during the biosorption process. Organic leaching results in secondary contamination and the leachate may lose some useful adsorption components that reduce the biosorption capacity. Therefore, it is recommended to treat the algae physically and/or chemically prior to application. One of the pretreatment methods is encapsulation by which leaching can be avoided efficiently [9]. In the encapsulation technique, various supporting materials are used as stabilizing agents such as alginate, chitosan, agar, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyacrylamide [9, 20,21,22,23,24,25].
Alginate (Alg), a stabilizing agent, is a polysaccharide biopolymer extracted from brown algae and consists of 1,4-linked β-D-mannuronic acid and α-L-guluronic acid [26]. Sodium alginate has some good features such as bio-degradability, bio-compatibility, and renewability. Alginate has a high affinity for toxic heavy metal ions due to the abundance of numerous carboxyl and hydroxyl groups [27, 28]. Physicochemical modifications such as composite formation can significantly improve the alginate adsorption properties due to the increasing number of surface functional groups. It can also modify its poor mechanical strength, stability and reusability [26]. In numerous studies, sodium alginate composite materials using nanomaterials, carbonaceous materials, some natural and synthetic polymers have been synthesized to increase the adsorption capacities for heavy metal ions [29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
Ulva fasciata is a green alga mainly contains cellulose in the cell wall, and a high content of proteins bonded associated with many polysaccharides [9]. The presence of functional groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino and sulfate give algae the efficiency to remove Cr(VI) [7, 9, 12]. In our previous study, we reported that U. fasciata has the ability to completely remove Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions [7].
To the best of our knowledge, U. fasciata biomass encapsulated into calcium alginate beads has not been previously used to remove Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Consequently, this is the first comparative study of calcium alginate beads and calcium alginate/U. fasciata biocomposite for potential removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using various isotherm and kinetic models defined by different error functions. In this study, calcium alginate beads were prepared and composite beads for fixing the green alga U. fasciata to alginate as a support matrix. In terms of comparing calcium alginate (CA) and calcium alginate/U. fasciata (CA/UF) adsorption mechanism, several parameters such as the pH, initial concentration, contact time and dose are taken into consideration during batch studies to evaluate the optimal parameters of their adsorption process. The adsorption mechanism was confirmed using FTIR, SEM, EDAX, BET and BJH techniques as well as several error function methods to determine the best adsorption isotherm and kinetic models. Finally, studies of regeneration and reuse of the developed beads were also examined.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Materials
Potassium dichromate, sodium alginate, calcium chloride, hydrochloric acid, and sodium hydroxide were purchased from May and Baker Ltd (England), Alpha Chemika (India), Oxford Lab Chem (India), Advent Chembio Pvt. Ltd. (India) and Qualikems Fine Chem Pvt. Ltd. (India). All required solutions were prepared using deionized water. The green alga U. fasciata was collected from the Eastern Harbor of Alexandria along the Egyptian Mediterranean Sea coast during 2018.
2.2 Preparation of calcium alginate beads (CA)
1% Sodium alginate solution was prepared by adding 1 g of sodium alginate to 100 mL of deionized water and the resulting solution was heated at 65 °C with constant stirring. After cooling, the solution was dropped into 200 mL of 0.1 M calcium chloride solution. The water-insoluble calcium alginate beads formed were solidified in calcium chloride solution for 24 h at 4 °C and then filtered, rinsed several times with deionized water and dried at 70 °C for 24 h [36].
2.3 Preparation of alga (U. fasciata)
After the alga was collected, it was washed with fresh water followed by distilled water to remove any adherent plants and residues. The alga was dried under shade and then in an oven at 65 °C for 24 h. The dried alga was ground and sieved to obtain a particle size of < 200 µm.
2.4 Preparation of calcium alginate/U. fasciata composite beads (CA/UF)
A 1 g of the powdered alga U. fasciata with a particle size < 200 µm was mixed with 100 mL of (1%, w/v) sodium alginate solution. The mixture was stirred for 1 h to obtain a homogeneous solution which was added in dropwise into 200 mL of 0.1 M calcium chloride solution and the resulting green composite beads were collected and processed as prepared CA beads [36, 37].
2.5 Preparation of Cr(VI) solution
A 1000 mg/L stock solution was prepared by liquefying potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) in 1.0 L deionized water. Then concentrations of 25 to 200 mg/L of the stock solution were prepared. The Cr(VI) concentration was determined according to standard method of Gilcreas et al. using UV–Vis spectrophotometer (unico UV-2000) with a wavelength of λ 540 nm [38]. All adsorption experiments were performed at room temperature (25 ± 2 ◦C). Initial pH was adjusted with 0.1 N HCl and 0.1 N NaOH solutions.
2.6 Characterization of adsorbents
The surface morphology and elemental composition of the adsorbents CA and CA/UF were studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) using Quanta 250 scanning electron microscope. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of CA and CA/UF before and after adsorption of Cr(VI) were characterized with a VERTEX 70 FTIR-Bruker spectrometer over the range 4000–400 cm−1. The surface area, pore volume and mean pore diameter of the adsorbents were determined using a BET analyzer (BELSORP mini, BEL Japan, INC). BET and BJH analyses were performed by adsorption isotherm measurements based on Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) theory at 77 K and saturated vapor pressure of 102.22 kPa nitrogen.
2.7 Batch adsorption studies
Hexavalent chromium adsorption to the surface of CA and CA/UF beads was performed in well-sealed bottles (100 mL) with a capacity of 25 mL of Cr (VI) solution under conditions of different initial chromium concentrations (25–200 mg/L), weight of adsorbents (0.1–0.75 g), pH (1–9) contact time, (30–360 min) and stirring speed (120 rpm). The percentage of Cr(VI) ions removed (% Re) at 25 °C ± 2 °C and the adsorbed amount of Cr(VI) ions per unit mass of the beads at time t qt (mg/g) and at equilibrium qe (mg/g) was calculated using the following equations Eqs. (1–3).
where, C0, Ct and Ce are the initial, specific contact time t and equilibrium Cr(VI) concentration in mg/L, V is the volume of solution (L), and m is the weight of adsorbent (g).
2.8 Adsorption isotherm and kinetic studies
The adsorption properties and equilibrium data, known as adsorption isotherms describe how Cr(VI) interacts with the adsorbent. In order to optimize the adsorption system design, it is important to establish the most suitable correlation of the equilibrium curve. In this study, experimental data were compared by using eleven well-known and widely applied isotherm equations in order to find the best fit model for the obtained data. These adsorption equilibrium theories are Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Generalized, Dubinin-Radushkevich, Flory–Huggins, Non-ideal competitive adsorption, Redlich–Peterson, Radke–Prausnitz, Khan, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller models that can describe equilibrium studies [14, 16, 39].
The adsorption rate which varies with the surface and pore properties of the adsorbent material was evaluated using the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order and intra-particle diffusion models to remove 25 mL of Cr(VI) solution under conditions of different initial chromium concentrations (25–200 mg/L), weight of adsorbents (0.5 g for CA and 0.75 g for CA/UF), pH 1, at 25 °C ± 2 °C, contact time, (30–360 min) and stirring speed (120 rpm) [16, 40].
2.9 Regeneration and reuse study
For desorption, 0.75 g of the spent adsorbent (CA/UF) was added to 20 mL of 0.1 N HCl and the mixture was shaken at 120 rpm at 25 ± 2 °C for 2 h. The regenerated adsorbent was washed with distilled water after each sorption/desorption cycle until neutral pH was obtained, then the composite adsorbent was filtered and dried at 70 °C and cooled at room temperature (25 ± 2 ◦C) for reuse [41, 42].
2.10 Statistical analyses
Several statistical terms are used as a measure of accuracy and are defined as error functions. These functions are used to select the best fit data for isothermal and kinetic models [43]. Error functions are used to evaluate the validity of mathematical equations for isotherm and kinetic models with experimental adsorption results. In the current study, the best fit isotherm and kinetic model were evaluated by calculations of error functions including coefficient of determination (R2), chi-square test (χ2), average relative error (ARE), sum of squares of the errors (ERRSQ), hybrid fractional error function (HYBRID), Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD), residual root mean square error (RMSE) and sum of absolute errors (EABS) [43]. Various error functions were examined, and in each case the variables for the isotherm and kinetic models were determined by minimizing the relevant error function over the studied concentration range. This process was performed using the Solver add-Ins with Microsoft Excel 2010.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Adsorbent characterization
Characterization of CA and CA/UF beads is performed by FTIR, SEM, EDAX, BET and BJH instrumental techniques. The active functional groups present in both adsorbents before and after Cr(VI) adsorption are identified by FTIR (Figs. 1, 2). From these figures, the binding mechanism of the studied adsorbents is explored. As shown in Fig. 1, the removal of Cr(VI) increases the intensity of the peaks of the active binding sites due to the swelling of CA during the adsorption process and the replacement of the linked calcium ions by chromium on the surface and the porous spaces in the beads [44, 45]. Further, the broad 3260.66 cm−1 of O–H stretching peak in the alginate molecule shifts and becomes sharper at 3361.68 cm−1 after chromium adsorption on CA. This may be attributed to the replacement of Ca and adsorption of water molecules [46]. The assigned band 2924.26 cm−1 of C-H bonds in the alginate beads becomes sharper at 2924.63 cm−1 after Cr(VI) adsorption due to incorporation of chromium into the alginate matrix [44]. The sharp peak that appeared strongly at 1721.34 cm−1 belongs to the C = O carbonyl vibration within the alginate molecule [46]. The shift and sharpness of the bands from 1589.30 and 1415.71 cm−1 before the absorption process to 1633.18 and 1407.16 cm−1 after adsorption may be accompanied by the asymmetric stretching of − COO− groups in CA and the electrostatic interaction of Cr (VI) with protonated carboxyl groups [46, 47]. In addition, the intense shift of the 1079.25 cm−1sharp peak to the smaller wavelength 1029.26 cm−1can be attributed to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration of C-O and C–O–C bonds, respectively after chromium binding during adsorption process [35, 48]. Figure 2 shows the drastic decrease in the bands’ intensity in CA/UF before and after adsorption, i.e. the increase in transmittance % at higher wavelengths, which attributes to the large number of groups especially, the association of carboxyl and hydroxyl groups with Cr(VI). This indicates the incorporation of chromium within the polysaccharide polymer [46]. However, it has been reported that shifts or changes in FTIR peaks may be related to the interactions between chromium and functional groups on the surface of adsorbent during the adsorption process or a chemical reaction [49]. These electrostatic interactions were previously demonstrated by the positive charge formed on alginate with the Cr(VI) as the dominant species of oxyanion (HCrO4−) at pH less than 2.5 [50].
The surface morphology and the elemental composition of CA and CA/UF are achieved by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX). The EDAX spectra of CA and CA/UF after Cr(VI) adsorption are presented (Fig. 3a, b). The EDAX spectra of CA and CA/UF show the increase in calcium ions from 0.07 to 0.19% confirming the increased calcium content due to the confinement of biomass retention of U. fasciata containing polysaccharides with calcium alginate in CA/UF beads (Fig. 3a, b). The enhancement of Cr(VI) uptake from 34.13 to 36.62%, while, the oxygen content retained around 30.91 and 29.62% in the CA and CA/UF beads, respectively, reflecting the contribution of the functional groups of polysaccharide polymer to chromium adsorption (Fig. 3a, b). Also the increase in Cr(VI) in CA/UF more than CA may be related to the replacement of Ca ions bounded to the carboxylic groups by Cr(III) on the surface and/or within the polysaccharide polymer in CA besides that in U. fasciata biomass during the Cr(VI) adsorption process (Fig. 3a, b; [50]). The slight change in the oxygen content may accompany with the swelling of CA/UF beads during the adsorption process. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of CA and CA/UF before and after Cr(VI) adsorption show the difference between their surface morphology (Fig. 4a–d). The surface of the CA beads at the beginning of the adsorption process is smooth with some cracks and porosity, while at the end of Cr(VI) sorption procedure the surface appears to be covered by the Cr(VI) ion species with some porosity (Fig. 4a, b). In case of CA/UF initially, the surface appears to be homogenous with algal particles with visible cracks. Whereas, after Cr(VI) removal experiment, the surface of the beads appears to be swollen with chromium solution and covered with Cr(VI) ion species with some distributed porosity (Fig. 4c, d).
The specific surface area, pore volume, mean pore diameter and mean particle size for CA and CA/UF are determined by isotherm measurements of N2 adsorption–desorption under liquid nitrogen temperature using BELSORP mini, BEL Japan, INC, and at 77 K as an adsorption temperature. In this process, samples are pretreated at 140 ºC under a nitrogen gas flow. The exact surface area, pore diameter, pore volume and mean particle size are calculated from the nitrogen adsorption isotherms based on Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) theory. BET and BJH methods for CA using 0.5018 g with saturated vapor pressure and standard volume of 102.22 kPa and 0.354 cm3/g, respectively give a BET surface area, BJH surface area, total pore volume (p/p0 = 0.990), and mean pore diameter of 1.542 m2/g, 1.481 m2/g, 0.001 cm3/g, and 4.94 nm, respectively. While for CA/UF, BET and BJH methods using 0.1680 g with saturated vapor pressure and standard volume of 102.19 kPa and 1.17 cm3/g, respectively give a BET surface area, BJH surface area, total pore volume (p/p0 = 0.990), and mean pore diameter of 5.07 m2/g, 4.77 m2/g, 0.014 cm3/g, and 11.33 nm, respectively. It is noteworthy that the mean pore follows the meso-porous adsorbent pore width (2–50 nm) which is adsorbed at a relative pressure close to unity (0.990) [51]. The presented BET and BJH data indicate the significant difference in particle size of CA and CA/UF beads. Thus, these data indicate that CA/UF beads possess a surface area three times larger than that of CA. Also, CA/UF beads have a mean pore diameter and total pore volume of about 2.3 and 14 times greater than those of CA. This confirms the importance of CA/UF in chromium removal. Our results are in consistence with the findings of Shetty et al. who demonstrated that the embedded chitosan in calcium alginate beads possesses improved surface area compared with that of chitosan alone which led to a better adsorption efficiency of the immobilized chitosan [29].
3.2 Effect of pH
The initial pH of a chromium solution is an important parameter that affects the biosorption of chromium ions [19, 52]. Adsorption of chromium ions on adsorbents (CA and CA/UF) was studied in the pH range from 1 to 9, while other extraction parameters were kept constant: adsorbent dosage: 0.3 g/25 mL; agitation time: 360 min; initial concentration of Cr(VI) ions: 50 mg/L and temperature 25 °C ± 2 °C. The adsorption of Cr(VI) ions was found to decrease with increasing pH and reached a maximum of % 51.5% removal for CA and 86.5% for CA/UF at pH 1 indicating the maximum biosorption capacity of CA/UF beads from CA (Fig. 5a, b). The high removal efficiency of CA/UF reflects the important role of entrapping UF into CA beads. Similar results have been reported for hexavalent chromium removal using other adsorbents with an optimum pH of 1.0 [17, 52].
Based on the pKa values of guluronic and mannuronic acids, monomers of alginate, that have been reported to be 3.65 and 3.38, respectively [53], the alginate gel is positively charged at pH < 2.5, neutral at pH≈3.0–3.5 and negatively charged at pH > 4.0. Therefore, at low pH values, the surface of the adsorbents containing carboxyl and hydroxyl groups are protonated and acquire positive charges and thus, allowing adsorption of Cr(VI) ions [54]. Chromium can exist in different forms such as HCrO4−, H2CrO4, Cr2O72−, and CrO42− depending on the pH [55,56,57]. El-Sikaily et al. [17] reported that adsorption of Cr6+ at pH < 3.0 was attributed to the electrostatic attraction between the negatively charged chromium species (HCrO4−) and the positively charged functional groups on the surface of adsorbent cell wall due to the presence of more positively charged functional groups [55]. However, at pH > 4 the adsorbent cell wall contains more negative charge functional groups that repel metal anions resulting in a lower percentage of Cr(VI) removal [55].
3.3 Effect of adsorbent dose
In the present study, the effect of adsorbent dose on the % removal of Cr(VI) ions was investigated by changing the adsorbent dose of CA and CA/UF from 0.1 to 0.75 g/25 mL at other constant conditions: pH 1; contact time: 360 min; initial concentration of chromium ions: 50 mg/L; and temperature: 25 ± 2 °C (Fig. 5c, d). The figure shows that for CA, the removal increases from 37.1% to 69.6% with increasing dose from 0.1 g/25 mL to 0.5 g/25 mL and then remaining constant at 0.75 g/25 mL. For CA/UF, when its amount increases from 0.1 g/25 mL to 0.75 g/25 mL, the removal significantly increases from 41.9% to 97.4%.This confirms the increased biosorption activity of CA/UF compared to CA. However, the present results may coincide with the fact that when the dose of the adsorbents is increased the surface area and the number of active sites increase and after a certain dose a stationary phase is reached with a slight increase in the % removal [58]. This may be due to the accumulation or overlap of the adsorption sites with increasing dose of the adsorbent [59]. This can also be attributed to the difference in the porosity and surface area of the beads when loading a larger amount of the adsorbent [60]. As we mentioned previously, the present BET and BJH analyses reflect the larger surface area of CA/UF beads compared to CA. With the increase in the concentration of the metal adsorption solution, the beads become less porous and the free transport of metal ions to the internal adsorption sites is affected [60]. Thus, the porous amounts of beads are reduced along the total surface area due to their retention of metal ions [60].
3.4 Effect of initial Cr(VI) concentration
The effect of the initial concentration of Cr(VI) on the % removal of Cr(VI) ions was investigated by changing the initial concentration of Cr(VI) ions from 25 mg/L to 100 mg/L for CA beads and 25 mg/L to 200 mg/L for CA/UF beads, while keeping other parameters of the extraction constant (Fig. 5e, f). For CA, at time of 360 min and at initial concentrations of 25–100 mg/L, the removal of Cr(VI) slightly increases from 57.1 to 59.4% (Fig. 5e). This low observation of the efficiency of Cr (VI) removal by CA in the current study coincides with some previously mentioned studies [61, 62]. On the other hand, CA/UF beads show a gradual decrease in Cr(VI) removal for initial Cr(VI) concentrations 25–200 mg/L from 100 to 81.8% with a higher Cr(VI) removal percentage than CA beads (Fig. 5f). This may be due to the fact that at lower concentrations of Cr(IV) ions, the number of active sites for both adsorbents is more and therefore a higher removal of Cr(VI) ions is obtained [58]. But by increasing the concentration of Cr(VI) ions, the availability of active sites decreases which leads to lower removal. The higher Cr(VI) removal of CA/UF beads than that of CA beads may relate to their greater diameter, surface area, and higher amounts of trapped biomaterial [61, 62].
3.5 Effect of contact time
The effect of contact time on the % removal of Cr(VI) was studied by changing the contact time from 30 to 360 min, while keeping all other parameters constant: pH 1, sorbent dosage 0.5 g/25 mL for CA and 0.75 g/25 mL for CA/UF, initial Cr(VI) concentration 25 mg/L; and the temperature is 25 ± 2 °C (Fig. 5g, h). The results indicated that after 30 min contact time, 54.5% of removal is observed for the adsorbent CA beads and 59.1% for the CA/UF beads. Then, the % of removal is slowly increased and reaches a maximum of 75.0% after 360 min of contact with CA and 100% after 240 min of agitation with CA/UF. These results may be due to the fact that the active sites are initially available on the surface of the adsorbents, so the adsorption process is fast [62]. But as the active sites are gradually consumed over time, the % removal decreases and reaches a steady state after a certain period of time. The greater removal of Cr(VI) % by CA/UF beads than by CA attributed to the larger surface area and larger active sites of CA/UF beads, however, as discussed before the encapsulation of U. fasciata biomass into CA leads to more beads diameter and adds more active sites [62].
3.6 Regeneration and reuse
Regeneration of the spent adsorbent allowing multiple uses is a desirable feature to reduce the cost of the adsorption removal process for practical applications. The CA/UF adsorption efficiency for Cr(VI) after the first regeneration decreases from 97.4 to 89.1%, and a slight decrease in the efficiency is observed in the following two cycles (87.7 and 82.3%, respectively). The decrease in the adsorption efficiency may be attributed to the mass loss of the adsorbents and surface passivation after initial adsorption [63]. The regeneration study revealed that Cr(VI) loaded adsorbents can be effectively recycled using HCl treatment.
3.7 Isotherm adsorption models
The adsorption process has been described by various two–parameter linear isotherm models namely: Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Flory–Huggins, Dubinin–Radushkevich, Generalized, Non-ideal competitive adsorption (NICA), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET). Two –parameter non-linear isotherm models namely: Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Generalized as well as three-parameter non-linear isotherms namely: Redlich–Peterson, Radke–Prausnitz, and Khan were also used. The adsorbed amount of Cr(VI) is calculated from the given relationship Eq. (3) [14,15,16, 64].
The effect of Cr(VI) concentration on adsorption by CA and CA/UF beads was achieved using 25 mL of 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 mg/L Cr(VI) at pH 1, 0. 5 g (CA) and 0.75 g (CA/UF) beads weight, 25 ± 2 ºC, 120 rpm and stirring time 90 and 180 min, respectively. The applicability of the adsorption models is estimated by three invoking statistical methods: coefficient of determination (R2; Eq. 4), chi-square test (χ2; Eq. 5) and error functions Eqs. (6–11). The error functions used are the average relative error (ARE), sum of squares of the errors (ERRSQ), hybrid fractional error function (HYBRID), Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD), residual root mean square error (RMSE) and sum of absolute errors (EABS) [43]:
where, qcal, qexp and qaexp are the calculated, experimental and averaged values of capacitance of the adsorbents q (mg/g) and (i-p) are the number of data points. The fit of the non-linear adsorption and kinetic models is obtained when ARE values become less than 5, while, the preference of the linear and non-linear models is tested by the high values of R2 (0 < R2 < 1) and the small amounts of χ2 [65, 66]. Higher ERRSQ and lower EABS amounts provide a better fit for the adsorption graph.
3.7.1 Two-parameter linear and non-linear isotherm models
The equations belonging to the investigated adsorption isotherms are listed as follows Eqs. (12–23) [14,15,16]:
Linear Flory–Huggins [67]:
Linear Generalized [39]:
Linear Brunauer–Emmett–Teller:
Non-ideal competitive adsorption (NICA) [65]:
where, qe, and Ce represent the amount of Cr(VI) uptake per unit weight and the solution concentration at equilibrium.
Qm and KL are the monolayer adsorption affinity parameter and the Langmuir constant belonging to the adsorption energy Eqs. (12) and (13). Linear and non-linear Langmuir isotherm models for CA give relatively similar Qm values of 416.67 and 401.67 (mg/g) with R2 0.9858 and 0.9995, respectively; and a KL of 0.01 L/mg (Tables 1 and 2). Linear Langmuir isotherm is applied to CA/UF beads giving Qm = 133.33 (mg/g) and KL = 1.12 L/mg with R2 of 0.9260, while the non-liner form is not preferred (Tables 1 and 2). Although, more rapid removal of Cr(VI) by CA/UF is observed than CA beads, CA/UF beads show lower Qm indicating multilayer adsorption along the heterogeneous surface. However, Langmuir isotherm postulates surface homogenous adsorption and the monolayer adsorption [68]. As it is generally known, the Langmuir isotherm is the most widely used isothermal equation due to its simplicity; it can only compare between different adsorbents but cannot explain the adsorption mechanism [68]. The preference of the Langmuir equation can be evaluated by the dimensionless separation factor (RL) as follows Eq. (24) [64]:
Calculation of the RL for initial Cr(VI) concentrations (C0) 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 mg/L adsorbed on CA and CA/UF gives values less than one of 0.86, 0.75, 0.67, 0.60, 0.56 and 0.43, and 3.5E-02, 1.8E-02, 1.2E-02, 8.9E-03, 7.4E-03 and 4.4E-03, respectively, indicating the applicability of the Langmuir model in the CA and CA/UF adsorbents [69].
The linear form of Freundlich model gives a straight line describing the multilayer adsorption of Cr(VI) on the heterogeneous surface of CA with Kf and nf values of 1.15 (mg/g)/(mg/L)n and 0.84, respectively (Eq. 14; Table 1) however, the non-linear Freundlich model is not applied to CA (Eq. 15; Table 2). The nf values are in the 1–10 range and reflect the availability of this adsorption model when the Cr(VI) concentrations are in the range of 25–200 mg/L [69, 70]. On the other hand, linear and non-linear forms of Freundlich isotherm are applied to adsorb 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 mg/L initial Cr(VI) concentrations on CA/UF giving different Kf values 39.46 and 29.15 and similar nf values of 2.43 with R2 0.9680 and 0.9997 and χ2 of 1.85E-02 and 2.51E-04, respectively, reflecting greater applicability of the non-linear adsorption form (Tables 1 and 2). The results reflect that this non-linear form prefers an isotherm model to CA/UF with a higher R2 (0.9997) value and a lower χ2 (2.51E-04) value and indicate the multilayer adsorption of Cr(VI) ions on the heterogeneous CA/UF surface adsorbent [14,15,16]..
The linear form of Temkin isotherm (Eq. 16; Table 1) that deals with the interactions between Cr(VI) and CA is applied with a very low χ2 = 5.92E-09, while the non-linear form is not optimized (Eq. 17). Where, AT value (0.15 l/min) refers to the low equilibrium binding constant, that is, the low binding energy required for the Cr(VI) adsorption [39] (Table 1). The value of BT can be estimated from the relation: BT = (RT)/bT, where, T is the absolute temperature (K), R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol K), and the constant, bT relates to adsorption heat [14]. The bT of small value (0.05 kJ/mol) from the adsorption isotherm confirms the increase in the surface coverage of the CA adsorbent. In the case of CA/UF, linear and non-liner forms of Temkin isotherm also need small binding energy and demonstrate a high adsorbate approach [14] (Tables 1 and 2).
Linear Flory–Huggins isotherm can estimate the degree of surface coverage (θ) of the Cr(VI) on the CA and CA/UF (Table 1) [67]. The degree of surface coverage is 1-Ce/C0, and the equilibrium constants KFH and nFH model are typical exponents from the intercept and slop of the linear straight line, respectively (Eq. 18). The KFH value is used in calculating the free Gibbs non-spontaneous energy as given Eq. (25):
The negative ΔG0 values obtained for CA and CA/UF -4.76 and -6.91 kJ/mol, respectively, reflect the spontaneity of Cr(VI) adsorption upon them (Table 1).
Linear Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm can explain the physicochemical properties of the Cr(VI) adsorption on CA and CA/UF Eq. (19) [15]. The mean free energy of adsorption (E) and ε can be calculated from the following equations Eqs. (26 and 27):
where, R, T, and Ce are the gas constant (8.314 J/mol K), absolute temperature (K), and equilibrium concentration of Cr(VI) (mg/L), respectively. The plot of lnqe versus ε2 yields a straight line, in which, the values of qDR and the mean free energy of adsorption E are calculated from the intersection and slope of the straight line, respectively. The value of E can predict the type of the adsorption, when, E < 8 kJ/mol and 8 < E < 16 kJ/mol values refer to the types of physical and chemical ion-exchange, respectively [65, 71]. The calculated E values of 0.13 and 2.24 kJ/mol reflect the physical adsorption of Cr(VI) on CA and CA/UF, respectively (Table 1). The χ2 and R2values (6.28E-04; 0.8798), and (2.83E-04;0.7142) for CA and CA/UF, respectively can explore the performance of adsorption process of Cr(VI) by this model on CA and CA/UF beads (Table 1).
Linear and non-linear forms of Generalized isotherm equations examine equilibrium data for Cr(VI) adsorption on CA and CA/UF (Eqs. 20 and 21; [14]). Where, KG is the saturation constant (mg/L), Nb is the cooperative binding constant, and qm is the maximum adsorption amplitude taken from Langmuir isotherm model (mg/g). The linear graphs of ln (qm/qe) versus ln Ce for CA and CA/UF give significant straight line (R2 ≥ 0.9968 and 0.9277, respectively) and from the intercept and plot KG (128.43 and 1.18 mg/L, respectively) and Nb amounts (0.94 and 0.74, respectively) (Table 1). In addition, the non-linear equation for CA gives relatively similar KG values for the linear form (130.17 mg/L) and Nb (0.84) with a small ARE (2.03) value and different values for CA/UF (Table 2). Calculated quantities from linear and non-linear Generalized equations reveal to their applicability to remove Cr(VI) by CA and CA/UF (Tables1 and 2).
The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) linear isotherm is estimated for the multilayer adsorption theoretical model Eq. (22) [15]. Where qe is the amount of Cr(VI) adsorbed per unit weigh of CA and CA/UF (mg/g) and Ce is the concentration of Cr(VI) remaining in the solution at equilibrium (mg/L). Whereas, Cs is the Cr(VI) saturation concentration (mg/L), Qmax is the amount of Cr(VI) adsorbed per unit weight of CA and CA/UF in complete monolayer formation on the surface (mg/g) and CBET is the surface interaction energy constant (L/mg). The plots of Ce/qe (Cs − Ce) versus Ce/Cs for CA and CA/UF give straight lines of R2 ≥ 0.8775 and χ2 = 3.10E-08 and R2 ≥ 0.8832 and χ2 = 8.92E-06, respectively (Table1).CBET and Qmax are calculated from the intercept and slope, respectively (Table1). These data for CA and CA/UF reflect the formation of the successive layers of Cr(VI) ions after the monolayer is completed.
The Non-ideal competitive adsorption (NICA) model reflects the cooperative phenomenon of the adsorption due to the ability of Cr(VI) ions to bind at one site on an adsorbent to influence Cr(VI) ions bound at another site on the same adsorbent (Eq. 23; [65]).
KD, Hill constant which can be obtained from the given equation (Eq. 28):
where Kd, the dissociation constant per site (mg/L), is equal to the unadsorbed Cr(VI) content at half saturation (Kd = Ce50). Also, Kd = 1 /Ka, where, Ka is the association constant and nH implies Hill cooperatively coefficient. Thus, three cases can be obtained; (i) nH > 1, positive cooperative association, (ii) nH = 1, non-cooperative or hyperbolic association (iii) nH < 1, negative cooperative association [65]. The KD and nH values of the adsorption of Cr(VI) on CA/UF can be estimated from the intersection and slope of the graph, respectively and the Kd and Ka values are calculated (Table1). The obtained nH <1 refers to the negative cooperative association of CA/UF [65]. However, the NICA model is not applied to CA beads. An executable NICA model for Cr(VI) removal by CA/UF with a value of χ2 4.38E-05 and a value of R2 0.9835 (Table 1).
Given the values of χ2, the applicability of two-parameter linear models for CA beads takes the descending order: Temkin > BET > Generalized > Dubinin-Radushkevich > Langmuir > Flory–Huggins > Freundlich (Table 1). The ARE and RMSE values for the two-parameter non-linear form of Langmuir and Generalized models for CA beads indicate that the Generalized model is relatively more applicable than the Langmuir model (Table 2 and Fig. 6a). While, the two-parameter linear models for CA/UF give the descending order Temkin > BET > NICA > Dubinin-Radushkevich > Generalized > Freundlich > Flory–Huggins > Langmuir (Table 1). The two-parameter non-linear model for CA/UF beads takes the sequence Freundlich > Temkin > Generalized (Table 2 and Fig. 6b). The least preference of the two-parameter linear model of Langmuir model for Cr(VI) adsorption over CA/UF beads among other studied adsorption isotherm models, reflects the multi-layered adsorption mechanism of Cr(VI) ions [65].
3.7.2 Three-parameter non-linear isotherm models
The equations used for the three-parameter non-linear models that express the Cr(VI) adsorption procedure are given as Eqs. (29–31):
Radke–Prausnitz [70]:
Khan [72]:
Redlich–Peterson isotherm expresses the heterogeneous multilayer adsorption systems at high adsorbate concentration, and also follows Henry’s law at low concentration (Eq. 29; [65, 73]). This isothermal model is a proposed equation for the expression of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms, thus represents both heterogeneous and homogeneous adsorption systems [68]. The three Redlich–Peterson isotherm constants Kr, ar, and B are calculated for Cr(VI) adsorption on CA and CA/UF (Table 3 and Fig. 6b). Calculations of the constants reflect the heterogeneous multilayer adsorption at high Cr(VI) concentration (R2 ≥ 0.9994, χ2 = 5.20E-05 and ARE = 5.04 for CA and R2 ≥ 0.9997, χ2 = 7.23E-02 and ARE = 3.79 for CA/UF with B values between 0 and 1 [65].
Radke–Prausnitz examines the heterogeneous equilibrium adsorption systems in dilute solutions Eq. (30) [70]. This model appears to be applicable to CA (R2 ≥ 0.9997, χ2 = 1.63E-01 and ARE = 5.99) with parameters of A, RP, and d of 50.8, 0.04 and 0.33 values, respectively (Table 3).
The non-linear equation of Khan's adsorption balance is the general isotherm of pure solutions Eq. (31) [72].
Given the χ2 values of CA for two- and three-parameter non-linear adsorption models, they take the sequence Redlich-Peterson > Generalized > Langmuir > Khan > Radke–Prausnitz (Tables 2, 3 and Fig. 6a). For CA/UF the sequence follows Freundlich > Temkin > Khan > Generalized > Redlich-Peterson (Tables 2, 3 and Fig. 6b). The two-parameter non-linear form of Langmuir isotherm does not apply to CA/UF beads indicating multilayered adsorption of Cr(VI).
3.8 Adsorption kinetic models
Adsorption kinetics at a concentration of 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 mg/L Cr(VI) in 25 mL at pH 1, 0.5 g and 0.75 g adsorbent's dose for CA and CA/UF, respectively, and 30–360 min stirring time are carried out at 25 ºC ± 2 °C. Three kinetic models namely; pseudo 1st order, pseudo 2nd order, and intra-particle diffusion are investigated Eqs. (32–36) [40, 74]:
where, k1, k2 and kp are the rate constants of pseudo-first-order (1/min), pseudo-second-order (g/mg min), and intra-particle diffusion (mg/g min1/2), respectively.
The adsorption mechanism of 25–200 mg/L Cr(VI) on 0.5 g CA beads appears to be more favorable with non-linear pseudo-first-order and linear pseudo-second-order models with χ2 (2.00E-06–5.14E-02 and 2.00E-06–5.64E-02), RMSE (0.22–4.54 and 0.22–4.57 mg/g) and ARE (8.53E-13–5.75E-02,), respectively instead of linear pseudo-first-order and non-linear pseudo-second-order kinetic models (Table 4). Similar results confirmed that the calcium alginate encapsulated grape waste beads follow the pseudo-second order kinetic model [62].This indicates that the adsorption process depends on the concentration of Cr(VI) on CA beads, however, k1 and k2 increase with Cr(VI) concentration. In addition, the amounts of qe,exp are relatively similar to those of qe,cal with values of k1 and k2 directly proportional to the concentration of Cr(VI). This validation finding is associated with large amounts of active sites on and inside the CA polymers.
Experimental adsorption data of 25–200 mg/L Cr(VI) on 0.75 g of CA/UF beads may reveal that linear pseudo-first-order, linear pseudo-second-order, and intra-particle diffusion kinetic models are the most applicable mechanisms (χ2 = 1.01E-01–2.83E + 00, 8.31E-31–1.45E + 00 and 7.10E-07–2.41E + 00, respectively) (Table 5), although the linear pseudo-second-order model cannot be applied when the values of qcal are different from those of qexp. For linear pseudo-first-order, the k1 relatively increases with increasing Cr(VI) concentration from 25 to 200 mg/L. The performance of intra-particle diffusion model gives a straight linear line that doesn’t pass through the origin with a deviation from the linearity. Also, the values of Ci increase with increasing Cr(VI) concentration, that is, with increasing thickness of the boundary layer due to swelling of the CA/UF beads [74]. This suggests that the intra-particle diffusion is a part of rate-limiting steps that are likely to continue at the same time [75]. Thus, the adsorption may undergo by ion exchange interaction and depends on the concentration of Cr(VI), and the ionic radius. Basically, the adsorption mechanism of Cr(VI) ions on CA/UF beads may involve a multi-stage process. As a result, the intra-particle diffusion model is applied to further explain the adsorption mechanism.
3.9 Comparative adsorption of CA and CA/UF beads
Adsorption rate constants with a concentration range of 25–200 Cr(VI) mg/L on CA beads are lower than those of CA/UF beads with the majority of adsorption (54.2–59.4%) observed with time ranges from 60 min at low Cr(VI) (25–75 mg/L) concentrations to 30 min at higher concentration (100 mg/L). In case of CA/UF beads, the majority of adsorption observed (81.8–100.0%) over a time period of 120 min at low Cr(VI) concentrations (25–75 mg/L) and 180 min at higher concentrations (100–200 mg/L). This observation is coincident with the applied kinetic models of Cr(VI) adsorption on CA and CA/UF that is related to the change of beads properties from the non-encapsulated type to encapsulated type showing increased surface area, total pore volume, and mean pore diameter from (1.54 m2/g, 0.001 cm3/g and 4.94 nm) to (5.07 m2/g, 0.014 cm3/g and 11.33 nm) for CA, and CA/UF beads, respectively. Increased Cr(VI) adsorption phenomenon was previously achieved from bare to coated CA [62]. In addition to the different characterization between the type of beads, the enhancement of Cr(VI) adsorption may be associated with the partial reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by electron donors exist on the surface of the encapsulated algae. The reduced form of Cr(VI) interacts with the carboxylic groups of guluronate and mannuronate in the alginate structure and in the algal substance, along with other functional groups present such as hydroxyl and amino [62]. Although Cr(III) is involved in the process of chromium adsorption from its Cr(VI) solution by substitution of released Ca2+, HCrO4− appears to be the most predominant Cr(VI) adsorbed species on the CA and CA/UF beads in the strong acidic medium (pH 1), however, this suggestion is also previously proposed [50]. In the current study, EDAX and FTIR analyses confirm the presence of the high oxygen and carbon contents more than calcium ions responsible for the interaction of Cr(III) with carboxyl groups [50]. Figure 7 represents the systemic diagram proposed for the current adsorption of Cr(VI) by CA and CA/UF taken from the expected similar mechanism for adsorption of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) ions on grape stalk powder trapped in CA [50]. Also, similar results previously revealed that the adsorption of Cr(VI) was related to both Cr(VI) adsorption and Cr(VI) partial reduction as well as the amount of functional groups present in the biomass [49].
The proposed schematic diagram of Cr(VI) adsorption on CA and CA/UF beads. The round circles represent the CA and CA/UF beads; the zigzag shapes represent the calcium alginate structure in CA and CA/UF; the round blue circles represent the U. fasciata algae immobilized in CA/UF beads. This schematic diagram includes several steps either consecutive and/or simultaneously: (1) partial reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III), meanwhile, HCrO4− appears to be the most dominant chromium species, which replaces Ca2+ in CA and CA/UF beads, (2) diffusion of the Cr(VI) solution through the CA and CA/UF beads, and (3) incubation of the formed Cr(III) inside CA and CA/UF beads. The adsorption process on CA and CA/UF beads is based on different interactions such as: ion exchange, electrostatic attractions, physical adsorption, etc.
3.10 Comparison of adsorption capacity of CA and CA/UF with various reported adsorbents
The maximum sorption capacities of various adsorbents for Cr(VI) reported in previous studies are compiled in Table 6. The adsorption capacities displayed by CA and CA/UF composite are better than that obtained by other reported adsorbents. The characterization results of CA/UF indicate that the composite has several binding groups and large surface area which are appropriate for Cr(VI) adsorption and markedly enhance the process of removal. Additionally as previously mentioned in the subSect. 3.7.1., the postulated Langmuir isotherm for the monolayer homogenous adsorption mechanism is the least suitable isotherm model for CA/UF beads among the studied isotherms, although it is the most notable for its simplicity with different adsorbents. Thus, the smaller Qm value of CA/UF in the current study than that of CA matches the results of the studied kinetic models and instrumental results that reflect the complexity of the adsorption mechanism which involves a multi-step and a multi-layer adsorbate formation (Table 6).
4 Conclusion
A comparative study was conducted on the removal of Cr(VI) by calcium alginate (CA) and U. fasciata biomass encapsulated in calcium alginate beads (CA/UF). This comparison was the first study to examine the appropriate adsorption mechanism of Cr(VI) adsorption on CA and CA/UF beads. The studied instrumental analyses including FTIR, SEM, EDAX, BJH and BET confirmed the greater Cr(VI) removal performance by CA/UF compared to CA.
The removal efficiency (%) was found to be 86.5% and 51.5% for CA/UF and CA, respectively at pH 1. The quantitative results of variable dose showed an increase in the Cr(VI) removal for CA from 37.1% to 69.6% as the dose increased from 0.1 to 0.5 g, while, for CA/UF, the removal enhanced significantly from 41.9% to 97.4% as the dose increased from 0.1–0.75 g. On the other hand, CA/UF beads showed a gradual decrease in the removal % from 100 to 81.8% for the initial Cr(VI) concentrations 25–200 mg/L but still higher than that of CA beads. Moreover, after 30 and 240 min of agitation, the removal by CA/UF was higher (59.1% and 100%, respectively) than that by CA after (30 min: 54.5% and 360 min: 75.0%), respectively. The regeneration experiments showed that the adsorption efficiency of CA/UF composite decreased to 82.3% after three cycles.
The adsorption process was evaluated by using various two–parameter linear isotherm models namely: Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Flory–Huggins, Dubinin–Radushkevich, Generalized, Non-ideal competitive adsorption (NICA), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET). Two-parameter non-linear isotherm models namely: Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Generalized in addition to three-parameter non-linear isotherms namely: Redlich–Peterson, Radke–Prausnitz, and Khan were also used.
Adsorption by CA beads followed the pseudo- first-order and pseudo-second-order mechanisms, while, the intra-particle diffusion was specifically related to CA/UF beads besides the pseudo- first-order model. The observation of the applied kinetic models of Cr(VI) adsorption on CA and CA/UF beads was simultaneous with a change in the properties of the beads from the non-encapsulated type to encapsulated type. This was due to the increased surface area, total pore volume, and mean pore diameter from (1.54 m2/g, 0.001 cm3/g and 4.94 nm) to (5.07 m2/g, 0.014 cm3/g and 11.33 nm) for CA and CA/UF beads, respectively.
From the presented study, it can be concluded that U. fasciata biomass encapsulated in calcium alginate beads CA/UF can be efficiently utilized in the Cr(VI) removal more than CA. Thus, it is advantageous to use the most practical eco-friendly adsorbents known for the lowest cost and the highest efficiency for removing toxic metals.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available in this published paper.
References
Bashir I, Lone FA, Bhat RA, Mir SA, Dar ZA, Dar SA (2020) Concerns and threats of contamination on aquatic ecosystems. In: Hakeem KR, Bhat RA, Qadri H et al. (eds) Bioremediation and biotechnology, pp 1–26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35691-0_1
Sinha R, Kumar R, Sharma P, Kant N, Shang J, Aminabhavi TM (2022) Removal of hexavalent chromium via biochar-based adsorbents: state-of-the-art, challenges, and future perspectives. J Environ Manag 317:115356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115356
WHO (World Health Organization) (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Vol. 1. Recommendations. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42852
ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), (2012) Toxicological profile for chromium. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, September 2012
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2009) National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs), EPA 816-F-09-004, May 2009. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations
Kamali M, Appels L, Kwon EE, Aminabhavi TM, Dewil R (2021) Biochar in water and wastewater treatment-a sustainability assessment. Chem Eng J 420:129946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129946
Shobier AH, El-Sadaawy MM, El-Said GF (2020) Removal of hexavalent chromium by ecofriendly raw marine green alga Ulva fasciata: Kinetic, thermodynamic and isotherm studies. Egypt J Aquat Res 46(4):325–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2020.09.003
Karimi-Maleh H, Ayati A, Ghanbari S, Orooji Y, Tanhaei B, Karimi F, Alizadeh M, Rouhi J, Fu L, Sillanpää M (2021) Recent advances in removal techniques of Cr(VI) toxic ion from aqueous solution: a comprehensive review. J Mol Liq 329:115062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115062
He J, Chen JP (2014) A comprehensive review on biosorption of heavy metals by algal biomass: materials, performances, chemistry, and modeling simulation tools. Bioresour Technol 160:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.068
Bilgic A, Cimen A, Kursunlu AN (2023) A novel biosorbent functionalized pillar[5]arene: synthesis, characterization and effective biosorption of Cr(VI). Sci Total Environ 857:159312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159312
Boddu S, Alugunulla VN, Dulla JB, Khan AA, Kolimarla BB, Jajula S (2023) Enhanced biosorption of Cr(VI) from contaminated water using biodegradable natural polymeric biosorbent. Mater Today Proc 72:441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.312
Ramesh B, Saravanan A, Senthil Kumar P, Yaashikaa PR, Thamarai P, Shaji A, Rangasamy G (2023) A review on algae biosorption for the removal of hazardous pollutants from wastewater: limiting factors, prospects and recommendations. Environ Pollut 327:121572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121572
Wu SC, Hsiao W-C, Zhao Y-C, Wu L-F (2023) Hexavalent chromate bioreduction by a magnetotactic bacterium Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense MSR-1 and the effect of magnetosome synthesis. Chemosphere 330:138739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138739
El-Said GF, El-Sadaawy MM, Aly-Eldeen MA (2018) Adsorption isotherms and kinetic studies for the defluoridation from aqueous solution using eco-friendly raw marine green algae, Ulva lactuca. Environ Monit Assess 190:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6392-6
El-Said GF, Abdelrehim ESM, Elba MES, Abdel Kawy SMH (2019) A critical study of interactive fluoride adsorption by raw marine organisms and a synthetic organic 2-amino-3-cyano-4(4-nitrophenyl)-6-phenylpyridine as adsorbent tools. Environ Monit Assess 191(5):311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7465-5
Mahmoud ME, El-Said GF, Rashedy IRK, Abdelfattah AM (2020) Assembly and implementation of an eco-friendly marine nanosediment for adsorptive removal of heptavalent manganese: adsorption isotherm, thermodynamic and kinetics studies. Powder Technol 359:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.09.063
El-Sikaily A, El Nemr A, Khaled A, Abdelwehab O (2007) Removal of toxic chromium from wastewater using green alga Ulva lactuca and its activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 148:216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.146
Nagababu A, Reddy DS, Mohan GVK (2022) Toxic chrome removal from industrial effluents using marine algae: modeling and optimization. J Ind Eng Chem 114:377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2022.07.027
Jobby R, Jha P, Yadav AK, Desai N (2018) Biosorption and biotransformation of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere 207:225–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.050
Liu Y, Shan H, Pang Y, Zhan H, Zeng C (2023) Iron modified chitosan/coconut shell activated carbon composite beads for Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution. Int J Biol Macromol 224:156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.112
Mokaddem H, Azouaou N, Kaci Y, Sadaoui Z (2014) Study of lead adsorption from aqueous solutions on agar beads with EPS produced from Paenibacillus polymyxa. Chem Eng Trans 38:31–36. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1438006
Zhu G, Liu J, Yin J, Li Z, Ren B, Sun Y, Wan P, LiuY, (2016) Functionalized polyacrylamide by xanthate for Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 288:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.043
Habiba U, Siddique TA, Joo TC, Salleh A, Ang BC, Afifi AM (2017) Synthesis of chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/zeolite composite for removal of methyl orange, Congo red and chromium (VI) by flocculation/adsorption. Carbohydr Polym 157:1568–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.037
Parlayıcı Ş, Pehlivan E (2019) Removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution using chitosan doped with carbon nanotubes. Mater Today Proc 18:1978–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.689
Omer AM, Khalifa RE, Hu Z, Zhang H, Liu C, Ouyang X-K (2019) Fabrication of tetraethylenepentamine functionalized alginate beads for adsorptive removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions. Int J Biol Macromol 125:1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.097
Sutirman ZA, Sanagi MM, Aini WIW (2021) Alginate-based adsorbents for removal of metal ions and radionuclides from aqueous solutions: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 174:216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.150
Thakur S, Sharma B, Verma A, Chaudhary J, Tamulevicius S, Thakur VK (2018) Recent progress in sodium alginate based sustainable hydrogels for environmental applications. J Clean Prod 198:143–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.259
Wang B, Wan Y, Zheng Y, Lee X, Liu T, Yu Z, Huang J, Ok YS, Chen J, Gao B (2019) Alginate-based composites for environmental applications: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 49:318–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1547621
Shetty MK, Karthik KV, Patil JH, Shekhar SM, Desai SM, Hiremath PG, Ravishankar R (2023) Sorption studies of Cr (VI) ions from synthetic waste water using chitosan embedded in calcium alginate beads. Mater Today Proc 76:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.438
Madenli Ö, Akarsu C, Deveci EÜ (2023) Effective removal of hexavalent chromium by novel modified alginate-based biocomposites: characterization, kinetics and equilibrium studies. Ceram Int 49:16440–16450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.005
Li Y, Wen J, Xue Z, Yin X, Yuan L, Yang C (2022) Removal of Cr(VI) by polyaniline embedded polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate beads-extension from water treatment to soil remediation. J Hazard Mater 426:127809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127809
Mao W, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wen N, Guan Y (2022) Adsorption and photocatalysis removal of arsenite, arsenate, and hexavalent chromium in water by the carbonized composite of manganese-crosslinked sodium alginate. Chemosphere 292:133391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133391
Sun X, Guo P, Sun Y, Cui Y (2021) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by sodium alginate fiber biochar loaded with lanthanum. Materials 14:2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092224
Ayyaril SS, Shanableh A, Bhattacharjee S, Rawas-Qalaji M, Cagliani R, Shabib AG, khan MI, (2023) Recent progress in micro and nano-encapsulation techniques for environmental applications: a review. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101094
Wu S, Han C, Xin L, Li M, Long H, Gao X (2023) Synthesis of triethylenetetramine modified sodium alginate/CuS nanocrystal composite for enhanced Cr(VI) removal: performance and mechanism. Int J Biol Macromol 238:124283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124283
Hassan AF, Abdel-Mohsen AM, Fouda MMG (2014) Comparative study of calcium alginate, activated carbon, and their composite beads on methylene blue adsorption. Carbohydr Polym 102:192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.104
Bée A, Talbot D, Abramson S, Dupuis V (2011) Magnetic alginate beads for Pb(II) ions removal from wastewater. J Colloid Interface Sci 362(2):486–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.06.036
Gilcreas FW, Tarars MJ, Ingols RS (1965) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 12th edn. American Public Health Association (APHA) Inc., New York
Gimbert F, Morin-Crini N, Renault F, Badot P-M, Crini G (2008) Adsorption isotherm models for dye removal by cationized starch based material in a single component system: error analysis. J Hazard Mater 157(1):34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.072
Chen N, Feng C, Li M (2014) Fluoride removal on Fe–Al-impregnated granular ceramic adsorbent from aqueous solution. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(3):609–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0659-6
Ravulapalli S, Kunta R (2018) Removal of lead (II) from wastewater using active carbon of Caryota urens seeds and its embedded calcium alginate beads as adsorbents. J Environ Chem Eng 6(4):4298–4309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.033
Kumar R, Kim S-J, Kim K-H, Lee S-h, Park H-S, Jeon B-H (2018) Removal of hazardous hexavalent chromium from aqueous phase using zirconium oxide-immobilized alginate beads. Appl Geochem 88:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.04.002
Hami HK, Abbas RF, Mahdi AS, Maryoosh AA (2021) An overview of using error function in adsorption isotherm modeling. Muthanna J Pure Sci (MJPS) 8(1):22–30. https://doi.org/10.52113/2/08.01.2021/130-134
Jabli M, Almalki SG, Agougui H (2020) An insight into methylene blue adsorption characteristics onto functionalized alginate bio-polymer gel beads with λ-carrageenan-calcium phosphate, carboxymethyl cellulose, and celite 545. Int J Biol Macromol 156:1091–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.140
Bahrami F, Yu X, Zou Y, Sun Y, Sun G (2020) Impregnated calcium-alginate beads as floating reactors for the remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater. Chem Eng J 382:122774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122774
Torres-Caban R, Vega-Olivencia CA, Mina-Camilde N (2019) Adsorption of Ni2+ and Cd2+ from water by calcium alginate/spent coffee grounds composite beads. Appl Sci 9(21):4531. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214531
Kurayama F, Bahadur NM, Furusawa T, Sato M, Suzuki N (2020) Facile preparation of aminosilane-alginate hybrid beads for enzyme immobilization: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Int J Biol Macromol 150:1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.130
Arenales-Sierra IM, Lobato-Calleros C, Vernon-Carter EJ, Hernández-Rodríguez L, Alvarez-Ramirez J (2019) Calcium alginate beads loaded with Mg(OH)2 improve L. casei viability under simulated gastric condition. LWT Food Sci Technol 112:108220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.118
Albadarin AB, Al-Muhtase AH, Al-laqtah NA, Walker GM, Allen SJ, Ahmad MNM (2011) Biosorption of toxic chromium from aqueous phase by lignin: mechanism, effect of other metal ions and salts. Chem Eng J 169:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.044
Escudero C, Fiol N, Villaescusa I, Bollinger JC (2017) Effect of chromium speciation on its sorption mechanism onto grape stalks entrapped into alginate beads. Arab J Chem 10:S1293–S1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.03.011
Asgari G, Dayari A, Ghasemi M, Seid-mohammadi A, Gupta VK, Agarwal S (2019) Efficient fluoride removal by preparation, characterization of pyrolysis bone: Mixed level design experiment and Taguchi L8 orthogonal array optimization. J Mol Liq 275:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.10.137
Pradhan D, Sukla LB, Mishra BB, Devi N (2019) Biosorption for removal of hexavalent chromium using microalgae Scenedesmus sp. J Clean Prod 209:617–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.288
Percival VE, McDowell RH (1967) Chemistry and enzymology of marine algal polysaccharides. Academic Pres, London
Sathvika T, Manasi RV, Rajesh N (2016) Adsorption of chromium supported with various column modelling studies through the synergistic influence of Aspergillus and cellulose. J Environ Chem Eng 4(3):3193–3204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.06.027
Saha B, Orvig C (2010) Biosorbents for hexavalent chromium elimination from industrial and municipal effluents. Coord Chem Rev 254(23–24):2959–2972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2010.06.005
Jiang X, An Q-D, Xiao Z-Y, Zhai S-R, Shi Z (2018) Mussel-inspired surface modification of untreated wasted husks with stable polydopamine/polyethylenimine for efficient continuous Cr(VI) removal. Mater Res Bull 102:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.02.037
Pradhan D, Sukla LB, Sawyer M, Rahman PKSM (2017) Recent bioreduction of hexavalent chromium in wastewater treatment: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 55:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.040
Kıvanç MR, Ozay O, Ozay H, Ilgin P (2022) Removal of anionic dyes from aqueous media by using a novel high positively charged hydrogel with high capacity. J Dispers Sci Technol 43(7):1000-1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2020.1847658
Edokpayi JN, Odiyo JO, Msagati TAM, Popoola EO (2015) A novel approach for the removal of lead(II) ion from wastewater using mucilaginous leaves of Diceriocaryum eriocarpum plant. Sustainability 7(10):14026–14041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71014026
Pandey A, Bera D, Shukla A, Ray L (2007) Studies on Cr(VI), Pb(II) and Cu(II) adsorption–desorption using calcium alginate as biopolymer. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 19(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422907X198031
Fiol N, Poch J, Villaescusa I (2005) Grape stalks encapsulated in calcium alginate beads for Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solutions. Sep Sci Technol 40(5):1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200048041
Šillerová H, Komárek M, Liu C, Poch J, Villaescusa I (2015) Biosorbent encapsulation in calcium alginate: effects of process variables on Cr(VI) removal from solutions. Int J Biol Macromol 80:260–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.032
Lei Z-M, An Q-D, Fan Y, Lv J-L, Gao C, Zhai S-R, Xiao Z-Y (2016) Monolithic magnetic carbonaceous beads for efficient Cr (VI) removal from water. New J Chem 40(2):1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ02210J
Mallakpour S, Rashidimoghadam S (2019) Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Vitamin C-multi walled carbon nanotubes composites and their applications for removal of methylene blue: advanced comparison between linear and nonlinear forms of adsorption isotherms and kinetics models. Polymer 160:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.035
El-Said GF, Draz SEO (2010) Physicochemical and geochemical characteristics of raw marine sediment used in fluoride removal. J Environ Sci Health A 45(12):1601–1615. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2010.506117
Ajisha MAT, Rajagopal K (2015) Fluoride removal study using pyrolyzed Delonix regia pod, an unconventional adsorbent. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:223–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0485-8
Rangabhashiyam S, Anu N, Giri Nandagopal MS, Selvaraju N (2014) Relevance of isotherm models in biosorption of pollutants by agricultural by products. J Environ Chem Eng 2(1):398–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.01.014
Gao X, Guo C, Hao J, Zhao Z, Long H, Li M (2020) Adsorption of heavy metal ions by sodium alginate based adsorbent—a review and new perspectives. Int J Biol Macromol 164:4423–4434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.046
Zhang Y-X, Jia Y (2016) Fluoride adsorption onto amorphous aluminum hydroxide: Roles of the surface acetate anions. J Colloid Interface Sci 483:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.08.054
Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156(1):2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013
Dehghani MH, Haghighat GhA, Yetilmezsoy K, McKay G, Heibati B, Tyagi I, Agarwal Sh, Gupta VK (2016) Adsorptive removal of fluoride from aqueous solution using single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Mol Liq 216:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.057
Khan AR, Al-Waheab IR, Al-Haddad A (1996) A generalized equation for adsorption isotherms for multi-component organic pollutants in dilute aqueous solution. Environ Technol 17(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331708616356
Redlich O, Peterson DL (1959) A useful adsorption isotherm. J Phys Chem 63(6):1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150576a611
Pellicer JA, Rodríguez-López MI, Fortea MI, Lucas-Abellán C, Mercader-Ros MT, López-Miranda S, Gómez-López VM, Semeraro P, Cosma P, Fini P, Franco E, Ferrándiz M, Pérez E, Ferrándiz M, Núñez-Delicado E, Gabaldón JA (2019) Adsorption properties of β- and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrins cross-linked with epichlorohydrin in aqueous solution. A sustainable recycling strategy in textile dyeing process. Polymers 11(2):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11020252
Geethamani CK, Ramesh ST, Gandhimathi R, Nidhees PV (2013) Fluoride sorption by treated fly ash: kinetic and isotherm studies. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15(3):381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-013-0128-7
Neolaka YA, Lawa Y, Naat JN, Riwu AA, Iqbal M, Darmokoesoemo H, Kusuma HS (2020) The adsorption of Cr (VI) from water samples using graphene oxide-magnetic (GO-Fe3O4) synthesized from natural cellulose-based graphite (kusambi wood or Schleichera oleosa): study of kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics. J Mater Res Technol 9(3):6544–6556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.040
Zhou Y, Liu G, Liu J, Xiao Y, Wang T, Xue Y (2021) Magnetic biochar prepared by electromagnetic induction pyrolysis of cellulose: biochar characterization, mechanism of magnetization and adsorption removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol 337:125429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125429
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Egypt for the financial support under grant number Env. D-13-2017.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This work was financially supported by the National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Egypt. Grant number (Env. D-13-2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AHS did the following: conceptualization, methodology, data processing, formal analysis, writing original draft, investigation and validation, supervision, writing review and editing. GFEl-S did the following: conceptualization, methodology, data processing, formal analysis, writing original draft, investigation and validation, supervision, writing review and editing. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
It is a pleasure for all the authors to publish the paper in this valuable journal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shobier, A.H., El-Said, G.F. Comparative study of the effective removal of hexavalent chromium via calcium alginate and calcium alginate/Ulva fasciata composite. SN Appl. Sci. 5, 198 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05397-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05397-6