Abstract
Farmers generally use more nitrogen fertilizer than others for crop production in Bangladesh because of its visible growth symptoms. Such practice is responsible for extra reactive N (Nr) load to the environment, but data are not available. Nitrous oxide (N2O) data were collected from a field trial following static closed-chamber technique, which were used for calibration and validation of DeNitrification and DeComposition model along with soil clay fraction, pH, bulk density and organic carbon contents. The model was well fitted and estimated about 364 g N2O–N ha−1 emission in Rajshahi region and only 15 g N2O–N ha−1 in Barisal region. District-wise N2O–N emissions varied from < 1–15.96 t season−1. In 2011–2016, N2O–N emissions from wheat fields were about 103–129 t yr−1 in Bangladesh. The model estimated nitric oxide (NO), ammonia (NH3) and nitrate (NO3) fluxes varied from 0.012 to 0.447, 7 to 12.5 and 0 to 4.7 kg N ha−1, respectively, under ambient temperature condition. In about 79% yield variabilities were explainable by N2O emission. In dominant wheat growing areas, if sowing is started from 15 to 30 November, N2O emission could be reduced by 8–40% with 5–13% reduction in yields compared to 10 November sowing. In similar areas and same sowing date with 1.5 °C temperature rise, N2O emission may increase by 8–45% and wheat yield might reduce by about 4–8%. Time of seeding and other cultural management in wheat cultivation would be the main avenue for reducing Nr loads to the environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Nitrous oxide is an important greenhouse gas (GHG) with a global warming potential of 265-fold greater than carbon dioxide (CO2) within 100-year period [1]. It contributes about 6% to the global warming [2] because of anthropogenic interventions for crop production. Agricultural soils supply about 60% of the anthropogenic N2O, which is mostly because of increased chemical fertilizer use [3]. With increasing food demands, N2O emissions from agricultural soils are likely to be increased in future [4, 5] because of greater amounts of nitrogen (N) uses. Since factor productivities of N have decreased in many countries, farmers are adding more to maximize production resulting in greater N2O emission from soils under different cropping systems [4, 6].
Cropping intensity has been augmented in many parts of the world to produce more food for the growing populations resulting in tremendous pressures on soil health and its fertility. In Bangladesh, soil health and its fertility status are decreasing [7, 8] because of intense utilization of soil and water resources, while on the other hand, land area is decreasing because of industrialization and urbanization but we have to produce from less area that must come from marginal and degraded soils. Increased salinity and soil mineralization are other type of challenges for producing more foods under changing climate, especially for major cereal production in Bangladesh including other tropical countries.
Rice, wheat and maize are the major cereals in Bangladesh in which rice and wheat crops are involved with many cropping patterns and wheat–fallow–rice pattern covers 1.061% of net cropped areas [9]. Although there are fertilizer recommendations from national agricultural research systems for growing different crops, farmers generally use more N rates than other fertilizers resulting in additional release of Nr to the environments [10, 11]. In general, the main sources of Nr are cultivation-induced biological N fixation, fossil fuel combustion (NOx) and use of ammonia producing fertilizers [12, 13]. Besides, animal waste management is also responsible for N2O emissions. As global surface temperature is increasing, it is most likely that emissions of Nr will be greater in future because of enhanced microbial activities, but not much information is available in Bangladesh that needs to be investigated in relation to wheat cultivation.
Since rice and wheat crops grow in diverse agro-ecological regions of a country, there would be variations in Nr emission patterns under multidimensional agronomic management options. Either direct or indirect measurement technique can be adopted for measuring Nr emission, but it would be very costly to establish sophisticated laboratory for direct measurements from different parts of the country. Under such situations, crop model like DeNitrification and DeComposition (DNDC) would be very cost-effective. We hypothesize that there are spatio-temporal variations in Nr loads to the environment because of wheat cultivation in Bangladesh and it will vary depending on temperature regimes. Therefore, we have investigated the distribution patterns and quantity of Nr emissions from wheat fields in Bangladesh under ambient and 1.5 °C increased temperature conditions.
2 Materials and methods
Data were collected from field experiment and secondary sources. Primary data collection on N2O emissions were done as stated below:
2.1 Experiment set up
The experiment was conducted at the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur (24°00’ N, 90°25’ E), Bangladesh. Soil belongs to Chhiata series of grey terrace soil, an Inceptisol. The treatments used were: native fertility (control) and recommended N dose from urea. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Wheat (BARI Gom-30) seeds were sown in continuous line at 120 kg ha−1 on 28 November 2018 with row to row spacing of 20 cm. Fertilizers were used at N150P40K120S20Zn1.5B1 kg ha−1 as urea, triple superphosphate, muriate of potash, gypsum, zinc sulphate (hepta) and boric acid, respectively. The unit plot size was 4 m × 2.5 m. Two-third N and all quantities of P, K, S, Zn and B fertilizers were applied during final land preparation. Different intercultural operations such as irrigation, weeding and pest control were done as and when required. The rest amount of N was applied at crown root initiation stage of wheat.
2.2 Chemical analyses of soil samples
Initial soil samples were collected from the surface layer (0–15 cm), composited and air-dried. Sieved soils (< 2 mm) were analysed for pH (1:2.5water extraction), soil organic carbon (SOC) [14, 15], total N [16], available Olsen P [17], 0.16 M Ca (H2PO4)2 extracted S [17] and DTPA extracted Zn [18].
2.3 Gas sampling and analysis
Static closed-chamber method [19] was used to estimate N2O emission rate. Opaque acrylic column chambers (20 cm diameter and 50 cm height) were placed between wheat row [20]. The bottom 20 cm of the chamber was inserted into soil surface to prevent plant root intrusion. Weeds were removed continuously from the chambers during crop growing period. Chambers were kept open under the study period except during gas sampling. The chamber was equipped with a circulating fan for gas mixing and a thermometer to monitor temperature during sampling time.
Air gas samples were collected using 50-mL gas-tight syringe at 0 and 30 min after chamber closing. Gas samplings were carried out at 8:00, 12:00 and 16:00 h in a day. Three gas samples from each replication of a treatment were drawn off from the chamber headspace equipped with 3-way stop cock. Collected gas samples were immediately transferred into 20-ml air-evacuated glass vials sealed with a butyl rubber septum and then analysed by gas chromatography (Shimadzu, GC-2014, Japan) with Porapak NQ column (Q 80–100 mesh). A 63Ni electron capture detector (ECD) was used for quantifying N2O concentration. The temperatures of the column, injector and detector were adjusted at 70, 80 and 320 °C. Argon, helium and H2 gases were used as the carrier and burning gases, respectively.
Nitrous oxide emission rates were calculated from the increase in its concentrations per unit surface area of the chamber for a specific time interval. A closed-chamber equation [21] was used to estimate seasonal fluxes as follows:
where F is the N2O flux (μg N2O m−2 h−1), ρ is the N2O gas density under a standardized state (mg cm−3), V is the volume of the chamber (m3), A is the surface area of the chamber (m2), Δc/Δt is the rate of increase in N2O gas concentration (mg m−3 h−1) and T (absolute temperature) is 273 + mean temperature (°C) of the chamber.
Seasonal N2O flux for the crop growing period was computed according to Singh et al. [22]:
where Ri is the rate of N2O flux (g m−2 d−1) in the ith sampling interval, Di is the number of days in the ith sampling interval and n the number of sampling.
2.4 Secondary data collection and use of the model
Soil data from the existing literature and from our analyses were used for running DeNitrification and DeComposition (DNDC) model. Data on wheat areas and grain yields were collected from Bangladesh Bureau of statistics [23, 24] along with our field experiment. Soil parameters for different districts were adopted from soil resource development institute and our own data. The DNDC model was calibrated and validated using soil clay fraction, pH, bulk density and organic carbon contents. Performance of the model was evaluated as prediction error (Pe), coefficient of determination (R2), normalized root mean square error (NRSME) and Willmott’s index of agreement (d) as shown in equations of 1–4. The model was well fitted in terms of observed and estimated N2O emissions (Fig. 1). Reactive nitrogen emission rates and its total emissions from different wheat growing regions of Bangladesh were estimated under ambient and 1.5 °C [25] rise in temperature conditions. Total N2O emission in different wheat growing areas was calculated as follows:
Relationships of grain yields with N2O emissions were established through regression model. The effect of sowing time and increased temperature on grain yield was investigated for Thakurgaon (one of the important wheat growing areas) district by utilizing DNDC model. Seeding time considered was 10 November to 20 December at 5-day interval. Standard agronomic management options were considered and weather data were collected from Bangladesh Meteorological Department.
2.5 Statistical tools used
Model calibration was done using following formulas:
where Pi and Oi is the predicted and observed data, \(\overline{P}\) is the mean of predicted data and \(\overline{O}\) is the mean of observed data.
Regression model to show relationship between grain yields and nitrous oxide emissions was established after stepwise evaluation. Student’s t-test was employed to compares means.
3 Results
3.1 Nitrous oxide emission rate and total emission
Under present temperature condition, N2O emission rates varied from 25 to > 350 g N ha−1 (Fig. 2a). In about 62.6% wheat growing areas, N2O emission rate was 150–350 g N ha−1 and in 12.4% areas, it was > 350 g N ha−1. Total N2O emissions varied from < 50 to > 12,000 kg N season−1 depending on area coverage and locations of the country (Fig. 2b). The highest total N2O emissions were found in about 3% of wheat growing areas, and in about 10.7% areas it was 4000–12,000 kg N season−1.
With rise in temperature by 1.5 °C in future, the emission rates of N2O are likely to vary from < 60 to > 400 g N ha−1 (Fig. 3a). It could be 200–400 g N ha−1 in about 62.5% wheat growing areas of the country. Like ambient temperature condition, total N2O emission in future would be < 50 to > 13,000 kg N season−1 (Fig. 3b), indicating that there might be some increase in total N2O emissions.
Based on administration boundaries, total N2O–N emissions were mostly observed in Khulna (14.54–15.49 t yr−1), Dhaka (19.96–24.86 t yr−1), Rangpur (27.01–35.77 t yr−1) and Rajshahi (41.53–53.56 t yr−1) divisions (Fig. 4). The least N2O–N emitting divisions were Sylhet, Barisal and Chittagong. During 2011–2016, total N2O–N emissions in Bangladesh were about 103–129 t yr−1.
3.2 Ammonia, nitrate and nitric oxide load to environment
DNDC-estimated loads of ammonia (NH3) to the environment were 7.21–12.45 kg N ha−1 under ambient temperature, which were 0–12.82 kg N ha−1 with 1.5 °C rise in temperature (Table 1). Similarly, nitrate (NO3) loads were 0–4.67 kg N ha−1 under ambient temperature that slightly reduced (0–3.81 kg N ha−1) with 1.5 °C rise in temperature. Nitric oxide (NO) emissions varied from 12 to 447 g N ha−1 under ambient temperature, which showed a little reduction (0–433 g N ha−1) under 1.5 °C rise in temperature.
3.3 Relationships of N2O emission with grain yield
Grain yield of wheat showed a good relationship with N2O emissions (R2 = 0.786). Major share of grain yield variabilities (about 79%) was explainable with N2O emission rates (Fig. 5).
3.4 Effects of sowing time and temperature rise
In general, grain yield of wheat was decreasing depending on delayed sowing dates compared to 10–15 November seeding under both ambient and 1.5 °C rise in temperature conditions (Fig. 6a). Similarly, growth durations were decreasing with delayed seeding (Fig. 6b). However, about 8–40% N2O emission can be reduced by sowing wheat seeds in between 15 and 30 November with 2–13% grain yield reductions compared to 10–15 November sowing (Fig. 7).
4 Discussion
The DNDC model estimated N2O emission with < 5% prediction error. Other parameters like R2 (0.82) was close to 1 indicating good agreement [26], NRMSE was 7.57 which is less than 10% indicating excellent simulation [27], and d value was close to unity (0.93). Depending on model calibration parameters, we believe that our findings are reproducible under similar conditions.
The calibrated and validated DNDC model estimated N2O emissions varied greatly both under ambient and 1.5 °C rise in temperature conditions in different locations of the country (Figs. 2 and 3) might be because of soil types, nature of soil fertility and its moisture contents. Besides, there were variations in soil pH (4.38–8.12) that have influenced N2O emission rates. Similar results were reported by Wang et al. [28]. They found that N2O emission factor increases significantly with decrease in soil pH and its emission in acidic soils were more sensitive to N management than in alkaline soils. Samad et al. [29] also reported that pH was strongly and inversely associated with N2O emissions. There were variations in total N2O emissions during 2011–2016 in all major wheat growing areas of Bangladesh but were mostly concentrated in Rajshahi and Rangpur divisions (Fig. 4), the major wheat growing areas of the country. Such variations were related to wheat area coverages over the years and N2O emission rates. Rice, wheat, maize, potato, mustard, pulses, onion, garlic, etc. are grown during winter season in Bangladesh, indicating that farmers have many choices to grow a particular crop that generally depends on seed availability, profitability and own consumption requirements. So, wheat areas varied in every year and thus total N2O emissions. Although we have used recommended fertilizer dose and standard crop management practices, farmers in many cases do not follow standard production practices and thus there would be less or higher Nr emissions from wheat fields that need to be confirmed through field observations. Since no data on Nr emission from wheat fields are available in Bangladesh, our findings can be utilized as benchmark data for Nr loads to the environment.
Agricultural practices, especially increased N fertilizer rates, greatly influence N2O emissions [3, 30]. So, it is most likely that there are spatial variations in N2O emission at farm levels because of variable fertilizer doses used by the farmers. Panek et al. [31] reported that both nitrification and denitrification also contribute to N2O emissions. Although uncertainty range for N2O emission could be 0.3–3.0 kg N2O per 100 kg N applied, generally 1.0 kg N2O emission is likely for every 100 kg N application [32]. But in major wheat growing areas (more than 60% areas), we have found 0.2–0.5 kg N2O emission per 100 kg added N, indicating that N2O emission is less than IPCC guideline for Bangladesh. Wallace et al. [33] found 75–270 g N2O-N ha−1 in whole growing season, which is similar with our findings. They also reported that 14–22% of applied N is lost as N2O emission. On the contrary, UNEP [34] reported that 80% of applied N is lost to the environment as NH3, nitrogen oxides and NO3. These variations might be because of uncertainty of N2O emission as associated with its negative fluxes of ± 0.5 to ± 378.6 µg m−2 h−1 during wheat growing season [35] along with production practices such as sowing time, fertilizer dose and irrigation water management. Moreover, indigenous N fertility varies among soils in different locations of a country and thus played an important role in varied N2O emission patterns.
The loads of NH3 in relation to wheat crop cultivation were the highest compared to NO3 and NO under ambient temperature, which were almost similar with 1.5 °C rise in temperature. Since NH3 volatilization is dependent on temperature and soil pH, its loss to the environment could be higher in future because of global surface temperature rise. As Nr emissions are likely to increase in future, environmental loads of all Nr except N2O could be responsible for smog, air pollution and freshwater eutrophication [36], while on the other hand, N2O play an important role in global warming indicating that its emission rates need to be reduced through efficient utilization of added N fertilizers. Although adequate data are available on N2O emissions, modest quantitative information is available on NO fluxes, especially with wheat crop production [37, 38] indicating that some more works are yet needed. The estimated NO emission from Asian cultivated soils was 0.8–1.2 Tg NO–N yr−1 in 1980s and 1990s [37]. Our findings on NO emissions could be utilized to update such data. As emissions of NO are sporadic depending on N fertilizer application time, drying and wetting of soils, continuous measurements at least on daily basis are needed, but it is costly and sometimes opportunities are not available in developing countries. So, our estimated technique can be utilized for assessing NO emissions from wheat fields.
In Asia, Nr transfers to the atmosphere as NH3 volatilization could be 19 Tg N yr−1 in coming three decades in which contribution of India would be 29% [39]. However, all emitted NH3 returned to the surface because of deposition [39, 40]. There are also variations in N2O emission in Asian countries. For example, India and China contribute about 74% of total N2O emissions from agriculture [41] and thus create transboundary environmental hazards [42]. These indicate that Nr loads to the environment should be minimized without sacrificing grain production in south Asia and other countries.
The relationship of wheat grain yields with N2O emissions was well explained by the function, y = 0.154Ln (x) + 1.415. This function suggests that seasonal N2O emission from wheat fields could be effectively predicted by crop yield. Similar finding was reported by Chen et al. [43]. They also found good fit between grain yield of wheat and N2O emission than biological yields.
Grain yield and growth duration of wheat reduce depending on sowing times [44], which was also reflected with 1.5 °C rise in temperature indicating that we have to find out a suitable sowing window for satisfactory wheat yield but N2O emissions can also be minimized. We have found that sowing time of wheat can be delayed up to a certain period without significant yield reduction (Fig. 7). For example, seeding can be done in 15 November instead of 10 November for reducing N2O emissions from wheat fields under Bangladesh conditions. Sowing of wheat seeds during 15 to 30 November in a rice–wheat system in Indian subcontinent could be achieved if short duration wet season rice varieties are grown at the right time. Short duration wet season rice varieties having high yield potentials are available. It requires massive demonstrations to convince the farmers for adoption of such rice varieties in wet season. Moreover, development of wheat varieties having high yielding potentials, short growth duration and tolerant to heat is the requirement of the time. As climate change impacts are visible in terms of temperature rise and increase in episodic events such as extreme temperature, dry spell and rainfall, it is the duty of the agricultural scientists to find out ways and means to cope up such natural calamities and to enhance food production for the world communities in future.
5 Conclusion
The findings are based on calibration and validation of DNDC model, which was done by using soil clay fraction, pH, bulk density and organic carbon contents under observed weather data. There were spatio-temporal variations in Nr loads to the environment in relation to wheat cultivation in Bangladesh because of variations in prevailing temperatures during crop growing period and soil texture and pH. The highest N2O emission rate (364 g N ha−1) was observed in the main wheat growing areas and the least (15 g N ha−1) in minor wheat growing areas. In 2011–2016, about 103–129 t N2O–N yr−1 were emitted because of wheat cultivation. Model estimated NO, NH3 and NO3 fluxes varied from 0.012 to 0.447, 7 to 12.5 and 0 to 4.7 kg N ha−1, respectively, under ambient temperature condition. As temperature is rising because of climate change impact, optimum temperature window for growing wheat crop will be narrowed down in future that warrant development of cool wheat varieties for sustaining food production around the globe. Besides, variations in crop management like changes in planting time would be another avenue to minimize yield reduction. For example, N2O emission could be reduced by 8–40% depending on 15–30 seeding without significant yield reduction compared to early or late sowing dates as we have found in the present investigation. Temperature rise by 1.5 °C might reduce 4–8% of wheat grain yields in future and could lead to 8–45% higher N2O emissions than present conditions. Time of sowing and other cultural management options, such as cultivation of heat tolerant varieties, improvement in water and fertilizer management would be the main avenue for reducing Nr loads to the environment in future.
References
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis Report in: Core Writing Team, R K Pachauri and LA Meyer (eds) Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of IPCC, Geneva
Saarenheimo J, Rissanen AJ, Arvola L, Nyknen H, Lehmann MF, Tiirola M (2015) Genetic and environmental controls on nitrous oxide accumulation in lakes. PLosS One 10:1–14. http:// doi.org/ 10.1371/ journal.ppone. 0121201 PMID, 25756328
Charles A, Rochette P, Whalen JK, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Bertrand N (2017) Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: A meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 236:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.021
Roche L, Forrestal PJ, Lanigan GJ, Richards KG, Shaw LJ, Wall DP (2016) Agriculture, ecosystems and environment impact of fertilizer nitrogen formulation and N stabilizers on nitrous oxide emissions in spring barley. Agric Ecosyst Environ 233:229–237
Reay DS, Davison EA, Smith KA, Smith P, Melillo JM, DentenerF CPJ (2012) Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Clim Chang Nat Pub Group, Nat. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1458
Parkin TB, Hatfield JL (2013) Enhanced efficiency fertilizers: effect on nitrous oxide emissions in Iowa. Agron J 105:1–9
Biswas JC, Kalra N, Maniruzzaman M, Haque MM, Naher UA, Ali MH, Kabir W, Rahnamayan S (2019) Soil fertility levels in Bangladesh for rice cultivation. Asian J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 4(4):1–11
Biswas JC, Kalra N, Maniruzzaman M, Naher UA, Haque MM (2019) Soil health assessment methods and relationship with wheat yield. Open J Soil Sci 9:189–205. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2019.99011
Nasim M, Shahidullah SM, Saha A, Muttaleb MA, Aditya TL, Ali MA, Kabir MS (2017) Distribution of crops and cropping patterns in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Rice J 21(2):1–55
Zhu X, Burger M, Doane TA, Horwath WR (2013) Ammonia oxidation pathways and nitrifier denitrification are significant sources of N2O and NO under low oxygen availability. PNAS 110:6328–6333
Yao Z, Zheng X, Dong H, Wang R, Mei B, Zhu J (2012) A 3-year record of N2O and CH4 emissions from a sandy loam paddy during rice seasons as affected by different nitrogen application rates. Agric Ecosyst Environ 152:1–9
EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2011) Chapter 2: sources, transfer and transformation of Nr in Environmental Systems. Reactive nitrogen in the United States: An analysis of inputs, flows, consequences and management options. A report of the EPA Science Advisory Board, Washington DC, EPA-SAB-11–013
Mueller ND, West PC, Gerber JS, MacDonald GK, Polasky S, Foley JA (2014) A tradeoff frontier for global nitrogen use and cereal production. Environ Res Lett 9:054002
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of digestation method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration. Soil Sci 37:29038
Allison LE (1965) Organic carbon Methods of soil analysis Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. The American society of agronomy, USA, pp 1367–1378
Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Total nitrogen. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison, pp 595–624
Fox RL, Olson RA, Rhoades HF (1964) Evaluating the sulfur status of soil by plant and soil tests. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 28:243–246
Olsen RV, Ellis R (1982) Iron. In: Page A et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. ASA, Madison
Haque MM, Kim SY, Ali MA, Kim PJ (2015) Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions during cropping and fallow seasons on total global warming potential in mono-rice paddy soils. Plant Soil 387:251–264
Haque MM, Biswas JC, Maniruzzaman M, Choudhury AK, Naher UA, Hossain MB, Akhter S, Ahmed F, Kalra N (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions from selected cropping patterns and adaptation strategies in Bangladesh. J Develop Res 7:16832–16838
Lou Y, Li Z, Zhang T, Liang Y (2004) CO2 emissions from subtropical arable soils of China. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1835–1842
Singh S, Singh J, Kashyap A (1999) Methane flux from irrigated rice fields in relation to crop growth and N-fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1219–1228
BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2016) Year Book of Agricultural Statistics-2015. Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh
BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2017) Year Book of Agricultural Statistics-2016. Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2018) IPCC SR1.5. Global Warming of 1.5°C. Summary for Policymakers. WMO, UNEP, 33pp
Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Liew MWV, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systemic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900
Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2012) Reference Manual of Aqua Crop Model. Chapter 2, Users Guide, FAO Land and Water Division, Rome Italy, p 164
Wang Y, GuoJ VRD, Mulder J, Wang J (2017) Soil pH as the chief modifier for regional nitrous oxide emissions: New evidence and implications for global estimates and mitigation. Global Chang Biol 24(2):e617–e624. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13966
Samad MS, Biswas A, Bakken LR, Clough TJ, de Klein CM, Richards KG, Lanigan GJ, Morales SE (2016) Phylogenetic and functional potential links pH and N2O emissions in pasture soils. Sci Reports 6:35990. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35990
Zhang Y, Lin F, Jin Y, Wang X, Liu S, Zou J (2016) Response of nitric and nitrous oxide fluxes to N fertilizer application in greenhouse vegetable cropping systems in southeast China. Sci Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8
Panek JA, Matson PA, Ortíz-Monasterio I, Brooks P (2000) Distinguishing nitrification and denitrification sources of N2O in a Mexican wheat system using 15N. Ecol Appl 10:506–514
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, Japan
Wallace A, Armstrong R, Harris R, Bellyaeva O, Grace P, Scheer C (2016) Nitrous oxide emissions from wheat grown in a medium rainfall environment in SE Australia are low compared to overall nitrogen losses. Proc. Intl. Nitrogen Initiative Conf, Solutions to N use efficiency for the world, 4–8 Dec 2016, Melbourne, Australia
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2007) Reactive nitrogen in the environment: Too much or too little of a good thing. UNEP DTIE Sustainable Consumption and Production Branch, 15 rue de Milan 75441, Paris, CEDEX 09, France, 56pp
Shakoor A, Xu Y, Wang Q, Chen N, He F, Zuo H, Yin H, Yan X, Ma Y, Yang S (2016) Effects of fertilizer application schemes and soil environmental factors on nitrous oxide emission fluxes in a rice-wheat cropping system, east China. PLoS One 13. e0202016 http:// doi. org/ 10.1371/ jounal. pone. 0202016
Liang X, Lam SK, Gu B, Galloway JN, Leach AM, Chen D (2018) Reactive nitrogen spatial intensity (NrSI): a new indicator for environmental sustainability. Global Environ Change 52:101–107
Zheng H, Fu C, Xu X, Yan X, Huang Y, HanS HuF, Chen G (2002) The Asian nitrogen cycle case study. Ambio 31:79–87
Gaihre YK, Bible WD, Singh U, Sanabria J (2019) Quantifying nitric oxide emissions under rice-wheat cropping systems. Environ Pollution 250:856–862
Singh B, Singh Y (2008) Reactive nitrogen in Indian agriculture: Inputs, use efficiency and leakages. Current Sci 94:1382–1393
van Breemen N, Burrough PA, Velthorst EJ, Van Dobben HF, deWit T, Ridder TB, Reijnders HFR (1982) Soil acidification from atmospheric ammonium sulphate in forest canopy through fall. Nature 299:548–550
WB (World Bank) (2020) Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ EN. ATM. NOXE. AG. ZS? locations=CN (Access on 10/11/2020)
Naseem M, Kulshrestha UC (2019) An overview of atmospheric reactive nitrogen research: South Asian perspective. Curr World Environ 14(1):10–26
Chen S, Huang Y, Zou J (2008) Relationship between nitrous oxide emission and winter wheat production. Biol Fertil Soils 44:985–989
Jahan MAHS, Sen R, Ishtiaque S, Choudhury AK, Akhter S, Ahmed F, Biswas JC, Manirruzaman M, Miah MM, Rahman MM, Kalra N (2018) Optimizing sowing window for wheat cultivation in Bangladesh using CERES-wheat crop simulation model. Agric Ecosys Environ 258:23–39
Acknowledgements
We greatly acknowledge partial financial support for this study through CRP-II project of KGF and technical support from INMS.
Funding
This study was not funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interests among the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Biswas, J.C., Hossain, M.B., Maniruzzaman, M. et al. Spatio-temporal distribution of reactive nitrogen species in relation to wheat cultivation in Bangladesh. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04120-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04120-z