Abstract
Biodiesel is a kind of biofuels that can be mixed with diesel and used as fuel. Selecting cheap and available feedstock is a prominent step in producing biodiesel economically. This paper presents the pros and cons of biodiesel and its production methods. The diesel demand is significantly high in Iran, especially in the transportation sector; On the other hand, the amount of produced waste is significant in chicken slaughterhouses. Considering this type of feedstock as a source to produce biodiesel not only can reduce the associated environmental problems, but also can supply some of the diesel needs. Hence, this paper also estimates biodiesel production potential from poultry slaughter waste and its cost. Based on the results, 736 kilotonnes of poultry slaughter waste is produced annually in Iran, which can be used as feedstock to produce 112 million liters of biodiesel by transesterification process with the production cost of around 14,277 rial/liter; i.e. 30% of diesel demand in the transportation sector can be supplied by B2 (98% diesel and 2% biodiesel) or diesel demand growth in this sector converted to B20 to increase economical and environmental sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The total global energy consumption has been rising due to the population growth, industrialization and increase of the living standards level. In 2017, the world total energy consumption was 609.5 quadrillion Btu and it is expected to reach 910.7 quadrillion Btu in 2050 with 49% growth rate [1]; More than 80% of the world energy demands are supplied by non-renewable fossil fuels (natural gas, crude oil and coal) [2]. This increasing trend, not only causes a serious crisis in energy supply, but also leads to numerous environmental issues such as climate change and global warming, caused by greenhouse gases emissions [3]. Renewable and non-fossil fuels could be a great alternative to solve this problem. In 2017, 14.6% of total world energy consumption was supplied by renewable energies [4]. The use of biofuels is growing as an option in developed countries. In 2017, 1.0% of the total global energy consumption was provided by biofuels which is equivalent to 6.8% of total renewable energies [4].
Iran is a developing country located in the Middle East, with a population of about 80 million and highly dependent on low-price fossil fuels [3, 5]. In 2017, the total primary energy consumption was 285.7 Mtoe (million tonnes of oil equivalent, 1 Mtoe = 41,868,000 GJ), more than 90% of which was supplied by crude oil and natural gas resources as indicated in the Fig. 1 [6]. In this year, 217 million liters/day of various types of petroleum products were consumed in Iran, 38% of which (equals to 30,277 million liters/year) was diesel. This presents 90% of total diesel production in Iran, about 2394 million liters of which has been exported this year (Fig. 1); However, compared to the previous year, diesel consumption has been reduced in all sectors while is increased in the transport sector (the second largest part in energy consumption and the largest diesel consumer in Iran) with a growth rate of 2.6% [7]. In 2017, 72% of suspended particulate matter (SPM), 34% of Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and 58% of Sulphur oxides (SOx) emissions, were released due to diesel consumption in the energy sector of Iran [7]. In other words, 8.2, 16.9 and 10.6 tonnes of SPM, NOx and SOx are produced per million liters of diesel consumption, respectively. These contaminants are the basic factors to corrosion, acid rain, and damages to trees and plants. In addition, diesel combustion and its greenhouse gases emissions cause reduction in visibility and ground-level ozone. Furthermore, organic compounds coming out of diesel engines exhaust contain carcinogens like nitro- polyaromatic hydrocarbons [8]. Therefore, the consumption of this petroleum product is the main cause of the most dangerous pollutants emissions in Iran which should be replaced by non-carbon biofuels such as biodiesel. Studying biodiesel production methods, as a carbon–neutral fuel can be certainly an important stride in substituting this clean energy with diesel. The potential assessment can support planning for the sustainable development of the bioenergy system.
The first purpose of this paper is to evaluate the various feedstocks as well as explain a brief overview of the technologies currently used for biodiesel production. The second purpose is to assess the potential of biodiesel production and consumption from chicken fat as feedstock and its cost in Iran, which research methodology is described in Sect. 3. According to the results and discussion, Sect. 4 concluded weather biodiesel is an acceptable and sustainable alternative for diesel in Iran or not?
2 Biodiesel: feedstocks and production methods
The mono-alkyl ester of long chain fatty acid is called biodiesel. It is a renewable alternative for the petroleum-derived diesel which has non-renewable nature [9, 10]. The impressive features of biodiesel made it acceptable in the energy market. However, it is worth noting that these biofuels have some disadvantages too. The pros and cons of biodiesel is tabulated in Table 1 [8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
Figure 2 shows the world’s largest producing countries in 2017. In this year, U.S. was the largest biodiesel producer in the world, generating 6 billion liters; To produce this amount of biodiesel, in U.S. during 2017, various feedstocks were used, including soybean oil (52%), recycled feeds (13%), corn oil (13%), canola oil (12%) and animal fats (10%) [15].
Biodiesel production in different countries, 2017 [4]
One of the major challenges in biodiesel production is the supply of raw materials, because more than 70% of the total cost of biodiesel production depends on it. Another challenge is the availability of feedstock which depends on various factors, including the geographical conditions of the region and the nature of the oil resources. In general, biodiesel is divided into five types based on feedstock that are introduced and discussed in Table 2 [8,9,10, 16,17,18,19,20]. Currently, more than 95% of biodiesel production in the world is based on 1st generation feedstocks that are commonly used in rich countries in terms of agricultural land and water resources. However, producing this type of biodiesel results in increasing land use change (LUC) and reducing land allocation for cultivation of food crops, leading to food shortages and price increase [21,22,23]. The 2nd generation of biodiesel production does not compete with food production plans but affects LUC criterion. In addition, the use of chemical fertilizers, irrigation and harvesting is inevitable in order to achieve the maximum yield of 2nd generation feedstocks. The approach of using waste sources (waste oil produced from the consumption of edible oil and animal waste) for biodiesel production not only avoids the extra cost and environmental problems but also eliminates competition for food, water and land. In addition, it ensures the supply of feedstocks for biodiesel production thanks to their variety and plenitude [24]. Extensive research directed on biodiesel production from 4th and 5th generation feedstocks that showed production cost is high compared to petroleum-derived diesel. Therefore, only 3rd generation biodiesel production is possible in viewpoint of cost and feedstock sustainability.
However, the direct use of pure oil from these types of feedstocks are not satisfactory and practical in diesel engines as it results in polymerization during storage and combustion and, subsequently, gum formation, carbon deposit and incomplete combustion, due to its high viscosity, acid composition and free fatty acid content. To resolve this problem, either pure oil needs to be diluted or its hydrocarbon chains have to be broken down into simpler components. It can be performed in several methods: physical methods, including direct use and blending (dilution) and microemulsion; and chemical methods, including pyrolysis (thermal cracking) and transesterification (alcoholysis). Today, transesterification is the most common method used in industry [25,26,27,28]. The comparison of these four main techniques is shown in Table 3 [12, 17, 19, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Feedstock
Chicken slaughterhouse wastewater is often discharged directly (untreated) to municipal wastewater or in most cases to surface water sources and their solid waste is also usually burned or buried. These disposal methods will result in environmental pollution as outflows in the slaughterhouse industry have a lot of BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) and COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand). In addition, the presence of pathogenic microorganisms in this waste type results in its decomposition into the environment and odor production and uncontrolled greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere; Consequently, it threatens the health of residents near disposal sites.
It is proved that chicken fat is a promising feedstock for biodiesel production [14, 41, 42]; Although slaughter waste requires pre-processing, compared to low fatty acid sources. It is considered as one of the cheapest industrial products to produce biodiesel [43,44,45]. Furthermore, the amount of non-edible oil produced from chicken fat extraction is by far more than the related counterpart for vegetable oil; Rendering it is more cost-effective compared to the other feedstock. Chicken oil contains high energy content (Its calorific value is 39.4 MJ/kg [46], which is just a bit lesser than that of petroleum fuel). In biodiesel production, The highest yield has been acquired from chicken fat (approximately 99.1% [42]) in comparison with other types of biodiesel feedstock and it can be used as a solvent to improve alcohol and diesel properties (since it is more lubricant than petroleum diesel) [11, 47,48,49]. In this paper, the potential and cost of biodiesel production from chicken fat is investigated in Iran.
3.2 Calculation of biodiesel production potential from chicken fat
In Iran, there is no accurate data on the amount of produced waste in poultry slaughterhouses. Only, there are some statistics on the number of chickens and live chicken weight. The 2017 statistics, separated by province, are presented in Table 4 [50].
The amount of slaughter waste production in each region varies based on feeding conditions, the number and type of slaughter as well as the percentage of waste from each animal; However, at least 28% of the weight of a live broiler chicken constitutes solid waste [51, 52] (Table 5). 35% of the waste is converted to high protein meal and 1.09 kg of Chicken fat oil (with density equal to 0.87 kg/l) can be extracted by rendering 7.5 kg waste [53]. Efficiency of converting chicken fat oil to biodiesel is 88.1% by transesterification process in the presence of homogeneous alkaline catalyst KOH. Finally, according to all these, the potential of biodiesel production is calculated for broiler slaughter waste [42, 54].
3.3 Estimation of the cost of biodiesel production from chicken fat
Chicken fat is a by-product in the rendering process of chicken slaughter waste for meal preparation (Fig. 3). So, it is free and only the cost of collection and transportation is considered.
Rendering process of poultry wastes [42], with permission from “Elsevier” Copyright© 2020
In this paper, the transesterification process with methanol as alcohol (due to its low cost, better physical and chemical properties and easy removal from glycerin) and KOH as catalyst (due to its low cost, high catalytic activity and mild operating conditions) were considered to estimate the cost of biodiesel production from chicken fat [41, 54, 55]; The most important parameters of this process are: reaction temperature, alcohol to oil ratio, type and amount of catalyst, mixing intensity and type of raw oil. The various stages of the process are shown in Fig. 4 [54]. Chicken fat is slowly melted and then filtered. 1000 ml of chicken fat oil is poured into a volumetric flask; volumetric flask is manually shaked and simultaneously heated. When the raw oil temperature reaches 60 °C, methanol (200 ml) and KOH solution (7.5 g) are added separately to the oil and the volumetric flask door is closed. Then, the solution is stirred at high speeds. The temperature should not exceed 60° C as methanol evaporates, if temperature passes 60 °C. This solution is stirred for an hour and transferred to a separating glass conical flask. Upon separation, biodiesel accumulated at the top and glycerin at the bottom. By opening the valve, the conical flask is cleared from the glycerin. At this time, the biodiesel is repeatedly washed with distilled water at 50 °C to clean the soap thoroughly. Finally, it is heated to temperature above 100 °C to evaporate the water. The result is ready-to-use chicken fat biodiesel. The data and assumptions needed to estimate the net cost of biodiesel production are presented in Table 6.
Various stages of chicken fat biodiesel production by transesterification process [54]
4 Results and discussion
In 2017, 2,539,761 tonne live chickens were bred per 1,104,918,000 chickens in Iran (2.30 kg per chicken). The amount of poultry slaughter waste was estimated at 7.632 × 105 tonne. Figure 5 shows the amount of waste generated based on its type. 2.671 × 105 tonne of high protein meals and 110.918 × 103 tonne of chicken fat oil can be obtained from this produced waste.
The potential of biodiesel production is given for each province in Table 7. Based on these results, 127.492 million liters of chicken fat oil can be produced with the potential of producing 112.321 million liters of biodiesel in Iran. The highest contributions are determined for the provinces of Mazandaran (12.49%), Golestan (9.08%), Razavi Khorasan (7.88%), Gilan (7.51%), Isfahan (6.49%), and Fars (6.58%). In other words, these Six provinces can produce approximately half of the total biodiesel production potential from slaughter wastes in Iran. This amount of biodiesel production potential is equal to 0.6% of consumed diesel in the transportation sector in 2017. By managing that, 561.602 million liters of B20 (80% diesel and 20% biodiesel) can be replaced with required diesel for transportation, which is approximately equivalent to increasing diesel consumption in this sector compared to 2016; Or supplying 30% of diesel consumption in the transportation sector as B2 (98% diesel and 2% biodiesel). This will be efficient for reducing the emission of pollutants, especially SPM and SOx. Although the potential of biodiesel production from edible oilseeds is estimated at 721 million liters [56], oilseeds are consumed only in the food sector in Iran. Also, using poultry slaughter waste to produce biodiesel can solve the problem of disposal.
The annual cost was estimated to produce biodiesel from 1000 L/day of chicken fat (as feedstock consumption); The results of cost evaluation are presented in Table 8. Despite the use of free feedstock (chicken fat), these results show that 90% of the biodiesel production cost is related to raw materials (collection and transportation and melting chicken fat, Methanol and KOH), 51% of which is related to chemicals. Income comes around 270 million rial/year from producing glycerin, which can cover 6% of biodiesel production cost. Therefore, the net cost of biodiesel production is 4590.889 million rial/year equals 14,277 rial/lite from chicken fat. According to the declaration of the National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company (NIORDC), the price of diesel is 3000 rials [57] per liter and the subsidy is paid more than 65,500 rials per liter of diesel. The use of biodiesel can reduce subsidies. Also, consuming biodiesel instead of diesel can reduce external cost.
5 Conclusion
The growing need for new sources of energy has become a major problem in recent years. This energy crisis has led to widespread use of exhaustible and non-renewable fossil fuel resources and severe environmental problems. Therefore, replacing fossil fuel sources with renewable biofuels is essential for achieving sustainable development, environmental protection and controlling greenhouse gas emissions. Biodiesel is known as an alternative fuel for diesel. In addition to reviewing feedstock types and biodiesel production methods, this paper evaluated the potential of biodiesel production from slaughter wastes of broiler chicken. According to the results, in 2017, 763 kilotonnes of poultry slaughter waste was produced in Iran; The biodiesel production potential was estimated at 112 million liters from this source that Mazandaran province has the highest potential for producing biodiesel with 14 million liters per year. The results of this study show that we can supply 30% of the diesel demand in the transportation sector by B2 by this amount of biodiesel production. The cost of biodiesel production was estimated to be less than 15,000 rial/liter from chicken fat by transesterification process with methanol and KOH; This cost will even become minimal if socio-economic benefits like reducing pollution and employment generation are considered. In the following, it is suggested to evaluate the potential of biodiesel production from various types of animal fat waste in Iran and to identify the provinces with the highest potential. This knowledge helps to better plan for sustainable development of the bioenergy system.
References
EIA (2020) International Energy Outlook 2019. In: U.S. Energy Inf. Adm. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/. Accessed 24 Aug 2020
Ritchie H, Roser M (2020) Fossil fuels. In: Our world data. https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels. Accessed 18 May 2020
Hosseini SS, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M et al (2015) Thermodynamic evaluation of a photobioreactor for hydrogen production from syngas via a locally isolated Rhodopseudomonas palustris PT. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:14246–14256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.092
REN21 (2019) Renewables 2019 Global Status Report (GSR), Paris, France
Worldometer (2020) Iran population in 2020. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/iran-population/. Accessed 18 May 2020
SCI (2020) Iran statistical yearbook 2017–2018: Oil and Gas. Statistical Centre of Iran
MoE (2020) National Energy Balance of Iran in 2017
Khan HM, Ali CH, Iqbal T et al (2019) Current scenario and potential of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in Pakistan: an overview. Chin J Chem Eng 27:2238–2250
Da Silva KRN, Corazza MZ, Raposo JL (2018) Renewable energy sources: a sustainable strategy for biodiesel productions. In: Trindade M (ed) Increased biodiesel efficiency: alternatives for production, stabilization, characterization and use of coproduct. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–31
Bonet Ragel K, Benaiges i Massa MD, Valero Barranco F, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament d’Enginyeria Química B i A (2018) Enzymatic synthesis of biodiesel from high free fatty acid feedstock using a recombinant Rhizopus oryzae lipase. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Subramaniam D, Murugesan A, Avinash A, Kumaravel A (2013) Bio-diesel production and its engine characteristics—an expatiate view. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 22:361–370
Hassan MH, Kalam MA (2013) An overview of biofuel as a renewable energy source: development and challenges. In: Procedia engineering, Elsevier Ltd, pp 39–53
Banka S, Parikh SP (2019) Nonedible oil biodiesels: the cutting-edge future of renewable energy in India. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 14:e2310. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.2310
Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Badruddin IA et al (2012) A comprehensive review on biodiesel as an alternative energy resource and its characteristics. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:2070–2093
EIA (2020) Monthly biodiesel production report. In: U.S. Energy Inf. Adm. https://www.eia.gov/biofuels/biodiesel/production/. Accessed 19 May 2020
Taufiq-Yap YH, Ahmad Farabi MS, Syazwani ON et al (2020) Sustainable production of bioenergy. In: Innovations in sustainable energy and cleaner environment, Springer, pp 541–561
Singh D, Sharma D, Soni SL et al (2020) A review on feedstocks, production processes, and yield for different generations of biodiesel. Fuel 262:116553
Sharma AK, Baredar P (2018) Biodiesel: Sources, production, emissions, and policies. In: Sharma A, Shukla A, Aye L (eds) Low carbon energy supply. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–174
Karmakar B, Halder G (2019) Progress and future of biodiesel synthesis: advancements in oil extraction and conversion technologies. Energy Convers Manag 182:307–339
Chakraborty R, Gupta AK, Chowdhury R (2014) Conversion of slaughterhouse and poultry farm animal fats and wastes to biodiesel: parametric sensitivity and fuel quality assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:120–134
Khanali M, Mousavi SA, Sharifi M et al (2018) Life cycle assessment of canola edible oil production in Iran: a case study in Isfahan province. J Clean Prod 196:714–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.217
Borugadda VB, Goud VV (2012) Biodiesel production from renewable feedstocks: status and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4763–4784
Najafi B, Faizollahzadeh Ardabili S (2018) Application of ANFIS, ANN, and logistic methods in estimating biogas production from spent mushroom compost (SMC). Resour Conserv Recycl 133:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.025
Hajjari M, Tabatabaei M, Aghbashlo M, Ghanavati H (2017) A review on the prospects of sustainable biodiesel production: a global scenario with an emphasis on waste-oil biodiesel utilization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:445–464
Marchetti JM, Miguel VU, Errazu AF (2007) Possible methods for biodiesel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11:1300–1311
Harold S (1997) Industrial vegetable oil: opportunities within the European biodiesel and lubricants markets. Part 2. Marketcharacteristics. Lipid Technol 9:67–70
Balat M, Balat H (2010) Progress in biodiesel processing. Appl Energy 87:1815–1835
Knothe G, Krahl J, Van Gerpen J (2010) The biodiesel handbook, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Lourinho G, Brito P (2015) Advanced biodiesel production technologies: novel developments. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14:287–316
Kirubakaran M, Arul Mozhi Selvan V (2018) A comprehensive review of low cost biodiesel production from waste chicken fat. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:390–401
Gebremariam SN, Marchetti JM (2017) Biodiesel production technologies: review. Energy 5:425–457. https://doi.org/10.3934/ENERGY.2017.3.425
Ambat I, Srivastava V, Sillanpää M (2018) Recent advancement in biodiesel production methodologies using various feedstock: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:356–369
Lin L, Cunshan Z, Vittayapadung S et al (2011) Opportunities and challenges for biodiesel fuel. Appl Energy 88:1020–1031
Zahan K, Kano M (2018) Biodiesel production from palm oil, its by-products, and mill effluent: a review. Energies 11:2132. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082132
Tabatabaei M, Aghbashlo M, Dehhaghi M et al (2019) Reactor technologies for biodiesel production and processing: a review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 74:239–303
Sharma YC, Singh B (2009) Development of biodiesel: current scenario. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1646–1651
Shahid EM, Jamal Y (2011) Production of biodiesel: a technical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:4732–4745
Saifuddin N, Samiuddin A, Kumaran P (2015) A review on processing technology for biodiesel production. Trends Appl Sci Res 10:1–37. https://doi.org/10.3923/tasr.2015.1.37
Rezania S, Oryani B, Park J et al (2019) Review on transesterification of non-edible sources for biodiesel production with a focus on economic aspects, fuel properties and by-product applications. Energy Convers Manag 201:112155
Quah RV, Tan YH, Mubarak NM et al (2019) An overview of biodiesel production using recyclable biomass and non-biomass derived magnetic catalysts. J Environ Chem Eng 7:103219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103219
Alptekin E, Canakci M (2011) Optimization of transesterification for methyl ester production from chicken fat. Fuel 90:2630–2638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.042
Adewale P, Dumont M-J, Ngadi M (2015) Recent trends of biodiesel production from animal fat wastes and associated production techniques. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:574–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.039
Ramírez-Verduzco LF, Rodríguez-Rodríguez JE, Jaramillo-Jacob ADR (2012) Predicting cetane number, kinematic viscosity, density and higher heating value of biodiesel from its fatty acid methyl ester composition. Fuel 91:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.06.070
Yanowitz J, McCormick RL (2009) Effect of biodiesel blends on North American heavy-duty diesel engine emissions. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 111:763–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200800245
Haas MJ, Scott KM, Alleman TL, McCormick Robert L (2001) Engine performance of biodiesel fuel prepared from soybean soapstock: a high quality renewable fuel produced from a waste feedstock. Energy Fuels 15:1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1021/EF010051X
Mohiddin MN, Saleh AA, Reddy ANR, Hamdan S (2018) A study on chicken fat as an alternative feedstock: biodiesel production, fuel characterisation, and diesel engine performance analysis. Int J Automot Mech Eng 15:5535–5546. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.15.3.2018.10.0425
Bhatti HN, Hanif MA, Qasim M, Ata-ur-Rehman (2008) Biodiesel production from waste tallow. Fuel 87:2961–2966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.016
Marulanda VF, Anitescu G, Tavlarides LL (2010) Investigations on supercritical transesterification of chicken fat for biodiesel production from low-cost lipid feedstocks. J Supercrit Fluids 54:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2010.04.001
Behçet R, Oktay H, Çakmak A, Aydin H (2015) Comparison of exhaust emissions of biodiesel-diesel fuel blends produced from animal fats. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 46:157–165
SCI (2020) Selected results of layer chicken farms census, the year 2017
Jayathilakan K, Sultana K, Radhakrishna K, Bawa AS (2012) Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a review. J Food Sci Technol 49:278–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0290-7
Sari ÖF, Özdemir S, Celebi A (2016) Utilization and management of poultry slaughterhouse wastes with new methods. In: EurAsia waste management symposium, İstanbul, Turkey
Abraham J, Kumar RS, Xavier F, Mathew D (2015) Biodiesel production from broiler chicken Waste. Int J Agric Biosyst Eng 9:1190–1193. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1110157
Srinivasa Rao K, Ramakrishna A (2015) Cost estimation analysis of biodiesel production from waste chicken fat. Int J Appl Eng Res 10:8863–8870
Aristizábal-Marulanda V, Cardona Alzate CA (2019) Methods for designing and assessing biorefineries: review. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 13:789–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1961
Safieddin Ardebili SM, Khademalrasoul A (2018) An analysis of liquid-biofuel production potential from agricultural residues and animal fat (case study: khuzestan Province). J Clean Prod 204:819–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.031
NIORDC (2020) Statistical yearbook: petroleum products consumption of energy producer in 2018. Tehran, I.R. Iran
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to study idea of project. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by ZFM, ZK and KFM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ZFM and edited by ZK. MK was responsible for leadership and advisement. KFM was responsible to the management and coordination for the research activity planning and execution. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Faraji Mahyari, Z., Khorasanizadeh, Z., Khanali, M. et al. Biodiesel production from slaughter wastes of broiler chicken: a potential survey in Iran. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04045-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04045-7