1 Introduction

Micro-organisms are ubiquitous in atmosphere and surroundings. Over the last decade, aspects related to air microbiology received ample attention of researchers specifically on microbial air quality (MAQ)- and exposure-related health issues [1,2,3]. Airborne micro-organisms (AM) are considered as a serious concern in pulmonology. Their involvement influences the onset and complication of diseases particularly in the respiratory system [4]. Impact of being exposed to AM has been discussed with regard to diverse indoor and outdoor settings such as healthcare facilities, office buildings, educational settings and deserts [5,6,7]. The importance of routine monitoring of MAQ has been emphasized elsewhere, and such research findings are now utilized in air quality management in developed countries. Since 2004, the South Korean ministry of environment took initiatives in maintaining the air quality of public health facilities in their country [3]. In 2009, World Health Organization (WHO) gave priority to studies relevant to indoor air pollutants including AM [8]. Many countries have set reference standard values for indoor and outdoor microbial counts; for example, in China, indoor air quality standard (GB/T18883-2002) is 2500 CFU/m3 [6]. Accordingly, all regions of the world need prevention of health issues related to AM. On this facet, facts and details with regard to indoor and outdoor AM in developing countries need to be investigated further to administer necessary control strategies.

Microbial properties differ as per the environment as they tend to adapt themselves to the conditions they face. Moreover, drastically different microbial communities and concentrations were described even within different locations of the same premises [5]. Also, there is evidence that the concentration and composition of AM vary with the level of air pollution [9]. Hence, it is essential to understand regionally how AM differ in face of air pollution and its impact on one’s health. As per the literature, most of the research on outdoor air focuses on chemical pollutants [10, 11]. Thus, more studies are in need to arrive into agreements regarding biological aspects of airborne particles. In contrast, indoor air quality is equally important as outdoors as the time we spent indoors is generally higher than outdoors: approximately 90% [12]. WHO identified indoor air quality as the eighth most important risk factor for global disease burden [13]. Thus, it is of timely requirement to study AM and their impact, especially for the protection of susceptible groups like children and immune-compromised individuals [3]. Because of relevance to children, studies centred on schools are budding today; however, information is still insufficient, especially with respect to comparable identification of AM and inhalation doses [2, 14, 15].

Children spend the majority of their time indoors, either at preschool, day-care centre or at home, while some hours are spent outdoors playing. They are more prone to acquire infections, especially those of airborne origin, than adults [16]. Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are the leading cause of child mortality in developing countries accounting for 1.3 million deaths annually [17]. Worldwide, tropics hold significant percentage of cases: India—14% [18], Nepal—28.4%, Thailand—18.2% and Vietnam—27.9% in 2017 [19]. The scenario is reasonably similar in Sri Lanka; in 2015, respiratory diseases (most common being acute upper and lower respiratory infections (ALRI, AURI), asthma, bronchiolitis, pneumonia and tonsillitis) were the third commonest cause of hospitalization at all ages [20]. Asthma shows a worldwide increase, 2013 prevalence being 235 million [21]. Reported percentages of wheeze, asthma or physician-diagnosed asthma among Sri Lankan early adolescents were 16.7%, 10.7% and 14.5% respectively. During 2000–2001, 10–15% of reported wheeze cases were severe, most leading to pneumonia and/or asthma [22]. Alarmingly, a considerable portion of the country’s total medical expenditure was required for respiratory diseases: 7.2%—2005 (13.4% allocated for non-communicable diseases was required for asthma management in 2013), and hence, they impart an additional economic burden for the country [23]. As such, the burden of childhood respiratory diseases persists notably in many countries including Sri Lanka. The potency of risk factors such as climate changes and air pollution is being researched elsewhere; however, sufficient pieces of evidence are still limited [24].

Herein, we conducted a study to investigate the impact of distribution of indoor and outdoor airborne micro-organisms on the respiratory disease prevalence of preschool children. Kandy, one of the most rapidly urbanizing districts in Sri Lanka, was selected as our study area. For comparison of the impact of air pollution level on microbial dynamics, study sites were selected as representatives of a highly traffic-congested urban area and a less congested rural area in the district. As Kandy bears features similar to developing cities in tropics, the study can be considered as a resemblance in the region.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area, study subjects, ethics and health assessment

A total of 146 preschool children residing in Kandy, a district in Central Province, Sri Lanka (the second-most important district in the country), were included in the study (Fig. 1). Spanning over an area of 1940 km2, the district bears a permanent population of around > 170,000 and a daily transient population around 100,000 [25]. Majority of the population is centred at the capital of the district Kandy, within a highly urbanized area of 25 km2, while the environment outside is essentially rural. The capital experiences a daily traffic flow of nearly 100,000 vehicles, while no significant traffic is reported from rural areas. Preschool children were selected such that one cohort (urban cohort, n = 69) represented a preschool in the capital (P1) and the other (rural cohort, n = 77) represented a preschool in rural area (P2) of the Kandy district.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of the selected urban preschool (P1) and rural preschool (P2) in a Sri Lankan map

Information on age, sex, previous and current health status was gathered using an interviewer-administered questionnaire presented to their parents. Children were examined by a panel of consultant respiratory physicians, and symptomology of any prevailing respiratory disease/s was recorded. Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of General Teaching Hospital, Kandy, Sri Lanka.

2.2 Study site selection and air sampling

Air sampling was conducted on nonrainy days in August–December 2017: during preschool working hours: 8.30 am–12.00 pm. Details on indoor and outdoor temperature and a total number of occupants were noted at both premises (see supplementary table S1). For air sampling, one passive and two active methods were adopted as summarized in Fig. 2. Three indoor and three outdoor sites were selected for the passive natural sedimentation method (NSM). Active sampling was conducted using calibrated air samplers single-stage viable particle sampler (viable Andersen cascade impactor, Tisch, USA—28.3 ALPM) and fine particulate air sampler (APM 550 system, Envirotech Pvt. Ltd., India—1 m3/h) as per the manufacturer’s guidelines. It was ensured that at all sites, all practices were done under similar conditions, and for each sampling event, triplicates were taken. Sampling was done at 1 m above the ground (average breathing zone of preschool children) for durations as listed in Fig. 2. Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (Alfa Aesar Co., Inc) was used for all microbiological purposes, and sterility checking was conducted for each lot of media prior to sampling.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Outline of air sample collection methodology

2.3 Enumeration of micro-organisms in air samples

Plate count method was adopted for total culturable count (TCC) after 48-h incubation of NSM plates at room temperature, RT (25 ± 3 °C) [26]. For the total microbial count (TMC), filter papers aseptically removed from air samplers were cut into pieces, suspended in sterile Milli-Q water (8 ml, Whatman No 5 and 4 ml, fine particulate air sampler filter papers provided by the manufacturer) and allowed to be shaken for 2 h at 95 rpm in a laboratory orbital shaker (ORBITEK, Scigenics Biotech., India). One millilitre of the above extract was used for fluorescence enumeration of total microbial cells (both live and dead) using a nucleic acid gel stain. In brief, 2.5 µl of 1x SYBR Green® I dye (Promega, USA) was mixed with 1 ml of the filter paper extract, incubated in dark for 15 min and transferred to a surface-sterilized, gridded Sedgewick rafter counting cell (Wildco 1801-G20, USA). The average cell count per unit field (1 µl) was obtained by manual counting using a fluorescence microscope (CLx41, Olympus), and the values were used to calculate the TMC by extrapolating to the entire volume (1 ml) [27]. Extract prepared using an autoclaved Whatman No. 5 filter paper was used as the negative control.

2.4 Molecular identification of bacteria in air samples

One hundred microlitres of the filter paper extract was spread plated on LB agar, and the plates were incubated at RT (25 ± 3 °C) along with NSM plates for 24–48 h. Each morphologically dissimilar bacterium was culturally isolated, and DNA was extracted using the modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [28].

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a real-time PCR instrument (RotorGeneQ, Qiagen, Germany) using universal bacterial 16S rDNA primers 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′) [29]. Reaction was carried out in a 25 μl mixture containing 375 ng bacterial DNA, 0.1 mM each dNTP (Promega, USA), 0.4 μM each forward and reverse primer, 1 × Taq buffer (Promega, USA), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega, USA), one unit Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA). The thermo-cycle program was set as: 94 °C—2 min: initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C—1 min, annealing at 50 °C—1 min and elongation at 70 °C—2 min, and final extension at 70 °C—20 min [30]. Amplified DNA was visualized using a gel documentation system (Syngene, UK) after electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose and ethidium bromide staining. Amplicons were purified using a gel extraction kit (Promega, USA) and were subjected to Sanger sequencing using a commercial facility (Macrogen Inc., Korea).

2.5 Data analysis

TMC values were used to calculate the inhalation dose rates of children during the hours spent at the preschool premises using the following equation:

$$D = \frac{\text{BR}}{{{\text{BW}}}} \times C\; \times {\text{OF}}\; \times N$$

in which D is the age-specific dose (cells/kg day); BR is the age-specific weighted average breathing rate (L/min); BW is the age-specific body weight (kg); C is the total microbial count (cells/m3); OF is the occupancy factor; and N is the time spent per day in the location of exposure (min/day) [2]. Reference values for BR and BW were retrieved from USEPA data [31]; accordingly, for calculations of indoor air inhalation dose rates, the “sedentary/passive” level (BR = 4.5E−03 m3/min) was selected, as children were mostly seated and engaged in learning activities. For calculations of outdoor air inhalation dose rate, “moderate intensity” level (2.1E−02  m3/min) was selected as children were used to play around in outdoors. OF was considered 1 as the preschools had scheduled timetables for all the days. N was considered 180 min for indoor calculations and 30 min for outdoor calculations.

Statistical analysis was conducted using Microsoft® Excel (office 2010) and SPSS® statistical software version 21 (IBM, USA). Anderson–Darling tests were conducted to check the normality of data, and Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s exact test were conducted for data analysis. For all tests, p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Profile of preschool children: demographics and distribution of respiratory diseases

In total, 146 preschool children aged 3–6 years were included in the study (Table 1(A)). All the children were residents within a few metres from their preschools.

Table 1 Characteristics of preschool children: (A) demographics and (B) respiratory system examination information

Respiratory rates of all the subjects were within the normal range as per PALS guidelines, 2018 (Table 1(B)), and none displayed bronchial breathing or cyanosis.

Figure 3 explains the distribution of respiratory diseases and symptoms among the subjects before and after the entrance to preschool. At the time of examination, a total of 57.97% (n = 40) urban and 31.17% (n = 24) rural preschoolers were suffering from at least one respiratory symptom. Statistically, the symptoms were more common among urban subjects (Chi-square value: 0.004). The increment of respiratory disease symptoms following entrance to preschool was significant in both groups (Fisher’s exact test p value: 0.000): 10.4% increment among rural preschoolers and 5.8% increment in urban preschoolers. Prior to entrance and following entrance to preschool, majority had multiple respiratory symptoms and cough was the most predominant among urban subjects.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of respiratory diseases/symptoms among rural preschool children and urban preschool children, before and after the entrance to preschool

3.2 Microbial concentrations in indoor and outdoor preschool atmosphere

Figure 4 illustrates the culturable microbial counts obtained at each site selected for NSM air sampling (see supplementary table S1). Irrespective of the site of sample collection (Fig. 4), rural preschool counts were high in indoor (575.1 ± 190.77 CFU/m2/min vs. 208.63 ± 130.01 CFU/m2/min) while urban preschool counts were high in outdoor atmosphere (430.79 ± 152.56 CFU/m2/min vs. 337.386 ± 98.07 CFU/m2/min). Accordingly, in indoor, the culturable counts were high at all sites of the rural preschool (indoor/outdoor ratio = 1.71) and in outdoor, the culturable counts were high at all sites of the urban preschool (urban/rural ratio = 1.28). Significantly, majority were gram-negative organisms.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Culturable counts obtained from natural sedimentation method (NSM) at each site selected in preschools. (Outdoor sites: Site 1—front side of the preschool, Site 2—play area, Site 3—near the litter disposal area, indoor sites: Site 4—front side inside the preschool, Site 5—teacher’s table, Site 6—near the washroom)

However, as illustrated in Fig. 5 and Table 2, in both indoor and outdoor environments, total microbial counts were high in urban premises: indoor urban/rural ratio = 1.90 (4.66 × 105 ± 1.28 × 105 cells/m3 vs. 2.45 × 105 ± 1.21 × 105 cells/m3) and outdoor urban/rural ratio = 1.56 (4.29 × 104 ± 8.92 × 103 cells/m3 vs. 2.74 × 104 ± 2.18 × 103 cells/m3). As per indoor/outdoor ratio, in both premises, indoor TMCs were higher than outdoor TMCs by nearly ten times.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Total microbial counts (TMC) and total culturable counts (TCC) in indoor and outdoor atmosphere of the selected rural and urban preschool premises and the gram nature of isolated bacteria (GN gram-negative, GP gram-positive)

Table 2 Total microbial counts (TMC) of urban and rural preschools and associated inhalation dose rates

3.3 Inhalation dose rate calculation

Compared to rural preschool, inhalation dose rates were high in both indoor and outdoor environments of urban preschool (2.00 × 104 and 1.05 × 104 cells/kg day) (Table 2).

3.4 Identification of airborne bacteria

Identified micro-organisms (see supplementary table S2 for NCBI accession numbers) are listed in Fig. 6, amongst which Pseudomonas was the most dominant Genus. Pseudomonas stutzeri was isolated from outdoor air of both preschools and also from the indoor air of the rural preschool. Morganella morganii, Pseudomonas fulva and P. chlororaphis were isolated from outdoor air of both preschools. Similarly, P. fluorescens was isolated from indoor air of the rural preschool and the outdoor air of the urban preschool.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Venn diagram depicting the organisms identified from the atmosphere surrounding the rural and urban preschool premises

4 Discussion

The study overviewed the microbial air quality in the atmosphere surrounding preschools located in Kandy, the central city in Sri Lanka. Consequently, we encountered high microbial counts in indoors (indoor/outdoor ratio: P1 10.86 and P2 8.94) amongst which opportunistic pathogens occupied a considerable proportion (Fig. 6). In previous studies also, indoor concentrations were greater than those of outdoors [15, 32]. The findings are of much importance since our subjects: preschool children, stay inside the premises within a considerable period of the day. As per WHO, indoors possess limited space for air circulation and in the absence of proper ventilation, micro-organisms released from various sources tend to remain inside increasing the inhalation doses of occupants as seen in our study (Table 2) [13]. We should not disregard our results even though the numbers we obtained for inhalation dose rates were lower than the previous studies. However, compared to the few studies that report inhalation dose rates, the numbers we obtained were low [2]. Regarding TMCs, high values in P1 could be due to insufficient number of windows for ventilation compared to P2 (see supplementary table S1). Furthermore, human occupancy has great influence on the surrounding microbial composition [12]. Activities, particularly talking, singing, sneezing and even scratching the skin, release numerous micro-organisms to the atmosphere. For instance, per event, sneezing releases 40,000 droplet particles approximately [5]. Moreover, such human activities can release infected aerosols if released from a diseased individual. Such aerosols can increase cross infections, which could have influenced the increase in occurrence of paediatric respiratory diseases upon entering preschool in both cohorts of our study (Table 1) [6]. Besides, human activities like walking and running disturb the settled dust particles making them re-circulate in the atmosphere [12]. Previous studies have identified that Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Acinetobacter species are associated with dust particles [33]. In addition, the presence of an attached washroom could be another reason. Common washrooms are ideal sources of bio-aerosols specifically dominated by human-associated micro-organisms [34]. Even though inside dumps and moist walls are also sources of air microbes, we did not come across the same in our study sites [12]. Conversely, exposure time also affects one’s respiratory health. Short-term exposure to high microbial concentrations is more effective, but long-term exposure to low concentrations should not also be underestimated [35]. This explains our observation of high disease prevalence among urban preschoolers: 57.97% (those who were exposed to high inhalation dose rates) plus a considerable disease prevalence (which is not too low) among the rural preschoolers. Also, even though the microbial concentrations are comparatively low, it cannot be guaranteed that outdoor is safer. For example, TCC value of the play area in P1 is above 500 CFU/m3, the permissible level recommended by American Industrial Hygiene Association [36]. The same was observed in P2, with respect to site 4 and site 5 in indoors. This could be possibly due to high human occupancy at the said sites. However, one should note that TCC values are not true representatives of the microbial composition of a place and the proportion is quite low when compared with the TMC values [37]. For good air quality management, one requirement is that the indoor TCCs should not surpass the outdoor TCCs by 350 CFU/m3 [15]. In our study, both preschools have met the requirement.

In addition to exposure factors, impact of airborne micro-organisms on one’s health is closely related to immunity of the individual. Children remain vulnerable to most of the infections owing to their developing immunity system [2]. Human lung mechanics develop significantly during 2–6 years of age. Any disorder that disturbs its development influences his/her future respiratory perspectives. Also, they inhale a higher dose of air per unit body weight, when compared to adults [2]. In view of that, children who were not previously exposed to high microbial concentrations would have been the most likely victims. Perhaps, this could be why we came across respiratory diseases among children who had minimal or no respiratory diseases prior to entrance to preschool. Also, we observed a trend towards developing multiple symptoms following admission to the preschool: 5.8% increase in urban area and 1.37% in rural area (Fig. 3), perhaps due to weak immunity one gains as a consequence of any prevailing respiratory disorders.

Among the micro-organisms identified, majority were opportunistic pathogens (Fig. 6). Although direct associations of prevailing respiratory diseases in the cohorts and the identified micro-organisms cannot be established, it could be assumed that the pathogens play a role either in causation or in complication of prevailing respiratory diseases. Wheezing is significantly correlated with bacteria [38]. Furthermore, as per [39], species belonging to Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Acinetobacter and Bacillus are directly associated with upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Pseudomonas sp. identified from both premises and both indoors and outdoors is a well-known opportunistic pathogen, causing mild-to-severe respiratory complications. We came across P. stutzeri, P. fluorescens and P. putida which are cited as associated with respiratory infections; however, such information on P. fulva and P. chlororaphis is reported less [40]. We also encountered Brevundimonas diminuta, Enterobacter cloacae, Bacillus pumilus and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus from urban atmosphere and B. cereus and Pseudoescherichia vulneris from rural atmosphere which bear potential to cause respiratory diseases [40]. In addition, Morganella morganii cited as a pathogen that complicates existing respiratory disorders was also found in both sites [41]. Apart from respiratory diseases, they are also capable of causing other infections on skin and digestive system [42]. In Norway, short-term exposure to microbial agents was found to be responsible for both eye and respiratory illnesses among farmers [43]. In addition to direct contact with live micro-organisms, spores or dead particles can also trigger allergies and asthma [44]. However, we encountered allergic rhinitis only among rural preschoolers (Fig. 3). The original sources of identified bacteria could be diverse. As discussed, human oral and skin flora could get released to the atmosphere: for example, Enterobacter sp. is an inhabitant of both oral cavity and skin [45]. Outdoors, it could be soil—Enterobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas sp.; water—Enterobacter sp., Pseudomonas; plants—Pseudomonas sp.; and/or animals—Pseudomonas, Micrococcus sp. [46], etc. Among the organisms isolated, we encountered Brevundimonas sp. only in the urban premises (Fig. 6). Similarly, in a study done in Singapore, Brevundimonas sp. was isolated from urban atmosphere which accounted for 56% of its total micro-biome [47]. The high indoor/outdoor ratio we came across, also predicts that indoor sources could also be responsible for the air quality outdoors. In Europe, it was found that majority of bacteria in indoor air were of gram-positive nature [37]. However, we came across a similar observation only in the urban site (73%, Fig. 4). The survival of AM generally depends on temperature, humidity, wind and other seasonal variations [37]. At low temperature, aerosols of gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas and Enterobacter sp. survive their best. Critical situation in getting exposed to outdoor AM is that we cannot control these factors.

Atmospheric microbial load differs with air pollution level, and our results suggested the same. As per a study conducted in an inland city in China, the maximum TMC is observed at moderate air pollution level, i.e. at first, the TMC value increases with depletion of air quality and then it slightly decreases: excellent (1.92 × 105 ± 0.88 × 105 cells/m3) < good (2.39 × 105 ± 1.47 × 105 cells/m3) < lightly polluted (5.38 × 105 ± 3.26 × 105 cells/m3) < heavily polluted (5.93 × 105 ± 3.45 × 105 cells/m3) < severely polluted (7.23 × 105 ± 3.49 × 105 cells/m3) < moderately polluted (7.38 × 105 ± 4.43 × 105 cells/m3) [9]. In our study, outdoor TMCs obtained for urban and rural premises were significantly different (4.29 × 104 ± 8.92 × 103 cells/m3 vs. 2.74 × 104 ± 2.18 × 103 cells/m3) and thus, TMC itself suggests being an ideal marker for air quality level in an environment. Bearing properties of a city in a developing tropical country, Kandy drives towards the list of polluted cities in the region. Recent studies revealed that Kandy city atmosphere has considerable percentages of heavy metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Cd, Zn and Pb), mainly traffic influenced [25]. Moreover, continuous constructions and incomplete fuel combustion contribute to the city air quality depletion. Atmospheric microbial load acts as an air quality indicator as it increases with air pollution up to a certain limit [9]. This explains our observation of high microbial counts in the urban atmosphere compared to the rural atmosphere: urban/rural ratio (outdoor) 1.56 and urban/rural (indoor) ratio 1.90 (Table 2). Counts we obtained were correlative to previous studies done in Kandy city; accordingly, total bacterial concentrations ranged from 2.40 × 104 to 1.15 × 106 cells/ml with the mean concentration of 5.87 × 105 cells/ml [25]. In a study conducted in India, the industrialized area showed higher culturable bacterial counts (781.6 × 10CFU/m3) compared to the residential area (318 × 103 CFU/m3) [48]. High pollution levels increase the ambient environmental temperature, ultraviolet exposure and reduce the concentration of dissolved oxygen per unit volume. Hence, micro-organisms are pressurized to adapt or die. Those which adapt tend to bear thick cell walls resistant to air pollutants, radiation and heat [37, 49]. Brevundimonas diminuta and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus we came across only in urban atmosphere are reported as capable of surviving in high radiation [50]. Pigmentation and gram-negative majority we came across [51], therefore, could be consequences of the above situation. Alarmingly, the majority of pathogens are gram-negative, and thus, air pollution aids in better survival of resistant and potentially pathogenic micro-organisms in air. This could be why we came across high urban/rural ratio of microbial counts (Table 2). The air quality also influences the initial acquisition of bacteria such as Pseudomonas sp [52]. On the whole, air microbial dynamics with respect to air pollution leads to increased chances of developing respiratory infections and complicating existing respiratory failures [17].

However, there could be other factors influencing the high numbers of respiratory malfunctions as observed in [53, 54]. For instance, a study done in China revealed that air pollutants bear the potential to cause rhinitis [53]. Impact of air pollution on health has been described elsewhere, and the effect seems a result of constitutive of various risk factors rather than one [53]. For example in our study, we observed that comparatively, the symptoms were more commonly seen among urban preschool children (Chi-square value: 0.004). This information reconfirmed the results of a study done on respiratory disease prevalence of Sri Lankan children aged 7–10 years in Colombo, the capital of Sri Lanka [55]. Similar studies were conducted in diverse settings; in Nigeria, children under five suffering with ARI were found to be linked with high exposure to indoor airborne micro-organisms [36]. In certain other studies, the microbial counts observed were drastically different which could be due to different techniques used and due to the absence of standardization [2]. This is the first study of its kind in the South Asian region to compare indoor and outdoor air microbiota as well as the rural and urban air microbiota simultaneously considering the health impact on preschool children. The information we generated in a selected small cohort would open ways for advanced studies on indoor and outdoor air quality, pollution control and offer new insights in prevention of respiratory illnesses among preschool children not only in Sri Lanka but also in similar countries.

5 Limitations

The study focused majorly on bacteria although fungi and viruses are also influential in causation of respiratory diseases. Moreover, the study findings could be presented more strongly if the number of study sites was more than two. Also, as there can be many other risk factors, thorough investigations are required for better conclusions. In the absence of relevant data for inhalation dose rate calculations, we used reference values from USEPA database, which would be more meaningful if the data were generated from the same study subjects. Also, TCC values do not reflect the microbial composition truly as it is only a small proportion of the whole picture. Furthermore, since impingement can physically damage the cell walls of bacteria resulting in loss of viability, bacteria identified by culturing would not be a true resemblance in certain situations [37].

6 Conclusions

The organisms identified were opportunistic pathogens, and higher microbial counts were observed in the urban atmosphere when compared to the rural atmosphere. Irrespective of the study sites, indoor microbial counts were high in both premises. Observed higher microbial counts and presence of opportunistic pathogens could have been a risk factor for the higher respiratory disease prevalence seen among urban preschool children, whose symptoms were seen with statistical significance. Furthermore, inhalation dose rates were high among urban preschoolers. Hence, increasing dynamics of air microbiota w.r.t. air pollution should not be underestimated and thorough investigations should be conducted to evaluate its potential of causing respiratory malfunctions.