Abstract
This study concerns the utility of the coagulation process in removing humic substances and its dependence on the properties of these substances and their concentrations. The coagulation process was performed on model solutions of natural humic acids. Polyaluminum chloride (PAX XL3) and aluminum sulfate were used for this study, which allowed for a comparison of the effectiveness of pre-hydrolyzed and hydrolyzing coagulants. The coagulant dosages were determined as gram aluminum per gram carbon, thanks to which it was possible to compare the process effectiveness for different initial organic carbon concentrations, whose values were in the range of 5.51–21.23 gC/m3. The obtained values of reductions in organic carbon concentrations point to a significant process effectiveness (37.2–59.4% and 20.0–41.5% for pre-hydrolyzed and hydrolyzing coagulants, respectively), which increased with increasing molecular mass of the humic substances present in water. These results are analogous to those found for coagulation of surface waters and point to a greater effectiveness of pre-hydrolyzed coagulant in removing humic substances (at the same coagulant dosage). The effectiveness in removing organic substances increased with coagulant dosage and the initial total organic carbon concentration. The coagulation process most effectively removed aromatic substances absorbing UV light. The content of substances absorbing UV light in raw and post-coagulation water was proportional to the dissolved organic carbon content.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Surface waters are one of the basic drinking water sources, and therefore their treatment is the subject of many studies all over the world. Among all the surface water contamination, the most attention is paid to organic substances [1, 2]. The main group of organic contamination in surface water are humic substances, whose structure is very diverse and has not yet been unambiguously determined [3, 4]. They make up about 90% of all organic substances in surface waters and in general are made up of large-molecule substances, such as humic acid, fulvic acids and humines [3, 5].
Humic substances, being organic substances, may pose a danger to human health. There are no toxic effects on the human body attributed to them; however, they may undergo chemical transformations during water treatment, and therefore, their removal is necessary. They are, in fact, precursors of organochlorides [6,7,8,9]. The coagulation process is commonly used for removing humic substances from water [10, 11], and increasing its effectiveness is obtained by the use of electrocoagulation [12,13,14] or other modifications connected with increasing coagulant effectiveness [15,16,17]. Satisfactory effects in removing humic substances have been found with the use of natural coagulants, such as powdered added sea bream, or powdered Moringa oleifera fruits [18, 19]. Studies have shown that aluminum coagulants are more effective in removing humic compounds than iron coagulants [20]. Additional removal of humic substances is ensured by chemical oxidation and advanced oxidative processes [21,22,23], which results from the mineralization of these substances or a transformation of their structure. Thanks to this, substances are obtained that have a lower potential to react with chlorine.
Unfortunately, depending on the humic substances present in water and the coagulants that are used, a different removal effectiveness is obtained. This means that the chemical properties of chemical compounds in the mixture have an effect on the coagulation process and its effectiveness. Therefore, it is justifiable to perform studies to determine the utility of the coagulation process in removing humic substances as a function of the chemical properties of these substances and their concentration.
2 Object and methods of study
A model solution of concentrated natural humic acids from a mountain river was used for this study. The concentration of organic carbon in the concentrated solution amounted to 1880 gC/m3. Through dilution of the basic solution with demineralized water, four solutions of differing organic carbon concentrations were obtained, with values of approximately 5 gC/m3, 10 gC/m3, 15 gC/m3 and 20 gC/m3. The actual organic carbon concentrations differed slightly from the intended ones, which is due to the natural source of these humic acids and the large-molecule nature of humic substances. The prepared solutions were characterized by a low alkalinity (0.11–0.39 mol/m3), a pH in the range of 6.36–7.46 and an acidity of 0.1 mol/m3.
For studies of the effectiveness of removing humic substances in the coagulation process, pre-hydrolyzed polyaluminum chloride and non-hydrolyzed (hydrolyzing) aluminum sulfate (ALS) were used, whose characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Coagulant dosages were defined in terms of grams aluminum per gram carbon, which allowed for a comparison of process effectiveness with different initial humic substance contents. Five dosages were used: 0.3 gAl/gC, 0.35 gAl/gC, 0.4 gAl/gC, 0.45 gAl/gC and 0.5 gAl/gC. The coagulation process was performed in laboratory conditions (breaker tests), with the use of a VELP Scientifica flocculator. The tests were performed in 1 dm3 of water. Rapid mixing was performed for 2 min with a speed of 200 rev/min, followed by 20 min. slow mixing at a speed of 15 rev/min. The samples underwent sedimentation for 2 h, after which 700 cm3 of water was decanted for analysis.
For all raw and post-coagulation water samples, pH, general alkalinity and acidity, color at wavelengths of 410 nm and 240 nm, UV254 and UV272 absorption, total organic carbon (TOC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) concentrations were determined. Based on the obtained results, the SUVa value was calculated. Raw and chosen post-coagulation water samples also underwent molecular size analysis via Selective Exclusion Chromatography (SEC). The water quality analysis was performed in accordance with norms currently in force in Poland. A list of norms and methods is presented in Table 2.
Chromatographic analysis was performed with the use of an UltiMate 3000 Dionex liquid chromatograph, equipped with a DAD detector. The results were obtained with detection at 254 nm. A Shodex OHpak SB-803 HQ polymer column with a molecule size of 13 μm and dimensions of 8 × 300 mm was used, along with a Shodex OHpak SB-G 6B, 10 μm, 6 × 50 mm pre-column. An analysis of concentrations of molecules of a given size was performed based on changes of the peak areas in chromatographs. Calibration was performed with the use of polystyrene sulfonate sodium salts (PSS, American Polymer Standards Corporation) of molecular masses of 891, 1600, 3420, 7420, 15,650 and 29,500 Da.
3 Results and discussion
Water undergoing the coagulation process contained only humic substances, whose organic carbon content was in the range of 5.51–21.23 gC/m3 (Table 3).
The majority of the organic substances in humic substances occurred in dissolved form, whose fraction in TOC was in the range of 96.7–99.5%. Humic present in solutions determined the concentrations of total and dissolved organic carbon, which was proportional to color measured at 410 nm and UV254 and UV272 absorbance (Fig. 1). Despite the fact that according to Baker [24] humic substances cause the greatest increase in absorbance at a wavelength of 240 nm, no correlation was found between the amount of these substances (measured as DOC) and the color intensity measured at this wavelength.
A large UV254 absorbance value testifies to the presence of chlorinated organic substance precursors [25, 26], which must be removed from water due to the hazard to health that they may present after disinfection with chlorine. On the other hand, a SUVa value of 2.02–2.28 m2/g testifies to the low susceptibility of organic substances to removal during the coagulation process [27]. The molecular size of humic substances in raw water was in the range of 0.01–1.2 kDa (Fig. 2). Among humic substances, the large-molecule fraction dominates [28,29,30]; however, in the studied water the molecular sizes were significantly smaller than found in other studies.
Additionally, it must be noticed that among dissolved organic substances, the biodegradable fraction (substances of a low molecular mass) [31] made up 14.9–31.3% of TOC. The larger participation of biodegradable dissolved organic carbon than that found in natural waters [32] would also indicate a limited potential for these substances to be removed via the coagulation process.
The results that have been obtained indicate a large effectiveness of the coagulation process in removing humic substances, which for TOC was in the range of 37.2–59.4% and 20.0–41.5% for pre-hydrolyzed and hydrolyzing coagulants, respectively.
The effectiveness in reducing total organic carbon content that was found is analogous to that found for coagulation of surface waters [33, 34] and indicates a greater effectiveness of pre-hydrolyzed coagulant in removing humic substances (at a given dosage). In general, the effectiveness in removing organic substances irrespective of the used coagulant increased with increasing coagulant dosage and the initial total organic carbon concentration (Fig. 3).
A consequence of removing total and especially dissolved organic carbon was a decrease in UV254 and UV272 absorbance and the SUVa value (Table 4).
For all analyzed indicators, a greater effectiveness of pre-hydrolyzed coagulant was found. This difference was greater with increasing initial organic substance concentrations in raw water and increasing coagulant dosage. Only for raw water with an initial concentration of 5 gC/m3-at a dosage of 0.3 gAl/gC, a greater effectiveness of the ALS coagulant was found. This may be connected to an insufficient pre-hydrolyzed coagulant dosage or may be due to an analysis error. Higher efficacy of pre-hydrolyzed coagulants was confirmed by other studies [25, 35]. It is results of low-sensitivity pre-hydrolyzed coagulants for water temperature changes.
For the pre-hydrolyzed coagulant, the effectiveness in reducing UV272 and UV254 absorbance was found, and color at 340 nm was proportional to the reduction in DOC concentration (Fig. 4). No such relationship was found for color at 410 nm, which corresponds to absorption by humic substances to a much smaller degree [24].
For the hydrolyzing coagulant, no such relationship was found in any of the studied absorbances. Despite this, the values of UV254, UV272 absorbances and color at 340 nm and 410 nm after the coagulation process were proportional to the dissolved organic carbon content. Irrespective of the coagulant type, even at dosages of 0.3 gAl/gC, the coagulation process ensured a reduction in organic substances that have an effect on water color and which absorb UV radiation. Regardless of coagulant dosage, no significant reduction of SUVa values was found, which were in the ranges of: 0.12–0.80 m2/g and 0.43–0.71 m2/g, respectively, for pre-hydrolyzed and hydrolyzing coagulants. No unambiguous effect of coagulant dosage or the initial organic substance concentration on the magnitude of changes of this indicator was found. This confirms the fact that organic substances of low molecular mass are not significantly removed during the coagulation process. During the coagulation process, substances of the highest molecular mass were most effectively removed (Table 4). Differences in the effectiveness of the coagulants in reducing organic substances of a given size depended above all on the organic substance concentration in raw water (Fig. 5a, b). Volk et al. [36] have similar conclusion, although they research the molecular size distribution during ultrafiltration process.
For water with a low humic substance content, the effectiveness of removing molecules of sizes 0.8–1.2 kDa and 0.5–0.7 kD was the same for both coagulants. However, at a TOC initial concentration of 20 mg/L, a greater effectiveness of removing large-molecule organic substances was found for the pre-hydrolyzed coagulant. Irrespective of the coagulant type and dosage, the coagulation process did not have an effect on molecules smaller than 0.1 kDa. This is confirmed by the insignificant reduction in BDOC (Table 4).
4 Conclusions
Among the humic substances dominated by the color-causing water and substances absorbing UV light. This confirms the established relationship between the values of these parameters and DOC.
The effectiveness in removing organic substances during the coagulation process increases with increased molecular mass of substances present in water and increase in TOC concentration in fresh water. The efficiency of humic substances removal during coagulation with pre-hydrolyzed coagulant was greater than the hydrolysis coagulant one. During the coagulation process, aromatic substances absorbing UV light are most effectively removed.
The absorbance at 340 nm more closely corresponds to removal of humic substances than absorbance at 410 nm. The DOC removal efficiency was proportional to UV254, UV272 and color 340 removal efficiency. The UV absorbing substance content in water before and after coagulation is proportional to the dissolved organic carbon concentration.
References
Chang EE, Chiang PC, Hsing HJ, Yeh SY (2007) Removal of model organic precursors by coagulation. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manag 11(1):69–76
Bolto B, Dixon D, Eldridge R, King S, Linge K (2002) Removal of natural organic matter by ion exchange. Water Res 36:5057–5065
Weber J, Chen Y, Jamroz E, Miano T (2018) Preface: humic substances in the environment. J Soils Sediments 18:2665–2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2052-x
Medyńska I, Ćwieląg-Piasecka I, Juraszek A, Jerzykiewicz M, Dębicka M, Bekier J, Jamroz E, Kawałko D (2018) Humic acid and biochar as specific sorbents of pesticides. J Soils Sediments 18(8):2692–2702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1976-5
Huculak-Mączka M, Hoffmann J, Hoffmann K (2018) Evaluation of the possibilities of using humic acids obtained from lignite in the production of commercial fertilizers. J Soils Sediments 18(8):2868–2880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1907-x
Sharp LE, Parson AS, Jefferson B (2006) Seasonal variations in natural organic matter and its impact on coagulation in water treatment. Sci Total Environ 363:183–194
Hua G, Reckhow DA (2007) Characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors based on hydrophobicity and molecular size. Environ Sci Technol 41:3309–3315
Bond T, Goslan EH, Efferson JB, Roddick F, Fan L, Parsons SA (2009) Chemical and biological oxidation of NOM surrogates and effect on HAA formation. Water Res 43:2615–2622
Liu S, Lim M, Fabris R, Chow C, Drikas M, Amal R (2010) Comparison of photocatalytic degradation of natural organic matter in two Australian surface waters using multiple analytical techniques. Org Geochem 41:124–129
Goné D, Seidel J, Batiot C, Bamory K, Ligban R, Biemi J (2009) Using fluorescence spectroscopy EEM to evaluate the efficiency of organic matter removal during coagulation–flocculation of a tropical surface water (Agbo reservoir). J Hazard Mater 172:693–699
Yildiz YS, Koparal AS, Keskinler B (2008) Effect of initial pH and supporting electrolyte on the treatment of water containing high concentration of humic substances by electrocoagulation. Chem Eng J 138(1–3):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.029
Kuokkanen V, Kuokkanen T, Rämö J, Lassi U (2013) Recent applications of electrocoagulation in treatment of water and wastewaters. A review. Green Sustain Chem 2:89–121. https://doi.org/10.4236/gsc.2013.32013
Chen G (2004) Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 38(1):11–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.006
Kuokkanen V, Kuokkanen T, Rämö J, Lassi U (2015) Electrocoagulation treatment of peat bog drainage water containing humic substances. Water Res 79:79–87
Chen CY, Wu CY, Chung YC (2014) The coagulation characteristics of humic acid by using acid-soluble chitosan, water-soluble chitosan, and chitosan coagulant mixtures. Environ Technol 36(9–12):1141–1146
Wei J, Gao B, Yue Q, Wang Y, Li W, Zhu X (2009) Comparison of coagulation behavior and floc structure characteristic of different polyferric-cationic polymer dual-coagulants in humic acid solution. Water Res 43:724–732
Zhao YX, Phuntsho S, Gao BY, Yang YZ, Kim JH, Shon HK (2015) Comparison of a novel polytitanium chloride coagulant with polyaluminium chloride: coagulation performance and floc characteristics. J Environ Manag 147:194–202
Harfouchi H, Hank D, Hellal A (2016) Response surface methodology for the elimination of humic substances from water by coagulation using powdered Saddled sea bream scale as coagulant-aid. Process Saf Environ 99:216–226
Hoa NT, Hue CT (2018) Enhanced water treatment by Moringa oleifera seeds extract as the bio-coagulant: role of the extraction method. J Water Supply Res Technol 67(7):634–647
Dentel SK, Gossett JM (1988) Mechanisms of coagulation with aluminum salts. J Am Water Works Assoc 80(4):187–198
Kanakaraju D, Glass BD, Oelgemöller M, (2013) Heterogeneous photocatalysis for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment. In: Green materials for energy, products and depollution, part of the ECSW 3: Environmental chemistry for a sustainable world book series, pp 69–133
Oturan MA, Aaron JJ (2014) Advanced oxidation processes in water/wastewater treatment: principles and applications. A Review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:2577–2641
Rizzo L, Della Sala A, Fiorentino A, Li Puma G (2014) Disinfection of urban wastewater by solar driven and UV lamp—TiO2 photocatalysis: effect on a multi drug resistant Escherichia coli strain. Water Res 53:145–152
Baker A (2001) Fluorescence excitation − emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environ Sci Technol 35(5):948–953
Wolska M, Mołczan M, Urbańska-Kozłowska H, Solipiwko-Pieścik A (2018) Optimizing coagulant choice for treatment technology of surface water for human consumption. EPE 4:131–141
Zhao H, Wang L, Hanigan D, Westerhoff P, Ni J (2016) Novel ion-exchange coagulants removal more low molecular weight organics than traditional coagulants. Environ Sci Technol 50(7):3897–3905
Mołczan M, Szlachta M, Karpińska A, Biłyk A (2006) Zastosowanie absorbancji właściwej w nadfiolecie (SUVA) w ocenie jakości wody. Ochr Sr 28(4):11–16
Naddeo V, Belgiorno V, Napoli RMA (2007) Behaviour of natural organic matter during ultrasonic irradiation. Desal 210(1e3):175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.042
Jokubauskaite I, Amaleviciute K, Lepane V, Slepetiene A, Slepetys J, Liaudanskiene I, Booth CA (2015) High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-size exclusion chromatography (SEC) for qualitative detection of humic substances and dissolved organic matter in mineral soils and peats in Lithuania. Int J Environ Anal Chem 95(6):508–519
Wagner M, Schmidt W, Imhof L, Grübel A, Jähn C, Georgi D, Petzoldt H (2016) Characterization and quantification of humic substances 2D-Fluorescence by usage of extended size exclusion chromatography. Water Res 93:98–109
Li WT, Cao MJ, Young T, Ruffino B, Dodd M, Li AM, Korshin G (2017) Application of UV absorbance and fluorescence indicators to assess the formation of biodegradable dissolved organic carbon and bromate during ozonation. Water Res 111:154–162
Charnock C, Kjønnø O (2000) Assimilable organic carbon and biodegradable dissolved organic carbon in Norwegian raw and drinking waters. Water Res 34(10):2629–2642
Świderska-Bróż M, Rak M (2004) Significance of aluminium coagulants alkalinity in intensification of water corrosivity. Arch Ochr Środ 30(2):39–44
Sillanpää M, Ncibi MC, Matilainen A, Vepsäläinen M (2018) Removal of natural organic matter in drinking water treatment by coagulation: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere 190:54–71
Dąbrowska L (2016) Removal of organic matter from surface water using coagulants with various basicity. JEE 17(3):66–72. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/63307
Volk C, Bell K, Ibrahim E, Verges D, Amy G, LeChevallier M (2000) Impact of enhanced and optimized coagulation on removal of organic matter and its biodegradable fraction in drinking water. Water Res 34(12):3247–3257
Funding
This work was supported by a Grant (No. 0401/0053/18) from the Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Rucka, K., Solipiwko-Pieścik, A. & Wolska, M. Effectiveness of humic substance removal during the coagulation process. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0541-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0541-1