Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Properties of a Novel Vibration Isolator with Negative Stiffness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The vibration isolator with quasi-zero stiffness can achieve extraordinary isolation performance in high bands for its negligible elastic force. The novel dual-chamber solid and liquid mixture (SALiM) isolator, designed for vibration reduction of heavy machines, can obtain a quasi-zero-stiffness property in certain frequency band. This article implemented a deep analysis on the mechanism of the novel isolator.

Methods

In this work, the dynamic model of the isolator was established and the expressions of stiffness and damping were derived. Both experimental and numerical methods were adopted to study the dynamic properties of the isolator. The test was performed by a fatigue testing machine, with which both the quasi-static and dynamic test results were obtained.

Simulation

The results show that the isolator’s equivalent stiffness is frequency- and displacement-dependent. When the system is still, the isolator’s stiffness is positive to keep the load capacity and stability. When the system is vibrating, the isolator is likely to capture a negative-stiffness property, which is helpful to get excellent isolation. In the quasi-zero-stiffness band, the isolator can obtain a satisfactory performance. Therefore, the isolator has the potential to be used as substitution for the traditional dynamic absorbers in some harsh working situations. The simulation results corresponded well with the test results.

Conclusion

This paper studied the mechanism of the negative stiffness by theoretical analysis and numerical simulation, and proved the practicability of the novel isolator experimentally. Finally, comparisons with the isolation performance of the traditional isolators were made to verify its advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kovacic I, Brennan MJ, Waters TP (2008) A study of a nonlinear vibration isolator with a quasi-zero stiffness characteristic. J Sound Vib 315(3):700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrella A, Brennan MJ, Kovacic I, Waters TP (2009) On the force transmissibility of a vibration isolator with quasi-zero-stiffness. J Sound Vib 322(4–5):707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrella A, Brennan MJ, Waters TP, Lopes V (2012) Force and displacement transmissibility of a nonlinear isolator with high-static-low-dynamic-stiffness. Int J Mech Sci 55(1):22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Le TD, Ahn KK (2011) A vibration isolation system in low frequency excitation region using negative stiffness structure for vehicle seat. J Sound Vib 330(26):6311–6335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang X, Liu X, Sun J, Zhang Z, Hua H (2014) Vibration isolation characteristics of a nonlinear isolator using Euler buckled beam as negative stiffness corrector: a theoretical and experimental study. J Sound Vib 333(4):1132–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu X, Huang X, Hua H (2013) On the characteristics of a quasi-zero stiffness isolator using Euler buckled beam as negative stiffness corrector. J Sound Vib 332(14):3359–3376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrella A, Brennan MJ, Waters TP, Shin K (2008) On the design of a high-static—low-dynamic stiffness isolator using linear mechanical springs and magnets. J Sound Vib 315(3):712–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou N, Liu K (2010) A tunable high-static—low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator. J Sound Vib 329(9):1254–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoque ME, Mizuno T, Ishino Y, Takasaki M (2011) A three-axis vibration isolation system using modified zero-power controller with parallel mechanism technique. Mechatronics 21(6):1055–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw AD, Neild SA, Wagg DJ, Weaver PM, Carrella A (2013) A nonlinear spring mechanism incorporating a bistable composite plate for vibration isolation. J Sound Vib 332(24):6265–6275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Le TD, Ahn KK (2013) Experimental investigation of a vibration isolation system using negative stiffness structure. Int J Mech Sci 70:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carrella A, Brennan MJ, Waters TP (2008) Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 222:1189–1192 (Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan R, Lu Z (2007) Fixed points on the nonlinear dynamic properties of hydraulic engine mounts and parameter identification method: experiment and theory. J Sound Vib 305(4–5):703–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shangguan W, Lu Z (2004) Experimental study and simulation of a hydraulic engine mount with fully coupled fluid–structure interaction finite element analysis model. Comput Struct 82(22):1751–1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marzbani H, Jazar RN, Fard M (2014) Hydraulic engine mounts: a survey. J Vib Control 20(10):1439–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li FS, Chen Q, Zhou JH (2016) Modeling and dynamic properties of dual-chamber solid and liquid mixture vibration isolator. J Sound Vib 374:61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao X, Chen Q, Teng HD (2012) Modelling and dynamic properties of a novel solid and liquid mixture vibration isolator. J Sound Vib 331(16):3695–3709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou JX, Zhang L (2005) Incremental harmonic balance method for predicting amplitudes of a multi-d.o.f. non-linear wheel shimmy system with combined Coulomb and quadratic damping. J Sound Vib 279(1–2):403–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomson WT, Dahleh MD (1997) Theory of vibration with applications. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  20. Merz S, Kinns R, Kessissoglou N (2009) Structural and acoustic responses of a submarine hull due to propeller forces. J Sound Vib 325(1–2):266–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang CC (1999) Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control. Eng Struct 21(5):454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hochrainer MJ, Ziegler F (2006) Control of tall building vibrations by sealed tuned liquid column dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 13(6):980–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education (no. KYLX_0235) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, F.S., Chen, Q. & Zhou, J.H. Dynamic Properties of a Novel Vibration Isolator with Negative Stiffness. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 6, 239–247 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0035-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0035-2

Keywords

Navigation