Skip to main content
Log in

Participation and Reification: Meanings and Applications

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the article “Participation and Reification: Two Basic Design Principles for Mathematics Professional Development Programs” (Gómez-Blancarte & Miranda, 2021), this commentary aims to discuss how Wenger’s concepts of participation and reification may be used in the design of a MPDP. The meanings of participation and reification and how their dialectical relation was applied and reflected in the MPDP design. Several related applications to participation and reification are discussed and three aspects are proposed for future studies.

Résumé

S’inspirant de l’article intitulé « Participation and Reification: Two Basic Design Principles for Mathematics Professional Development Programs (La participation et la réification: deux principes conceptuels fondamentaux applicables aux programmes de développement professionnels en mathématiques)» (Gómez-Blancarte et Miranda, 2021), ce commentaire a pour but d’examiner comment les concepts de participation et de réification de Wenger peuvent servir à l’élaboration d’un PDPM; les sens donnés aux termes participation et réification; et comment leur relation dialectique s’applique et se trouve reflétée dans la conception du PDPM. On y discute de plusieurs applications interreliées pertinentes à la participation et à la réification et on propose que trois aspects soient l’objet de recherches futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, J. (1996). Lave and Wenger’s social practice theory and the teaching and learning of mathematics. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.). Proceedings of the 20th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 2, pp. 3–10).

  • Bannister, N. A. (2018). Theorizing collaborative mathematics teacher learning in communities of practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohl, J. V., & Van Zoest, L. (2003). The value of Wenger’s concept of modes of participation and regimes of accountability in understanding teacher learning. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty & J. T. Zillox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, 339–346).

  • Gómez-Blancarte, A. L., & Miranda, I. (2014). Communities of practice: A theoretical framework to design for teachers’ statistical learning. In K. Makar (Ed.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9).

  • Gómez-Blancarte, A., & Miranda, I. (2021). Participation and Reification: Two Basic Design Principles for Mathematics Professional Development Programs. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(3), 625-638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 177-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Kimmins, D., Winters, J., & Rushton, G. (2020). Does a technology assisted lesson study approach enhance teacher learning while eliminating obstacles of traditional lesson study? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(4), 618-659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913-945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llinares, S. (2002). Participation and reification in learning to teach: The role of knowledge and beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 195–209).

  • Lotter, C., Yow, J. A., & Peters, T. T. (2014). Building a community of practice around inquiry instruction through a professional development program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos, J. M., Powell, A., & Stajn, P. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ professional development: Processes of learning in and from practice. In R. Even & D.L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (Vol. 11, pp. 167–183).

  • Qi, C. Chen, C., & Huang, R. (2021). Teacher learning through collaboration between teachers and researchers: A case study in China. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10241-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztajn, P., Wilson, P. H., Edgington, C., & Myers, M. (2014). Mathematics professional development as design for boundary encounters. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(2), 201-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge MA., USA: Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunxia Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, C., Liang, H. Participation and Reification: Meanings and Applications. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 22, 474–480 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00217-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00217-2

Keywords

Navigation