Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Practice-Based Pedagogy in Mathematics and Science Teaching Methods: Challenges and Adaptations in Context

  • Viewpoint/Points de Vue
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research indicates that learning about teaching methods is not the same as learning to enact teaching methods. In our mathematics and science teacher education programs, we employ a practice-based pedagogy approach requiring novice teachers to learn, practice, enact, and reflect on their teaching. This approach draws on work highlighting core instructional practices (Grossman et al., 2009a), the Cycle of Enactment and Investigation (Kazemi et al., 2009), and ambitious science teaching (Windschitl et al., 2012). This paper addresses how we implement these pedagogies in our context, the challenges we have encountered, and the adaptations we have made to optimize these practices.

RÉSUMÉ

La recherche indique que l’apprentissage des méthodes d’enseignement ne correspond pas exactement à l’apprentissage de l’application de ces méthodes. Dans notre programme de formation en enseignement des mathématiques, nous utilisons une pédagogie fondée sur la pratique qui demande aux futurs enseignants d’apprendre, d’exercer, de jouer certains rôles et de réfléchir sur leur enseignement. Cette approche est basée sur des travaux qui soulignent les pratiques d’enseignement fondamentales (Grossman et al., 2009), le cycle de promulgation et d’investigation (Kazemi et al., 2009), et un enseignement des sciences ambitieux (Windschitl et al., 2012). Cet article s’intéresse surtout aux façons d’appliquer ces méthodes pédagogiques à notre contexte, aux défis que nous avons rencontrés et aux efforts que nous avons faits pour adapter et optimiser ces pratiques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study & International Business Machines. (1989). New designs for elementary science and health: A Cooperative Project between Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) and International Business Machines (IBM). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, M. L., & Robinson, M. (2006). Prospective teachers' perspectives on microteaching lesson study. Education, 127(2), 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009a). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009b). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (Ed.). (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Hatfield: The Association for Science Education.

  • Kazemi, E, Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In Hunter, R., Bicknell, B., & Burgess, T. (Eds.). Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, (Vol. 1, pp. 12–30). Wellington, NZ.

  • Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cunard, A., & Turrou, A. C. (2016). Getting inside rehearsals: Insights from teacher educators to support work on complex practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers' and teacher educators’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In M. K. Stein & L. Lucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129–141). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A.C., Beasley, H., … Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsal to support novice teacher learning of Ambitious Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., Kelley-Petersen, M., Mikolasy, K., Thompson, J., Valencia, S. W., & Windschitl, M. (2014). Practice makes practice: Learning to teach in teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 500–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, E. (2013). Evidence of teacher educator feedback from coaching rehearsals into classroom enactments of ambitious math discussions. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics – Research Conference.

  • Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M. (2006). Sparking the debate over science education reform. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 71(8), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Kara Jackson and Gale Seiler for their work in helping to get the practice-based pedagogies started in our mathematics and science teacher education programs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Limin Jao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jao, L., Wiseman, D., Kobiela, M. et al. Practice-Based Pedagogy in Mathematics and Science Teaching Methods: Challenges and Adaptations in Context. Can J Sci Math Techn 18, 177–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0009-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0009-0

Keywords

Navigation