Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Hydrodynamic Analysis Towards Capabilities Improvement of Bio-inspired Underwater Vehicles Using Momentum Redistribution Method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient and versatile OpenFOAM (Open-source Field Operation And Manipulation)-based numerical solver for fully resolved simulations that can handle any rigid and deforming bodies moving in the fluid. The algorithm used for solving Fluid–Structure Interactions (FSI) involving the immersed structure with changeable shapes is based on the momentum redistribution method. The present approach excludes the need to solve elastic equations, obtain high-accuracy predictions of the flow field and provide a rigorous basis for implementing the Immersed Boundary Method (IBM). The OpenFOAM implementation of the algorithm is discussed along with the design methodology for developing bio-inspired underwater vehicles using the present solver. The computational results are validated with the experimental observations of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional anguilliform swimmer case studies. The study further extended to the three-dimensional hydrodynamics of a bioinspired, self-propelling manta bot. The motion of the body is specified a priori according to the reported experimental observations. The results quantify the vortex formation and shedding processes and enable the identification of the portions of the body responsible for the majority of thrust. The body accelerates from rest to an asymptotic mean forward velocity of 0.2 ms−1 in almost 5 s, consistent with experimental observations. It is observed that the developed computational model is capable of performing any motion simulation and manoeuvrability analysis, which are critical for the designers to develop novel unmanned underwater vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ziaeefard, S., Page, B. R., Pinar, A. J., & Mahmoudian, N. (2018). Effective turning motion control of internally actuated autonomous underwater vehicles. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 89(1), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu, H., Yeo, K. S., & Chew, C.-M. (2018). Effect of pectoral fin kinematics on manta ray propulsion. Modern Physics Letters B, 32(12n13), 1840025.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandyopadhyay, P. R. (2005). Trends in biorobotic autonomous undersea vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 30(1), 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fish, F. E. (2006). Limits of nature and advances of technology: What does biomimetics have to offer to aquatic robots? Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 3(1), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moored, K. W., Fish, F. E., Kemp, T. H., & Bart-Smith, H. (2011). Batoid fishes: Inspiration for the next generation of underwater robots. Marine Technology Society Journal, 45(4), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moslemi, A. A., & Krueger, P. S. (2010). Propulsive efficiency of a biomorphic pulsed-jet underwater vehicle. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 5(3), 036003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, A. J., & Haroutunian, M. (2011). Using bio-inspiration to improve capabilities of underwater vehicles. In: 17th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology (UUST), Portsmouth, USA, 2011, p. 012.

  8. Lock, R. J., Burgess, S. C., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2013). Multi-modal locomotion: from animal to application. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 9(1), 011001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lauder, G. V., & Tangorra, J. L. (2015). Fish locomotion: Biology and robotics of body and fin-based movements. Robot fish (pp. 25–49). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa, D., Palmieri, G., Palpacelli, M. C., Panebianco, L., & Scaradozzi, D. (2018). Design of a bio-inspired autonomous underwater robot. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 91(2), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui, R., Chen, L., Yang, C., & Chen, M. (2017). Extended state observer-based integral sliding mode control for an underwater robot with unknown disturbances and uncertain nonlinearities. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(8), 6785–6795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lauder, G. V., Madden, P. G., Mittal, R., Dong, H., & Bozkurttas, M. (2006). Locomotion with flexible propulsors: I. Experimental analysis of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 1(4), S25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Struebig, K., Bayat, B., Eckert, P., Looijestijn, A., Lueth, T. C., & Ijspeert, A. J. (2020). Design and development of the efficient anguilliform swimming robot—MAR. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 15(3), 035001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mittal, R. (2004). Computational modeling in biohydrodynamics: Trends, challenges, and recent advances. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 29(3), 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, H., Tianjiang, Hu., Xie, H., Zhang, D., & Shen, L. (2010). Computational hydrodynamics and statistical modeling on biologically inspired undulating robotic fins: A two-dimensional study. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 7(1), 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, Y., & Wan, D. (2012). Numerical simulation of fish swimming with rigid pectoral fins. Journal of Hydrodynamics Series B, 24(2), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, R., Xiao, Q., Liu, Y., Hu, J., Li, L., Li, G., Liu, H., Hu, K., & Wen, L. (2018). A multi-body dynamics based numerical modelling tool for solving aquatic biomimetic problems. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 13(5), 6001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu, Q., & Shoele, K. (2008). Propulsion performance of a skeleton-strengthened fin. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211(13), 2087–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo, Y., Xiao, Q., Shi, G., Wen, L., Chen, D., & Pan, G. (2020). A fluid–structure interaction solver for the study on a passively deformed fish fin with non-uniformly distributed stiffness. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 92, 102778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian, R., Li, L., Wang, W., Chang, X., Ravi, S., & Xie, G. (2020). CFD based parameter tuning for motion control of robotic fish. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 15(2), 026008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shirgaonkar, A. A., MacIver, M. A., & Patankar, N. A. (2009). A new mathematical formulation and fast algorithm for fully resolved simulation of self-propulsion. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(7), 2366–2390.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kern, S., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2006). Simulations of optimized anguilliform swimming. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209(24), 4841–4857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng, H., Wang, Z., Todd, P. A., & Lee, H. P. (2019). Simulations of self-propelled anguilliform swimming using the immersed boundary method in OpenFOAM. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 438–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tytell, E. D., & Lauder, G. V. (2004). The hydrodynamics of eel swimming: I. Wake structure. Journal of Experimental Biology, 207(11), 1825–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. MüllerSmitStamhuisVideler, U. K. J. E. J. J. J. (2001). How the body contributes to the wake in undulatory fish swimming: Flow fields of a swimming eel (Anguilla anguilla). Journal of Experimental Biology, 204(16), 2751–2762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fish, F. E., Schreiber, C. M., Moored, K. W., Liu, G., Dong, H., & Bart-Smith, H. (2016). Hydrodynamic performance of aquatic flapping: Efficiency of underwater flight in the manta. Aerospace, 3(3), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding received from Naval Research Board, Marine System Panel to carry out this research work at Shiv Nadar University. Award Number: NRB/4003/PG/400, Recipient: Dr. Santanu Mitra, Ph.D., Assoc. Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Shiv Nadar University. The authors would like to thank Dr Ajit Kumar from the department of mathematics at Shiv Nadar University, India, and Maguram Prasaad, PhD scholar from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India for their useful discussions and valuable inputs.

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santanu Mitra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest statement

The authors R. Rayapureddi. and S Mitra declare that there is no conflict of interest pertaining to this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rayapureddi, R., Mitra, S. Novel Hydrodynamic Analysis Towards Capabilities Improvement of Bio-inspired Underwater Vehicles Using Momentum Redistribution Method. J Bionic Eng 19, 314–330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-00140-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-00140-6

Keywords

Navigation