Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation–optimization model for the structural design of cantilever retaining walls

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the trend of retaining wall construction in Egypt continues to grow, it becomes necessary to find ways to reduce their construction costs. There are various types of retaining walls such as cantilever, counterfort, buttressed, and tied back walls. All these types have two elements in common; namely, the stem and the base. The cost of a retaining wall depends primarily on its material, and secondarily on excavation and backfill works. In this study, a new model is implemented in MATLAB to create the optimal design of the cantilever retaining wall elements. The design model is coupled with the shuffled complex evolution algorithm, developed at the University of Arizona (SCE-UA). This developed framework is applied to an existing model previously used by other researchers to demonstrate its efficiency and obtain the best economical solution. The results proved that using the SCE-UA method provides superior outcomes compared to those of other algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI Committee 318, S. B. C. (1992). Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318–89)(Revised 1992) and Commentary-ACI 318R-89 (Revised 1992).

  • Awad, H., Kawamura, A., Jinno, K., & Kuno, Y. (2003). Evolutionary computing techniques for optimal pressure regulation in water distribution networks. Proceedings of Hydraulic Engineering, 47, 865–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, J. E. (1988). Foundation analysis and design. McGraw-Hill Book Company Limited, England, Inc. Fifth edition.

  • Brooks, H., & Nielsen, J. (2010). Basics of retaining wall design. HBA Publication, 11

  • Caquot, A., & Kerisel, J. (1953). Sur le terme de surface dans le calcul des fondations en milieu pulvérulent. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., Zurich (Switzerland), 1, 336–337.

  • Ceranic, B., Fryer, C., & Baines, R. (2001). An application of simulated annealing to the optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining structures. Computers & Structures, 79(17), 1569–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikute, G. C., & Sonar, I. P. (2019). Techno-economical analysis of gabion retaining wall against conventional retaining walls. Dimension, 300(450), 900.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Daniel Valadão Baroni and F. M. Varejão. (2016). A shuffled complex evolution algorithm for the multidimensional knapsack problem using core concept. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

  • Das, B. M., & Sivakugan, N. (2018). Principles of foundation engineering. Cengage learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Q., Gupta, V. K., & Sorooshian, S. (1993). Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 76(3), 501–521.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. (1992). Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, 28(4), 1015–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, J., Martí, J. V., & Yepes, V. (2020). The buttressed walls problem: An application of a hybrid clustering particle swarm optimization algorithm. Mathematics, 8(6), 862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazavi, M., & Bonab, S. B. (2011). Optimization of reinforced concrete retaining walls using ant colony method. Geotechnical Safety and Risk ISGSR, 2011, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günday, F. (2021). Study for system identification of the gravity wall model with automated machine learning. 6th International conference on advances in mechanical engineering Istanbul, 20–22.

  • Hachana, O., Meghni, B., Benamor, A., & Toumi, I. (2022). Efficient PMSG wind turbine with energy storage system control based shuffled complex evolution optimizer. ISA Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, A., & Meyerhof, G. (1980). Design charts for ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on sand overlying soft clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 17(2), 300–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. B. (1970). A revised and extended formula for bearing capacity.

  • Hazra, S., & Patra, N. R. (2008). Performance of counterfort walls with reinforced granular and fly ash backfills: Experimental investigation. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 26(3), 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalemci, E. N., İkizler, S. B., Dede, T., & Angın, Z. (2020). Design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall using Grey wolf optimization algorithm. Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Akbari, H., & Hosseini, S. M. (2021). Plasma generation optimization for optimal design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall structures. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 46, 1177–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00566-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Behnam, A. (2013). Charged system search algorithm for the optimum cost design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 38, 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Kalateh-Ahani, M., & Fahimi-Farzam, M. (2013). Constructability optimal design of reinforced concrete retaining walls using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 47(2), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Khayatazad, M. (2014). Optimal design of cantilever retaining walls using ray optimization method. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. Transactions of Civil Engineering, 38(C1+), 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Soleimani, N. (2015). CBO and DPSO for optimum design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Asian J Civil Eng, 16(6), 751–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Ngo, L., Madsen, H., & Rosbjerg, D. (2007). Simulation and optimisation modelling approach for operation of the Hoa Binh reservoir Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology, 336(3–4), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Chen, B., & Wang, C. (2020). Pyrolysis kinetics study of biomass waste using shuffled complex evolution algorithm. Fuel Processing Technology, 208, 106509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof, G. G. (1963). Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moayedi, H., & Mosavi, A. (2021). Hybridizing neural network with multi-verse, black hole, and shuffled complex evolution optimizer algorithms predicting the dissolved oxygen.

  • Moayyeri, N., Gharehbaghi, S., & Plevris, V. (2019). Cost-based optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining walls considering different methods of bearing capacity computation. Mathematics, 7(12), 1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunoo, C., & Mrawira, D. (2004). Shuffled complex evolution algorithms in infrastructure works programming. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18(3), 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, Y., & Xia, Y. (2012). Design of reinforced cantilever retaining walls using heuristic optimization algorithms. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 5, 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prandtl, L. (1921). Uber die Eindringungs-festigkeit (Harte) plastischer Baustoffe und die Festigkeit von Schneiden. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 1, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reissner, H. (1924). Zum erddruckproblem. Paper presented at the Proc. 1st Int. Congress for Applied Mechanics.

  • Sarıbaş, A., & Erbatur, F. (1996). Optimization and sensitivity of retaining structures. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(8), 649–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikholeslami, R., Khalili, B. G., & Zahrai, S. (2014). Optimum cost design of reinforced concrete retaining walls using hybrid firefly algorithm. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(6), 465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenouda, I. M., Fleifle, A. E., Awad, H. M., & Younan, N. A. (2018). Simulation-optimization model for the hydraulic and structural design of barrages-regulators in Egypt. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 144(12), 04018034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temür, R., Kayabekir, A. E., Bekdas, G., & Nigdeli, S. M. (2018). Grey wolf optimizer based design of reinforced concrete retaining walls considering shear key. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 3, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, M., Kuczera, G., & Bates, B. C. (1999). Probabilistic optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: A comparison of the shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms. Water Resources Research, 35(3), 767–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesić, A. S. (1973). Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 99(1), 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, X., & Zhou, M. (2004). Handbook of retaining structure design. Beijing: China Building Industry.

  • Wu, J., & Zhu, X. (2006). Using the shuffled complex evolution global optimization method to solve groundwater management models. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Web Conference.

  • Yepes, V., Alcala, J., Perea, C., & González-Vidosa, F. (2008). A parametric study of optimum earth-retaining walls by simulated annealing. Engineering Structures, 30(3), 821–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younan, N. A. (1986). Problem - based design textbooks in civil engineering: Irrigation Structures "Printed and bound in Egypt by: DELTA PRESS CENTER".

  • Yücel, M., Kayabekir, A. E., Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli, S. M., Kim, S., & Geem, Z. W. (2021). Adaptive-hybrid harmony search algorithm for multi-constrained optimum eco-design of reinforced concrete retaining walls. Sustainability, 13(4), 1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Irini M. made the MATLAB program using the algorithm mentioned in the manuscript. Momen drew the figures and review the MATLAB program. All authors wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irini M. Shenouda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that may appear to influence the work presented in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shenouda, I.M., Ali, M. Simulation–optimization model for the structural design of cantilever retaining walls. Asian J Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01028-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01028-6

Keywords

Navigation