Abstract
Our research aimed to identify interrelationships between characteristics of personality life-meaning sphere and individual specificity of the perception and interpretation of works of fine art. To assess the latter, the “Strategies for free descriptions of pictures” technique was used, developed by Leontyev and Belonogova (Belonogova in Dissertation. Ph.D. psychol. Sciences: 19.00.01, 2003). To assess parameters of the life-meaning sphere we used the Meaning of Life Orientations (ML) test, a Russian adaptation of the PIL test, (Leontyev in Test of life-meaning orientations (SZhO), 1992), and the Existence Scale (Längle et al., in European Psychotherapy, 4(1), 135–151, 2003; Mainina in Orgler to a Russian-speaking sample: thesis, 2007, Adaptation of the Existence Scale by A. Langle, K. Orgler to a Russian-speaking sample: thesis). Results of the study revealed statistically significant correlations between a number of indicators of the personality life-meaning sphere and two of the ten assessed strategies for free descriptions of pictures. The results obtained suggest two trends in the way how a work of art is perceived, related to the state of the life-meaning sphere of personality. A “problematic” state of the life-meaning sphere, correlated with the associative strategy for free descriptions, manifests in using the observed picture as a steppingstone, pushing off from which a person dwells on issues relevant to his/her life situation and world view, so that the painting is just a tool for pushing off to surf the unbounded. In the other case, which manifests in close correlations of the indicators of the Existence Scale to the Stylistic description strategy, the subject focuses on the picture, its place, and specific meaning in culture, following cultural norms and traditions, not associations generated by his subjective experience.
Subsequently, using the cluster analysis method, we identified groups of subjects similar in the general pattern of characteristics of the life-meaning sphere of personality and analyzed the specificity of interpretations of works of art by representatives of each of the six clusters, considering their descriptions of paintings through the lens of the general pattern of characteristics of the life-meaning sphere of personality, revealed by cluster analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The authors have all the data and upon request, it will be possible to access the data in an anonymized version.
References
Afhami, R., & Mohammadi-Zarghan, S. (2018). The Big Five, aesthetic judgment styles, and art interest. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(4), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1479
Atari, M., & Yaghoubirad, M. (2016). The Big Five personality dimensions and mental health: The mediating role of alexithymia. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.008
Axelsson, Ö. (2007). Individual differences in preferences for photographs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.61
Bahrami-Ehsan, H., Mohammadi-Zarghan, S., & Atari, M. (2015). Aesthetic judgment style: Conceptualization and scale development. International Journal of Arts, 5, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arts.20150502.01
Belonogova, E. V. (2003). Dissertation. Individual strategies for the perception of painting: Dissertation. Ph.D. psychol. Sciences: 19.00.01 / Belonogova E. V. Moscow, 2003 (in Russian).
Bundgaard, P. F. (2015). Feeling, meaning, and intentionality—A critique of the neuroaesthetics of beauty. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14, 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9351-5
Burt, C. (1933). The psychology of art. In How the mind works (chap. 15). London: Allen and Unwin.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2004). Art judgement: A measure related to both personality and intelligence? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 24, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.2190/U4LW-TH9X-80M3-NJ54
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Reimers, S., Hsu, A., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X366867
Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press.
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality, intelligence, and art. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00128-4
Kopatich, R. D., Steciuch, C. C., Feller, D. P., Millis, K., & Siegesmund, R. (2023). Development and validation of the Aesthetic Processing Preference Scale (APPS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(5), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000449
Längle, A., Orgler, C. H., & Kundi, M. (2003). The existence scale. A new approach to assess the ability to find personal meaning in life and to reach existential fulfilment. European Psychotherapy, 4(1), 135–151. https://www.existenzanalyse.org/wp-content/uploads/ESK-Article_-_EP_2003.pdf
Leontiev, A. N. (2005). The structure of consciousness: Sensory fabric, meaning, personal sense. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 43(5), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2005.11059262
Leontyev, D. A. (1992). Test of life-meaning orientations (SZhO) M.: Smysl, 1992 (in Russian).
Mainina, I. N. (2007). Adaptation of the existence scale by A. Langle, K. Orgler to a Russian-speaking sample: thesis. – M.: MSU. (in Russian).
Mironenko, I. A., Proskuriakova, E., Rafikova, V., et al. (2020). Walking in St. Petersburg—Vienna walks continued. Human Arenas, 3, 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-019-00076-8
Pourhosein, R., Mohammadi-Zarghan, S., Soufiabadi, M., & Atari, M. (2017). Ego development and aesthetic judgment styles in Iranian adults. Psychological Thought, 10, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.213
Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2014). Personality and aesthetic experiences. In P. P. L. Tinio & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 540–561). Cambridge University Press.
Swami, V., & Furnham A. (2020). The influence of personality on aesthetic preferences. The Oxford handbook of empirical aesthetics. Ed. Marcos Nadal and Oshin Vartanian. Oxford University Press, 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198824350.013.36
Valsiner, J. (2021). General human psychology: Foundations for a Science. Springer VS.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. (352–371).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The article was written using the materials of Master Dissertation by Maria Kovalenko supervised by Irina Mironenko, who also wrote the main part of this manuscript text.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kovalenko, M.S., Mironenko, I.A. Interrelationships of Characteristics of Perception and Interpretation of Paintings with Specific Traits of Personality Life-Meaning Sphere. Hu Arenas (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00395-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00395-x