Skip to main content
Log in

Re-claiming Convivial Participation as a Tool for Education: #Defund the Police and the 2020 Protests and Their Role(s) in Human Progress

  • Arena of Changing
  • Published:
Human Arenas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participation is most often portrayed as positive for human condition. Humans are social creatures, and they tend to be at their best when they work together to solve problems. But participation can be very different depending on social circumstances. This paper identifies two types of participation, based in part on the work of Ivan Illich, with very different motives and consequences: controlled participation focusing on don neophyte–expert relationships and legitimacy and convivial participation which relies on the human desire to form connections in exploring solutions. This paper suggests that Internet-based tools offer possibilities for re-claiming convivial participation by communicating and developing contexts for action outside of traditional institutional boundaries. The Black Lives Matter–inspired protests of 2020 might be a watershed moment in this regard. Using the Twitter platform to release #Defund the Police, it helped create contexts for protests as convivial participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Links are provided for all data.

Notes

  1. Illich, one of the first to see the possibilities of the information society, was also one of the first to see the dangers in the way it was being co-opted by large corporations like MicroSoft (1991). Ironically, or maybe not so ironically, Illich brought Orwell into the conversation on technology soon after Apple’s famed 1984 Superbowl commercial.

  2. The quote was originally from Wolfgang Sachs, but Fals Borda extends its meaning in important ways.

  3. Later changed to CHOP, the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest because many of the protestors believed the name was being misused to suggest the people involved wanted succession from Seattle or the USA.

  4. A recent series of articles (e.g., Wong, 2022) were published in major news outlets about how the Democrats must “fund” the police, almost 2 years after the George Floyd protests.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Michael Glassman was the sole author of this manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Glassman.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

NA.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glassman, M. Re-claiming Convivial Participation as a Tool for Education: #Defund the Police and the 2020 Protests and Their Role(s) in Human Progress. Hu Arenas (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00323-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00323-5

Keywords

Navigation