Abstract
The social sciences and the humanities—especially sociology and psychology—have adopted a “negativistic” approach since their inception, i.e., a modus operandi that tends to bring out only negative or pathological phenomena without ever highlighting positive and healthy ones. Moreover, they were characteristically oriented towards societal contrasts often ignoring the meaningful interactions between all the elements that constitute and give life to socio-cultural phenomena (personality, society, and culture). Researchers usually refer to conditions that affect the individual, but further analysis shows that in everyday life these conditions are in fact closely related to social and cultural aspects. The latter feature has often been neglected in studies on positive aspects of daily life such as gratitude, altruism, solidarity, cooperation, etc., since these are not considered a problematic (negative) aspect of society but rather a regular aspect of human and social events. From here, starting from Archer’s morphogenetic cycle and reaching out to Luccarelli’s The Asymmetry in Gratitude, we will examine through the perspective of the relational theory of society gratitude as a symbolic-cultural reality and therefore a key to read daily life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambrige: University Press Cambridge.
Donati, P. (2011a). Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences. London and New York: Routledge.
Donati, P. (2011b). Modernization and relational reflexivity. International Review of Sociology – Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 21(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.544178.
Donati, P. (2011c). Cultural change, family transitions and reflexivity in a morphogenetic society. Memorandum, 21, 39–55.
Donati, P., & Archer, M. (2015). The relational subject. Cambrige: University Press Cambridge.
Douglas, M. (1997). The depoliticisation of risk. In R. J. Ellis & M. Thompson (Eds.), Culture matters: Essays in honour of Aaron Wildavsky (pp. 121–132). Boulder: Westview Press.
Dubar, C. (2003). La socialisasion. Construction des identités socailes et professionalles. Paris: Armand Colin.
Dumez, H. (2016). Méthodologie recherche qualitative. Les questions clés de la démarche compréhensive. Paris: Vuibert.
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Griswold, W. (1994). Cultures and societies in a changing world. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Jeffrey, V. (2014). The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. In Search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Luccarelli, V. (2018). The asymmetry in gratitude. Hu Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0016-8.
Mangone, E. (2017). Risk according to the relational theory of society. Stan Rzeczy, 12, 261–276.
Maxim, P. S. (1999). Quantitative research methods in the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127.
Mutti, A. (2007). Distrust. In Italian Sociological Association (Ed.), Annual Review of Italian Sociology 2007 (47-63). Naples : Srciptaweb.It.
Nichols, L. T. (2012). North central sociological association presidential address. Renewing sociology: Integral science, solidarity, and loving kindness. Sociological Focus, 45(4), 261–273.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe: Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5.
Sorokin, P. A. (1966). Sociological theories of today. New York and London: Harper e Row.
Willke, H. (1987). Observation, diagnosis, guidance. A system of theoretical view of intervention. In K. Hurrelmann & F.-Z. Kaufmann (Eds.), Social interventions: Potential and constraints (pp. 21–35). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mangone, E. Gratitude and the Relational Theory of Society. Hu Arenas 2, 34–44 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0040-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0040-8