Abstract
If psychobiography is about historically significant individuals, then Shakespeare certainly fits the bill. His works belong to the most venerable, most studied and most read of world literature. But where is the biography? Can there be psychobiography in the absence of knowledge about meaningful events in the individual’s life? In this chapter Shakespeare is viewed from the vantage point of the social outlier. His psychobiography will then be concerned with the ways in which later generations dealt (and deal) with him. Much of the mystery surrounding his person (mystification, idealization, but also denial, rejection, suppression, pathologizing) is to be understood in the light of how he escapes entrenched categories of evaluation. Psychobiography’s concentration on individual personality thus misses out on understanding how human outliers function. The author therefore pleads for a social psychobiography and will illustrate the issue by two examples outside the Western context: the historical figure of Sunjata in the fourteenth century Mande epic, and Hatshepsut (fifteenth century BCE), one of the very few female pharaohs in ancient Egypt. In doing so, this chapter offers a criticism of the WEIRD concept, in terms of its (limited) applicability in socio-historic research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘the talent (natural endowment) … for producing that for which no definite rule can be given’ (Kant, 1952, p. 525).
- 2.
because ‘there may also be original nonsense, its products must at the same time be models, i.e., be exemplary, so not sprung from imitation, but must serve others as a guideline or rules of judgment’. (p. 256)
References
Austen, R. E. (Ed.). (1999). In search of Sunjata. The Mande Oral epic as history, literature and performance. Indiana University Press.
Blakemore, G. E. (1996). Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.
Bryson, B. (2007). Shakespeare. The world as a stage. Harper Press.
Champollion, J.-F. (1828–29). Lettres écrites d’Egypte et de Nubie. Vol. 10764. Project Gutenberg. 1828–1829. OCLC 979571496.
Cooney, K. (2014). The woman who would be king: Hatshepsut’s rise to power in ancient Egypt. Crown Publishing.
Elias, N. (1994). Mozart: Portrait of a genius. The sociology of a genius. Polity Press.
Greenblatt, S. (2004). Will in the world. How Shakespeare became shakespeare. W.W. Norton.
Henrich, J. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world. How the west became psychologic ally peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences., 33(2–3), 61–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Hildesheimer, W. (1977). Mozart. Suhrkamp.
Jansen, J. (2001). The Sunjata epic: The ultimate version. Research in African Literatures, 32(1), 14–46.
Jansen, J. (2017). Sunjata. Roem duurt langer dan een leven. Het verhaal over koning Sunjata zoals verteld door de familie Diabate uit Kela (Mali). (Sunjata. Fame outlasts life. The story of king Sunjata as narrated by the Diabate family from Kela (Mali).) Leiden: African Studies Centre.
Johnson, J. W. (2003). Son-Jara. The Mande epic. Indiana University Press.
Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der urteilskraft (Critique of Judgment). In Werke in sechs bänden. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1957.
Kant, I. (1952). The critique of judgment. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world (Vol. 42, pp. 459–613). Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Louwerse, M. (2021). Keeping those words in mind. In How language creates meaning. Prometheus Books.
Marsh, G. (2021). Living with Shakespeare. Saint Helen’s parish 1593–1598. Edinburgh University Press.
Nadig, P. (2014). Hatschepsut. von Zabern.
Niane, D. T. (2006). Soundiata: Sn epic of old Mali. Harlow Pearson.
Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences., 115(45), 11401–11405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115
Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the human mind. Morrow.
Roehrig, C. H., Dreyfus, R., & Keller, C. A. (Eds.). (2005). Hatshepsut. From queen to pharaoh. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Schulz, W. T., & Lawrence, S. (2017). Psychobiography: Theory and method. American Psychologist, 72(5), 434–445.
Shapiro, J. (2015). The year of Lear. In Shakespeare in 1606. Simon & Schuster.
Tyldesley, J. (1996). Hatschepsut. The female pharaoh. Viking.
Van Peer, W. (1997). Mutilated signs: Toward a literary palaeography. Poetics Today, 18(1), 33–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Peer, W. (2023). “Looking on Darkness Which the Blind Do See”: Psychobiography from a Social Perspective. In: Mayer, CH., van Niekerk, R., Fouché, P.J., Ponterotto, J.G. (eds) Beyond WEIRD: Psychobiography in Times of Transcultural and Transdisciplinary Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28827-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28827-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28826-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28827-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)