Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the relation between subclinical systolic dysfunction defined by four-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and growth differentiation factor-15 levels in patients with acromegaly

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hormones Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In patients with acromegaly, the long-term presence of elevated GH and IGF-1 levels is associated with an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile. We aimed to assess the relationship of four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic (4DSTE) measurements with growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) levels and the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS) in patients with acromegaly.

Methods

A single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted. The study included 40 acromegaly and 32 age- and gender-matched controls. Anthropometric, biochemical, and echocardiographic assessments were performed. GDF-15 levels were measured using ELISA.

Results

In the controlled acromegaly group, global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), area (GAS), and radial (GRS) strain measurements identified by 4DSTE were lower than those of the controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, strain parameters were lower in active acromegaly patients than in controls, but the difference was not statistically significant. The GLS was negatively correlated with age, the estimated disease duration, and FRS. Serum GDF-15 levels showed no significant difference between the acromegaly and control groups. In patients with acromegaly, serum GDF-15 levels were positively correlated with age, waist-to-hip ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, FRS, fasting plasma glucose, and HbA1c, but not with strain parameters. The multiple regression analysis revealed that FRS was an independent factor associated with serum GDF-15 levels in patients with acromegaly and the overall cohort (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that while LVEF was within normal limits, global strain parameters (GLS, GCS, GAS, and GRS) measured by using a novel imaging technique, 4DSTE, were lower in patients with acromegaly, suggesting the presence of subclinical systolic dysfunction in patients with acromegaly. GDF-15 can be a potential predictor of cardiovascular risk in patients with acromegaly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hong S, Kim KS, Han K et al (2022) Acromegaly and cardiovascular outcomes: a cohort study. Eur Heart J 43:1491–1499. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akgul E, Tokgozoglu SL, Erbas T et al (2010) Evaluation of the impact of treatment on endothelial function and cardiac performance in acromegaly. Echocardiography 27:990–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01179.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sendur SN, Hazirolan T, Aydin B et al (2022) Specific FSTL1 polymorphism may determine the risk of cardiomyopathy in patients with acromegaly. Acta Cardiol 77:350–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2021.1948206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiloiro S, Giampietro A, Gagliardi I et al (2022) Impact of the diagnostic delay of acromegaly on bone health: data from a real life and long term follow-up experience. Pituitary 25:831–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-022-01266-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kempf T, Eden M, Strelau J et al (2006) The transforming growth factor-beta superfamily member growth-differentiation factor-15 protects the heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury. Circ Res 98:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.Res.0000202805.73038.48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang D, Day EA, Townsend LK et al (2021) GDF15: emerging biology and therapeutic applications for obesity and cardiometabolic disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol 17:592–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-021-00529-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Xanthakis V, Larson MG, Wollert KC et al (2013) Association of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress with left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction: implications for screening. J Am Heart Assoc 2:e000399. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.113.000399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu J, Kimball TR, Lorenz JN et al (2006) GDF15/MIC-1 functions as a protective and antihypertrophic factor released from the myocardium in association with SMAD protein activation. Circ Res 98:342–350. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000202804.84885.d0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santhanakrishnan R, Chong JP, Ng TP et al (2012) Growth differentiation factor 15, ST2, high-sensitivity troponin T, and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 14:1338–1347. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang S, Zhang Z, Wang Y et al (2019) Predictive value of left ventricular myocardial strain by four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography combined with red cell distribution width in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiography 36:1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH (2014) Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction. Heart 100:1673–1680. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Volschan ICM, Kasuki L, Silva CMS et al (2017) Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography demonstrates no effect of active acromegaly on left ventricular strain. Pituitary 20:349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0795-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Popielarz-Grygalewicz A, Stelmachowska-Banaś M, Gąsior JS et al (2020) Subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with naive acromegaly - assessment with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: retrospective study. Endokrynol Pol 71:227–234. https://doi.org/10.5603/EP.a2020.0021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gadelha P, Santos ECL, Castillo J et al (2022) Subclinical ventricular dysfunction in long-term acromegaly assessed by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13:812964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.812964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giustina A, Chanson P, Bronstein MD et al (2010) A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:3141–3148. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussein Z, Slack RW, Marcus HJ et al (2023) Post-operative medium- and long-term endocrine outcomes in patients with Non-functioning Pituitary Adenomas-Machine Learning Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102771

  17. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W et al (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Eur Heart J 39:3021–3104. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 42:S13–s28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S002

  19. D’agostino RB, Sr., Vasan RS, Pencina MJ et al (2008) General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 117:743–753. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Muraru D, Niero A, Rodriguez-Zanella H et al (2018) Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: benefits and limitations of integrating myocardial mechanics with three-dimensional imaging. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 8:101–117. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.06.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W et al (2012) EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jer316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jayasena CN, Comninos AN, Clarke H et al (2011) The effects of long-term growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 exposure on the development of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and metabolic co-morbidities in treated patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 75:220–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04019.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Colao A, Marzullo P, Cuocolo A et al (2003) Reversal of acromegalic cardiomyopathy in young but not in middle-aged patients after 12 months of treatment with the depot long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01689.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fung MJ, Leung DY, Thomas L (2018) Differential Myocardial Fibre involvement by Strain Analysis in patients with aortic stenosis. Heart Lung Circ 27:1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2017.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jurcut R, Găloiu S, Florian A et al (2014) Quantifying subtle changes in cardiovascular mechanics in acromegaly: a Doppler myocardial imaging study. J Endocrinol Invest 37:1081–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-014-0147-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seferović PM, Petrie MC, Filippatos GS et al (2018) Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 20:853–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Minciună IA, Hilda Orășan O, Minciună I et al (2021) Assessment of subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy by speckle-tracking imaging. Eur J Clin Invest 51:e13475. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghoreyshi-Hefzabad SM, Jeyaprakash P, Vo HQ et al (2023) Subclinical systolic dysfunction detected by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in adults with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of 6668 individuals with diabetes mellitus and 7218 controls. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 39:977–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02810-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gao J, Xu M, Gong M et al (2023) Left ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is independently associated with glycated hemoglobin level. Clin Cardiolhttps://doi. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.24136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jabbar A, Pingitore A, Pearce SH et al (2017) Thyroid hormones and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 14:39–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2016.174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kong LY, Gao X, Ding XY et al (2019) Left ventricular end-diastolic strain rate recovered in hypothyroidism following levothyroxine replacement therapy: a strain rate imaging study. Echocardiography 36:707–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang WH, Sung KT, Kuo JY et al (2021) Atrioventricular longitudinal mechanics using Novel Speckle-Tracking Improved Risk Stratification Beyond baseline thyroid hormone in asymptomatic subclinical hypothyroidism. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 14:e012433. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.121.012433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wallentin L, Hijazi Z, Andersson U et al (2014) Growth differentiation factor 15, a marker of oxidative stress and inflammation, for risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the Apixaban for reduction in stroke and other thromboembolic events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial. Circulation 130:1847–1858. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.011204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shin MY, Kim JM, Kang YE et al (2016) Association between growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and Cardiovascular Risk in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes Mellitus. J Korean Med Sci 31:1413–1418. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hong JH, Chung HK, Park HY et al (2014) GDF15 is a novel biomarker for impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Metab J 38:472–479. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.6.472

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Xie S, Lu L, Liu L (2019) Growth differentiation factor-15 and the risk of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Clin Cardiol 42:513–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Natali A, Nesti L, Venturi E et al (2019) Metformin is the key factor in elevated plasma growth differentiation factor-15 levels in type 2 diabetes: a nested, case-control study. Diabetes Obes Metab 21:412–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Funding Number # THD-2019-18223).

Funding

This study was supported by the Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Funding Number # THD-2019-18223).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BF, TE, UNK, and GK contributed to the study conception and design. The provision of study materials or patients, data collection, and assembly were performed by BF, UNK, VH, BGI, SD, and IL. Data analysis was performed by BF and DY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by BF. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Busra Firlatan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Non-interventional Clinical Research Ethics Board of the Hacettepe University (Project Number # GO 19/302).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Firlatan, B., Karakulak, U.N., Hekimsoy, V. et al. Evaluation of the relation between subclinical systolic dysfunction defined by four-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and growth differentiation factor-15 levels in patients with acromegaly. Hormones (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-024-00558-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-024-00558-7

Keywords

Navigation