Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel anticoagulants in an older and frail population with atrial fibrillation: the effect of inappropriate dosing on clinical outcomes

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
European Geriatric Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Key summary points

AbstractSection Aim

To evaluate the proportion of patients underdosed (prescribed a reduced dose despite lack of indication) with a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in an older and frail population with atrial fibrillation (AF).

AbstractSection Findings

Around half (51%) of patients received a reduced dose despite lacking formal criteria for dose reduction. Adjusted combined stroke, systemic embolism and major bleeding event rate was higher in underdosed patients, but not adjusted survival.

AbstractSection Message

A very significant proportion of frail and older patients with AF remains under an inappropriately reduced-dosed NOAC, and these patients have a worse prognosis.

Abstract

Purpose

An individualized approach should be taken regarding the use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in frail and older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that there would be a high proportion of underdosed patients among an older and frail population, where bleeding risk is higher.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to an Internal Medicine ward with a previous diagnosis of AF and discharged with a NOAC (n = 327). We compared survival and incidence of dosing-related events (stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding) at 1-year between inappropriately underdosed patients (dose reduction without a formal indication) and the rest of the population.

Results

A total of 167 patients (51%) received a reduced dose despite lacking formal criteria for dose reduction. Before adjustment, underdosed patients, in comparison with non-underdosed patients, had a higher mortality at 1 year (HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.1, p = 0.003) and a higher combined stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding event rate at 1-year (HR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.3–8.0, p = 0.015). After adjustment, combined stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding event rate was higher in underdosed patients (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–12.3, p = 0.030), but survival was not different in the adjusted model (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9–2.1, p = 0.110).

Conclusions

Underdosed patients have a significant survival disadvantage and this may be due to clinician prescription bias, since this difference does not remain after adjusting for confounders. Combined stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding event rate was higher in underdosed patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GY (2012) Net clinical benefit of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Swedish atrial fibrillation cohort study. Circulation 125(19):2298–2307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kato ET, Guigliano RP, Ruff CT et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the management of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: Engage AF-TIMI 48. J Am Heart Assoc 5pii:e003432

    Google Scholar 

  3. Perera V, Bajorek BV, Matthews S et al (2009) The impact of frailty on the utilisation of antithrombotic therapy in older patients with atrial fibrillation. Age Ageing 38:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:883–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al (2013) Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 369:2093–2104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patti G, Lucerna M, Pecen L et al (2017) Thromboembolic risk, bleeding outcomes and effect of different antithrombotic strategies in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a sub-analysis from the PREFER in AF (PREvention oF Thromboembolic Events-European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Heart Assoc 6pii:e005657

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xue QL (2011) The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clin Geriatr Med 27(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haim M, Hoshen M, Reges O et al (2015) Prospective national study of the prevalence, incidence, management and outcome of a large contemporary cohort of patients with incident non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 4:e001486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patti G, Mantione L, Bressi E, Bisignani A (2018) Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapy in frail patients with atrial fibrillation. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 88(2):958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadlon AH, Tsakiris DA (2016) Direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence, current and future directions. Swiss Med Wkly 146:w14356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao X, Shah ND, Sangaralingham LR et al (2017) Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(23):2779–2790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137(2):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R et al (2010) A Novel user-friendly score (Has-Bled) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the euro heart survey. Chest 138(5):1093–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS et al (2018) The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 39(16):1330–1393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aggarwal V, Armstrong EJ, Liu W et al (2016) Prasugrel use following PCI and associated patient outcomes: insights from the national VA CART program. Clin Cardiol 39(10):578–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SR, Lee YS, Park JS et al (2019) Label adherence for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in a prospective cohort of asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Yonsei Med J 60(3):277–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Thomas L et al (2016) Off-label dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and adverse outcomes: the ORBIT-AF II Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:2597–2604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho MS, Yun JE, Park JJ et al (2018) Outcomes after use of standard- and low-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Pieper K et al (2018) Frequency and outcomes of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants: results from ORBIT-AF II (The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II). J Am Heart Assoc 7(4):e007633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Halvorsen S, Atar D, Yang H et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to age for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J 35(28):1864–1872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Paulo Henriques Cabral Lopes de Almeida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All the data were collected and treated in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, fully respecting the anonymity of the patients.

Informed consent

Given the retrospective non-interventional design of the study and the full anonymization of patient data, informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Almeida, J.P.H.C.L., Martinho, A.S., Girão, A. et al. Novel anticoagulants in an older and frail population with atrial fibrillation: the effect of inappropriate dosing on clinical outcomes. Eur Geriatr Med 11, 813–820 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00343-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00343-w

Keywords

Navigation