Key summary points
To evaluate the proportion of patients underdosed (prescribed a reduced dose despite lack of indication) with a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in an older and frail population with atrial fibrillation (AF).
AbstractSection FindingsAround half (51%) of patients received a reduced dose despite lacking formal criteria for dose reduction. Adjusted combined stroke, systemic embolism and major bleeding event rate was higher in underdosed patients, but not adjusted survival.
AbstractSection MessageA very significant proportion of frail and older patients with AF remains under an inappropriately reduced-dosed NOAC, and these patients have a worse prognosis.
Abstract
Purpose
An individualized approach should be taken regarding the use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in frail and older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that there would be a high proportion of underdosed patients among an older and frail population, where bleeding risk is higher.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to an Internal Medicine ward with a previous diagnosis of AF and discharged with a NOAC (n = 327). We compared survival and incidence of dosing-related events (stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding) at 1-year between inappropriately underdosed patients (dose reduction without a formal indication) and the rest of the population.
Results
A total of 167 patients (51%) received a reduced dose despite lacking formal criteria for dose reduction. Before adjustment, underdosed patients, in comparison with non-underdosed patients, had a higher mortality at 1 year (HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.1, p = 0.003) and a higher combined stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding event rate at 1-year (HR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.3–8.0, p = 0.015). After adjustment, combined stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding event rate was higher in underdosed patients (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–12.3, p = 0.030), but survival was not different in the adjusted model (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9–2.1, p = 0.110).
Conclusions
Underdosed patients have a significant survival disadvantage and this may be due to clinician prescription bias, since this difference does not remain after adjusting for confounders. Combined stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding event rate was higher in underdosed patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GY (2012) Net clinical benefit of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Swedish atrial fibrillation cohort study. Circulation 125(19):2298–2307
Kato ET, Guigliano RP, Ruff CT et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the management of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: Engage AF-TIMI 48. J Am Heart Assoc 5pii:e003432
Perera V, Bajorek BV, Matthews S et al (2009) The impact of frailty on the utilisation of antithrombotic therapy in older patients with atrial fibrillation. Age Ageing 38:156–162
Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151
Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992
Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:883–891
Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al (2013) Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 369:2093–2104
Patti G, Lucerna M, Pecen L et al (2017) Thromboembolic risk, bleeding outcomes and effect of different antithrombotic strategies in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a sub-analysis from the PREFER in AF (PREvention oF Thromboembolic Events-European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Heart Assoc 6pii:e005657
Xue QL (2011) The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clin Geriatr Med 27(1):1–15
Haim M, Hoshen M, Reges O et al (2015) Prospective national study of the prevalence, incidence, management and outcome of a large contemporary cohort of patients with incident non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 4:e001486
Patti G, Mantione L, Bressi E, Bisignani A (2018) Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapy in frail patients with atrial fibrillation. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 88(2):958
Sadlon AH, Tsakiris DA (2016) Direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence, current and future directions. Swiss Med Wkly 146:w14356
Yao X, Shah ND, Sangaralingham LR et al (2017) Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(23):2779–2790
Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137(2):263–272
Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R et al (2010) A Novel user-friendly score (Has-Bled) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the euro heart survey. Chest 138(5):1093–1100
Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS et al (2018) The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 39(16):1330–1393
Aggarwal V, Armstrong EJ, Liu W et al (2016) Prasugrel use following PCI and associated patient outcomes: insights from the national VA CART program. Clin Cardiol 39(10):578–584
Lee SR, Lee YS, Park JS et al (2019) Label adherence for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in a prospective cohort of asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Yonsei Med J 60(3):277–284
Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Thomas L et al (2016) Off-label dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and adverse outcomes: the ORBIT-AF II Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:2597–2604
Cho MS, Yun JE, Park JJ et al (2018) Outcomes after use of standard- and low-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023093
Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Pieper K et al (2018) Frequency and outcomes of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants: results from ORBIT-AF II (The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II). J Am Heart Assoc 7(4):e007633
Halvorsen S, Atar D, Yang H et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to age for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J 35(28):1864–1872
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
All the data were collected and treated in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, fully respecting the anonymity of the patients.
Informed consent
Given the retrospective non-interventional design of the study and the full anonymization of patient data, informed consent was waived.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Almeida, J.P.H.C.L., Martinho, A.S., Girão, A. et al. Novel anticoagulants in an older and frail population with atrial fibrillation: the effect of inappropriate dosing on clinical outcomes. Eur Geriatr Med 11, 813–820 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00343-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00343-w