Abstract
This paper focuses on the local economic growth impacts of a specific natural disaster, viz. the Yogyakarta earthquake in 2006 employing data at the sub-national level in two provinces in Java, Indonesia. Specifically, we are concerned with the heterogeneity in the response of the various economic sectors to the earthquake, the spatial economic spill-overs from the affected regions to the non-affected districts, and the overall implications of the earthquake on the relative position of the local economies of the affected districts. We find that the earthquake did affect the growth of some sectors in the affected districts, but the shock did not change the (industrial) structure of the local economy. All sectors still had positive growth some years after the earthquake, which indicates the existence of a recovery processes following the shock.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
These radical political revolutions are the Islamic Iranian revolution after the 1978 earthquake, and the Sandinista revolution a few years after the 1972 earthquake in Managua, Nicaragua (see Cavallo et al. 2013).
Different possible scenarios are discussed in next section. See also Martin (2012) on regional economic resilience.
For simplification, the term ‘district’ in this paper also includes cities.
Martin (2012) also provides similar scenarios, although he uses the framework of regional resilience.
These data area available at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/indonesia-database-for-policy-and-economic-research.
We use fixed effects to control for the spatial heterogeneity among the districts. This spatial heterogeneity is related to, for instance, the difference in the geographical position (North Coast vs. South Coast, coastal districts vs. inland districts) or in the industrial stage of development (the three biggest economic centres based on GRDP per capita are Kudus, Semarang city, and Surakarta city, see Brata 2009).
We used this formula: LQ s,i,t = (GRDP s,i,t / GRDP i,t ) / (GRDP r,i,t / GRDP rt ), where s is the sector; i is the district (or local economy); t is the year; and r is the reference area or total Yogyakarta province and Central Java province (40 districts). The result of this formula is also referred to as a coefficient of specialisation. An LQ of 1.0 in manufacturing, for example, means that the district and the province have an equal sector share in mining. An LQ of 1.8 in agriculture means that the district has an 80% higher share in agriculture than the province.
This issue is beyond the scope of this paper.
References
Abadie A, Gardeazabal J (2003) The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country. Am Econ Rev 93(1):113–132
Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California tobacco control program. J Am Stat Assoc 105(490):493–505
Bappeda Provinsi DI Yogyakarta, Bappeda Provinsi Jawa Tengah, Bappenas (2008) Laporan Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Dua Tahun Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi Pascabencana Gempa Bumi 27 Mei di Wilayah Provinsi DI Yogyakarta dan Provinsi Jawa Tengah (Monitoring and Evaluation of Two Years Implementation of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Post-disaster Earthquake May 27 in the Province of DI Yogyakarta and Central Java). Jakarta: Bappenas
Bappenas (2006) Preliminary damage and loss assessment Yogyakarta and Central Java natural disaster. Bappenas, Jakarta
Bappenas, BNPB (2011) Rencana Aksi Rehabilitasidan Rekonstruksi Pascabencana Erupsi Gunung Merapi Provinsi D.I. Yogyakarta dan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2011–2013 (the action plan for rehabilitation and reconstruction in post-eruption of the Merapi volcano in the province of DI Yogyakarta and Central Java, 2011–2013). Jakarta: Bappenas & BNPB
Barone G, Mocetti S (2014) Natural disasters, growth and institutions: a tale of two earthquakes. J Urban Econ 84(C:52–66
Brata AG (2009) Do geographic factors determine local economic development. Econ Manag Finan Markets 4(3):170–189
Cavallo E, Noy I (2011) Natural disasters and the economy — a survey. Int Rev Environ Res Econ 5(1):63–102
Cavallo EA, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J (2013) Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1549–1561
Chhibber A, Laajaj R (2008) Disasters, climate change and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons and directions. J Afr Econ 17(Supplement 2): 7–49
Cueresma JC, Hlouskova J, Oberstreiner M (2008) Natural disasters as creative destruction? Evidence from developing countries. Econ Inq 46(2):214–226
Dekle R, Hong E, Xie W (2014) The regional spill-over effects of the Tohoku earthquake. University of Southern California, Department of Economics
Dick H (2000) Representation of development in 19th and 20th century Indonesia: a transport history perspective. Bull Indones Econ Stud 36(1):185–207
Fomby T, Ikdea Y, Loayza NV (2013) The growth aftermath of natural disasters. J Appl Econ 28(3):412–434
Groot SPT, Möhlmann JL, Garretsen JH, De Groot HLF (2011) The crisis sensitivity of European countries and regions: stylized facts and spatial heterogeneity. Cambridge J Reg Econ Soc 4(3):437–456
Hoen AR, Oosterhaven J (2006) On the measurement of comparative advantage. Ann Reg Sci 40(3):677–691
Kim C (2010) The effects of natural disasters on long-run economic growth. The Michigan. J Bus 41:15–49
Klomp J, Valckx K (2014) Natural disasters and economic growth: a meta-analysis. Glob Environ Chang 26(1):183–195
Lazzaroni S, Van Bergeijk PAG (2014) Natural disasters’ impact, factors of resilience and development: a meta-analysis of the macroeconomic literature. Ecol Econ 107(C:333–346
Leitmann J (2007) Cities and calamities: learning from post-disaster response in Indonesia. J Urban Health 84(3 Suppl):144–153
Loayza NV, Olaberŕia E, Rigolini J, Christiansen L (2012) Natural disasters and growth: going beyond the averages. World Dev 40(7):1317–1336
Martin R (2012) Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. J Econ Geogr 12(1):1–32
Martin R, Sunley P (2015) On the regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. J Econ Geogr 1(1):1–42
Mehregan N, Asgary A, Rezaei R (2012) Effects of the bam earthquake on employment: a shift-share analysis. Disasters 36(3):420–438
Monroe T, Mirzaei A (2016) The impact of the global financial crisis on industry growth. Manch Sch 84(2):159–180
Noy I, Vu TB (2010) The economics of natural disasters in a developing country: the case of Vietnam. J Asian Econ 21(4):345–354
Okuyama Y (2014) Disaster and economic structural change: case study on the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Econ Syst Res 26(1):98–117
Pritchett L (2000) Understanding patterns of economic growth: searching for hills among plateaus, mountains, and plains. World Bank Econ Rev 14(2):221–250
Resosudarmo B, Sugiyanto C, Kuncoro A (2012) Livelihood recovery after natural disasters and the role of aid: the case of the 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake. Asian Econ J 26(3):233–259
Ridhwan MM, De Groot HLF, Rietveld P, Nijkamp P (2014) The regional impact of monetary policy in Indonesia. Growth Chang 45(2):240–262
Rodriquez-Oreggia E, De La Fuente A, De La Torre R, Moreno HA (2013) Natural disasters, human development and poverty at the municipal level in Mexico. J Dev Stud 49(3):442–455
Skidmore M, Toya H (2002) Do natural disasters promote long-run growth? Econ Inq 40(4):664–687
Von Peter G, Von Dahlen S, Saxena SC (2012) Unmitigated disasters? New evidence on the macroeconomic cost of natural catastrophes. Working Paper No. 394. Bank for International Settlements
World Bank (2007) One year after the java earthquake and tsunami: reconstruction achievements and the results of the java reconstruction fund. Java reconstruction fund progress report. World Bank, Washington, DC, p 2007
World Bank (2012) Rekompak: rebuilding Indonesia's communities after disasters. Financial Literacy and Education Russia Trust Fund. Washington DC, World Bank Group
World Bank, GFDRR (2012) Advancing disaster risk financing and insurance in ASEAN member states: framework and option for implementation. IBRD/World Bank, Washington, DC
Xiao Y, Feser E (2014) The unemployment impact of the 1993 US midwest flood: a quasi-experimental structural break point analysis. Environ Hazards 13(2):93–113
Xiao Y, Nilawar U (2013) Winners and losers: analysing post-disaster spatial economic demand shift. Disasters 37(4):646–668
Yusrina A, Akhmadi (2013) Impact of the global financial crisis on households in Kota Pekalongan. SMERU Working Paper November 2013
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and Editor-in-Chief Prof. Ilan Noy for valuable suggestions and comments. Brata acknowledges a scholarship from the Indonesian Directorate General of Higher Education (DIKTI). The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brata, A.G., de Groot, H.L.F. & Zant, W. The Impact of the 2006 Yogyakarta Earthquake on Local Economic Growth. EconDisCliCha 2, 203–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-018-0026-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-018-0026-5