Skip to main content
Log in

An extended FMECA approach using new risk assessment and prioritization based approach

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study develops a new hybrid multi-criticality approach to enhance the use of the traditional Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method. The proposed model is based on replacing the computation of the mono criticality from the conventional method with a fuzzy model providing five criticalities that calculate the failure impact on the personnel, equipment, time, cost, and quality. Furthermore, an analytical hierarchy method (AHP) is adopted to construct a criticality matrix and compute the different weights for each criticality in order to assess the total criticality and effectively improve the prioritization of the failure modes. In addition, a real case study of an auto LPG Dispensing Station is provided to illustrate the factual application of the suggested model and show its pertinence in dealing with a risk evaluation and prioritization of failure mode with handling different forms of uncertainty and divergent judgments of experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Chakhrit A, Bougofa M, Guetarni I, Nehal N, Bouafia A, Ghazli F et al (2022)New risk assessment and prioritization failure modes based approach in a gas turbine system. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, p 012009

  2. Joubert F, Steyn E, Pretorius L (2021) Using the HAZOP method to conduct a risk assessment on the dismantling of large industrial machines and associated structures: case study. J Constr Eng Manag 147:05020021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guetarni IH, Aissani N, Châlet E, Lounis Z (2019) Reliability analysis by mapping probabilistic importance factors into Bayesian belief networks for making decision in water deluge system. Process Saf Prog 38:e12011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bougofa M, Taleb-Berrouane M, Bouafia A, Baziz A, Kharzi R, Bellaouar A (2021) Dynamic availability analysis using dynamic Bayesian and evidential networks. Process Saf Environ Prot 153:486–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bougofaa M, Bouafiab A, Bellaouara A (2020) Availability assessment of complex systems under parameter uncertainty using dynamic evidential networks. Int J Perform Eng 16:510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geum Y, Cho Y, Park Y (2011) A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach. Math Comput Model 54:3126–3142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Certa A, Enea M, Galante GM, La Fata CM (2017) ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: an alternative to the risk priority number. Comput Ind Eng 108:100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu H-C, Hu Y-P, Wang J-J, Sun M (2018) Failure mode and effects analysis using two-dimensional uncertain linguistic variables and alternative queuing method. IEEE Trans Reliab 68:554–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu H-C, Wang L-E, You X-Y, Wu S-M (2019) Failure mode and effect analysis with extended grey relational analysis method in cloud setting. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence 30:745–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohsen O, Fereshteh N (2017) An extended VIKOR method based on entropy measure for the failure modes risk assessment–A case study of the geothermal power plant (GPP). Saf Sci 92:160–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Li H, Sun B, Wang F (2018) Assessing information security risk for an evolving smart city based on fuzzy and grey FMEA. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 34:2491–2501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghoushchi SJ, Yousefi S, Khazaeili M (2019) An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures. Appl Soft Comput 81:105505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fattahi R, Khalilzadeh M (2018) Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Saf Sci 102:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou Q, Thai VV (2016) Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Saf Sci 83:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Udhaya Sankar S, Praveen R, Jagadish Kumar N, Jagatheswari S (2023) Fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria decision-making technique for achieving reliable data dissemination in MANETs. Int J Inform Technol 15:1985–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01251-5

  16. Anes V, Henriques E, Freitas M, Reis L (2018) A new risk prioritization model for failure mode and effects analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 34:516–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seiti H, Fathi M, Hafezalkotob A, Herrera-Viedma E, Hameed IA (2021) Developing the modified R-numbers for risk-based fuzzy information fusion and its application to failure modes, effects, and system resilience analysis (FMESRA). ISA Trans 113:9–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yousefi S, Alizadeh A, Hayati J, Baghery M (2018) HSE risk prioritization using robust DEA-FMEA approach with undesirable outputs: a study of automotive parts industry in Iran. Saf Sci 102:144–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar M, "Maniram Kumar A, Rajakarunakaran S, Pitchipoo P, Vimalesan R (2018) Fuzzy based risk prioritisation in an auto LPG dispensing station. Saf Sci 101:231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu S-J, Wang D, Li S-J, Wang Q-H (2017) Speckle noise suppression method in holographic display using time multiplexing. Opt Eng 56:063107–063107

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Gao J-M, Wang R-X, Chen K, Gao Z-Y, Zheng W (2017) Failure mode and effects analysis by using the house of reliability-based rough VIKOR approach. IEEE Trans Reliab 67:230–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yazdi M (2019) Improving failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) with consideration of uncertainty handling as an interactive approach. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 13:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu H-C, You J-X, Shan M-M, Su Q (2019) Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence 30:537–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bian T, Zheng H, Yin L, Deng Y (2018) Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS. Qual Reliab Eng Int 34:501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X, Zhang Y, Shen G (2016) An improved FMECA for feed system of CNC machining center based on ICR and DEMATEL method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakhrit A, Chennoufi M (2021) Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis improvement by using new criticality assessment and prioritization based approach. J Eng Des Technol. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2021-0395 (Ahead-of-print)

  27. Lekhraj A, Kumar, Kumar A (2022) Multi criteria decision making based energy efficient clustered solution for wireless sensor networks. Int J Inform Technol 14:3333–3342

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singh P, Agrawal R (2021) AHP based network selection scheme for heterogeneous network in different traffic scenarios. Int J Inform Technol 13:2505–2513

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chakhrit A, Chennoufi M (2021) Fuzzy multi-criteria approach for criticality assessment and optimization of decision making, J Intell Fuzzy Syst, pp. 1–16.

  30. Acharjee S, Sinha Chaudhuri S (2023) Fuzzy inference based decision making model to control the operational parameters of motion estimation algorithms. Int J Inform Technol 15:2197–2207

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kharya S, Soni S, Swarnkar T (2023) Fuzzy weighted bayesian belief network: a medical knowledge-driven bayesian model using fuzzy weighted rules, Int J Inform Technol, pp. 1–9.

  32. Kumar AM, Rajakarunakaran S, Prabu VA (2015) Human reliability analysis by cognitive approach for unloading process in an ALDS (auto LPG dispensing Station). Indian J Sci Technol 8:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ammar Chakhrit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chennoufi, M., Chakhrit, A. An extended FMECA approach using new risk assessment and prioritization based approach. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 16, 1595–1604 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01455-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01455-9

Keywords

Navigation