Abstract
This work epitomizes an innovative application of industrial FMEA (failure modes and effects analysis) into the educational context through an experiential co-curricular activity as an engineering learning mechanism. Students were sensitized regarding the FMEA procedure and were asked to divide into teams for constructing the FMEA worksheets on the given problem statements as a part of the activity comprising the competitive usage of the concept. The students allocated values to the severity, occurrence and detection rankings. These rankings were on the higher side which indicated a more vigilant approach towards the pre-defined problem statements. The experiential co-curricular activities like constructing the FMEA worksheet is first-of-its kind as an industrial applicatory tool which is applied for the benefit of students of mechanical engineering. The multitude of benefits which this formative mode of learning offers is discussed at length. This activity shall provide an experience of the industry-way-of-approach to the student which in-turn shall make the student more employable by making them industry-ready thereby expecting to reduce the industry-academia gap.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
The data and material has been generated by the authors on their own and are not from any previous publications and so authors assure that any permission need not be taken from anyone.
References
Alboaouh, K. (2018). The gap between engineering schools and industry: a strategic initiative. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).
Alpert, F., Brown, M., Ferrier, E., Gonzalez-Arcos, C. F., & Piehler, R. (2022). Branding’s academic–practitioner gap: Managers’ views. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(2), 218–237.
Bae, H., Polmear, M., & Simmons, D. R. (2022). Bridging the gap between industry expectations and academic preparation: Civil engineering students’ employability. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 148(3), 04022003.
Bartolomé, E., & Benítez, P. (2022). Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to improve collaborative project-based learning: Case study of a study and research path in mechanical engineering. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 50(2), 291–325.
Bond-Trittipo, B., Valle, J., Secules, S., & Green, A. (2022). Challenging the hegemonic culture of engineering: curricular and co-curricular methodologies. 2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity),
Cai, Q., & Robinson, D. (2021). Design, redesign, and continuous refinement of an online graduate course: a case study for implementing universal design for learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1–11.
Chetlur, V. V., & Dhillon, H. S. (2022). Spatial models for networks on roads: Bridging the gap between industry and academia. IEEE Network, 36(1), 26–31.
Choi, B. (2023). A collaborative board game as an assessment environment to evaluate teacher’s pedagogical design thinking for technology integration. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1–16.
da Silva, R. F., de Andrade Melani, A. H., de Carvalho Michalski, M. A., & de Souza, G. F. M. (2022). Failure mode and observability analysis (FMOA): an FMEA-based method to support fault detection and diagnosis.
Garrett, S. D., Martin, J. P., & Adams, S. G. (2021). Developing nontechnical professional skills in African American engineering majors through co-curricular activities. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(3), 394–401.
Henriksen, D., Cain, W., & Mishra, P. (2018). Everyone designs: Learner autonomy through creative, reflective, and iterative practice mindsets. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 2, 69–81.
Hill, J., & Cebulski, A. R. (2022). Leadership learning through games in co-curricular settings. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2022(174), 31–41.
Kirillov, N. P., Leontyeva, E. G., & Moiseenko, Y. A. (2015). Creativity in engineering education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 360–363.
Lattuca, L. R., Knight, D. B., Ro, H. K., & Novoselich, B. J. (2017). Supporting the development of engineers’ interdisciplinary competence. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 71–97.
Lawler, E. E., III., & Benson, G. S. (2022). The practitioner-academic gap: A view from the middle. Human Resource Management Review, 32(1), 100748.
Liu, Y., & Tang, Y. (2022). Managing uncertainty of expert’s assessment in FMEA with the belief divergence measure. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 6812.
Moeeni, H., Javadi, M., & Raissi, S. (2022). Design for manufacturing (DFM): A sustainable approach to drive the design process from suitability to low cost. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 16(3), 1079–1088.
Ogwezi, B., Tyler, K., Manai, N., & Penny, C. L. (2023). Closing the gap between industry and academia via student teams support. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Peralta Hernández, J., & Tirado Segura, F. (2023). The teaching of collaborative creativity, a methodological approach to designing the environment. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1–15.
Prasad, C., Sharma, G., & Pavani, P. (2021). Capability resurrection of DC sputtering machine: A case studY. International Journal of Surface Engineering and Interdisciplinary Materials Science (IJSEIMS), 9(1), 60–76.
Sharma, G., & Rao, P. S. (2014). A DMAIC approach for process capability improvement an engine crankshaft manufacturing process. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 10, 1–11.
Sharma, G., Rao, P. S., & Babu, B. S. (2018). Process capability improvement through DMAIC for aluminum alloy wheel machining. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 14, 213–226.
Sharma, G. V. S. S., Prasad, C. L. V. R. S. V., & Rambabu, V. (2022). Online machine drawing pedagogy—a knowledge management perspective through maker education in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Knowledge and Process Management, 29(3), 231–241.
Sharma, G. V. S. S., Vara Prasad, C. L. V. R. S., & Santa Rao, K. (2022). Post-COVID-19 era: an enabler for the implementation of blended learning in compliance with the NEP 2020. International Journal of Educational Reform, 10567879221112059.
Van Hoof, V., Bench, S., Soto, A. B., Luppa, P. P., Malpass, A., Schilling, U. M., . . . Tintu, A. N. (2022). Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) at the preanalytical phase for POCT blood gas analysis: proposal for a shared proactive risk analysis model. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 60(8), 1186–1201.
Yan, Y., Suo, B., & Li, Z. (2022). An area-based metrics to evaluate risk in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainties. IEEE Access, 10, 33969–33979.
Yazdanian, M., Alam, M., Rafiee, E., Tahmasebi, E., Ghaffarpasand, A., Abbasi, K., & Bahadori, M. (2022). Use and effectiveness of the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for identification of potential errors and failures in the process of root canal treatment. Dentistry 3000, 10(1).
Zakaria, N., Masduki, M., & Ismail, N. N. (2018). Eliminating shyness through co-curricular activities towards enhancing the career development of engineering students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Zhu, G.-N., Ma, J., & Hu, J. (2022). A fuzzy rough number extended AHP and VIKOR for failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51, 101454.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the non-teaching staff of the department for their continued support in facilitating and arranging the materials, stationery and consumables required for this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The present study was given approval by the institute’s ethics and research committee.
Informed Consent
All the participating students have given informed consent to participate in this research activity and could terminate their participation at any time at their own. A photo/video release consent is also taken from the participants.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, G.V.S.S., Naidu, A.L., Rao, K.S. et al. Bridging the Industry–Academia Gap: An Experiential Learning for Engineering Students. J Form Des Learn 7, 139–157 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00086-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00086-4