Motivating Students in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Using the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction (ARCS) Model
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) often have low persistence rates, which may be attributed to a learners’ lack of motivation. In this design-based research study, Keller’s Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction (ARCS) motivational design model was integrated into two MOOCs as an initial exploration of how to design effective motivational interventions in MOOC environment. The Instructional Motivation Materials Scale (IMMS) was used to measure learners’ perceptions and reactions to the course components, in terms of the ARCS model, in both MOOCs. The whole design, implementation, and evaluation process was documented and reflected upon to provide practical guidance on designing motivational-enhanced materials in MOOC environments. The results revealed patterns of learners selectively paying attention, drawing relevance for self-determined reasons, having high confidence, and deriving satisfaction from multiple sources.
KeywordsARCS model Design-based research MOOCs Motivation Motivational design
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: a quantitative approach Duke University’s first MOOC (Report). Retrieved from: http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/6216.
- Butler, B. (2012). Massive open online courses: legal and policy issues for research libraries (pp. 1–15). Association of Research Libraries.Google Scholar
- Chang, M.-M., & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: an experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. Calico Journal, 20(1), 81–98.Google Scholar
- Gerson, S. M. (2000). E-CLASS: creating a guide to online course development for distance learning faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(4), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Glance, D. G., Forsey, M., & Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i5.4350.
- Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41–50). ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2566239.
- Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: a review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42.Google Scholar
- Huett, J. B., Moller, L., Young, J., Bray, M., & Huett, K. C. (2008b). Supporting the distant student: the effect of arcs-based strategies on confidence and performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 113–126.Google Scholar
- Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651.
- Keller, J. M. (1987b). Instructional materials motivation scale (IMMS). Unpublished Manuscript, The Florida State University.Google Scholar
- Keller, J. M. (2006). What is motivational design? (pp. 1–12). Florida: Florida State University.Google Scholar
- Keller, J. M. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 6(2), 79–104.Google Scholar
- Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170–179). ACM. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2460330.
- Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society; Palmerston North, 7(3), n/a.Google Scholar
- Lei, S. A. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: evaluating benefits and drawbacks from college instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 153–160.Google Scholar
- Ma, Y., & Harmon, S. W. (2009). A case study of design-based research for creating a vision prototype of a technology-based innovative learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(1), 75–93.Google Scholar
- Masters, K. (2011). A brief guide to understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education, 1(2). Retrieved from: http://ispub.com/IJME/1/2/10995.
- Nawrot, I., & Doucet, A. (2014). Building engagement for MOOC students: introducing support for time management on online learning platforms. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World wide web companion (pp. 1077–1082). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2580054.
- O’Toole, R. (2013). Pedagogical strategies and technologies for peer assessment in Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs) (Unpublished Discussion Paper). University of Warwick, Coventry, UK: University of Warwick. Retrieved from: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/54602/
- Ocak, M. A., & Akçayır, M. (2013). Do motivation tactics work in blended learning environments?: the ARCS model approach. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 3(4), 1058–1070.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Reeves, T. C. (2000). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other development research strategies. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA.Google Scholar
- Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN, 7(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
- Sankaran, S. R., & Bui, T. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: a study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(3), 191–198.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Roth, N. E. W., Li, K., Cetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: an examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Small, R. V., & Gluck, M. (1994). The relationship of motivational conditions to effective instructional attributes: a magnitude scaling approach. Educational Technology, 34(8), 33–40.Google Scholar
- Song, S. H. (2000). Research issues of motivation in web-based instruction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1(3), 225–229.Google Scholar
- Starcher, K., & Proffitt, D. (2011). Encouraging students to read: what professors are (and aren’t) doing about it. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 396–407.Google Scholar
- Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.Google Scholar
- Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1882–1895). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675217