Brousse C, Boisaubert B. La qualité de vie et ses mesures. Rev Med Interne. 2007;28(7):458–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2007.02.010.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tyler R, Perreauf A, Mohr A-M, Ji H, Mancini PC. An exploratory step toward measuring the “meaning of life” in patients with tinnitus and in cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol. 2020;31(4):277–85. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.19022.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J. Measurement and valuation of health for economic evaluation. In: Quah SR, editor. International encyclopedia of public health. 2nd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2017. p. 586–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00457-4.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Baguley D, McFerran D, Hall D. Tinnitus. Lancet (London, England). 2013;382(9904):1600–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60142-7.
Article
Google Scholar
Tyler RS, Aran JM, Dauman R. Recent advances in tinnitus. Am J Audiol. 1992;1(4):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0104.36.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tyler R, Ji H, Perreau A, Witt S, Noble W, Coelho C. Development and validation of the tinnitus primary function Questionnaire. Am J Audiol. 2014;23(3):260–72. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0014.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tyler RS, Baker LJ. Difficulties experienced by tinnitus sufferers. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983;48(2):150–4. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4802.150.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Crönlein T, Langguth B, Pregler M, Kreuzer PM, Wetter TC, Schecklmann M. Insomnia in patients with chronic tinnitus: cognitive and emotional distress as moderator variables. J Psychosom Res. 2016;83:65–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.001.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tegg-Quinn S, Bennett RJ, Eikelboom RH, Baguley DM. The impact of tinnitus upon cognition in adults: a systematic review. Int J Audiol. 2016;55(10):533–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1185168.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lasisi AO, Gureje O. Prevalence of insomnia and impact on quality of life among community elderly subjects with tinnitus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;120(4):226–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941112000402.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fetoni AR, Lucidi D, Corso ED, Fiorita A, Conti G, Paludetti G. Relationship between Subjective Tinnitus Perception and Psychiatric Discomfort. Int Tinnitus J. 2017;20(2):76–82. https://doi.org/10.5935/0946-5448.20160015.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weidt S, Delsignore A, Meyer M, Rufer M, Peter N, Drabe N, Kleinjung T. Which tinnitus-related characteristics affect current health-related quality of life and depression? A cross-sectional cohort study. Psychiatry Res. 2016;237:114–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.065.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zeman F, Koller M, Langguth B, Landgrebe M. Which tinnitus-related aspects are relevant for quality of life and depression: results from a large international multicentre sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-7.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res. 2016;337:70–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.009.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Adrian D, El Refaie A. The epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Tyler R, editor. The handbook of tinnitus. Norwich: Singular; 2000. p. 1–23.
Google Scholar
McFerran DJ, Stockdale D, Holme R, Large CH, Baguley DM. Why is there no cure for tinnitus? Front Neurosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00802.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cima RFF, Kikidis D, Mazurek B, Haider HF, Cederroth CR, Noreña AJ, et al. Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe. BMJ Open. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029346.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kreuzer PM, Vielsmeier V, Langguth B. Chronic tinnitus: an interdisciplinary challenge. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. 2013;110(16):278–84. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2013.0278.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fuller T, Cima R, Langguth B, Mazurek B, Vlaeyen JW, Hoare DJ. Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1:CD012614. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012614.pub2.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goldstein E, Ho C-X, Hanna R, Elinger C, Yaremchuk KL, Seidman MD, Jesse MT. Cost of care for subjective tinnitus in relation to patient satisfaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(3):518–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814566179.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maes IHL, Cima RFF, Vlaeyen JW, Anteunis LJC, Joore MA. Tinnitus: a cost study. Ear Hear. 2013;34(4):508–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827d113a.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stockdale D, McFerran D, Brazier P, Pritchard C, Kay T, Dowrick C, Hoare DJ. An economic evaluation of the healthcare cost of tinnitus management in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):577. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2527-2.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hall DA, Haider H, Szczepek AJ, Lau P, Rabau S, Jones-Diette J, et al. Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults. Trials. 2016;17(1):270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1399-9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Brazier J, Tsuchiya A. Improving cross-sector comparisons: going beyond the health-related QALY. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(6):557–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-015-0194-1.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, Brock DW, Feeny D, Krahn M, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1093–103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
Article
Google Scholar
Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(2):143–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, et al. The Tinnitus Functional Index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012;33(2):153–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson PH, Jane H, Maitland B, George H. Tinnitus reaction questionnaire. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1991;34(1):197–201. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3401.197.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016;335:220–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kamalski DM, Hoekstra CE, van Zanten BG, Grolman W, Rovers MM. Measuring disease-specific health-related quality of life to evaluate treatment outcomes in tinnitus patients: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143(2):181–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.03.026.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tyler RS, Oleson J, Noble W, Coelho C, Ji H. Clinical trials for tinnitus: study populations, designs, measurement variables, and data analysis. In: Langguth B, Hajak G, Kleinjung T, Cacace A, Møller AR, editors. Progress in brain research, vol. 166. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66048-8.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Rowen D, Azzabi Zouraq I, Chevrou-Severac H, van Hout B. International regulations and recommendations for utility data for health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(1):11–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0544-y.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Thomas R, Chalkidou K. Cost–effectiveness analysis. Health system efficiency: how to make measurement matter for policy and management [Internet]. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK436886/. Accessed May 2020
Salomon JA. Quality adjusted life years. In: Quah SR, editor. International encyclopedia of public health. 2nd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2017. p. 224–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00368-4.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Neumann PJ, Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC. Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:587–611. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.587.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F, editors. The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European Perspective: evidence from the EuroQol BIOMED Research Programme. Dordrecht: Springer; 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0233-1.
Book
Google Scholar
Ware J, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual & interpretation guide. Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated; 1993.
Google Scholar
Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI ®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-54.
Article
Google Scholar
Weinstein MC, Torrance G, McGuire A. QALYs: the basics. Value Health. 2009;12(Suppl 1):S5-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00515.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010;96(1):5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldq033.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bala MV, Mauskopf JA, Wood LL. Willingness to pay as a measure of health benefits. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199915010-00002.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bayoumi AM. The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(11):691–700. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200422110-00001.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
O’Brien B, Viramontes JL. Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference? Med Decision Making. 1994;14(3):289–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9401400311.
Article
Google Scholar
Olsen JA, Smith RD. Theory versus practice: a review of “willingness-to-pay” in health and health care. Health Econ. 2001;10(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1%3c39::aid-hec563%3e3.0.co;2-e.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. Cochrane Update. “Scoping the scope” of a cochrane review. J Public Health (Oxford, England). 2011;33(1):147–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015.
Article
Google Scholar
Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Article
Google Scholar
Happich M, Mazurek B. Priorities and prospect theory. Eur J Health Econ HEPAC Health Econ Prev Care. 2002;3(1):40–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-001-0089-y.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Happich M, Muehlbacher A. An exponential representation of health state utility. Eur J Health Econ HEPAC Health Econ Prev Care. 2003;4(4):292–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-003-0186-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Happich M, von Lengerke T. Valuing the health state “tinnitus”: differences between patients and the general public. Hear Res. 2005;207(1–2):50–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2005.04.002.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Happich M, Moock J, von Lengerke T. Health state valuation methods and reference points: the case of tinnitus. Value Health. 2009;12(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00397.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cima RFF, Maes IH, Joore MA, Scheyen DJWM, El Refaie A, Baguley DM, et al. Specialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2012;379(9830):1951–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60469-3.
Article
Google Scholar
Maes IHL, Joore MA, Cima RFF, Vlaeyen JW, Anteunis LJC. Assessment of health state in patients with tinnitus: a comparison of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III. Ear Hear. 2011;32(4):428–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fdf09f.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maes IHL, Cima RFF, Anteunis LJC, Scheijen DJWM, Baguley DM, El Refaie A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of specialized treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy versus usual care for tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(5):787–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000331.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Robinson SK, Viirre ES, Bailey KA, Gerke MA, Harris JP, Stein MB. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of nondepressed tinnitus subjects. Psychosom Med. 2005;67(6):981–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000188479.04891.74.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Robinson SK, Viirre ES, Bailey KA, Kindermann S, Minassian AL, Goldin PR, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavior therapy for tinnitus. Int Tinnitus J. 2008;14(2):119–26.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stephens D, Pyykkö I, Yoshida T, Kentala E, Levo H, Auramo Y, Poe D. The consequences of tinnitus in long-standing Ménière’s disease. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012;39(5):469–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2011.10.011.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Summerfield AQ, Barton GR, the UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Sensitivity of EQ-5D-3L, HUI2, HUI3, and SF-6D to changes in speech reception and tinnitus associated with cochlear implantation. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(5):1145–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2070-6.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Newman CW, Sandridge SA. A comparison of benefit and economic value between two sound therapy tinnitus management options. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(2):126–38. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.23.2.7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Boutron I, Page MJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG, Lundh A, Hróbjartsson A. Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. New York: Wiley; 2019. p. 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch7.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Engineer ND, Rosellini WM, Tyler RS. Willingness to accept and pay for implantable tinnitus treatments: a survey. Neuromodul J Int Neuromodul Soc. 2013;16(2):154–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00487.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Tyler RS. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for tinnitus treatments. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(2):115–25. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.23.2.6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smit JV, Pielkenrood BJ, Arts RAGJ, Janssen ML, Temel Y, Stokroos RJ. Patient acceptance of invasive treatments for tinnitus. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(2):184–96. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJA-17-0015.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996;276(15):1253–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arias E. United States life tables, 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;58(21):1–40.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
Google Scholar
Shepard, D. S. (1999). Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. By M.R. Gold, J.E Siegel, L.B. Russell, and M.C. Weinstein (eds). New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. J Mental Health Policy Econom 2(2):91–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199906)2:2<91::AID-MHP46>3.0.CO;2-I
Meikle MB, Stewart BJ, Griest SE, Martin WH, Henry JA, Abrams HB, et al. Assessment of tinnitus: measurement of treatment outcomes. In: Langguth B, Hajak G, Kleinjung T, Cacace A, Møller AR, editors., et al., Progress in brain research, vol. 166. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 511–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66049-X.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Abrams H, Chisolm TH, McArdle R. A cost-utility analysis of adult group audiologic rehabilitation: are the benefits worth the cost? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(5):549–58.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ward Fuller G, Hernandez M, Pallot D, Lecky F, Stevenson M, Gabbe B. Health state preference weights for the glasgow outcome scale following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and mapping study. Value Health. 2017;20(1):141–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2398.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yang Y, Longworth L, Brazier J. An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2813–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0417-6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Braun C, Rehdanz K, Schmidt U. Validity of willingness to pay measures under preference uncertainty. PLoS ONE. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154078.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Dalton DS, Klein BEK, Klein R, Schubert CR, et al. The impact of tinnitus on quality of life in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(3):257–66. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.18.3.7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson C, Lewis P, Stephens D. The Short Form 36 (SF36) in a specialist tinnitus clinic. Int J Audiol. 2002;41(4):216–20. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209078334.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI®) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):375–84. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002092.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chuang L-H, Whitehead SJ. Mapping for economic evaluation. Br Med Bull. 2012;101(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldr049.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Longworth L, Rowen D. Mapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessments. Value Health. 2013;16(1):202–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.010.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rentz AM, Kowalski JW, Walt JG, Hays RD, Brazier JE, Yu R, et al. Development of a Preference-Based Index From the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire–25. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(3):310–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7639.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Richardson J, Iezzi A, Peacock S, Sinha K, Khan M, Misajon R, Keeffe J. Utility weights for the vision-related assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-7D instrument. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(3):172–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2012.674613.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):344–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002088.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, Reed SD, Augustovski F, Jonsson B, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II—an ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value Health. 2015;18(2):161–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Google Scholar
Bowling A. Measuring health. London: McGraw-Hill Education; 2004.
Google Scholar
Moller AR. Similarities between severe tinnitus and chronic pain. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(3):115–24.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Folmer RL, Griest SE, Martin WH. Chronic Tinnitus as phantom auditory pain. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124(4):394–400. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2001.114673.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rauschecker JP, May ES, Maudoux A, Ploner M. Frontostriatal gating of tinnitus and chronic pain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015;19(10):567–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.002.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Harrison JD, Young JM, Butow P, Salkeld G, Solomon MJ. Is it worth the risk? A systematic review of instruments that measure risk propensity for use in the health setting. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(6):1385–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.006.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Martín-Fernández J, Polentinos-Castro E, del Cura-González MI, Ariza-Cardiel G, Abraira V, Gil-LaCruz AI, García-Pérez S. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: an evaluation of attitudes towards risk and preferences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):287. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-287.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar