Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

P-graph Causality Maps

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new class of bipartite causality maps is developed in this work to model influences in socio-technological systems. Unlike earlier forms of causality maps such as fuzzy cognitive maps, this novel approach uses two kinds of elements represented as different types of graph nodes. Based on the P-graph framework, “objects” and their “mechanisms” (or actions) are represented by O-type and M-type nodes, respectively. Objects consist of both tangible (e.g., technologies) and intangible (e.g., policies) elements, while mechanisms are the roles that objects play within the system. Objects in the network influence each other through these mechanisms as indicated by arcs. Two P-graph algorithms are used for this application. First, the maximal structure generation (MSG) is used to generate a maximal causality map based on specifications of local links of individual objects; the causality map assembly is automatic and does not require human understanding of the global problem topology. Next, the solution structure generation (SSG) algorithm is used to algorithmically generate all structurally feasible causality maps for the problem. The alternative networks can be evaluated to gauge practically viable candidate policy and technology combinations. Criticality of different objects can be quantified based on the frequency of occurrence in the enumerated causality maps. The methodology is illustrated using a case study on a policy framework for negative emissions technologies (NETs) for CO2 removal. The potential of this technique to determine how to sustain “virtuous networks” or to deactivate “vicious networks” is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson C, Törnberg P (2018) Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity. Futures 95:118–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviso KB, Cayamanda CD, Solis FDB, Danga AMR, Promentilla MAB, Yu KDS, Santos JR, Tan RR (2015) P-graph approach for GDP-optimal allocation of resources, commodities and capital in economic systems under climate change-induced crisis conditions. J Clean Prod 92:308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1976) Structure of decision: the cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertók B, Barany M, Friedler F (2013) Generating and analyzing mathematical programming models of conceptual process design by P-graph software. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:166–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (2004) Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. Eur J Oper Res 159:673–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix G, Napoles G, Falcon R, Froelich W, Vanhoof K, Bello R (2019) A review on methods and software for fuzzy cognitive maps. Artif Intell Rev 52:1707–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Tarjan K, Huang YW, Fan LT (1992a) Combinatorial algorithms for process synthesis. Comput Chem Eng 16:S313–S320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Tarján K, Huang YW, Fan LT (1992b) Graph-theoretic approach to process synthesis: axioms and theorems. Chem Eng Sci 47:1973–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Tarjan K, Huang YW, Fan LT (1993) Graph-theoretic approach to process synthesis: polynomial algorithm for maximal structure generation. Comput Chem Eng 17:929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Varga JB, Feher E, Fan LT (1996) Combinatorially accelerated branch-and-bound method for solving the MIP model of process network synthesis. In: Floudas CA, Pardalos PM (eds) State of the art in global optimization: computational methods and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 609–626

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Aviso KB, Bertók B, Foo DCY, Tan RR (2019) Prospects and challenges for chemical process synthesis with P-graph. Curr Opin Chem Eng 26:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuss S, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Hilaire J, Creutzig F, Amann T, Beringer T, De Oliveira Garcia W, Hartmann J, Khanna T, Luderer G, Nemet GF, Rogelj J, Smith P, Vicente Vicente JL, Wilcox J, Del Mar Zamora Dominguez M, Minx JC (2018) Negative emissions – part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ Res Lett 13:063002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haszeldine RS, Flude S, Johnson G, Scott V (2018) Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0447

  • How BS, Teng SY, Leong WD, Ng WPQ, Lim CH, Ngan SL, Lam HL (2019) Non-linear programming via P-graph framework. Chem Eng Trans 76:499–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva

  • Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man-Mach Stud 24:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosko B (1988) Hidden patterns in combined and adaptive knowledge networks. Int J Approx Reason 2:377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács Z, Ercsey Z, Friedler F, Fan LT (2000) Separation-network synthesis: global optimum through rigorous super-structure. Comput Chem Eng 24:1881–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakner R, Friedler F, Bertók B (2017) Synthesis and analysis of process networks by joint application of P-graphs and Petri nets. In: van der Aalst W, Best E (eds) Application and theory of Petri nets and concurrency. PETRI NETS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10258. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao A, Cabezas H, Orosz A, Friedler F, Tan R (2020) Socio-ecological network structures from process graphs. PLoS One 15:e0232384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minx JC, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Fuss S, Hilaire J, Creutzig F, Amann T, Beringer T, De Oliveira Garcia W, Hartmann J, Khanna T, Lenzi D, Luderer G, Nemet GF, Rogelj J, Smith P, Vicente Vicente JL, Wilcox J, Del Mar Zamora Dominguez M (2018) Negative emissions – part 1: research landscape and synthesis. Environ Res Lett 13:063001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, E., 2014, Fuzzy cognitive maps for applied sciences and engineering: from fundamentals to extensions and learning algorithms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Papageorgiou E, Salmeron J (2013) A review of fuzzy cognitive map research during the last decade. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21:66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P-graph Studio (2020) Accessed at www.p-graph.org on November 16, 2020

  • Pimentel J, Orosz A, Tan RR, Friedler F (2020) Automated synthesis of process-networks by the integration of P-graph with process simulation. Chem Eng Trans 81:1171–1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan RR, Aviso KB, Klemeš JJ, Lam HL, Varbanov PS, Friedler F (2018) Towards generalized process networks: prospective new research frontiers for the P-graph framework. Chem Eng Trans 70:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117:440–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the P-graph Studio development and technical support team based in the University of Pannonia, Hungary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond R. Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix. Alternative causality networks generated by SSG

Appendix. Alternative causality networks generated by SSG

Fig. A1
figure 9

Solution 4 generated by SSG

Fig. A2
figure 10

Solution 5 generated by SSG

Fig. A3
figure 11

Solution 6 generated by SSG

Fig. A4
figure 12

Solution 7 generated by SSG

Fig. A5
figure 13

Solution 8 generated by SSG

Fig. A6
figure 14

Solution 9 generated by SSG

Fig. A7
figure 15

Solution 10 generated by SSG

Fig. A8
figure 16

Solution 11 generated by SSG

Fig. A9
figure 17

Solution 14 generated by SSG

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Lao, A.R. et al. P-graph Causality Maps. Process Integr Optim Sustain 5, 319–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-020-00147-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-020-00147-2

Keywords

Navigation