Abstract
The performance of photovoltaic (PV) system depends upon the orientation and the site climatic conditions. Solar PV tracking systems align the modules perpendicular to the incoming solar radiation. In this paper, six locations with latitudes 0° through 55° were selected to investigate the PV system performance using single-axis (horizontal and vertical) and two-axis tracking systems compared to the fixed south-oriented PV system. It was found that single-axis (vertical axis) tracker optimally tilted is the most promising for sites near the equator and achieves around 19% more energy output over the fixed south-oriented solar panel system. Moreover, it is considered simpler compared to the two-axis tracking system. It is true that the two-axis tracking system could harvest around 4% more energy than the vertical axis tracker optimally tilted system for sites near and far from the equator. However, such increase in energy may not sound feasible as the two-axis system is consuming more power for tracking and considered more complicated compared to the vertical axis tracking system. The novelty of this work is that, it introduces a new concept for the optimum tilt for the single-axis (vertical axis) tracking system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Meteonorm 7.1© software 2016.
PVSyst 6.44© software
References
Axis (2010) [Online]. Available: http://www.usnovacorp.com/image/axis.jpg. Accessed 11 Aug 2016
Chang TP (2009) The Sun’s apparent position and the optimal tilt angle of a solar collector in the northern hemisphere. Sol Energy 83(8):1274–1284
Chang Y-P (2010) Optimal the tilt angles for photovoltaic modules in Taiwan. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32(9):956–964
Despotovic M, Nedic V (2015) Comparison of optimum tilt angles of solar collectors determined at yearly, seasonal and monthly levels. Energy Convers Manag 97:121–131
Drury E, Lopez A, Denholm P, Margolis R (2014) Relative performance of tracking versus fixed-tilt photovoltaic systems in the USA. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 22(12):1302–1315
Duffie JA, Beckman WA (2013) Solar engineering of thermal processes, 4th edn. Wiley
Eldin SS, Abd-Elhady M, Kandil H (2016) Feasibility of solar tracking systems for PV panels in hot and cold regions. Renew Energy 85:228–233
Gómez-Gil FJ, Wang X, Barnett A (2012) Energy production of photovoltaic systems: fixed, tracking, and concentrating. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(1):306–313
Heslop S, MacGill I (2014) Comparative analysis of the variability of fixed and tracking photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy 107:351–364
Hussein H, Ahmad G, El-Ghetany H (2004) Performance evaluation of photovoltaic modules at different tilt angles and orientations. Energy Convers Manag 45(15–16):2441–2452
Jordan DC, Kurtz SR (2013) Photovoltaic degradation rates—an analytical review. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 21(1):12–29
Lee J, Rahim NA (2013) Performance comparison of dual-axis solar tracker vs static solar system in Malaysia. Clean Energy and Technology (CEAT), 2013 IEEE Conference on, IEEE
Mahendran M, Ong H, Lee G, Thanikaikumaran K (2013) An experimental comparison study between single-axis tracking and fixed photovoltaic solar panel efficiency and power output: case study in east coast Malaysia. Sustainable Development Conference
Makrides G, Zinsser B, Norton M, Georghiou GE (2012) Performance of photovoltaics under actual operating conditions. Third generation photovoltaics, pp 201–232
Mondol JD, Yohanis YG, Norton B (2007) The impact of array inclination and orientation on the performance of a grid-connected photovoltaic system. Renew Energy 32(1):118–140
Mousazadeh H, Keyhani A, Javadi A, Mobli H, Abrinia K, Sharifi A (2009) A review of principle and sun-tracking methods for maximizing solar systems output. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(8):1800–1818
Rezk H, Eltamaly AM (2015) A comprehensive comparison of different MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy 112:1–11
Rowlands IH, Kemery BP, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2011) Optimal solar-PV tilt angle and azimuth: an Ontario (Canada) case study. Energy Policy 39(3):1397–1409
Şenpinar A, Cebeci M (2012) Evaluation of power output for fixed and two-axis tracking PV arrays. Appl Energy 92:677–685
Siraki AG, Pillay P (2012) Study of optimum tilt angles for solar panels in different latitudes for urban applications. Sol Energy 86(6):1920–1928
Yadav AK, Chandel S (2013) Tilt angle optimization to maximize incident solar radiation: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 23:503–513
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alkaff, S.A., Shamdasania, N.H., Ii, G.Y. et al. A Study on Implementation of PV Tracking for Sites Proximate and Away from the Equator. Process Integr Optim Sustain 3, 375–382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-019-00086-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-019-00086-7