Abstract
The trope of “tradition” dominates archaeological studies of the African diaspora. Much of the information archaeologists have about traditions on the African continent or in the early diaspora comes from historical documents and from ethnography. Here, the author argues that pragmatism provides a model for analysis that allows archaeology a degree of independence from these allied datasets. Archaeologists, like other social scientists, confront the problem of the relative importance of social learning (i.e., tradition) vs. structure as forces shaping cultural expression in the African diaspora. An analytical strategy inspired by pragmatism is here applied to beads recovered from Tidewater Chesapeake slave quarters occupied in the 18th and early 19th centuries in order to demonstrate that tradition is only part of the story
Extracto
El tropo de “tradición” domina los estudios arqueológicos de la diáspora africana. Una gran parte de la información que los arqueólogos tienen sobre las tradiciones del continente africano o de la primera diáspora procede de documentos históricos y de la etnografía. En el presente documento, el autor argumenta que el pragmatismo proporciona un modelo para el análisis que permite a la arqueología un grado de independencia de estos conjuntos de datos aliados. Los arqueólogos, al igual que otros científicos sociales, se enfrentan al problema de la importancia relativa del aprendizaje social (es decir, la tradición) frente a la estructura como fuerzas que dan forma a la expresión cultural en la diáspora africana. Una estrategia analítica inspirada por el pragmatismo se aplica aquí a abalorios recuperados de los barrios esclavos de Tidewater Cheaspeake ocupados en el siglo XVIII y a principios del siglo XIX, con el fin de demostrar que la tradición es sólo parte de la historia.
Résumé
Le trope de la « tradition » domine les études archéologiques de la diaspora africaine. Beaucoup des informations dont disposent les archéologues à propos des traditions sur le continent africain ou sur les premières années de la diaspora proviennent de documents historiques et de l’ethnographie. Ici, l’auteur soutient que le pragmatisme fournit un modèle d’analyse qui permet à l’archéologie un degré d’indépendance de ces ensembles de données connexes. Les archéologues, comme d’autres spécialistes des sciences sociales, font face au problème de l’importance relative de l’apprentissage social (p. ex., la tradition) par rapport à la structure des forces façonnant les expressions culturelles dans la diaspora africaine. Une stratégie analytique inspirée par le pragmatisme est. ici utilisée pour les perles récupérées dans les quartiers d’esclaves de Tidewater Chesapeake, occupés au 18e siècle et au début du 19e siècle afin de démontrer que la tradition n’est qu’une partie de l’histoire.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Chicago Defender ( 1931 ).
I went down to the crossroad
fell down on my knees
I went down to the crossroad
fell down on my knees
Asked the lord above “Have mercy now
save poor Bob if you please”
Yeeooo, standin at the crossroad
tried to flag a ride
ooo ooo eee
I tried to flag a ride
Didn't nobody seem to know me babe
everybody pass me by
Standin at the crossroad babe
risin sun goin down
Standin at the crossroad babe
eee eee eee, risin sun goin down
I believe to my soul now,
Poor Bob is sinkin down
You can run, you can run
tell my friend Willie Brown
You can run, you can run
tell my friend Willie Brown
[th]'at I got the crossroad blues this mornin Lord
babe, I'm sinkin down
And I went to the crossroad momma
I looked east and west
I went to the crossroad baby
I looked east and west
Lord, I didn't have no sweet woman
ooh-well babe, in my distress
The song may be heard on Youtube, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD2jXjV9Z8A>.
Antifoundationalism: resisting the assertion that no steps toward new knowledge can be taken until it has been proven that the investigation rests on an infallible foundation. It rejects the view that “there are firm, unchangeable foundations to knowledge” (Baert 2005:192).
Yelvington (2006) offers a critical analysis of this simplified picture of the “debate.”
Icons are a third kind of sign; they are related to their objects by resemblance. While blue beads may have held iconic meanings for people in the past, any relationship between blue beads and protection is—because it is historically contingent and arbitrary—by definition, symbolic.
For additional information about the sites, including maps and detailed descriptions, the reader is directed to <http://www.daacs.org >.
Furthermore, two-by-two contingency tables suggest the difference between Rich Neck and Utopia II is insignificant, whereas the Fairfield assemblage differs significantly from both. Rich Neck vs. Utopia II: x 2=1.74, df=1, p>0.10; Fairfield vs. Rich Neck: x 2=5.79, df=1, p<0.02; and Fairfield vs. Utopia II: x 2=23.8, df=1, p<0.001.
With the exception of ST116, which has only one bead—a blue one (DAACS 2014a).
For the Tidewater Chesapeake sites, fewer than 5% of beads are made of materials other than glass. At the New York African Burial Ground, the rate was even lower, less than 2% (LaRoche 1994:6; Bianco et al. 2009: table 55). Only 2.6 % of the beads from the sites in the Stine et al. (1996) sample were amber, shell, or stone.
Beads made of other materials do not cluster in a particular phase at Rich Neck, though there is a noticeable concentration of beads, especially shell beads, in Feature 5 and of copper alloy and porcelain beads in Feature 21. These two concentrations appear to be sets of beads, as they were recovered from distinct deposits within each feature.
Though spherical/subspherical forms are the dominant shape in the regional assemblage (62% of all beads), this is not the case at Rich Neck. This is true whether one considers all beads or only glass beads.
Again, this is true whether one considers all beads or only glass beads.
Comparison of structures: x 2=33.3, df=1, p<0.001; comparison of phases: x 2=15.8, df=1, p<0.001. Even though there is an association between structure and phase, the bead color seems to be linked to structure (with all blue and no red) rather than occupation date (almost twice as many blue as red).
References
Adams, William Hampton, and Sarah Jane Boling 1989 Status and Ceramics for Planters and Slaves on Three Georgia Coastal Plantations. Historical Archaeology 23(1):69–96.
Agbe-Davies, Anna S. 2015 Tobacco, Pipes, and Race in Colonial Virginia: Little Tubes of Mighty Power. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
Agbe-Davies, Anna S. 2016 How to Do Things with Things, or, Are Blue Beads Good to Think? Semiotic Review, Vol. 4 <http://www.semioticreview.com/>. 16 December 2016.
Agbe-Davies, Anna S. [2018] Laboring Under an Illusion: Steps to Align Method with Theory in the Archaeology of American Slavery. Historical Archaeology 52(1).
Archer, Stephen N., and Kevin M. Bartoy 2006 Introduction: Considering Methods and Methodology in Historical Archaeology. In Dirt and Discussion: Methods, Methodology, and Interpretation in Historical Archaeology, S. Archer and K. Bartoy, editors, pp. 1–9. Springer, New York, NY.
Baert, Patrick 2005 Towards a Pragmatist-Inspired Philosophy of Social Science. Acta Sociologica 48(3):191–203.
Barnes, Jodi A. (editor) 2011 The Materiality of Freedom: Archaeologies of Postemancipation Life. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
Bauer, Alexander A. 2014 Semiotics in Archaeological Theory. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, C. Smith, editor, pp. 6564–6570. Springer, New York, NY.
Bell, Alison 2008 On the Politics and Possibilities for Operationalizing Vindicationist Historical Archaeologies. Historical Archaeology 42(2):138–146.
Bianco, Barbara A., Christopher R. DeCorse, and Jean Howson 2009 Beads and other Adornment. In The New York African Burial Ground: Unearthing the African Presence in Colonial New York, Volume 2, Part 1: The Archaeology of the New York African Burial Ground, W. R. Perry, J. Howson, and B. A. Bianco, editors, pp. 321–347. U.S. General Services Administration, Washington, DC. U.S. General Services Administration <https://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/249941>. Accessed 16 December 2016.
Binford, Lewis R. 1961 A New Method of Calculating Dates from Kaolin Pipe Stem Samples. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Newsletter 9(1):19–21.
Brown, David A. 2006 Fairfield Quarter—Background. Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery <http://www.daacs.org/sites/fairfield-quarter/#background>. Accessed 7 December 2012.
Chicago Defender 1931 Church Folk Make up Mob of Lynchers. Chicago Defender 4 April:1.
DeCorse, Christopher R. 1999 Oceans Apart: Africanist Perspectives of Diaspora Archaeology. In I, Too, Am America: Studies in African-American Archaeology, Theresa A. Singleton, editor, pp. 132–155. University Press of Virginia Press, Charlottesville.
Deetz, James 1967 Invitation to Archaeology. Natural History Press, Garden City, NY.
Delle, James A. 2008 Archaeology at the Parvin Homestead: Searching for the Material Legacy of the Underground Railroad. Historical Archaeology 42(2):38–62.
Delle, James A., Stephen A. Mrozowski, and Robert Paynter (editors) 2000 Lines that Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery (DAACS) 2012 Utopia II. Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery`, Chronology <http://www.daacs.org/resources/sites/chronology/16/>. Accessed 7 December 2012.
Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery (DAACS) 2014a Artifact Query 4. Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery <http://www.daacs.org/>. Accessed 19 June 2014.
Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery (DAACS) 2014b MCD Query 1. Digital Archaeological Archive of Comparative Slavery <http://www.daacs.org/>. Accessed 19 June 2014.
Fennell, Christopher C. 2000 Conjuring Boundaries: Inferring Past Identities from Religious Artifacts. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 4(4):281–313.
Fennell, Christopher C. 2007 Crossroads and Cosmologies: Diasporas and Ethnogenesis in the New World. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
Fesler, Garrett Randall 2004 From Houses to Homes: An Archaeological Case Study of Household Formation at the Utopia Slave Quarter, ca. 1675 to 1775. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.
Franklin, Maria 1995 Rethinking the Carter's Grove Slave Quarter Reconstruction: A Proposal. In The Written and the Wrought: Complementary Sources in Historical Archaeology, Essays in Honor of James Deetz, University of California Berkeley, Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, Vol. 79, pp. 147–164. Berkeley.
Frazier, E. Franklin 1932 The Negro Family in Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Galle, Jillian E. 2010 Costly Signaling and Gendered Social Strategies among Slaves in the Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake: An Archaeological Perspective. American Antiquity 75(1):19–43.
Graves, Tom 2008 Crossroads: The Life and Afterlife of Blues Legend Robert Johnson. Demers, Spokane, WA.
Greenberg, Alan 2012 Love in Vain: A Vision of Robert Johnson. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Gundaker, Grey 2011 The Kongo Cosmogram in Historical Archaeology and the Moral Compass of Dave the Potter. Historical Archaeology 45(2):176–183.
Harrington, J. C. 1954 Dating Stem Fragments of Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Clay Tobacco Pipes. Quarterly Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Virginia 9(1):9–13.
Herskovits, Melville J. 1990 The Myth of the Negro Past. Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
Hughey, Matthew W. 2009 Cinethetic Racism: White Redemption and Black Stereotypes in “Magical Negro” Films. Social Problems 56(3):543–577.
Jacobs, Harriet A. 2000 Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Penguin, New York, NY.
Jeppson, Patrice L. 2001 Pitfalls, Pratfalls, and Pragmatism in Public Archaeology. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Long Beach, CA. Patrice L. Jeppson <http://www.p-j.net/pjeppson/SHA2001/Papers/Jeppson.htm>. Accessed 30 November 2012.
LaRoche, Cheryl A. 1994 Beads from the African Burial Ground, New York City: A Preliminary Assessment. BEADS: Journal of the Society of Bead Researchers 6:3–20.
Leaf, Murray J. 2003 Ethnography and Pragmatism. In Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science, A. Morales, editor, pp. 92–117. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
Leone, Mark P. 2005 The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis. University of California Press, Berkeley.
McDavid, Carol 2002 Archaeologies that Hurt; Descendants that Matter: A Pragmatic Approach to Collaboration in the Public Interpretation of African-American Archaeology. World Archaeology 34(2):303–314.
Miller, George L. 2000 Telling Time for Archaeologists. Northeast Historical Archaeology 29:1–22.
Moore, Sue Mullins 1985 Social and Economic Status on the Coastal Plantation: An Archaeological Perspective. In The Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life, T. A. Singleton, editor, pp. 141–160. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Morgan, Philip D. 1998 Slave Counterpoint: Black Culture in the Eighteenth Century Chesapeake and Lowcountry. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Mosley, Walter 2003 What Next: A Memoir toward World Peace. Black Classic Press, Baltimore, MD.
Mrozowski, Stephen A. 2012 Pragmatism and the Relevancy of Archaeology for Contemporary Society. In Archaeology in Society: Its Relevance in the Modern World, M. Rockman and J. Flatman, editors, pp. 239–243. Springer, New York, NY.
Muller, Nancy Ladd 1992 DuBoisian Pragmatism and 'The Problem of the Twentieth Century.' Critique of Anthropology 12(3):319–337.
Noël Hume, Ivor 1964 Archaeology: Handmaiden to History. North Carolina Historical Review 41(2):214–225.
Nöth, Winfried 2011 Semiotic Foundations of Pragmatics. In Foundations of Pragmatics, W. Bublitz and N. R. Norrick, editors, pp. 167–202. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, Germany.
Ogundiran, Akinwumi 2002 Of Small Things Remembered: Beads, Cowries, and Cultural Translations of the Atlantic Experience in Yorubaland. International Journal of African Historical Studies 35(2&3):427–457.
Otto, John Solomon 1984 Cannon's Point Plantation, 1794–1860: Living Conditions and Status Patterns in the Old South. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
Parmentier, Richard J. 1997 The Pragmatic Semiotics of Cultures. Semiotica 116(1):1–114.
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1994a How to Make Our Ideas Clear. In The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5, Book 2, Chapter 5. Past Masters: Full Text Humanities <http://www.nlx.com/home>. Accessed 17 February 2011.
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1994b Division of Signs. In The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5, Book 2, Chapter 5. Past Masters: Full Text Humanities <http://www.nlx.com/home>. Accessed 17 February 2011.
Phillips, Philip 1955 American Archaeology and General Anthropological Theory. Southwestern Journal of Archaeology 11(3):246–250.
Potter, Parker B., Jr. 1991 What Is the Use of Plantation Archaeology? Historical Archaeology 25(3):94–107.
Preucel, Robert W. 2006 Archaeological Semiotics. Blackwell, Malden, MA.
Preucel, Robert W., and Alexander A. Bauer 2001 Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34(2):85–96.
Preucel, Robert W., and Stephen A. Mrozowski 2010 The New Pragmatism. In Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: The New Pragmatism, R. W. Preucel and S. A. Mrozowski, editors, pp. 3–49. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
Reid, J. Jefferson, and Stephanie M. Whittlesey 1998 A Search for the Philosophical Julian: American Pragmatism and Southwestern Archaeology. Kiva 64(2):275–286.
Russell, Aaron E. 1997 Material Culture and African-American Spirituality at the Hermitage. Historical Archaeology 31(2):63–80.
Saitta, Dean J. 2003 Archaeology and the Problems of Men. In Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, Todd L. VanPool and Christine S. VanPool, editors, pp. 11–15. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Saitta, Dean J. 2007 The Archaeology of Collective Action. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
Samuels, Warren J. 2000 Signs, Pragmatism, and Abduction: The Tragedy, Irony, and Promise of Charles Sanders Peirce. Journal of Economic Issues 34(1):207–217.
Schroeder, Patricia R. 2004 Robert Johnson, Mythmaking, and Contemporary American Culture. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Shackel, Paul A. 2010 Identity and Collective Action in a Multiracial Community. Historical Archaeology 44(1):58–71.
South, Stanley 1977 Method and Theory in Historical Archeology. Academic Press, New York, NY.
Spaulding, Albert C. 1960 The Dimensions of Archaeology. In Essays in the Science of Culture: In Honor of Leslie A. White, G. E. Dole and R. L. Carneiro, editors, pp. 437–456. Thomas Y. Crowell, New York, NY.
Staat, Wim 1993 On Abduction, Deduction, Induction and the Categories. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29(2):225–237.
Stine, Linda France, Melanie A. Cabak, and Mark D. Groover 1996 Blue Beads as African-American Cultural Symbols. Historical Archaeology 30(3):49–75.
Thomas, Brian W. 2002 Struggling with the Past: Some Views of African-American Identity. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 6(2):143–151.
Upton, Dell 1996 Ethnicity, Authenticity, and Invented Traditions. Historical Archaeology 30(2):1–7.
White, Carolyn L. 2008 Personal Adornment and Interlaced Identities at the Sherburne Site, Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Historical Archaeology 42(2):17–37.
Wilkie, Laurie A. 1997 Secret and Sacred: Contextualizing the Artifacts of African-American Magic and Religion. Historical Archaeology 31(4):81–106.
Wilkie, Laurie A., and Paul Farnsworth 2010 Those Who Were Traded: African-Bahamian Archaeology and the Slave Trade. In Social Archaeologies of Trade and Exchange: Exploring Relationships among People, Places, and Things, A. A. Bauer and A. S. Agbe-Davies, editors, pp. 143–163. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
Williams, Heather Andrea 2012 Help Me to Find My People: the African American Search for Family Lost in Slavery. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Wylie, Alison 2002 Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Yelvington, Kevin A. 2006 Introduction. In Afro-Atlantic Dialogues: Anthropology in the Diaspora, K. A. Yelvington, editor, pp. 3–32. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM.
Acknowledgments:
Many thanks to William White for inviting me to contribute to this exciting collection of articles. I also owe a debt of gratitude to the many people who have shaped my thinking on the issues I raise here, including Alex Bauer, Jocelyn Chua, J. Eric Deetz, Jean Dennison, Maria Franklin, Jillian Galle, Mark Hauser, Carol McDavid, Linda Stine, and Silvia Tomášková. And, finally, to those who read this article in its last stages, Jamie Arjona, Nori Comello, Christian Lentz, Annelise Morris, Eliza Richards, and the anonymous reviewers: thank you for helping me to express more clearly the ideas herein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agbe-Davies, A.S. Where Tradition and Pragmatism Meet: African Diaspora Archaeology at the Crossroads. Hist Arch 51, 9–27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41636-017-0004-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41636-017-0004-8