Skip to main content
Log in

„Made in?“ – Eine Metaanalyse multidimensionaler Country-of-Origin Effekte

„Made in?“ – A multidimensional meta analysis of country-of-origin effects

  • Originalartikel
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Diese Studie untersucht die Auswirkungen von Herkunftslandinformationen von Produkten auf Qualitätswahrnehmungen, Einstellungen und Kaufabsichten von Konsumenten mittels einer differenzierten Metaanalyse, die insgesamt 67 Studien mit 327 Effektstärken integriert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen einen mittleren bis hohen signifikanten Country-of-Origin (COO)-Effekt. Nach der Globalisierungswelle zeigt sich ein verringerter COO-Effekt. Die differenzierte Betrachtung multidimensionaler Effekte zeigt einen vergleichsweise hohen Effekt des Country-of-Brand. Zusätzlich konnten zwei neue Moderatoren identifiziert werden. Erstens messen Studien, die auf Studentenstichproben basieren, höhere COO-Effekte. Zweitens fallen die Ergebnisse in Experimenten geringer aus, wenn hybride Produkte untersucht werden.

Abstract

This study applies a differentiated meta-analysis, which integrates 67 studies and 327 effect sizes, to analyze the impact of country-of-origin (COO) effects of products on quality perceptions, attitudes, and purchase intentions of customers. Results show a moderate to strong significant COO effect for the investigated period. This effect becomes weaker after the globalization wave after the period of the 1990s. The differentiated consideration of multidimensional effects shows a comparatively strong effect of the country-of-brand. Additionally, we identified two new moderators. First, studies that use student samples show stronger COO effects. Second, studies that use hybrid products show weaker COO effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Notes

  1. Vgl. Balabanis und Diamantopoulos (2008).

  2. Vgl. Liefeld (2004); Heslop et al. (2008).

  3. Vgl. z. B. Lee und Lee (2009); Phau und Cheong (2009); Wong et al. (2008); Godey et al. (2012); Sharma (2011).

  4. Z. B. American Marketing Association und European Marketing Academy.

  5. Vgl. Diamantopoulos et al. (2009a), (2009b).

  6. Die 67 verwendeten Primärstudien sind im Anhang aufgelistet.

  7. Vgl. Campello et al. (2010); Ivashina und Scharfstein (2010).

  8. Vgl. Bauer et al. (2006); Eisend (2006), (2009); Schwens und Kabst (2009); Völckner und Hofmann (2007).

  9. Vgl. Campbell und Stanley (1963); Rosenthal und Rosnow (1984).

  10. Vgl. Eisend (2006); Garlin und Owen (2006); Liefeld (1993); Völckner und Hofmann (2007).

  11. Zum Beispiel Kaynak (1989).

  12. Vgl. Han et al. (1994); Heslop et al. (1987); Niffenegger und White (1982).

  13. Vgl. Crook et al. (2008); Heugens und Lander (2009); Hunter und Schmidt (2004);.

  14. Vgl. Arthur et al. (2001).

  15. Vgl. z. B. Cano et al. (2004); Krasnikov und Jayachandran (2008); Palmatier et al. (2006).

  16. Vgl. z. B. Peterson und Jolibert (1995); Pharr (2005); Verlegh und Steenkamp (1999).

  17. Vgl. z. B. Chao (1989).

  18. Vgl. Bauer et al. (2006); De Matos und Rossi (2008); Eisend (2006); Völckner und Hofmann (2007).

  19. Vgl. Borenstein (2009); Garlin und Owen (2006); Waples et al. (2009).

  20. Vgl. Borenstein (2009).

  21. Vgl. Borenstein (2009); Fern und Monroe (1996); Hunter und Schmidt (2004); Ray und Shadish (1996).

  22. Vgl. Arthur et al. (2001).

  23. Vgl. Borenstein et al. (2007).

  24. Vgl. Hedges und Vevea (1998).

  25. Vgl. DerSimonian und Laird (1986); Hedges und Vevea (1998).

  26. Vgl. Callahan et al. (2003); Field (2001); Sturman (2003).

  27. Vgl. Borenstein et al. (2007); Franke und Park (2006).

  28. Vgl. Marín-Martínez und Sánchez-Meca (2010); Shadish und Haddock (2009).

  29. Vgl. Littell et al. (2008).

  30. Vgl. Eisend (2009).

  31. Vgl. Steenkamp (1990).

  32. Vgl. Fong und Burton (2008).

  33. Vgl. Ettenson und Gaeth (1991); Phau und Prendergast (2000).

  34. Vgl. Balabanis et al. (2001); Ettenson und Klein (2005); Shankarmahesh (2006).

  35. Vgl. Usunier (2006).

  36. Vgl. Borenstein (2009).

  37. Vgl. Spiegel Online (2009a), (2009b).

  38. Vgl. Handelsblatt (2009).

Literatur

  • Aboulnasr, Khaled 2007. Consumers’ response to foreign made products: the effect of product category involvement. Marketing Management Journal 17(2):47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Zafar, James Johnson, Yang Xia, Fatt Chen, Han Teng, und Lim Boon. 2004. Does country of origin matter for low-involvement products? International Marketing Review 21(1):102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, Winfried, Winston Bennett, und Allen Huffcutt. 2001. Conducting meta-analysis using Sas. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, George, und Adamantios Diamantopoulos. 2008. Brand origin identification by consumers: a classification perspective. Journal of International Marketing 16(1):39–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, George, Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Rene Dentiste Mueller, und T.C. Melewar. 2001. The impact of nationalism, patriotism and internationalism on consumer ethnocentric tendencies. Journal of International Business Studies 32(1):157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Hans, Ralf Mäder, und Sandra-Nadine Wagner. 2006. Übereinstimmung Von Marken- und Konsumentenpersönlichkeit als Determinante des Kaufverhaltens: Eine Metaanalyse der Selbstkongruenzforschung, Arbeitspapier Nr. W 97. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskaran, Suku, und Nishal Sukumaran. 2007. Contextual and methodological issues in coo studies. Marketing Intelligence Planning 25(1):66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijmolt, Tammo, und Rik Pieters. 2001. Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. Marketing Letters 12(2):157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey, Warren, und Erik Nes. 1982. Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies 13(1):89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, Michael 2009. Effect sizes for continuous data. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, Hrsg. Harris Cooper, Larry Hedges, Jeffrey Valentine, 221–235. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, Michael, Larry Hedges, und Hannah Rothstein. 2007. Meta-analysis: fixed effect vs. random effects. http://www.meta-analysis.com/downloads/Meta-analysis fixed effect vs random effects.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodowsky, Glen 1998. The effects of country of design and country of assembly on Evaluative beliefs about automobiles and attitudes toward buying them: A comparison between low and high Ethnocentric consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 10(3):85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, Judith, Scott Kiker, und Tom Cross. 2003. Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. Journal of Management 29(5):663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald Thomas, und Julian Stanley. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Campello, Murillo, John R. Graham, und Harvey R. Campbell. 2010. The real effects of financial constraints: evidence from a financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 97(3):470–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, Cynthia, Francois Carrillat, und Fernando Jaramillo. 2004. A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from five continents. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21(2):179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, Goutam, Anthony Allred, und Terry Bristol. 1996. Exploring consumers’ evaluations of counterfeits: the roles of country of origin and ethnocentrism. Advances Consumer Research 23(1):379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Chingching 2008. The effectiveness of using a global look in an asian market. Journal of Advertising Research 48(2):199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Paul 1989. Export and reverse investment: strategic implications for newly industrialized countries. Journal of International Business Studies 20(12):75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Yersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Harris, und Larry Hedges. 1994. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, Russell, David Ketchen, James Combs, und Samuel Todd. 2008. Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal 29(11):1141–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Matos, Celso, und Carlos Rossi. 2008. Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(4):578–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denson, Thomas, Marija Spanovic, und Norman Miller. 2009. Cognitive appraisals and emotions predict Cortisol and immune responses: a meta-analysis of acute laboratory social stressors and emotion inductions. Psychological Bulletin 135(6):823–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DerSimonian, Rebecca, und Nan Laird. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7(3):177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, Bodo Schlegelmilch, und Dayananda Palihawadana. 2009a. Country-of-origin: a construct past its sell by date? AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, Bodo Schlegelmilch, und Dayananda Palihawadana. 2009b. Country-of-origin: still alive and kicking? 38th EMAC Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, Martin 2006. Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing 23(2):187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, Martin 2009. A cross-cultural Generalizability study of consumers’ acceptance of product placements in movies. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 31(1):15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettenson, Richard, und Gary Gaeth. 1991. Consumer perceptions of hybrid (Bi-national products). Journal of Consumer Marketing 8(4):13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettenson, Richard, und Jill Gabrielle Klein. 2005. The fallout from french nuclear testing in the south pacific: a longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review 22(2):199–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fern, Edward, und Kent Monroe. 1996. Effect-size estimates: issues and problems in interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research 23(2):89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Andy 2001. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a monte carlo comparison of fixed-and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods 6(2):164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, John, und Suzan Burton. 2008. A cross-cultural comparison of electronic word-of-mouth and country-of-origin effects. Journal of Business Research 61(3):233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, George, und Jeong-Eun Park. 2006. Salesperson adaptive selling behavior and customer orientation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 43(4):693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garlin, Francine, und Katherine Owen. 2006. Setting the tone with the tune: a meta-analytic review of the effects of background music in retail settings. Journal of Business Research 59(6):755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godey, Bruno, Daniele Pederzoli, Gaetano Aiello, Raffaele Donvito, Priscilla Chan, Hyunjoo Oh, Rahul Singh, Irina I. Skorobogatykh, Junji Tsuchiya, und Bart Weitz. 2012. Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers’ decision to purchase luxury products. Journal of Business Research 65(10):1461–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinstein, Amir 2008. The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(2):166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürhan-Canli, Zeynep, und Durairaj Maheswaran. 2000. Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research 37(3):309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, Mariet, Robbert Sanderman, Hilde Bolks, Jolanda Tuinstra, und James Coyne. 2008. Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychological Bulletin 134(1):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamzaoui, Leila, und Dwight Merunka. 2006. The impact of country of design and country of manufacture on consumer perceptions of Bi-national products’ quality: an empirical model based on the concept of fit. Journal of Consumer Marketing 23(3):145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Sangpil, Sukki Yoon, und Patrick Vargas. 2005. Think it’s good, but feel it’s bad: country-of-origin effect on cognition, affect, and behavior. Advances Consumer Research 32(1):263–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelsblatt 2009. Trigema: Made in Germany - online verkauft. http://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/mittelstand/trigema-made-in-germany-online-verkauft/3244646.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, C. Min, Byoung-Woo Lee, und Kong-Kyun Ro. 1994. The choice of a survey mode in country image studies. Journal of Business Research 29(2):151–162.

  • Hedges, Larry 1981. Distribution theory for glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 6(2):107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, Larry, und Therese Pigott. 2004. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 9(4):426–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, Larry, und Jack Vevea. 1998. Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 3(4):486–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heslop, Louise, John Liefeld, und Marjorie Wall. 1987. An experimental study of the impact of country-of-origin information ASAC Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop, Louise, Irene Lu, und David Cray. 2008. Modeling country image effects through an international crisis. International Marketing Review 25(4):354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, Pursey, und Michel Lander. 2009. Structure! agency!(and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy Management Journal 52(1):61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, Stefan, Alice Sawyer, Ashley Witt, und Diana Oh. 2010b. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 78(2):169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, Wilhelm, Jan De Houwer, Marco Perugini, Frank Baeyens, und Geert Crombez. 2010a. Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136(3):390–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert 2001. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, John, und Frank Schmidt. 2004. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insch, Gary 2003. The impact of country-of-origin effects on industrial buyers’ perceptions of product quality. Management International Review 43(3):291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insch, Gary, und Brad McBride. 1999. Decomposing the country-of-origin construct: an empirical test of country of parts and country of assembly. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 10(4):69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivashina, Victoria, und David Scharfstein. 2010. Bank lending during the financial crisis of 2008. Journal of Financial Economics 97(3):319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak, Erdener 1989. How chinese buyers rate foreign suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management 18(3):187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, Nina, und Michael Frese. 2008. Effectiveness of error management training: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1):59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, Ahmet, Satish Jayachandran, und William Bearden. 2005. Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing 69(2):24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantopoulos, Spyros, und Larry Hedges. 2009. Analyzing effect sizes: fixed effects models. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, Hrsg. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, J.C. Valentine 279–294. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnikov, Alexander, und Satish Jayachandran. 2008. The relative impact of marketing, research-and-development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of Marketing 72(4):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jin Kyun, und Lee Wei-Na. 2009. Country-of-origin effects on consumer product evaluation and purchase intention: the role of objective versus subjective knowledge. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 21(2):137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Wai-Kwan, Kwok Leung, und Robert Wyer. 1993. The roles of country of origin information on buyers’ product evaluations: signal or attribute. Advances Consumer Research 20(1):684–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefeld, John 1993. Experiments on country-of-origin effects: review and meta-analysis of effect size. In Product-country images: impact and role in international marketing, Hrsg. Nicolas Papadopoulos, Louise Heslop, 117–156. New York: International Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefeld, John 2004. Consumer knowledge and use of country-of-origin information at the point of purchase. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 4(2):85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, Julia, Jacqueline Corcoran, und Vijayan Pillai. 2008. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, Peter, Daniel Baack, Srdan Zdravkovic, Karin Staub, und Amine Lyn. 2008. Meta-analysis of cultural differences: another slice at the apple. International Business Review 17(5):520–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio, und Julio Sánchez-Meca. 2010. Weighting by inverse variance or by sample size in random-effects meta-analysis. Educational Psychological Measurement 70(56):56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niffenegger, Phillip, und John White. 1982. How european retailers view american imported products: results of a product image survey. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 10(3):281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, Robert, Rajiv Dant, Dhruv Grewal, und Kenneth Evans. 2006. Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing 70(10):136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Siqing, und Yahui Zou. 2007. The moderating effect of Multicultural competence in brand-of-origin effect. International Management Review 3(3):57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert 2001. On the use of college students in social science research: insights from a second‐order meta‐analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 28(3):450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert, und Alain Jolibert. 1995. A meta-analysis of country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies 26(4):883–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, Julie 2005. Synthesizing country-of-origin research from the last decade: is the concept still salient in an era of global brands? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 13(4):34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phau, Ian, und Paul Chao. 2008. Country-of-origin: state of the art review for international marketing strategy and practice. International Marketing Review 25(4):349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phau, Ian, und Edith Cheong. 2009. How young adult consumers evaluate diffusion brands: effects of brand loyalty and status consumption. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 21(2):109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phau, Ian, und Gerard Prendergast. 2000. Conceptualizing the country of origin of brand. Journal of Marketing Communications 6(3):159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Jo Anne, und William Shadish. 1996. How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64(6):1316–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, Robert, Diane Edmondson, und John Hansen. 2009. A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research 62(10):1027–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Robert, und Robin DiMatteo. 2001. Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review Psychology 52(1):59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Robert, und Ralph Rosnow. 1984. Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Paul, Murray Young, und Rao Unnava. 1991. An experimental investigation of the processes behind the country of origin effect. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 3(2):29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, Ralf 2004. Meta-analysis: a comparison of approaches. Ashland: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwens, Christian, und Rüdiger Kabst. 2009. Determinanten Früher Internationalisierung: Eine Meta-Analyse. Zeitschrift Betriebswirtschaft 79(1):1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, William, und Keith Haddock. 2009. Combining estimates of effect size. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, Hrsg. Harris Cooper, Larry Hedges, Jeffrey Valentine, 257–277. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankarmahesh, Mahesh 2006. Consumer Ethnocentrism: an integrative review of its antecedents and consequences. International Marketing Review 23(2):146–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Piyush 2011. Country of origin effects in developed and emerging markets: exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies 42(2):285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel Online 2009a. „Buy American“-Klausel Beunruhigt Deutsche Wirtschaft. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,604655,00.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel Online 2009b. EU Warnt Vor „Buy China“-Klausel. http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,631087,00.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Stajkovic, Alexander, und Fred Luthans. 1997. A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance, 1975–95. Academy of Management Journal 40(5):1122–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict 1990. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 21(4):309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, Michael 2003. Searching for the inverted U‑shaped relationship between time and performance: meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships. Journal of Management 29(5):609–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, Barbara, und Linda Fidell. 2007. Experimental designs using Anova. London: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, Laszlo, David Griffith, und Craig Russell. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and Mne performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies 36(3):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topa, Gabriela, Juan Antonio Moriano, Marco Depolo, Carlos-María Alcover, und J. Morales. 2009. Antecedents and consequences of retirement planning and decision-making: a meta-analysis and model. Journal of Vocational Behavior 75(1):38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, David, und Gerald Gorn. 1993. An experiment on the salience of country-of-origin in the era of global brands. Journal of International Marketing 1(1):57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, David, und Lee Wei-Na. 1993. Removing negative country images: effects of decomposition, branding, and product experience. Journal of International Marketing 1(4):25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usunier, Jean-Claude 2006. Relevance in business research: the case of country-of-origin research in marketing. European Management Review 3(1):60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlegh, Peeter, und Jan-Benedict Steenkamp. 1999. A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology 20(5):521–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völckner, Franziska, und Julian Hofmann. 2007. The price-perceived quality relationship: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants. Marketing Letters 18(3):181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Morgan, und Brad Bushman. 1999. Integrating results through meta-analytic review using Sas software. Cary: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples, Ethan, Alison Antes, Stephen Murphy, Shane Connelly, und Michael Mumford. 2009. A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics 87(1):133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Chui, Michael Polonsky, und Romana Garma. 2008. The impact of consumer Ethnocentrism and country of origin sub-components for high involvement products on young chinese consumers’ product assessments. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 20(4):455–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils D. Kraiczy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schudey, A.P., Jensen, O. & Kraiczy, N.D. „Made in?“ – Eine Metaanalyse multidimensionaler Country-of-Origin Effekte. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 68, 47–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-016-0002-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-016-0002-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

JEL-Classification

Navigation