Skip to main content
Log in

Why Managers Matter matters: replies and reflections

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Organization Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The editors of the Journal of Organization Design invited several organization design scholars to provide brief reflections on our book Why Managers Matter: The Perils of the Bossless Company. The contributors have raised a host of interesting and important issues related to the theme of the book, including thoughtful objections to some of our arguments as well as suggestions on different roads forward for research in organization design. These include the need to distinguish more strongly between top and middle management, to include broader psychological ramifications of bossless companies, to treat in greater detail the implications of self-selection into distinct kinds of organizations, to consider more carefully the implications of our argument that to some extent humans are biologically hardwired for hierarchy, and to explore the particular challenges for flat organizations that pursue “social” goals. In this brief comment, we summarize some reactions to the essays, clarify a few misunderstandings, and suggest additional work to be done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. One critic accuses us of defending “dominance” hierarchies in which “one part tries to dominate the whole by force or threat of force, de-emphasizing communion in favor of control. The traditional hierarchical organizational structure is a domination hierarchy where the boss is the part that tries to control the whole” (Robledo 2022). This is a complete misunderstanding, especially of the second part of the book in which we discuss how hierarchies are changing.

References

  • Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger TR (2012) Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strateg Manag J 33(6):587–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourion C (2005) Hierarchical situations: obedience. In: Emotional logic and decision making. London: Palgrave Macmillan

  • Foss NJ, Klein PG (2022) Why managers matter: the perils of the bossless company. Public Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Klein PG (2023) Why managers matter as applied organization (design) theory. J Org Des. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00134-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Weber L (2016) Putting opportunism in the back seat: bounded rationality, costly conflict and hierarchical forms. Acad Manag Rev 41:41–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JR (1977) Organization design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB (2009) Theory-based causal induction. Psychol Rev 116(4):661–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurri M (2018) The revolt of the public and the crisis of authority in the New Millennium. Stripe Press

  • Jacques E (1976) A general theory of bureaucracy. Heinemann Educational, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques E (1990) In praise of hierarchy. Harv Bus Rev 68(1):127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques E (1997) Requisite organization: total system for effective managerial organization and managerial leadership for the 21st century. Gower, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang J, Kang R, Kim SJ (2017) An empirical examination of vacillation theory. Strateg Manag J 38(6):1356–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela F (2023) Managers matter less than we think: How can organizations function without any middle management? J Org Des. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00133-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzelli A (2023) Why managers matter: the paradox of organizing. J Org Des. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00131-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey M (2023) Who’s the boss? The persistence of entrepreneurial hierarchy in flat organizations. J Org Des. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00132-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1983) Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller U, McCaffrey M (2021) Levels without bosses? Entrepreneurship and valve’s organizational design. In: McCaffrey M (ed) The invisible hand in virtual worlds: the economic order of video games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 211–240

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: a dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ Sci 13(5):547–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson JA (2023) A review of Why managers matter: The perils of the bossless company. J Organ Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00130-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravier L (2022) Crítica a “Why managers matter” (Foss & Klein) contra el Self-management. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx_Oq0R50L0

  • Robledo MA (2022) Book review—why managers matter: the perils of the bossless company. Enlivening Edge Magazine, December 29

  • Sethi SP, Elango B (1999) The influence of “country of origin” on multinational corporation global strategy: a conceptual framework. J Int Manag 5:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steers RM, Nardon L, Sanchez-Runde C (2009) Culture and organization design: strategy, structure, and decision-making. In: Bhagat RS, Steers RM (eds) Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research: a guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press

  • Weber L (2023) Hierarchy and managers matter more than ever in the digital age: unexamined psychological transaction costs in bossless companies. J Org Des. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00137-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press

  • Workiewicz M (2023) On fads, fashions, and follies of flat organizing and why managers still matter. J Org Des. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00139-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Klein.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foss, N.J., Klein, P.G. Why Managers Matter matters: replies and reflections. J Org Design 12, 51–57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00142-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00142-0

Keywords

Navigation