This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Data Availability
All de-identified data and the Matlab script used to analyze the results reported here are available online at https://osf.io/78d42/.
References
Anderson, B. A., & Kim, H. (2018). Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention. Cognition, 178, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.05.005
Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., & Bohil, C. J. (2002). Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning. Memory and Cognition, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196423
Ashby, F. G., & Valentin, V. V. (2017). Multiple systems of perceptual category learning: Theory and cognitive tests. Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101107-2.00007-5
Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105(3), 442–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.442
Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.33
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2011). Human category learning 2.0. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-6632.2010.05874.X
Ashby, F. G., & Rosedahl, L. (2017). A neural interpretation of exemplar theory. Psychological Review, 124(4), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/REV0000064
Ashby, F. G., Smith, J. D., & Rosedahl, L. A. (2020). Dissociations between rule-based and information-integration categorization are not caused by differences in task difficulty. Memory and Cognition, 48(4), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13421-019-00988-4
Bourgeois, A., Sterpenich, V., Iannotti, G. R., & Vuilleumier, P. (2022). Reward-driven modulation of spatial attention in the human frontal eye-field. NeuroImage, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118846
Carrasco, M. (2018). How visual spatial attention alters perception. Cognitive Processing, 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0883-4
Crist, R. E., Kapadia, M. K., Westheimer, G., & Gilbert, C. D. (1997). Perceptual learning of spatial localization: Specificity for orientation, position, and context. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78(6), 2889–2894. https://doi.org/10.1152/JN.1997.78.6.2889
Eckstein, M. P., Lago, M. A., & Abbey, C. K. (2018). Evaluation of search strategies for microcalcifications and masses in 3D images. Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 10577, 11. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2293871
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007 39:2, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017196
Folstein, J. R., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Mere exposure alters category learning of novel objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(AUG), 1959. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2010.00040
Goldstone, R. L., & Hendrickson, A. T. (2010). Categorical perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/WCS.26
Hélie, S., & Cousineau, D. (2015). Differential effect of visual masking in perceptual categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000063
Hélie, S., Turner, B. O., Crossley, M. J., Ell, S. W., & Ashby, F. G. (2017). Trial-by-trial identification of categorization strategy using iterative decision-bound modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1146–1162. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-016-0774-5
Homa, D., Sterling, S., & Trepel, L. (1981). Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(6), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.7.6.418
Hoofs, V., Grahek, I., Boehler, C. N., & Krebs, R. M. (2022). Guiding spatial attention by multimodal reward cues. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 84(3). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02422-x
Karni, A., & Sagi, D. (1991). Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 88(11), 4966–4970. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.88.11.4966
Maddox, T., Gregory Ashby, F., & Bohil, C. J. (2003). Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.650
Maddox, W. T., & Ing, A. D. (2005). Delayed feedback disrupts the procedural-learning system but not the hypothesis-testing system in perceptual category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.100
Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211715
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
Milton, F., McLaren, I. P. L., Copestake, E., Satherley, D., & Wills, A. J. (2020). The effect of preexposure on overall similarity categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 46(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/XAN0000226
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0
Rosedahl, L. A., & Ashby, F. G. (2019). A difficulty predictor for perceptual category learning. Journal of Vision, 19(6), 20–20. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.6.20
Rosedahl, L. A., & Ashby, F. G. (2022). Linear separability, irrelevant variability, and categorization difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 48(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/XLM0001000
Rosedahl, L. A., Eckstein, M. P., & Ashby, F. G. (2018). Retinal-specific category learning. Nature Human Behaviour 2018 2:7, 2(7), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0370-z
Rosedahl, L. A., Serota, R., & Ashby, F. G. (2021). When instructions don’t help: Knowing the optimal strategy facilitates rule-based but not information-integration category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(9), 1226–1236. https://doi.org/10.1037/XHP0000940
Rosedahl, L., & Watanabe, T. (2023). Perceptual learning: Training together makes us better. Current Biology, 33(12), R681–R684. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2023.05.030
Schoups, A. A., Vogels, R., & Orban, G. A. (1995). Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: Retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity. The Journal of Physiology, 483(3), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1113/JPHYSIOL.1995.SP020623
Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(6), 1411–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1411
Soto, F. A. (2019). Categorization training changes the visual representation of face identity. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81(5), 1220–1227. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13414-019-01765-W
Soto, F. A., Escobar, K., & Salan, J. (2020). Adaptation aftereffects reveal how categorization training changes the encoding of face identity. Journal of Vision, 20(10), 18–18. https://doi.org/10.1167/JOV.20.10.18
Su, Z., Wang, L., Kang, G., & Zhou, X. (2021). Reward makes the rhythmic sampling of spatial attention emerge earlier. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 83(4). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02226-5
Tan, Q., Wang, Z., Sasaki, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2019). Category-induced transfer of visual perceptual learning. Current Biology, 29(8), 1374-1378.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2019.03.003
Unger, L., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2022). Ready to learn: Incidental exposure fosters category learning. Psychological Science, 33(6), 999–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211061470
Worthy, D. A., Markman, A. B., & Maddox, T. (2013). Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning. Brain and Cognition, 81(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.11.006
Xiao, L. Q., Zhang, J. Y., Wang, R., Klein, S. A., Levi, D. M., & Yu, C. (2008). Complete transfer of perceptual learning across retinal locations enabled by double training. Current Biology, 18(24), 1922–1926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.030
Zhang, J. Y., Zhang, G. L., Xiao, L. Q., Klein, S. A., Levi, D. M., & Yu, C. (2010). Rule-based learning explains visual perceptual learning and its specificity and transfer. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(37), 12323–12328. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0704-10.2010
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health National Eye Institute through the following grants: R01-EY019466 and R01-EY027841.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LR and TW planned the experiments. LR carried out the experiments and analyzed the data. LR took the lead in writing the manuscript. LR and TW revised the manuscript and contributed to its final form.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The study design and methods were approved by the Brown University Institutional Review Board and were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participants consented to the publication of their de-identified behavioral data.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosedahl, L., Watanabe, T. Category Learning Can Depend on Location-Specific Visual Representations. J Cogn Enhanc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-024-00292-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-024-00292-3