Abstract
In this note, I discuss the paper “Proposal for a democracy of the future” of Bruno Frey. I focus on some critical issues, and point to further potential applications of Frey’s ideas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Bernheim, D., Laibson, D., & Rabin, M. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of behavioral economics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Frey, B. S. (2017). Proposals for a democracy of the future. Homo Oeconomicus, 34(1), 1–9.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.
Osborne, M. J., & Turner, M. A. (2010). Cost benefit analyses versus referenda. Journal of Political Economy, 118(1), 156–187.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Welsh, M. P., & Poe, G. L. (1998). Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(2), 170–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am grateful to the editor Manfred Holler and to Enrico Santarelli for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franzoni, L.A. The Voter in the House of Mirrors: Comment on “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future” by Bruno Frey. Homo Oecon 35, 117–121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-018-0067-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-018-0067-6