Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What’s Right, and What’s Wrong, with “What is Wrong with the West’s Economies?” by Edmund Phelps

A Comment

  • Comment
  • Published:
Homo Oeconomicus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1970’s American workers who lack a college education have fared poorly in the labor market, as their compensation has fallen in both absolute and relative terms. In “What is Wrong with the West’s Economies”, Edmund Phelps attributes these adverse developments to a significant decline in productivity growth, which in turns results from a stagnation in innovation, entrepreneurial spirit, and in economic thought. In this essay I point to a number of problems with Phelps’ diagnosis, which include a tendency to overstate the dynamism of the past and to underestimate current gains in productivity. It is not declining productivity growth, but rather ongoing gains in productivity—and, more specifically, the nature and source of these productivity gains—that accounts for the worsening condition of those at the bottom of the labor market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Many economists prefer an alternative measure of productivity, called “total factor” productivity, which incorporates capital as well as labor inputs. The two measures tend to move together. According to Sargent and Rodriguez (2000), labor productivity is probably a preferable measure if one is looking at trends over the course of a decade or less, while total factor productivity is a better indicator of long run trends.

References

  • Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (2015, May 14). The mystery of declining productivity growth. The Wall Street Journal.

  • Brynjolfson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2006). The great escape: A review of Robert Fogel’s the escape from hunger and premature death, 1700–2100. Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feloni, R. (2015). Billionaire Sam Adams founder explains how he helped spark the craft-beer revolution. New York: Business Insider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. (2004). The escape from hunger and premature death, 1710–2100: Europe, America, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (2008). The race between education and technology. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. (2014). The demise of US economic growth: Restatement, rebuttal, and reflections. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 19895.

  • Hortaçsu, A., & Syverson, C. (2015). The ongoing evolution of retail: A format tug-of-war. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-y. (2015, October). Paper’s protector. Morning Calm, 39, 56–65. Seoul: Korean Air.

  • Leinbach-Reyhle, N. (2015, October 10). Etsy vs. Amazon: Different ideas of what is ‘handmade’. Forbes.

  • Phelps, E. (1997). Rewarding work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. (2013). Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiley, L. (2015, October 26). A look at where cocktail trends are heading. Tampa Bay Times.

  • Sargent, T., & Rodriguez, E. (2000). Labour or total factor productivity: Do we need to choose?. Canada: Economic Studies and Policy Analysis Division, Department of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, R. (2013). Total factor productivity in historical perspective. Working Paper 2013-01. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.

  • Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, C. (1998). A revival of the pessimist view: Child labor and the industrial revolution. Research in Economic History, 18, 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Kim Border, David Grether, Philip Hoffman, John Ledyard, and Jean-Laurent Rosenthal for helpful comments and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Roderick Kiewiet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roderick Kiewiet, D. What’s Right, and What’s Wrong, with “What is Wrong with the West’s Economies?” by Edmund Phelps. Homo Oecon 33, 11–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-016-0009-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-016-0009-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation