Abstract
The center of the stability island of super-heavy nuclei (SHN) is the subject of intense experimental and theoretical investigations and has potential technological applications. \(^{298}_{114}\)Fl lies in the \(Z=\)114 isotopic chain as a persuasive candidate of the spherical double-magic nucleus in SHN, and in this study, the calculations of nuclear binding energies, one-nucleon and two-nucleon separation energies, \(\alpha \)-decay energies, and the corresponding half-lives provide strong evidence for this point. These calculations within an improved Weizsäcker-Skyrme nuclear mass model (WS*) were performed and compared with the calculations of the finite-range droplet model (FRDM2012) and experimental data for \(Z=114\) isotopes and \(N=184\) isotones. Concurrently, the corresponding single-particle levels in a Woods-Saxon potential well with a spin-orbit term are calculated, which can be used as a powerful indicator to identify the shell effects existing in \(^{298}_{114}\)Fl. Both the study of the properties of the isotopic chain and microphysical quantities provide a vital signal that \(^{298}_{114}\)Fl is a spherical double-magic nucleus and also the center of the SHN.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y.T. Oganessian, V.K. Utyonkov, Y.V. Lobanov et al., Measurements of cross sections for the fusion-evaporation reactions \(^{244} \text{Pu}(^{48} \text{Ca,xn}) ^{292-x}114\) and \(^{245} \text{Cm}(^{48} \text{Ca,xn})^{293-x}116\). Phys. Rev. C 69, 054607 (2004)
Y.T. Oganessian, V.K. Utyonkov, S.N. Dmitriev et al., Synthesis of elements 115 and 113 in the reaction \(^{243}\)Am+\(^{48}\)Ca. Phys. Rev. C 72, 034611 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.034611
Y.T. Oganessian, V.K. Utyonkov, Y.V. Lobanov et al., Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116 in the \(^{249}{\rm Cf} \) and \(^{245}{\rm Cm}+^{48}{\rm Ca} \) fusion reactions. Phys. Rev. C 74, 044602 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.044602
Ch.E. Düllmann, M. Schädel, A. Yakushev et al., Production and decay of element 114: high cross sections and the new nucleus \(^{277}{\rm Hs}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 252701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.252701
J.M. Gates, Ch.E. Düllmann, M. Schädel et al., First superheavy element experiments at the GSI recoil separator TASCA: the production and decay of element 114 in the \(^{244}{\rm Pu}\) (\(^{48}{\rm Ca}\),3–4\(n\)) reaction. Phys. Rev. C 83, 054618 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054618
S. Hofmann, G. Münzenberg, The discovery of the heaviest elements. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 733 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.733
J. Dvorak, W. Brüchle, M. Chelnokov, R. Dressler et al., Doubly magic nucleus \(_{108}^{270}{\rm Hs}_{162}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 242501 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.242501
Y.T. Oganessian, F.S. Abdullin, P.D. Bailey et al., Synthesis of a new element with atomic number \(Z=117\). Phys.Rev. Lett. 104, 142502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.142502
M. Schädel, Chemistry of the superheavy elements. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 373, 20140191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0191
P.A. Ellison, K.E. Gregorich, J.S. Berryman et al., New Superheavy Element Isotopes: \(^{242}{\rm Pu}(^{48}{\rm Ca},5n)^{285}114\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 182701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.182701
Y.T. Oganessian, A.V. Yeremin, A.G. Popeko et al., Synthesis of nuclei of the superheavy element 114 in reactions induced by \(^{48}\)Ca. Nature 400, 242–245 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/22281
P. Möller, J.R. Nix, W.D. Myers et al., Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185–381 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/adnd.1995.1002
Y. Aboussir, J.M. Pearson, A.K. Dutta et al., Nuclear mass formula via an approximation to the Hartree-Fock method. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 61, 127 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-640X(95)90014-4
S. Goriely, N. Chamel, J.M. Pearson, Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear mass model with 0.50 MeV accuracy based on standard forms of Skyrme and pairing functionals. Phys. Rev. C 88, 061302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.061302
N. Wang, M. Liu, X.Z. Wu, Modification of nuclear mass formula by considering isospin effects. Phys. Rev. C 81, 044322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044322
A. Sobiczewski, F.A. Gareev, B.N. Kalinkin, Closed shells for Z>82 and N> 126 in a diffuse potential well. Phys. Lett. 22, 500 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(66)91243-1
W.D. Myers, W.J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. 81, 1 (1966)
S.G. Nilsson, C.F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski et al., On the nuclear structure and stability of heavy and superheavy elements. Nucl. Phys. A 131, 1 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(69)90809-4
Y.K. Gambhir, A. Bhagwat, M. Gupta, \(\alpha \)-decay half-lives of the observed superheavy nuclei \((Z=108-118)\). Phys. Rev. C 71, 037301 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.037301
M. Bender, \(\alpha \)-decay chains of \({}_{175}^{289}114\) and \({}_{175}^{293}118\) in the relativistic mean-field model. Phys. Rev. C 61, 031302 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.031302
S.K. Patra, C.L. Wu, C.R. Praharaj et al., A systematic study of superheavy nuclei for \(Z = 114\) and beyond using the relativistic mean field approach. Nucl. Phys. A 651, 117 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00129-3
S. Goriely, M. Samyn, J.M. Pearson et al., Hartree-Fock mass formulas and extrapolation to new mass data. Phys. Rev. C 66, 024326 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.024326
S. Typel, B.A. Brown, Skyrme Hartree-Fock calculations for the \(\alpha \)-decay Q values of superheavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 67, 034303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.034313
N. Wang, Z.Y. Liang, M. Liu et al., Mirror nuclei constraint in nuclear mass formula. Phys. Rev. C 82, 044304 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.044304
G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, C. Thibault, The Ame2003 atomic mass evaluation: (II). Tables, graphs and references. Nucl. Phys. A 729, 337 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003
J. Bardeen, L.N. Cooper, J.R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175
H.F. Zhang, L.H. Wang, J.P. Yin et al., Performance of the Levenberg-Marquardt neural network approach in nuclear mass prediction. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 44, 045110 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa5d78
N.N. Ma, H.F. Zhang, X.J. Bao et al., Weizsäcker-Skyrme-type mass formula by considering radial basis function correction. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 42, 095107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/9/095107
S. Cwiok, J. Dudek, W. Nazarewicz et al., Single-particle energies, wave functions, quadrupole moments and g-factors in an axially deformed woods-saxon potential with applications to the two-centre-type nuclear problems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 46, 379 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(87)90093-2
J. Damgaard, H.C. Pauli, V.V. Pashkevich et al., A method for solving the independent-particle Schrödinger equation with a deformed average field. Nucl. Phys. A 135, 432 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(69)90174-2
P. Salamon, A.T. Kruppa, Curvature correction in Strutinsky’s method. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 37, 105106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/37/10/105106
V.M. Strutinsky, F.A. Ivanjuk, A new definition of shell corrections to the liquid drop energy. Nucl. Phys. A 255, 405 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(75)90688-0
M. Brack, H.C. Pauli, On Strutinsky’s averaging method. Nucl. Phys. A 207, 401 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(73)90355-2
J.J. Li, W.H. Long, J. Margueron et al., Superheavy magic structures in the relativistic Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach. Phys. Lett. B 732, 169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.03.031
J.J. Li, J. Margueron, W.H. Long et al., Magicity of neutron-rich nuclei within relativistic self-consistent approaches. Phys. Lett. B 753, 97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.004
M. Wang, W.J. Huang, F.G. Kondev et al., The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chin. Phys. C 45, 030003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf
P. Möller, A.J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa et al., Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012). At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 109–110, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002
A.E.S. Green, Nuclear Physics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, New York, 1955), p. 250
Y.A. Lazarev, Y.V. Lobanov, Y.T. Oganessian et al., Discovery of enhanced nuclear stability near the deformed shells \(N=162\) and \(Z=108\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 624 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.624
J. Dvorak, W. Brüchle, M. Chelnokov et al., Doubly magic nucleus \(_{108}^{270}\rm Hs_{162}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 242501 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.242501
Y.T. Oganessian, V.K. Utyonkov, F.S. Abdullin et al., Synthesis and study of decay properties of the doubly magic nucleus \({}^{270}\)Hs in the \({}^{226}\)Ra + \({}^{48}\)Ca reaction. Phys. Rev. C 87, 034605 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034605
H.F. Zhang, G. Royer, \(\alpha \) particle preformation in heavy nuclei and penetration probability. Phys. Rev. C 77, 054318 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.054318
G. Royer, Alpha emission and spontaneous fission through quasi-molecular shapes. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 26, 1149 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/26/8/305
G. Royer, Analytic expressions for alpha-decay half-lives and potential barriers. Nucl. Phys. A 848, 279 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.09.009
J.G. Deng, H.F. Zhang, G. Royer, Improved empirical formula for \(\alpha \)-decay half-lives. Phys. Rev. C 101, 034307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034307
H.C. Manjunatha, L. Seenappa, K.N. Sridhar, Uncertainties in the empirical formulae for alpha decay half-lives of heavy and superheavy nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 477 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12838-0
Look Up Calculated Odd-Nucleon Spins and Parities at the Nuclear Ground State. https://t2.lanl.gov/nis/data/astro/molnix96/spidat.html
Q.H. Mo, M. Liu, N. Wang, Systematic study of shell gaps in nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 90, 024320 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024320
V.K. Utyonkov, N.T. Brewer, Y.T. Oganessian et al., Experiments on the synthesis of superheavy nuclei \(^{284}{\rm Fl}\) and \(^{285}{\rm Fl} \) in the \(^{239,240}{\rm Pu}+^{48}{\rm Ca}\) reactions. Phys. Rev. C 92, 034609 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034609
A. Yakushev, J.M. Gates, A. Turler et al., Superheavy element flerovium (Element 114) is a volatile metal. Inorg. Chem. 53, 1624 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ic4026766
Y. Aritomo, Possibility of synthesizing a doubly magic superheavy nucleus. Phys. Rev. C 75, 024602 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.024602
H.C. Manjunatha, K.N. Sridhar, N. Sowmya, Investigations of the synthesis of the superheavy element \(Z=122\). Phys. Rev. C 98, 024308 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024308
H.C. Manjunatha, N. Sowmya, Decay modes of superheavy nuclei \(Z = 124\). Int. J. Mod Phys E 27, 1850041 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301318500416
N. Sowmya, H.C. Manjunatha, Competition between different decay modes of superheavy element \(Z = 116\) and synthesis of possible isotopes. Braz. J. Phys. 49, 874–886 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-019-00710-4
N. Sowmya, H.C. Manjunatha, Investigations on different decay modes of darmstadtium. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 17, 370–378 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477120030140
H.C. Manjunatha, K.N. Sridhar, A detail investigation on the synthesis of superheavy element \(Z = 119\). Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 16, 647–655 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477119060487
K.N. Sridhar, H.C. Manjunatha, H.B. Ramalingam, Search for possible fusion reactions to synthesize the superheavy element \(Z=121\). Phys. Rev. C 98, 064605 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.064605
N. Sowmya, H.C. Manjunatha, P.S. Damodara Gupta et al., Competition between cluster and alpha decay in odd Z superheavy nuclei 111 \(\le \) Z \(\le \) 125. Braz. J. Phys. 51, 99–135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-020-00801-7
H.C. Manjunatha, Comparison of alpha decay with fission for isotopes of superheavy nuclei \(Z = 124\). Int. J. Mod Phys E 25, 1650074 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301316500749
N. Sowmya, H.C. Manjunatha, N. Dhananjaya et al., Competition between binary fission, ternary fission, cluster radioactivity and alpha decay of \(^{281}\)Ds. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 323, 1347 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06706-3
H.C. Manjunatha, Theoretical prediction of probable isotopes of superheavy nuclei of \(Z = 122\). Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1650100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301316501007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 10775061, 11175054, 11675066, 11665019, and 11947229), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M663853), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. lzujbky-2017-ot04 and lzujbky-2020-it01), and Feitian Scholar Project of Gansu Province.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xin, YQ., Ma, NN., Deng, JG. et al. Properties of \(Z=\)114 super-heavy nuclei. NUCL SCI TECH 32, 55 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00899-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00899-7