Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Benchmarking of JEFF-3.2, FENDL-3.0 and TENDL-2014 evaluated data for tungsten with 14.8 MeV neutrons

  • Published:
Nuclear Science and Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integral experiments on tungsten slab samples were carried out on the D-T neutron source facility at China Institute of Atomic Energy. Leakage neutron spectra from the irradiated tungsten target were measured by the time-of-flight technique. Accuracy of the nuclear data for tungsten was examined by comparing the measured neutron spectra with the leakage neutron spectra simulated using the MCNP-4C code with evaluated nuclear data of the JEFF-3.2, FENDL-3.0 and TENDL-2014 libraries. The results show that the calculations with JEFF-3.2 agree well with the measurements in the whole energy range and all angles, whereas the spectra calculated with FENDL-3.0 and TENDL-2014 have some discrepancies with the experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.L. Aldama, A.L. Nichols, ADS-2.0 A Test Library for Accelerator Driven Systems and New Reactor Designs, INDC(NDS)-0545 (2008). https://www-nds.iaea.org/publications/indc/indc-nds-0545/

  2. M.B. Chadwick, P. Obložinský, M. Herman et al., ENDF/B-VII.0: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. Nucl. Data Sheets 107, 2931–3060 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Obložinský et al., ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887–2996 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Shibata, O. Iwamoto, T. Nakagawa et al., JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1–30 (2011). doi:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z.G. Ge, Z.X. Zhao, H.H. Xia et al., The updated version of Chinese evaluated nuclear data library (CENDL-3.1). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 1052–1056 (2011). doi:10.3938/jkps.59.1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, JEFF-3.2 Evaluated Data Library (2014). http://www.oecd-nea.org/dbforms/data/eva/evatapes/jeff_32/

  7. R.A. Forrest, R. Capote, N. Otsuka et al., FENDL-3.0: Fusion Evaluated Nuclear Data Library, INDC(NDS-0628) (2012). https://www-nds.iaea.org/fendl30/

  8. J.A. Koning, D. Rochman, S.C. van der Marck et al., TENDL-2014: Talys-Based Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (2014). http://www.talys.eu/tendl-2014/

  9. Y. Oyama, K. Kosako, H. Maekawa, Measurement and calculations of angular neutron flux spectra from iron slabs bombarded with 14.8 MeV neutrons. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 115, 24–37 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Jordanova, L. Oláh, A. Fenyvesi et al., Validation of neutron data libraries by comparison of measured and calculated neutron leakage spectra. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 421, 522–530 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(98)01180-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D.V. Markovskij, A.I. Blokhin, V.A. Chirkin et al., Integral benchmark experiments with 14 MeV neutrons for testing the nuclear data of vanadium. Fusion Eng. Des. 69, 419–423 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0920-3796(03)00084-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Verzilov, S. Sato, K. Ochiai et al., The integral experiment on beryllium with D-T neutrons for verification of tritium breeding. Fusion Eng. Des. 82, 1–9 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Konno, K. Ochiai, M. Wada et al., Analyses of fusion integral benchmark experiments at JAEA/FNS with FENDL-2.1 and other recent nuclear data libraries. Fusion Eng. Des. 83, 1774–1781 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Nie, J. Bao, X. Ruan et al., Benchmarking of evaluated nuclear data for uranium by a 14.8 MeV neutron leakage spectra experiment with slab sample. Ann. Nucl. Energy 37, 1456–1460 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2010.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Ohnishi, K. Kondo, T. Azuma et al., New integral experiments for large angle scattering cross section data benchmarking with DT neutron beam at JAEA/FNS. Fusion Eng. Des. 87, 695–699 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Liu, T.H. Zhu, X.S. Yan et al., Progress of integral experiments in benchmark fission assemblies for a blanket of hybrid reactor. Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 588–591 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Murata, T. Nishio, T. Kondo et al., Neutron nuclear data benchmark for copper and tungsten by slab assembly transmission experiments with DT neutrons. Fusion Eng. Des. 58–59, 617–621 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0920-3796(01)00518-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Batistoni, M. Angelone, L. Petrizzi et al., Neutronics benchmark experiment on tungsten. J. Nucl. Mater. 329–333, 683–686 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Seidel, R. Eichin, U. Fischer et al., Benchmark experiments to validate the nuclear data of tungsten. Fusion Eng. Des. 81, 1211–1217 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Trkov, R. Capote, I. Kodeli et al., Evaluation of tungsten nuclear reaction data with covariances. Nucl. Data Sheets 109, 2905–2909 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.nds.2008.11.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Konno, K. Takakura, M. Wada et al., Benchmark test of JENDL-4.0 based on integral experiments at JAEA/FNS. Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol 2, 346–357 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Marck, Benchmarking ENDF/B-VII.1, JENDL-4.0 and JEFF-3.1.1 with MCNP6. Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 2935–3005 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.nds.2012.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H.I. Kim, C.W. Lee, D.H. Kim et al., Neutron cross section evaluation of tungsten and tantalum. Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 151–154 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y. Nie et al., Measurement of leakage neutron spectra for tungsten with D-T neutrons and validation of evaluated nuclear data. Fusion Eng. Des. 92, 41–45 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Briesmeister (Ed.), MCNP—A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System, Version 4C, Report LA-13709-M (2000)

  26. R. Han, R. Wada, Z. Chen et al., Fast neutron scattering on gallium target at 14.8 MeV. Nucl. Phys. A 936, 17–28 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Dietze, H. Klein, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, PTB-ND-22 (1982)

  28. D. Schlegel, TARGET User’s Manual, Laboricht PTB-6.42-05-2 (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Qiang Chen.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11605097, 91426301, and 11605257), Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Inner Mongolia University for the Nationalities (No. BS365) and the “ADS project 302” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA03030200).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Nie, YB., Ren, J. et al. Benchmarking of JEFF-3.2, FENDL-3.0 and TENDL-2014 evaluated data for tungsten with 14.8 MeV neutrons. NUCL SCI TECH 28, 27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0192-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0192-0

Keywords

Navigation