Advertisement

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 159–166 | Cite as

Evaluation of plant-derived preparations and microorganisms as seed treatments for control of covered kernel smut of sorghum (Sporisorium sorghi)

  • Moustafa H. A. Moharam
  • Dietrich Stephan
  • Eckhard Koch
Original Article
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

The agents studied included three commercial plant-derived preparations (Tillecur, Milsana and Quillaja), water extracts of different plant parts from 11 plant species, the active microbial ingredients of three commercial microbial products (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains MBI 600 and QST 713; Trichoderma harzianum strain T 39) and seven other experimental microorganisms. In the first step, the effect on the germination of teliospores of Sporisorium sorghi was evaluated on agar media. The observed antifungal activity was particularly pronounced for Quillaja, the water extracts from walnut, rhubarb, garlic, and Tillecur and the culture filtrates of Streptomyces (one isolate), Bacillus (two isolates) and Trichoderma (two isolates). In pot tests with sorghum grains inoculated with S. sorghi, full control of kernel smut was obtained by seed treatment with Tillecur, Quillaja and T. harzianum T39. In two field experiments, seed treatment with these preparations and with a second isolate of T. harzianum provided 84–100% control of the disease. In the pot tests, the level of control was assessed not only based on the presence of infected panicles at maturity but also using diagnostic microscopy and PCR of young plants. The results obtained with the different methods were in very good agreement. It is concluded that diagnosis of young plants by microscopy or PCR can significantly speed up screenings for new seed treatments with activity against covered kernel smut. Assuming that only agents with a high level of efficacy are of interest for further development, examination of a relatively small number of plants should yield sufficiently accurate data to identify promising candidates.

Keywords

Seed-borne fungi Seed treatment Biocontrol Trichoderma Tillecur Quillaja Bacillus 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Moustafa H. A. Moharam, Stephan Dietrich and Eckhard Koch declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agarwal SK, Singh SS, Verma S, Kumar S (2000) Antifungal activity of anthraquinone derivatives from Rheum emodi. J Ethnopharmacol 72(1):43–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtsson M, Wulff E, Jørgensen HL, Pham A, Lübeck M, Hockenhull J (2009) Comparative studies on the effects of a yucca extract and acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) on inhibition of Venturia inaequalis in apple leaves. Eur J Plant Pathol 124(2):187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgen A, Davanlou M (2001) Biological control of common bunt (Tilletia tritici). J Crop Prod 3(1):157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botros SE, Saeed FA, Mohamed MS, El-Zawahry AM (1994) Biological and chemical control of covered kernel smut of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (Linn.) Moench.). Assiut J Agric Sci 25(1):233–247Google Scholar
  5. D’Addabbo T, Curto G, Greco P, Di Silvestro D, Coiro MI et al (2005) Preliminary trials with extracts of Quillaja saponaria Molina for the control of root-knot nematodes. Nematol Mediterr 33:29–34Google Scholar
  6. El-Helaly AF, Ibrahim IA (1957) Host-parasite relationship of Sphacelotheca sorghi on sorghum. Phytopathology 47:620–623Google Scholar
  7. Fernández-Agulló A, Pereira E, Freire MS, Valentao P, Andrade PB, González-Álvarez J, Pereira JA (2013) Influence of solvent on the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of walnut (Juglans regia L.) green husk extracts. Ind Crops Prod 42:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frederiksen RA, Odvody GN (2000) Compendium of sorghum diseases, 2nd edn. APS Press, St. Paul, p 129Google Scholar
  9. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2PndP edn. Willey, New York, p 680Google Scholar
  10. Gwary DM, Bdliya BS, Bwatanglang N (2009) Integration of fungicides, crop varieties and sowing dates for the management of sorghum smuts in Nigerian Savanna. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 42(10):988–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasan MM, Rahman SME, Kim GH, Abdallah E, Oh DH (2012) Antagonistic potentiality of Trichoderma harzianum towards seed-borne fungal pathogens of winter wheat cv. protiva in vitro and in vivo. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22(5):585–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hassan SM, Byrd JA, Cartwright AL, Bailey CA (2010) Hemolytic and antimicrobial activities differ among saponin-rich extracts from guar, quillaja, yucca, and soybean. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162(4):1008–1017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Koch E, Weil B, Wächter R, Wohlleben S, Spiess H, Krauthausen HJ (2006) Evaluation of selected microbial strains and commercial alternative products as seed treatments for the control of Tilletia tritici, Fusarium culmorum, Drechslera graminea and D. teres. J Plant Dis Prot 113(4):150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch E, Enders M, Ullrich C, Molitor D, Berkelmann-Löhnertz B (2013) Effect of Primula root and other plant extracts on infection structure formation of Phyllosticta ampelicida (asexual stage of Guignardia bidwellii) and on black rot disease of grapevine in the greenhouse. J Plant Dis Prot 120(1):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lukanowski A (2006) Alternative methods of seed treatment against common bunt of wheat. Phytopatol Polon 41:79–82Google Scholar
  16. Masum MMI, Islam SMM, Fakir MGA (2009) Effect of seed treatment practices in controlling of seed-borne fungi in sorghum. Sci Res Essays 4(1):022–027Google Scholar
  17. Mathad RC, Shakuntala NM, Vasudevan SN, Naik MN, Patil SB (2013) The anti-fungal properties of aqueous extracts from Psorolea corylifolia Linn. seeds in controlling grain smut and seed quality enhancement of sorghum. The Bioscan 8(2):685–687Google Scholar
  18. McManus PS, Ravenscroft AV, Fulberight DW (1993) Inhibition of Tilletia laevis teliospore germination and suppression of common bunt of wheat by Pseudmonas fluorescens 2-79. Plant Dis 77:1012–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moharam MHA, Leclerque A, Koch E (2012) Cultural characteristics of Sporisorium sorghi and detection of the pathogen in plant tissue by microscopy and polymerase chain reaction. Phytoparasitica 40(5):475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Munkacsi AB, Stoxen S, May G (2007) Domestication of maize, sorghum, and sugarcane did not drive the divergence of their smut pathogens. Evolution 61:388–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pelah D, Abramovich Z, Markus A, Wiesman Z (2002) The use of commercial saponin from Quillaja saponaria bark as a larvicidal agent against Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens. J Ethnopharm 81:407–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perelló A, Gruhlke M, Slusarenko AJ (2013) Effect of garlic extract on seed germination, seedling health, and vigour of pathogen-infested wheat. J Plant Prot Res 53(4):317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ribera A, Cotoras M, Zúñiga GE (2008) Effect of extracts from in vitro-grown shoots of Quillaja saponaria Mol. on Botrytis cinerea Pers. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24(9):1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberti R, Flori P, Pisi A, Brunelli A, Cesari A (2000) Evaluation of biological seed treatment of wheat for the control of seed-borne Fusarium culmorum[Bewertung biologischer Behandlungen gegen Sameninfektionen an Weizen verursacht durch den pilzlichen Erreger Fusarium culmorum]. J Plant Dis Prot [Z Pflanzenkrankh Pflanzenschutz] 107:484–493Google Scholar
  25. Sajjan AS, Patil BB, Jamadar MM, Patil SB (2011) Management of grain smut in seed production of rabi sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]—a review. Agric Rev 32:202–208Google Scholar
  26. Sisay A, Abebe F, Wako K (2012) Evaluation of three potential botanicals against sorghum covered smut (Sphacelotheca sorghi) at Bako, Western Oromia Ethiopia. Afr J Plant Sci 6(8):226–231Google Scholar
  27. Sotelo T, Lema M, Soengas P, Cartea ME, Velasco P (2015) In vitro activity of glucosinolates and their degradation products against Brassica-pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 81(1):432–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tabo R, Olabanji OG, Ajayi O, Flower DJ (2002) Effect of plant population density on the growth and yield of sorghum varieties grown on a vertisol. Afr Crop Sci J 10(1):31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tegegne G, Pretorius JC, Swart WJ (2008) Antifungal properties of Agapanthus africanus L. extracts against plant pathogens. Crop Prot 27(7):1052–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waldow F, Jahn M (2007) Investigations in the regulation of common bunt (Tilletia tritici) of winter wheat with regard to threshold values, cultivar susceptibility and non-chemical protection measures. J Plant Dis Prot 114(6):269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wianowska D, Garbaczewska S, Cieniecka-Roslonkiewicz A, Dawidowicz AL, Jankowska A (2016) Comparison of antifungal activity of extracts from different Juglans regia cultivars and juglone. Microb Pathog 100:263–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Julius Kühn Institute, Institute for Biological ControlDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Plant Pathology Department, Faculty of AgricultureSohag UniversityEl-Kawamel, SohagEgypt

Personalised recommendations