Skip to main content
Log in

Scaled WHA Long Rod Projectile Impact Against an Armour Steel

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ballistic performance of an armour steel against a scaled-down tungsten heavy alloy projectile having an L/D ratio of 14 was investigated. The depth of penetration in the steel target plate was measured for different impact velocities (900–1400 m/s) using scaled-down experimental tests. Penetration velocities were calculated from the measured depth of penetration data using a steady-state relationship, and it is found to have a linear relationship with impact velocity. Using the linear relationship, penetration velocity at a higher impact velocity (1600 m/s) was calculated and was found to be in agreement with the full-scale experimental results for the projectiles with L/D = 16. The relative strength of the target and penetrator (RtYp) was calculated and found to increase initially and then decrease to zero as the impact velocity approaches the hydrodynamic range. Maximum RtYp was observed at a velocity of around 1000 m/s which is close to the critical velocity for commencement of eroding steady-state penetration. Microstructural observations on impacted target and projectiles have shown that both the target as well as penetrator materials undergo erosion during the penetration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magness LS Jr (1994) High strain rate deformation behaviors of kinetic energy penetrator materials during ballistic impact. Mech Mater 17:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(94)90055-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Batra RC, Peng Z (1995) Development of shear bands in dynamic plane strain compression of depleted uranium and tungsten blocks. Int. J. Impact Eng. 16:375–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(94)00049-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gust WH (1982) High impact deformation of metal cylinders at elevated temperatures. J Appl Phys 53:3566–3575. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.331136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker JD, Mullin SA, Weiss CE, Leslie PO (2006) Penetration of boron carbide, aluminum, and beryllium alloys by depleted uranium rods: modeling and experimentation. Int. J. Impact Eng. 33:826–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenberg Z, Dekel E (1999) On the role of nose profile in long-rod penetration. Int. J. Impact Eng. 22:551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00054-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao SS, BalakrishnaBhat T (1997) Depleted uranium penetrators –hazards and safety. Def Sci J 47(1):97–105. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.47.3982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hohler V, Stilp AJ, Weber K (1995) Hypervelocity penetration of tungsten sinter-alloy rods into aluminum. Int. J. Impact Eng. 17:409–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)99866-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lankford J, Anderson CE Jr, Royal SA, Riegel JP (1996) Penetration erosion phenomenology. Int. J. Impact Eng. 18:565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)00050-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Orphal DL, Franzen RR, Charters AC, Menna TL, Piekutowski AJ (1997) Penetration of confined boron carbide targets by tungsten long rods at impact velocities from 1.5 to 5.0 km/s. Int. J. Impact Eng. 19:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(96)00004-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Orphal DL, Franzen RR, Piekutowski AJ, Forrestal MJ (1996) Penetration of confined aluminum nitride targets by tungsten long rods at 1.5-4.5 km/s. Int. J. Impact Eng. 18:355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)00045-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Subramanian R, Bless SJ (1995) Penetration of semi-infinite AD995 alumina targets by tungsten long rod penetrators from 1.5 to 3.5 km/s. Int J Impact Eng 17:807–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)99901-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Orphal DL, Anderson CE Jr (2006) The dependence of penetration velocity on impact velocity. Int. J. Impact Eng. 33:546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tate A, Green KEB, Chamberlain PG, Baker RG. 1978 Model scale experiments on long rod penetration, In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Ballistics, Monterey, CA, 17–19

  14. Lundberg P, Westerling L, Lundberg B (1996) Influence of scale on the penetration of tungsten rods into steel-backed alumina targets. Int. J. Impact Eng. 18:403–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)00049-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson CE, Walker JD, Bless SJ, Partom Y (1996) On the L/D effect for long rod penetrators. Int. J. Impact Eng. 18:247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)00028-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cristman DR, Gehring JW (1966) Analysis of high-velocity projectile penetration mechanics. J Appl Phys 37:1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1708570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson CE, Orphal DL (2003) Analysis of the terminal phase of penetration. Int. J. Impact Eng. 29:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson CE, Walker JD, Bless SJ, Sharron TR (1995) On the velocity dependence of the L/D effect for long rod penetrators. Int. J. Impact Eng. 17:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)99831-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Birkhoff G, MacDougall DP, Pugh EM, Taylor SG (1948) Explosives with lined cavities. J Appl Phys 19:563–582. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1698173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenberg Z, Dekel E (Oct 1994) How large should semi-infinite targets be? In: Proceedings of the 45th meeting of the aeroballistics range association, Huntsville, Alabama, 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Projectile velocity measurements, US Army test and evaluation command test operations procedure1982 DRSTE-RP-702-103, AD NO.A119554

  22. Anderson Jr. CE, Morris BL, Littlefield DL 1992 A penetration mechanics database, SWRI Report 3593/C01() A157–8

  23. PonguruSenthil P, Bhav Singh B, Siva Kumar K, Gogia AK (2015) Effect of heat treatment on ballistic performance of an armour steel against long rod projectile. Int. J. Impact Eng. 80:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tate A (1967) A theory for the deceleration of long rods after impact. J Mech Phys Solids 15:387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(67)90010-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Director DMRL for the encouragement to publish this work. The authors also acknowledge the support rendered by ADDD staff in carrying out the work. The authors wish to express sincere thanks to the reviewer for constructive suggestions.

Funding

The work was supported by the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Ministry of Defence, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Rama Subba Reddy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Senthil, P.P., Reddy, P.R.S., Reddy, T.S. et al. Scaled WHA Long Rod Projectile Impact Against an Armour Steel. Hum Factors Mech Eng Def Saf 3, 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-019-0018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-019-0018-4

Keywords

Navigation