Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An evaluation of the Australian Government’s Students First agenda for strengthening the curriculum

  • The Australian curriculum
  • Published:
Curriculum Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to evaluate whether the Australian Government’s initiatives for a robust national curriculum, set out in The Coalition’s Policy for Schools: Students First, are leading to positive outcomes. Content analysis was used to dissect policy documents and reports relevant to the study. Results showed that most of the Australian Government’s initiatives have not yet produced measurable outcomes. Initiatives to restore the focus on science, technology, engineering and mathematics in schools are at different stages in the process of development, diffusion and adoption. Evidence from qualitative data suggests that direct instruction and explicit direct instruction are improving student learning in schools participating in the Flexible Literacy Learning for Remote Primary Schools program. The initiatives for improving the take up of foreign languages are likely to fail, because they do not establish connected pathways between preschool, primary school and secondary school. Activities undertaken to rebalance the Australian Curriculum and refocus the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority produced only minor adjustments. Transitioning the annual literacy and numeracy tests to online assessments is being implemented over two years from 2018. Results of the study showed that implementation of the Australian Government’s initiatives in the education system have the potential to affect curriculum policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACARA NASOP Research Team. (2015). An evaluation of automated scoring of NAPLAN persuasive writing. Sydney, NSW: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asia Education Foundation. (2014). Senior secondary languages education research: Final report. Parkville, VIC: Asia Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science. (2015). Desktop review of mathematics school education pedagogical approaches and learning resources. Canberra, ACT: Australian Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (2015). Desktop review of mathematics school education pedagogical approaches and learning resources. Stepney, SA: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research. (2013). Evaluation of the Cape York Aboriginal Australian Academy initiative. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research. (2015). NASOP research study: NAPLAN online assessment research accessibility options for student with disability. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). Tailored test design study 2013: Summary research report. Sydney, NSW: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015a). Monitoring the effectiveness of the foundation-year 10 Australian Curriculum. Sydney, NSW: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015b). Draft changes to the Australian Curriculum F-10: Consultation report. Sydney, NSW: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

  • Australian Government Department of Education. (2014). Review of the Australian Curriculum: Supplementary material. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Education.

  • Australian Government Department of Education and Training. (2015). Departmental report: Review of the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Education and Training.

  • Davis, L. L., Janiszewska, I., Schwartz, R., & Holland, L. (2016a). NAPLAN device effects study. Melbourne, VIC: Pearson.

  • Davis, L. L., Lai, E., & Brandt, R. (2016b). NAPLAN online readability and layout study. Melbourne, VIC: Pearson.

  • Deloitte Access Economics. (2016). Evaluation of the Early Learning Languages Australia trial: Final report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Education and Training.

  • Donnelly, K., & Wiltshire, K. (2014). Review of the Australian Curriculum: Final report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Education.

  • Education Council. (2015). National STEM school education strategy: A comprehensive plan for science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in Australia. Carlton South, VIC: Education Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, K., & Vivian, R. (2015). Coding across the curriculum: Resource review. Adelaide, SA: University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, A. (2016). Flexible literacy for remote primary schools. Yeerongpilly, QLD: ImpaxSIA Consulting.

  • McCollow, J. (2016). Schooling in Aurukun (research report 49). South Brisbane, QLD: T. J. Ryan Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Chief Scientist. (2013). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the National Interest: A strategic approach. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Chief Scientist. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the National Interest: Australia’s future. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Department of Education and Training. (2016). Review of school education at Aurukun. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Watt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watt, M. An evaluation of the Australian Government’s Students First agenda for strengthening the curriculum. Curric Perspect 37, 161–170 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0008-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0008-8

Keywords

Navigation