Abstract
This study investigates the pollution halo and natural resources blessing phenomenon in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) economies at the disaggregated level over 1995–2018. The study applies panel techniques useful in endogeneity, autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, and crossectional dependence. Our study's results partially supported the natural resources curse phenomena and resource blessing for BRICS countries. The empirical results further substantiated that total natural resource rents help decrease CO2 emissions, while the mineral, forest, and oil rents substantially increase CO2 emissions of the BRICS economies. The causality results further indicated that fossil fuels, economic growth, and CO2 emissions have feedback effects. Similarly, mineral resources have bidirectional causal impacts on CO2 emissions and fossil fuel consumption. The unilateral causal linkages are also found to forest resources from all the chosen variables. Finally, a significant causal relationship originates from GDP, fossil fuel to natural resource rents, and the BRICS economies' oil rents. Since the study outcomes are unique, it has reliable policies for the theory and practice of the BRICS economies.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AMG:
-
Augmented mean group
- ARDL:
-
Autoregressive distributed lags
- ASEAN:
-
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations
- BRICS:
-
Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
- CADF:
-
Crossectional augmented ADF
- CD:
-
Crossectional dependent
- CIPS:
-
Crossectional Im, Pesaran, & Shin
- DK:
-
Driscoll & Kraay
- DOLS:
-
Dynamic OLS
- D-H:
-
Dumitrescu & Hurlin test
- EU:
-
European Union
- FDI:
-
Foreign direct investment
- FF:
-
Fossil fuel
- FMOLS:
-
Fully modified OLS
- FOR:
-
Forest rents
- G7:
-
Group of seven countries
- GDP:
-
Gross domestic product
- GMM:
-
Generalized method of moment
- GVR:
-
Group mean variance ratio
- MENA:
-
Middle East & North Africa
- MIN:
-
Minerals rents
- MINT:
-
Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey
- NR:
-
Total natural resources rents
- OECD:
-
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Organization
- OIL:
-
Oil rents
- PHH:
-
Pollution haven hypothesis
- PVR:
-
Panel variance ratio
- VAR:
-
Vector autoregressive
- VR:
-
Variance ratio
References
Ahmad N, Du L, Tian XL, Wang J (2019) Chinese growth and dilemmas: modelling energy consumption, CO2 emissions and growth in China. Qual Quant 53:315–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11135-018-0755-0/TABLES/8
Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K (2020) Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
Anser MK, Yousaf Z, Nassani AA et al (2020) Evaluating ‘natural resource curse’ hypothesis under sustainable information technologies: a case study of Saudi Arabia. Resour Policy 68:101699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101699
Arora R, Kaur DB (2020) Fossil fuel consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions. Causality evinced from the BRICS world. Theor Appl Econ XXII 2020:131–142
Asafu-Adjaye J, Byrne D, Alvarez M (2016) Economic growth, fossil fuel and non-fossil consumption: a Pooled Mean Group analysis using proxies for capital. Energy Econ 60:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.10.016
Azevedo VG, Sartori S, Campos LMS (2018) CO2 emissions: a quantitative analysis among the BRICS nations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.027
Bakhsh K, Rose S, Ali MF et al (2017) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. J Environ Manage 196:627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2017.03.029
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos JM (2019) An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:23010–23026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x
Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
Bermejo Carbonell J, Werner RA (2018) Does foreign direct investment generate economic growth? A new empirical approach applied to Spain. Econ Geogr 94:425–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1393312
Breitung J (2002) Nonparametric tests for unit roots and cointegration. J Econ 108:343–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00139-7
Breitung J (2005) A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econ Rev 24:151–173. https://doi.org/10.1081/ETC-200067895
Chaabouni S, Saidi K (2017) The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: a case study for 51 countries. Environ Res 158:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.041
Cheng C, Ren X, Wang Z, Yan C (2019) Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission: evidence from the BRIICS. Sci Total Environ 668:1328–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.063
Danish UR (2020) The pathway toward pollution mitigation: does institutional quality make a difference? Bus Strateg Environ 29:3571–3583. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2597
Danish UR, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Danish BMA, Wang B (2019) Analyzing the role of governance in CO2 emissions mitigation: the BRICS experience. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 51:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.007
Danish BMA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.05.028
Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2020) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111192
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.10.017
Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4
Dong K, Sun R, Hochman G (2017) Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Energy 141:1466–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.092
Dong K, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.026
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
Dumitrescu E-II, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2012.02.014
Funk M, Strauss J (2000) The long-run relationship between productivity and capital. Econ Lett 69:213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(00)00281-0
Guan J, Kirikkaleli D, Bibi A, Zhang W (2020) Natural resources rents nexus with financial development in the presence of globalization: Is the “resource curse” exist or myth? Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101641
Gudaro AM, Chhapra IU, Sheikh SA (2012) Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth: a case study of Pakistan. MPRA Pap
Gurney KR, Mendoza DL, Zhou Y et al (2009) High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States. Environ Sci Technol 43:5535–5541. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900806c
Guzel AE, Okumus İ (2020) Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: new insights from panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:18157–18167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08317-y
Haseeb M, Kot S, Iqbal Hussain H, Kamarudin F (2021) The natural resources curse-economic growth hypotheses: quantile-on-quantile evidence from top Asian economies. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123596
Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2929–2938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3
Hilmawan R, Clark J (2019) An investigation of the resource curse in Indonesia. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101483
Huang Y, Raza SMF, Hanif I et al (2020) The role of forest resources, mineral resources, and oil extraction in economic progress of developing Asian economies. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101878
Hussain J, Khan A, Zhou K (2020) The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO2 emission in Belt & Road Initiative countries: a cross-country analysis. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2020.117409
Ishida H (2011) Causal relationship between fossil fuel consumption and economic growth in Japan: a multivariate approach. Discuss Pap Econ Bus
Joshua U, Bekun FV (2020) The path to achieving environmental sustainability in South Africa: the role of coal consumption, economic expansion, pollutant emission, and total natural resources rent. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:9435–9443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07546-0
Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom 90:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
Khan A, Chenggang Y, Hussain J et al (2020a) Natural resources, tourism development, and energy-growth-CO2 emission nexus: a simultaneity modeling analysis of BRI countries. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101751
Khan A, Chenggang Y, Khan G, Muhammad F (2020b) The dilemma of natural disasters: impact on economy, fiscal position, and foreign direct investment alongside Belt and Road Initiative countries. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140578
Khan A, Chenggang Y, Yi WX et al (2020) Examining the pollution haven, and environmental kuznets hypothesis for ecological footprints: an econometric analysis of China, India, and Pakistan. J Asia Pac Econ 26:462–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2020.1761739
Khan A, Muhammad F, Chenggang Y et al (2020d) The impression of technological innovations and natural resources in energy-growth-environment nexus: A new look into BRICS economies. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.138265
Kiefer NM, Vogelsang TJ (2000) Heteroskedasticity-autocorrelation robust standard errors using the Bartlett kernel without truncation. Econometrica 70:2093–2095. https://doi.org/10.2307/3082033
Kim DH, Lin SC (2018) The resource curse hypothesis: dynamic heterogeneous approach. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 54:2698–2717. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1372281
Lashitew AA, Werker E (2020) Do natural resources help or hinder development? Resource abundance, dependence, and the role of institutions. Resour Energy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101183
Li X, Liu X (2005) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: an increasingly endogenous relationship. World Dev 33:393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.11.001
Magazzino C (2014) The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Italy. Int J Sustain Energy 35:844–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2014.953160
Matallah S, Matallah A (2016) Oil rents and economic growth in oil-abundant MENA countries: governance is the trump card to escape the resource trap. Top Middle East andNorth African Econ 18
Mert M, Caglar AE (2020) Testing pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses for Turkey: a new perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32933–32943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09469-7
Muhammad B (2019) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in developed, emerging and Middle East and North Africa countries. Energy 179:232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2019.03.126
Naseer A, Su CW, Mirza N, Li JP (2020) Double jeopardy of resources and investment curse in South Asia: Is technology the only way out? Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101702
Nawaz K, Lahiani A, Roubaud D (2019) Natural resources as blessings and finance-growth nexus: a bootstrap ARDL approach in an emerging economy. Resour Policy 60:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.007
Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri MM et al (2015) A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:843–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2014.11.066
Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015) Natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus: panel data analysis for GCC countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:998–1003
Pao HT, Tsai CM (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38:7850–7860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045
Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36:685–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
Pedroni P (2000) Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Department of Economics, Williams College
Pedroni P (2001) Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev Econ Stat 83:727–731
Pesaran M (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Phillips PCB, Ouliaris S, Phillips P, Ouliaris S (1990) Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration. Econometrica 58:165–193
Prljić S, Nikitović Z, Stojanović AG et al (2018) Management of business economic growth as function of resource rents. Phys A Stat Appl 491:325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.087
Raza SA, Shah N, Arif I (2019) Relationship between FDI and economic growth in the presence of good governance system: evidence from OECD countries. Glob Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919833484
Sachs J, Warner A (1995) natural resource abundance and economic growth. Cambridge
Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ 64:206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.001
Sarkodie SA (2018) The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: what are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:21993–22022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2347-x
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. J Clean Prod 201:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.039
Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2013.04.009
Tiba S (2019) Modeling the nexus between resources abundance and economic growth: an overview from the PSTR model. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101503
Umar M, Ji X, Kirikkaleli D et al (2020) Environmental cost of natural resources utilization and economic growth: can China shift some burden through globalization for sustainable development? Sustain Dev 28:1678–1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2116
Wang Y, Li L, Kubota J et al (2016) Does urbanization lead to more carbon emission? Evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Appl Energy 168:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.105
Wang R, Zameer H, Feng Y et al (2019) Revisiting Chinese resource curse hypothesis based on spatial spillover effect: a fresh evidence. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101521
Westerlund J (2005) New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econ Rev 24:297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
Westerlund J, Basher SA (2008) Testing for convergence in carbon dioxide emissions using a century of panel data. Environ Resour Econ 40:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9143-2
Wilson JD (2015) Resource powers? Minerals, energy and the rise of the BRICS. Third World Q 36:223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1013318
World Bank (2019) World development indicators (WDI) | Data Catalog. In: World Dev. Indic.
Yildirim E (2014) Energy use, CO2 emission and foreign direct investment: Is there any inconsistence between causal relations? Front Energy 8:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-014-0326-6
Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F, Sinha A (2019a) From nonrenewable to renewable energy and its impact on economic growth: the role of research & development expenditures in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 212:1166–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.081
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR et al (2019b) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
Zafar MW, Saeed A, Zaidi SAH, Waheed A (2020) The linkages among natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality: a path toward sustainable development. Sustain Dev 21:51. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version. This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue. The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sicen, L., Khan, A. & Kakar, A. The Role of Disaggregated Level Natural Resources Rents in Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation of BRICS Economies. Biophys Econ Sust 7, 7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-022-00102-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-022-00102-4