Abstract
Pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) has been investigated extensively in the existing literature due to global environmental issues such as global warming and climate change. However, there is still no consensus on whether this hypothesis is valid. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the validity of the PHH in ASEAN-5 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand) covering the period of 1981–2014. It is utilized the up-to-date panel data techniques taking cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity into account to test the relationship. According to the results of CCEMG and AMG estimators, the validity of the PHH is confirmed in ASEAN-5 countries. The increase in foreign direct investments (FDI) increases environmental degradation in these countries. Our additional findings show that the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis (EKC) is also valid in these countries. There is an inverted U shape between economic growth and CO2 emissions. In addition, energy consumption exacerbates CO2 emissions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliyu MA (2005) Foreign direct investment and the environment: pollution haven hypothesis revisited. In: Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, pp 9–11
Al-mulali U (2012) Factors affecting CO2 emission in the Middle East: a panel data analysis. Energy 44(1):564–569
Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Nat Hazards 80(3):1729–1747
Apergis N (2016) Environmental Kuznets curves: new evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions. Energy Econ 54:263–271
Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22
Aslan A, Destek MA, Okumus I (2018) Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2402–2408
Atici C (2012) Carbon emissions, trade liberalization, and the Japan–ASEAN interaction: a group-wise examination. J Jpn Int Econ 26(1):167–178
Azam M, Khan AQ (2016) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 63:556–567
Baek J (2016) A new look at the FDI–income–energy–environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy 91:22–27
Bakhsh K, Rose S, Ali MF, Ahmad N, Shahbaz M (2017) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. J Environ Manag 196:627–632
Bakirtas I, Cetin MA (2017) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(22):18273–18283
Balaguer J, Cantavella M (2016) Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for Spain by considering fuel oil prices (1874–2011). Ecol Indic 60:853–859
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Driha OM, Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2019a) The effects of tourism and globalization over environmental degradation in developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–15
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos JM (2019b) An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–17
Baltagi B (2008) Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Bank of Thailand (2020). Foreign Direct Investment Classified by Business Sector
Behera SR, Dash DP (2017) The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (south and southeast Asian) region. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:96–106
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253
Busse M, Hefeker C (2007) Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. Eur J Polit Econ 23(2):397–415
Central Bank of the Republic of the Philippines (2020) International Investment Positions Database
Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K, Smyth R (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Econ 75:389–399
Cole MA, Elliott RJ, Zhang J (2011) Growth, foreign direct investment, and the environment: evidence from Chinese cities. J Reg Sci 51(1):121–138
De Hoyos RE, Sarafidis V (2006) Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stata J 6(4):482–496
Destek MA, Okumus I (2019) Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly industrialized countries? Evidence from ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–7
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537
Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29387–29396
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455
Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–8
Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator
Eberhardt M, Teal F (2011) Econometrics for grumblers: a new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics. J Econ Surv 25(1):109–155
Gill AR, Viswanathan KK, Hassan S (2018) A test of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for carbon emission and potential of renewable energy to reduce green house gases (GHG) in Malaysia. Environ Dev Sustain 20(3):1103–1114
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Hanif I, Raza SMF, Gago-de-Santos P, Abbas Q (2019) Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: some empirical evidence. Energy 171:493–501
He J (2006) Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: the case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecol Econ 60(1):228–245
Heidari H, Katircioğlu ST, Saeidpour L (2015) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:785–791
Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (2020) Foreign Direct Investment Statistics
IPCC (2018) Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C
Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12):5167–5172
Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831
Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Apergis N (2019) The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO 2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade. Lat Am Econ Rev 28(1):2
Karamelikli H, Akalin G, Arslan U (2017) Oil exports and non-oil exports: Dutch disease effects in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). J Econ Stud 44(4):540–551
Khan MA, Ozturk I (2019) Examining foreign direct investment and environmental pollution linkage in Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12
Kirkulak B, Qiu B, Yin W (2011) The impact of FDI on air quality: evidence from China. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 4(2):81–98
Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606
Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497
Lean HH, Smyth R (2010) CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Appl Energy 87(6):1858–1864
Liu X, Zhang S, Bae J (2017) The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 164:1239–1247
Malaysia Department of Statistics (2020). Statistics of Foreign Direct Investment in Malaysia, 2018
Merican Y, Yusop Z, Noor ZM, Hook LS (2007) Foreign direct investment and the pollution in five ASEAN nations. Int J Econ Manag 1(2):245–261
Nasir M, Rehman FU (2011) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 39(3):1857–1864
Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389
Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36(1):685–693
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper (No. 1229)
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142(1):50–93
Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econ J 11(1):105–127
Rafindadi AA, Muye IM, Kaita RA (2018) The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 25:126–137
Ren S, Yuan B, Ma X, Chen X (2014) International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ Rev 28:123–134
Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: a cointegration approach. Energy 55:813–822
Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51:184–191
Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2019) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. J Econ Stud 46(1):106–168
Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T, Ali A (2013) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:494–502
Shahbaz M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Sinha A (2019) Foreign direct investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. J Clean Prod 217:603–614
Singstat (2020) Singapore’s Direct Investment Abroad
Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy 119:703–711
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719
Sun C, Zhang F, Xu M (2017) Investigation of pollution haven hypothesis for China: an ARDL approach with breakpoint unit root tests. J Clean Prod 161:153–164
Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145
Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454
UNCTAD (2018) World Investment Report
United Nations (2019) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019
Ur Rahman Z, Chongbo W, Ahmad M (2019) An (a) symmetric analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis in the context of Pakistan: a non-linear approach. Carbon Manag 10(3):227–239
Wang DT, Chen WY (2014) Foreign direct investment, institutional development, and environmental externalities: evidence from China. J Environ Manag 135:81–90
Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the fisher effect. J Appl Econ 23(2):193–233
World Bank (2020). World development indicators
Zakarya GY, Mostefa BELMOKADDEM, Abbes SM, Seghir GM (2015) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries: a panel data analysis. Procedia Econ Finan 26:114–125
Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:943–951
Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guzel, A.E., Okumus, İ. Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: new insights from panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 18157–18167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08317-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08317-y