Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Approach to Calculating the “Corporate” EROI

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The EROI is one of the most important indices to evaluate the net energy output of a source of primary energy (there is a lively debate on the usability of this kind of parameter, but here we will use it under the hypothesis that it is a good way to establish if an oil company has a level of efficiency close to other energetic sources). It is generally defined as the ratio between the energy extracted by a given resource and the energy costs sustained to extract that energy. We tried to set up an alternative method for the calculation of the EROI, taking (1) as a proxy of the energy costs the available data about the CO2 emissions of the oil companies, as reported in the sustainability reports (SRs), recommended by the international organisms such as IPCC and WBCSD, although not mandatory, and (2) as a proxy of the energy extracted the CO2 emissions estimate obtained by a stoichiometric conversion of the oil/gas production declared by the oil companies. Both proxies have been also corrected to take into account the different CO2 emission rate per unit energy of oil and gas. The resulting estimates of EROI are rather homogeneous and not too different from the values reported in the literature. The method could be suitable for year-by-year comparison of the time evolution of this important energy quality parameter for the individual energy-producing and energy-delivering companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Each oil company draws up its SR and, where available, this document can be found on the website of the oil company itself. In Appendix 2, we leave a foot-page note with the web addresses where we have found the SR, for each oil company examined.

  2. For a complete list of the activities pertaining to Scope 3, and for a general overview about the Scope identification and goals, see GHGPT (2011)—for detailed list pp. 34–37.

  3. For the method of calculation, see the Appendix 1.

  4. Shell Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015. Available online at: http://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2015/servicepages/downloads/files/entire_shell_ar15.pdf.

  5. Ibid, p. 23.

  6. Shell Sustainability Report, p. 52. Available online at http://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2015/servicepages/downloads/files/entire_shell_sr15.pdf.

  7. From the website “World Atlas”: http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/biggest-oil-companies-in-the-world.html.

  8. One complication to retrieve data concerns the “place”: sometimes they are in the Sustainability Report, some other times are in the Annual Report, other are on the website of the company.

  9. In Appendix 2, the first case discussed is Saudi Aramco and there we have described the entire procedure to obtain exactly this value.

  10. https://energifaktanorge.no/en/om-energisektoren/verdt-a-vite-om-norsk-energipolitikk/.

  11. Page 52 of Shell Sustainability Report 2015.

  12. Available at: http://www.eninorge.com/Documents/Rapporter/WOGR%202015%20unico.pdf.

  13. Available at: http://www.saudiaramco.com/content/dam/Publications/annual-review/2015/English/AR-2015-SaudiAramco-English-full.pdf. All websites on this section are checked in June 27 and 28, 2017.

  14. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenrwald/2017/02/25/the-worlds-biggest-ipo-is-coming-what-you-should-know-about-aramco/#5749cfa4535f.

  15. http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL4N0P807H20140627.

  16. http://www.cnpc.com.cn/en/xhtml/pdf/2015_Annual_Report_online/0-2015_Annual_Report.pdf.

  17. http://www.petrochina.com.cn/petrochina/xhtml/images/shyhj/2015kcxfzbgen02.pdf.

  18. http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/global/files/corporate-citizenship-report/2015_corporate_citizenship_report_full_approved-pdf.pdf.

  19. https://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2015/servicepages/downloads/files/entire_shell_sr15.pdf.

  20. https://www.kpc.com.kw/Sustainability%20Reports/KPI%20CSR%20Report%202012.pdf.

  21. https://www.q8oils.com/en-us/en/mainnavigation/aboutus.aspx.

  22. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/sustainability/group-reports/bp-sustainability-report-2015.pdf.

  23. http://www.total.com/sites/default/files/atoms/files/registration_document_2015.pdf.

  24. http://www.lukoil.ru/FileSystem/PressCenter/27396.pdf?dl=1.

  25. http://www.lukoil.com/Responsibility/SafetyAndEnvironment/Ecology/GasEmissionRegulation.

  26. https://www.eni.com/docs/en_IT/enicom/company/fact-book-2015-eng.pdf.

  27. https://www.eni.com/docs/en_IT/enicom/sustainability/eni_for_2015_report_eng_.pdf.

  28. https://www.energievalero.ca/en-ca/PublishingImages/Company/ResourceCenter/2015%20Social%20Responsability%20Report.pdf.

  29. http://www.petrobras.com.br/lumis/portal/file/fileDownload.jsp?fileId=8A8B2D16572EBA5C0158D44479594FC5.

  30. https://www.chevron.com/-/media/chevron/annual-report/2015/2015-Annual-Report.pdf.

  31. https://www.chevron.com/-/media/chevron/shared/documents/2015-corporate-responsibility-report.pdf.

  32. http://uk.reuters.com/article/venezuela-pdvsa-production-idUKL2N0XE1CE20150420.

  33. http://www.pemex.com/responsabilidad/sustentable/informes/Documents/informeresponsabildiad_2014.pdf.

  34. http://www.pemex.com/en/investors/publications/Indicadores%20Petroleros%20Archivos/eprohidro_ing.pdf.

  35. http://www.nioc.ir/portal/home/default.aspx?categoryid=1749ab39-6590-49b0-a616-930afcbc8233&tabno=4.

  36. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/emissions/ira.dat.

  37. http://www.gazprom.com/about/production/extraction/.

  38. http://www.gazprom.com/f/posts/12/001311/gazprom-ecology-report-2015-en.pdf.

  39. http://www.petronas.com.my/media-relations/media-releases/Pages/article/Q1-FY2016.aspx.

  40. http://www.petronas.com.my/sustainability/Documents/sustainability-report/SustainabilityReport2015.pdf.

  41. http://www.cnooc.com.cn/attach/0/1605101600110775579.pdf.

  42. http://www.marathonpetroleum.com/content/documents/Citizenship/2016/2016_Citizenship_Report.pdf.

  43. https://www.pttep.com/en/OurBusiness/Publications/2015Annualreport.aspx.

  44. https://www.rosneft.com/upload/site2/document_file/RN_SR2016_eng_20160929.pdf.

  45. http://www.hd.jxtg-group.co.jp/english/ir/library/annual/2014/pdf/jx_en_ar_fy2014.pdf.

  46. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/system/attachments/cop_2015/222541/original/csr_report-2015-en.PDF?1451012531.

  47. https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/statoil-sustainability-report-2015.pdf.

  48. https://www.iocl.com/download/Sustainability_Report_2015-16.pdf.

  49. http://www.sonatrach.dz/docs/rapport_annuel_2014.pdf.

  50. http://www.ril.com/DownloadFiles/SustainiabilityReports/RIL's%20G4%20Sustainability%20Report%202014-15.pdf.

  51. http://www.pertamina.com/media/d2d30686-149d-4121-a63e-0dd6a776d1ee/SR_Pertamina_2015.pdf.

References

  • Absi Halabi M, Al-Qattan A, Al-Otaibi A (2015) Application of solar energy in the oil industry—current status and future prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:296–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP Energy Outlook database (2015) Available at: http://www.bp.com/energyoutlook

  • Brandt AR, Dale M (2011) A general mathematical framework for calculating systems scale efficiency of energy extraction and conversion: energy return on investment (EROI) and other energy return ratios. Energies 4:1211–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt AR, Englander J, Bharadwaj S (2013a) The energy efficiency of oil sands extraction: energy return ratios from 1970 to 2010. Energy 55:693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt AR, Dale M, Barnhart C (2013b) Calculating systems-scale energy efficiency and energy returns: a bottom-up matrix-based approach. Energy 62:235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt AR, Sun Y, Bharadwaj S, Livingston D, Tan E, Gordon D (2015a) Energy return on investment (EROI) for forty global oilfields using a detailed engineering-based model of oil production. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt AR, Yeskoo T, Vafi K (2015b) Net energy analysis of Bakken crude oil production using a well-level engineering-based model. Energy 93:2191–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmalt SW (2017) The economics of oil: a primer including geology, energy, economics, politics. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Choi Y, Lee C, Song J (2017) Review of renewable energy technologies utilized in the oil and gas industry. Int J Renew Energy Res 7(2):592–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ (1992) Energy quality and energy surplus in the extraction of fossil fuels in the US. Ecol Econ 6:139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ (2005) Net energy from the extraction of oil and gas in the United States. Energy 30:769–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ (2006a) Energy return on investment (EROI). In: Costanza R (ed) Encyclopedia of earth. Environmental Information Coalition. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ (2006b) Net energy analysis. In: Costanza R (ed) Encyclopedia of earth. Environmental Information Coalition. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell F (1953) Energy and society. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Court V, Fizaine F (2017), Long-term estimates of the energy-return-on-investment (EROI) of coal, oil, and gas global productions. Ecol Econ 138:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENI (2015) O&G. World oil and gas review 2015, available at: https://www.eni.com/it_IT/azienda/fuel-cafe/world-oil-gas-review.page

  • Fizaine F, Court V (2016) Energy expenditure, economic growth, and the minimum EROI of society. Energy Policy 95:172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon N, Hall CAS, Brinker L (2009) A preliminary investigation of energy return on energy investment for global oil and gas production. Energies 2(3):490–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse Gases Protocol Team (GHGPT) (2011) Corporate value chain (Scope 3) accounting and reporting standard. Supplement to the GHG protocol corporate accounting and reporting standard. Available online at: http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/Corporate-Value-Chain-Accounting-Reporing-Standard_041613.pdf

  • Guilford MC, Hall CAS, O’Connor P, Cleveland CJ (2011) A new long term assessment of energy return on investment (EROI) for U.S. oil and gas discovery and production. Sustainability 3:1866–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Hall CAS (2011) A review of the past and current state of EROI data. Sustainability 3:1796–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS (2017) Energy return on investment. A unifying principle for biology, economics, and sustainability. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS, Klitgaard K (2011) Energy and the wealth of Nations. Understanding the biophysical economy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS, Powers R, Schoenberg W (2008) Peak oil, EROI, investments and the economy in an uncertain future. In: Pimentel D (ed) Biofuels, solar and wind as renewable energy systems, benefits and risks. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS, Lambert J, Balogh S (2013), EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy 64:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong Z-Y, Dong X-C, Shao Q, Wan X, Tang D-L, Liu G-X (2016) The potential of domestic production and imports of oil and gas in China: an energy return on investment perspective. Petrol Sci 13:788–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder K, Hagens NJ (2009) Energy return on investment: toward a consistent framework. AMBIO 37(2):74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DJ, Hall CAS (2010), Year in review—EROI or energy return on (energy) invested. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185(1):102–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DJ, Hall CAS, Cleveland CJ (2011) Order from chaos: a preliminary protocol for determining EROI for fuels. Sustainability 3(10):1888–1907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raugei M, Sgouridis S, Murphy D, Fthenakis V, Frischknecht R, Breyer C, Bardi U, Barnhart C, Buckley A, Carbajales-Dale M, Csala D, de Wild-Scholten M, Heath G, Jæger-Waldaup A, Jones C, Keller A, Leccisi E, Mancarella P, Pearsall N, Siegel A, Sinke W, Stolz P (2017) Energy return on energy invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation: a comprehensive response. Energy Policy 102:377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raugei M, Leccisi E, Azzopardi B, Jones C, Gilbert P, Zhang L, Zhou Y, Mander S, Mancarella P (2018) A multi-disciplinary analysis of UK grid mix scenarios with large-scale PV deployment. Energy Policy 114:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safronov A, Sokolov A (2014) Preliminary calculation of the EROI for the production of crude oil and light oil products in Russia. Sustainability 6:5801–5819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speight JG (2001) Handbook of petroleum analysis. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Carbajales-Dale M (2018) Assessing the photovoltaic technology landscape: efficiency and energy return on investment (EROI). Energy Environ Sci 11:603–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Celi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1

We have calculated the mean API degree with the support of O&G. World Oil and Gas review 2015.Footnote 12 This report, drawn up by ENI, on page 85 shows a graph “Quality and Production Volume of Main Crudes 2014” for the worldwide production of oil.

figure a

To perform the calculation, we pick up two points in the midline of every circle. In this way, we have calculated the diameter and also the area for each circle, normalized with the standard circle—the unit of 500 thousand of barrels/day. Therefore, in this way we retrieve two informations: the amount of the production and the API degree for that production. To establish the weight of each contribution, we have calculated a simple weighted average, considering that for each circle the center represents the exact API degree:

Site

1st point

2nd point

Area

1000 barrels/day

API degree

Weighted mean

Default value in legenda

11.72

9.60

3.54

500.00

 

32.20

UL—Urals (Russia)

35.11

26.44

59.06

8334.88

30.77

 

BB—Brent Blend (UK)

39.39

38.32

0.90

126.89

38.85

 

BR—Bow River (Canada)

23.74

21.75

3.14

442.88

22.74

 

DR—Duri (Indonesia)

22.50

20.90

1.99

280.90

21.70

 

IH—Iran Heavy (Iran)

31.58

27.85

10.96

1546.94

29.72

 

ML—Marlim (Brazil)

20.92

18.63

4.09

577.15

19.77

 

OM—Oman (Oman)

35.98

33.02

6.89

972.37

34.50

 

SG—Shengli (China)

27.13

24.87

4.01

566.08

26.00

 

VS—Vasconia (Colombia)

25.30

23.26

3.26

459.88

24.28

 

WT—West Texas (USA)

42.59

39.17

9.19

1297.08

40.88

 

KW—Kuwait (Kuwait)

32.88

28.19

17.31

2442.01

30.53

 

DQ—Daqing (China)

33.61

30.83

6.06

855.31

32.22

 

EK—Ekofisk (UK, Norway)

39.28

37.74

1.87

263.19

38.51

 

DU—Dubai (UAE)

30.15

29.50

0.33

46.97

29.83

 

MU—Murban (UAE)

41.31

37.69

10.32

1456.39

39.50

 

AN—Alaskan (USA)

32.55

30.45

3.44

485.05

31.50

 

SH—Saharan (Algeria)

46.16

43.05

7.57

1068.52

44.60

 

WS—West Texas Sour (USA)

32.81

30.59

3.90

550.16

31.70

 

AL—Arab Light (Saudi Arabia)

36.81

29.77

39.01

5505.45

33.29

 

AM—Arab Med. (Saudi Arabia)

32.01

28.78

8.21

1159.15

30.39

 

CB—Cabinda (Angola)

32.75

31.43

1.35

190.78

32.09

 

EP—Espo (Russia)

36.03

33.16

6.46

912.27

34.59

 

IL—Iranian Light (Iran)

34.47

32.14

4.25

599.63

33.30

 

AE—Arab Extra (Saudi Arabia)

41.00

38.01

7.02

990.84

39.51

 

PZ—Pazflor (Angola)

26.13

25.04

0.93

131.68

25.59

 

TL—Troll (Norway)

35.60

34.26

1.41

199.31

34.93

 

ZU—Upper Zakum (UAE)

35.46

32.89

5.20

733.17

34.18

 

MB—Mixed Blend (Canada)

40.63

38.06

5.19

732.60

39.34

 

BL—Basrah Light (Iraq)

31.45

26.53

19.03

2685.00

28.99

 

CH—Changqing (China)

30.01

27.96

3.30

465.77

28.99

 

ES—Es Sider (Libia)

37.66

36.87

0.49

68.47

37.26

 

IS—Isthmus (Mexico)

33.66

30.92

5.93

836.94

32.29

 

MV—Merey (Venezuela)

19.30

16.70

5.30

747.49

18.00

 

QI—Qua Iboe (Nigeria)

36.15

34.86

1.30

183.01

35.51

 

TP—Tapis (Malaysia)

43.43

41.99

1.62

227.91

42.71

 

BK—Bakken Blend (USA)

42.98

39.82

7.81

1101.82

41.40

 

AZ—Azeri Light (Azerbaijan)

36.42

33.99

4.65

655.52

35.20

 

AH—Arab Heavy (Saudi Arabia)

29.89

26.71

7.92

1117.25

28.30

 

CL—Cold Lake (Canada)

21.33

18.07

8.34

1177.14

19.70

 

FT—Forties (UK)

40.54

38.64

2.84

401.36

39.59

 

KB—Kirkuk Blend (Iraq)

33.77

31.80

3.06

431.87

32.78

 

MY—Maya (Mexico)

23.78

20.40

8.94

1261.69

22.09

 

MN—Minas (Indonesia)

34.61

33.31

1.32

186.15

33.96

 

TZ—Tengiz (Kazakistan)

47.56

45.33

3.88

547.70

46.44

 

EF—Eagle Ford (USA)

42.76

40.05

5.76

813.35

41.40

 

Appendix 2

Some Methodological Considerations

The SR analyzed are different each other and there are no standards followed by the oil companies, so it is necessary to stress some points:

  • Some SR subdivided the company emissions into direct and indirect, complying with the guidelines issued by the GHG Protocol. For these companies, we have calculated two kinds of EROI; in the first case only for direct emission caused by the company and, in the second one, for the sum of direct and indirect emissions. Often, we will see, there are small differences between these two values.

  • Some SR reports the emissions subdivided into CO2 and other GHG (NOx, SOx, etc.), while better reports give us the value in CO2 equivalent—the value normally used to calculate the EROI. In the first case, when we do not have this information, we had considered only the CO2 emission, because it is, however, the most relevant contribution.

  • The companies examined are usually “oil & gas.” The production sometimes is reported separately for oil and gas, sometimes is put together, in tons (TOE) or barrels of oil equivalent (BOE). In all cases, we have converted the data into the best way to calculate the EROI estimate.

  • The list of the companies examined has a descending order by revenues, from the highest to the lowest. In some cases, the companies are not involved only in extraction activities, but also make services for other companies (refinery, storing, transport, and so forth). In these cases, the EROI of the company examined falls down because values of extraction for oil and gas are low, but those of emissions are high—and in some cases even unrealistically because under the unity. This could mean indirectly that many oil companies—already with a not large EROI—in spite of the “Scope 3” indicated in the GHG Protocol, make outsourcing.

Calculation Method

  1. 1.

    It takes the initial production data which, fortunately, is almost always expressed in millions of barrels a day—and where it is not, it has been converted into this form [barrels/day], or, depending on how the emissions were expressed, it is left as a value in tons of daily (or yearly) oil production;

  2. 2.

    In the case of daily production, obviously it has been multiplied by 365 to obtain the annual production (always either in barrels per year or in tons per year);

  3. 3.

    If the value is expressed in barrels, the value obtained in the previous step is multiplied by the conversion factor between cubic meters [m3] and barrels. The barrel of oil is 159 liters. One m3 is 1000 L and therefore the factor 0.159 [m3/barrels];

  4. 4.

    This value is then multiplied by the average oil density that we have calculated previously (see Appendix 1), whence the value of 863.6 [kg/m3] came out;

  5. 5.

    The last operation to be carried out—if the emissions are in tons of CO2 equivalent—is the multiplication related to the stoichiometric ratio between the molecular weight of a chain (the simplest) of hydrocarbons (methylene-CH2: 14.03 g/mol) and carbon dioxide (CO2: 44.01 g/mol), with a value of 3.14.

The dimensional analysis is as follows:

[barrels/year] × [m3/barrels] = [m3/year] × [kg/m3] = [kg/year] whence it is easier to infer the tons or million tons to be compared to the emissions.

As we can see in the following analysis it is quite difficult to have a valid value of emissions for oil companies outside the Western Countries, like the Arabian or the Middle East. Unfortunately, their “specific weight” is very high: for example, the first company of the list, Saudi Aramco, covers 10% of the oil market alone. In this appendix, we will discuss, case by case, the companies and the finding outcomes.

#01. SAUDI ARAMCO—EROI: 52.29

This is the biggest oil company in the world, but its Annual Report 2015Footnote 13 offers only the oil production (p. 8) and no information about emissions. The company is property of the Saudi Monarchy but has recently announced,Footnote 14 for a small portion (5%) of the entire capital, the launch of an IPO (Initial Public Offering) to enter in the Stock Exchange. The only useful information to know something about emissions is the intensity of energy requested for the production of one barrel of oil equivalent (1 BOE), expressed in thousands of BTU and equal to 108 for the 2015 (p. 66). The production is given separately between oil (91%) and NGL (9%). In this way, we have found an EROI at “mouth of the well” very high—probably because the operation involved is only the extraction.

SAUDI ARAMCO

Oil

 

 10,200,000.00

barrels/daya

 365.00

day/year

 3,723,000,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 510,892,546,920.00

kg/year

 510.89

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 1602.59

mtCO2eq/year

NGL

 

 1,300,000.00

barrels/dayb

 365.00

day/year

 474,825,000.00

barrels/year

 1,994,265,000.00

btu conversion

 356,118,750.00

crude conversion

 137.23

barrels > kg

 48,868,765,832.25

kg/year

 48.87

mtons/year

 2.74

CO2/CH4

 134.08

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 1736.68

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 108,000.00

btu/barrel

 453,365,100,000,000.00

btu

 77,072,067.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 10,576,599,754.41

kg/year

 10.58

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 33.21

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 52.29

at “mouth of well”

  1. aSaudi Aramco Annual Report 2015, p. 8
  2. bSaudi Aramco Annual Report 2015, p. 66

#02. SINOPEC—EROI: 1.67

The data are referred for the 2014 because there are no values, inside the SR, about emissions. OnlineFootnote 15 we have found an intensity value: «As part of its energy efficiency programme Sinopec aims to raise efficiency by 20 percent in 2014, or 14 million tons of coal equivalent, by cutting consumption at its refineries and power plants and improving its oil pumping systems». If 14 million are the 20%, then we presume that the 100% are 70 million. It was necessary to convert the value in TCE (tons of coal equivalent) in TOE (tons of oil equivalent) via BTU. The results are listed in the following table. The EROI found is very low but, in the same way of the previous case, we are talking about a national company and probably, here, the EROI includes the entire cost, up to the final user.

SINOPEC

 

Oil

 

 471,910,000.00

boe/yeara

 137.23

barrels > kg

 64,760,209,300.00

kg/year

 64.76

mtons/year

Gas

 

 734.79

bcf/yearb

 1000.00

cf > btu

 734,790,000,000,000.00

btu/year

 124,914,300.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 17,141,989,389.00

kg/year

 17.14

mtons/year

Oil & gas

 

 81.90

mtons/year

Emissions

 

 70,000,000.00

TCE

 1,943,176,747,400,000.00

BTU

 48,967,230.34

toe > tons

 48.97

mtons

EROI

 

 1.67

 
  1. aSinopec Annual Report and Accounts 2015, p. 12, available at: http://www.sinopec.com/listco/en/Resource/Pdf/2016032918C.pdf
  2. b http://www.statista.com/statistics/227293/sinopecs-natural-gas-production/

For the calculation of the EROI of Chinese oil companies, we also consulted Zhao-Yang Kong et al. (2016).

#03. CHINA NATIONAL PETROLEUM COMPANY (CNPC)—EROI: NOT AVAILABLE

The production data are available on the Annual Report 2015 (p. 7)Footnote 16 and is separated for oil and gas. However, nothing is possible to know about emissions. Therefore, the value of EROI is not available.

CHINA NATIONAL PETROLEUM

Oil

 

 111.43

mtoe/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 349.54

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 95.48

bcm/year

 3,371,844,691,600,000.00

bcm > btu

 573,213,597.57

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 78,662,101,994.81

kg/year

 78.66

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 247.00

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 596.54

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 Not available

 

EROI

 

 Not available

 

#04. PETROCHINA—EROI: 3.63

The aggregate production data for oil and gas can be found on page 3 of the report,Footnote 17 while the emissions—issued in TCE—are under the heading “total energy consumption.” The value of EROI thus determined is therefore very low.

PETROCHINA

Oil

 

 961,630,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 131,964,484,900.00

kg/year

 131.96

mtons/year

Gas

 

 3131.00

bcf/yeara

 3,131,000,000,000,000.00

bcf > btu

 532,270,000.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 73,043,412,100.00

kg/year

 73.04

mtons/year

Oil & gas

 

 205.00

mtons/year

Emissions

 

 80.77

TCE

 56.51

mtons/year

EROI

 

 3.63

 
  1. a https://www.statista.com/statistics/232509/natural-gas-production-volume-of-petrochina/

#05. EXXON MOBIL—EROI: 7.59

The production data are available on the Annual Report (p. 5).Footnote 18 The output data are on the Corporate Citizenship Report at p. 35.

EXXON

Oil

 

 4,097,000.00

barrels/day

 365.00

day/year

 1,495,405,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 205,214,428,150.00

kg/year

 205.21

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 644.37

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 10,515.00

mcf/day

 3,837,975.00

mcf/year

 1000.00

cf > btu

 3,837,975,000,000,000.00

btu/year

 652,455,750.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 89,536,502,572.50

kg/year

 89.54

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 281.14

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 925.51

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 122.00

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 7.59

 

#06. SHELL—EROI: 7.75, 6.88

The SRFootnote 19 reports 3 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (p. 5), direct emissions of 72 million tons annually, and indirectly of 9 million tons (p. 52). So the values are listed in the following table.

SHELL

Oil

 

 3,000,000.00

barrels/day

 365.00

day/year

 1,095,000,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 150,262,513,800.00

kg/year

 150.26

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 471.35

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 22.60

million tons gas/yeara

 201,140,000.00

mtons > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 27,602,442,200.00

kg/year

 27.60

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 86.67

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 558.02

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #1

 

 72.00

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #2

 

 81.00

mtCO2eq/year

EROI #1

 

 7.75

 

EROI #2

 

 6.88

 
  1. a http://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2015/strategic-report/upstream/production.php

#07. KUWAIT PETROLEUM—EROI: 19.86

There is an anomaly because the last SRFootnote 20 (to know the emissions) is referred to 2012, while the production is onlineFootnote 21 «With 120 years of known reserves and crude oil production levels of 2.9 million barrels per day, it is ranked the seventh largest oil producer in the world». The data about GHG emissions are shown separately (SR, page 25). If we sum all values the result is 7983 tons per year, but anyway the EROI is rather high.

KUWAIT

Oil

 

 2,900,000.00

barrels/day

 365.00

day/year

 1,058,500,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 145,253,763,340.00

kg/year

 145.25

mtons/year

Gas

 

 16.06

bcm/yeara

 567,153,600,200,000.00

bcm > btu

 96,416,112.03

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 13,231,183,054.43

kg/year

 13.23

mtons/year

Oil & gas

 

 158.48

mtons/year

Emissions

 

 7.98

mtons/year

EROI

 

 19.86

 
  1. a https://ycharts.com/indicators/kuwait_natural_gas_production

#08. BP—EROI: 11.23, 9.74

We have two results calculated for direct and indirect emissions. All data are available on the SR,Footnote 22 page 8.

BP

Oil

 

 729,649,388.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 100,129,785,515.24

kg/year

 100.13

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 314.41

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 7,146.00

mcf/daya

 2,608,290.00

mcf/year

 2,608,290,000,000,000.00

mcf > btu

 443,409,300.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 60,849,058,239.00

kg/year

 60.85

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 191.07

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 505.48

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #1

 

 45.00

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #2

 

 51.90

mtCO2eq/year

EROI #1

 

 11.23

 

EROI #2

 

 9.74

 
  1. a http://statista.com/statistics/305232/natural-gas-reserves-and-production-of-bp/

#09. TOTAL SA—EROI: 10.81

The website is a little bit disorganized, but all data about 2015 are in the “registration document”Footnote 23: the production on page 1 and the emissions on page 145.

TOTAL SA

 

Oil

 

 2,347,000.00

boe/day

 365.00

day/year

 856,655,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 117,555,373,296.20

kg/year

 117.56

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 368.75

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 66.40

bcm/year (2016)a

 2,344,894,088,000,000.00

bcm > btu

 398,631,994.96

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 54,704,268,668.36

kg/year

 54.70

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 171.77

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 540.52

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 50.00

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 10.81

 
  1. a https://www.total.com/en/news/natural-gas-integral-part-totals-strategy

#10: LUKOIL—EROI: 5.83

There are no data for the same year. We have picked up the data about production from the annual report 2015Footnote 24 (page 227) and, for the emissions, the only sure data come from the website of the company,Footnote 25 even if they cover 5 years (2008–2012). We simply calculated an arithmetic mean of the available data over the 5 years.

LUKOIL

 

Oil

 

 736,000,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 101,001,280,000.00

kg/year

 101.00

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 317.14

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 154,000,000.00

boe/yeara

 137.23

barrels > kg

 21,133,420,000.00

kg/year

 21.13

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 66.36

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 383.5

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 65.74

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 5.83

 
  1. a http://www.lukoil.com/FileSystem/9/227307.xlsx?dl=1 downloadable from: http://www.lukoil.com/Business/Upstream/DevelopmentAndProduction

#11: ENI—EROI: 10.43

ENI produces 1.76 million of BOE per day (p. 4 of “ENI Fact Book”)Footnote 26 and sustains to emit 38.5 million of tons of GHG (direct emissions, p. 4 of SR).Footnote 27

ENI

 

Oil

 

 1,760,000.00

barrels/day

 365.00

day/year

 642,400,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 88,154,008,096.00

kg/year

 88.15

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 276.53

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 4,681.00

mcf/day

 1,708,565.00

mcf/year

 1,708,565,000,000,000.00

bcm > btu

 290,456,050.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 39,859,283,741.50

kg/year

 39.86

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 125.16

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 401.69

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 38.50

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 10.43

 

#12: VALERO—EROI: NOT AVAILABLE

Valero is basically a tertiary company that is likely to refine oil and other materials for other companies, at claimed least according to what is declared on its SR: «Valero Energy Corporation, through its subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer, distributor and marketer of transport fuels, petrochemical Products and power. Valero’s subsidiaries employ approximately 10,000 people, and assets include 15 petroleum refineries with a combined throughput capacity of approximately 3 million barrels per day, 11 ethanol plants with a combined production capacity of 1.3 billion gallons per year» (p. 2 of the SR).Footnote 28 Even if it is rather difficult to estimate the amount of treated materials, the problem remains that data about emissions are lacking.

#13: PETROBRAS—EROI: 5.65

Both production and emissions are available on the SR (p. 2).Footnote 29

PETROBRAS

 

Oil

 

 2,230,000.00

barrels/daya

 813,950,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 111,698,358,500.00

kg/year

 111.70

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 350.73

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 560,000,00

barrels/day

 204,400,000,00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 28,049,812,000,00

kg/year

 28.05

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 88.08

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 438.81

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 77.70

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 5.64

 
  1. a http://www.investidorpetrobras.com.br/en/press-releases/oil-and-natural-gas-production-2015

#14: CHEVRON—EROI: 9.70

The production is available on the annual reportFootnote 30 (p. 5), while the value of emissions on the SRFootnote 31 (p. 24).

CHEVRON

 

Oil

 

 2,622,000.00

boe/day

 365.00

day/year

 957,030,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 131,333,226,900.00

kg/year

 131.33

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 411.97

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 5269.00

mcf/day

 1,923,185.00

mcf/year

 1,923,185,000,000,000.00

bcm > btu

 326,941,450.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 44,866,175,183.50

kg/year

 44.87

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 140.88

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 552.85

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 57.00

mtons/year

EROI

 

 9.70

 

#15: PDVSA (Venezuela)—EROI: NOT AVAILABLE

The production is retrieved from a communication agency (Reuters)Footnote 32 but nothing is possible to know about emissions. The company website in some part is “updated” at 2007 and, nowadays, the country has more serious problems to face.

PDVSA

 

Oil

 

 2,863,000.00

barrels/day

 1,044,995,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 143,404,663,850.00

kg/year

 143.40

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 450.29

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 5296.00

mcf/daya

 1,933,040.00

mcf/year

 1,933,040,000,000,000.00

mcf > btu

 328,616,800.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 45,096,083,464.00

kg/year

 45.10

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 141.60

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 591.89

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 Not available

 

EROI

 

 Not available

 
  1. a http://www.pdvsa.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6545&Itemid=900&lang=en

#16: PEMEX—EROI: 7.88

The SR is updated to 2014,Footnote 33 therefore we carried out the calculation for this year. Data about emissions can be found on the SR (p. 87), while the production is available in the monthly petroleum statistics.Footnote 34

PEMEX

 

Oil

 

 773,825,550.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 106,192,080,226.50

kg/year

 106.19

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 333.44

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 3,929.00

mcf/daya

 1,434,085.00

mcf/year

 1,434,085,000,000,000.00

bcm > btu

 243,794,450.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 33,455,912,373.50

kg/year

 33.46

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 105.05

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 438.49

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 55.62

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 7.88

 
  1. a http://www.pemex.com/en/investors/publications/Indicadores%20Petroleros%20Archivos/eprodcrudo_ing.pdf

#17: NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY (NIOC)—EROI: 1.30

The production data can be found on the company’s website at the following address: http://www.nioc.ir/portal/Home/ShowPage.aspx?Object=NEWS&ID=84aedbc4-c7e4-4f49-9b3b-ae95787258d7&LayoutID=ba9beea1-5bfb-4b05-8edf-39b84db5a4ec&CategoryID=a034ee3f-1acf-4bad-a4af-1bbbf5c1e716. Site copyright is 2009, while the “headline” (a sort of recent news roll) dates back to 2012. The webpage about reports exists, but it is a kind of empty box.Footnote 35 The general feeling is that the site was abandoned, especially because the page where the reports should be found has no content. The only information available on the web is an old estimate of the CO2 consumption of the ALL nation in 2008,Footnote 36 and this—even if we assume NIOC as the only Iranian oil producer—makes EROI very low, and probably biased. However, in the table the calculation is illustrated.

NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY

Oil

 

 489,349,513.14

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 67,153,433,688.20

kg/year

 67.15

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 210.86

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 189.04

bcm/yeara

 6,675,885,216,800,000.00

bcm > btu

 1,134,900,486.86

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 155,742,393,811.25

kg/year

 155.74

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 489.03

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 699.89

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 146,824.00

thousand metric tons of carbon

 3.67

conversion factor

 538,403.61

thousand tCO2eq/year

 538.40

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 1.30

 
  1. a http://en.nioc.ir/Portal/File/ShowFile.aspx?ID = a05977b6-5baf-4f8a-acb7-4f6da39133e6

#18: GAZPROM—EROI: 11.65

The production for 2015 is on the websiteFootnote 37: 418.5 billion cubic meters of gas; 15.3 million tons of gas condensate and 36 million tons of oil. The data about emissions are on the SR,Footnote 38 p. 23.

GAZPROM

 

Oil

 

 36.00

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 112.93

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 418.50

bcm/year

 14,779,189,395,000,000.00

bcm > btu

 2,512,462,197.15

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 344,785,187,314.89

kg/year

 344.79

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 1082.63

mtCO2eq/year

Gas condensate

 

 15.30

mtons/year

 136,170,000.00

mtons > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 18,686,609,100.00

kg/year

 18.69

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 58.68

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 1195.56

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 102.60

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 11.65

 

#19: PETRONAS—EROI: 7.93

The production is on the company website,Footnote 39 while the emissions are on the SR,Footnote 40 p. 60.

PETRONAS

 

Oil

 

 641,301,500.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 88,005,804,845.00

kg/year

 88.00

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 276.33

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 28.49

mtons/yeara

 253,561,000.00

mtons > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 34,796,176,030.00

kg/year

 34.80

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 109.26

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 385.59

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 48.63

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 7.93

 
  1. a http://www.petronas.com.my/media-relations/media-releases/Pages/article/HIGHER-2016-PROFIT-FOR-PETRONAS.aspx

#20: CHINA NATIONAL OFFSHORE OIL COMPANY (CNOOC)—EROI: 11.20

On page 14 of the SRFootnote 41 we find all the data, both output and—indirectly—emission. While production data are clearly expressed, emission issues need to be treated, as they are expressed not as energy but as capital intensity. The company’s earnings for 2015 are 468,900,000,000 RMB (yuan) and the energy intensity is calculated as a fraction of this capital, ie: 0.2731 TCE/10,000 RMB. Multiplying the two values, we determine how many tons of equivalent carbon (TCE) were produced in a year. This value has to be transformed into million tons of equivalent oil, so that it can be properly correlated with the production data for the calculation of EROI.

CHINA NATIONAL OFFSHORE OIL COMPANY

Oil

 

 79,700,000.00

tons/year

 79.70

mtons/year

Gas

 

 25,100.00

mcm/year

 886,398,217,000,000.00

mcm > btu

 150,687,696.89

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 20,678,872,644.21

kg/year

 20.68

mtons/year

Oil & gas

 

 100.38

mtons/year

Emissions

 

 468,900,000,000.00

RMB

 0.27

TCE/10,000 RMB

 12,805,659.00

TCE/year

 8,958,690.53

toe/year

 8.96

mtons/year

EROI

 

 11.20

 

#21: MARATHON PETROLEUM—EROI: 11.38, 8.41

Both data about emissions and production are concentrated on pages 63–64 of the citizenship report.Footnote 42 In this case, we have both direct and indirect emissions so we have made two different calculations for the EROI.

MARATHON PETROLEUM

 

Oil

 

 1,142,000.00

barrels/day

 365.00

day/year

 416,830,000.00

barrels/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 57,199,930,253.20

kg/year

 57.20

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 179.43

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 285,430.00

mcf/yeara

 285,430,000,000,000.00

mcf > btu

 48,523,100.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 6,658,825,013.00

kg/year

 6.66

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 20.91

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 200.34

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #1

 

 17.60

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #1

 

 23.80

mtCO2eq/year

EROI #1

 

 11.38

 

EROI #2

 

 8.41

 
  1. aAnnual report 2017, available at: http://www.annualreports.com/Company/marathon-oil-corporation

#22. PTT (Thailand)—EROI: 24.95, 24.89

The annual reportFootnote 43 is more complete than the SR. The production is available on page 32, while emissions—direct and indirect—are on page 34.

PTT

 

Oil

 

 136,000,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 18,662,741,440.00

kg/year

 18.66

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 58.54

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 618.00

bcf/year

 618,000,000,000,000,00

mcf > btu

 105,060,000,00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 14,417,383,800,00

kg/year

 14.42

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 45.27

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 103.81

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #1

 

 4.16

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #2

 

 4.17

mtCO2eq/year

EROI #1

 

 24.95

 

EROI #2

 

 24.89

 

#23: ROSNEFT—EROI: 21.14, 13.12

All data are available on the SRFootnote 44: the production on page 6 and the emissions on page 74.

ROSNEFT

 

Oil

 

 1,883,000,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 258,404,090,000.00

kg/year

 258.40

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 810.57

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 62.50

billion cubic meters

 2,207,166,875,000,000.00

bcf > btu

 375,218,368.75

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 51,491,216,743.56

kg/year

 51.49

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 161.68

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 972.25

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #1

 

 46.00

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions #2

 

 74.10

mtCO2eq/year

EROI #1

 

 21.14

 

EROI #2

 

 13.12

 

#24: JX HOLDINGS—EROI: 2.68

The production is in the annual report (p. 2),Footnote 45 limited to 2014 and analytically extrapolated via software (115,000 boe/day). The emissions are available on the SR (p. 82)Footnote 46 and split by scope. We are interested in scope 3 (upstream) and we sum those values (1337 + 233 + 1) × 104 = 15,710,000 tCO2 = 15.71 mtCO2eq.

This value seems to concern more than 1 year because, on the same page, we can read “Starting in fiscal 2013, we began estimating and disclosing the target scope of JX Nippon Oil & Energy’s petroleum division supply chain.” Therefore, does the count in the table begin in 2013 and end in 2014? If it is true, the value found should be divided by two, at least. Also in this case the EROI is very low.

JX HOLDINGS

 

Oil

 

 115,000.00

boe/day

 365.00

day/year

 41,975,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 5,760,229,250.00

kg/year

 5.76

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 18.07

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 790,000.00

tons/yeara

 7,031,000.00

mtons > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 964,864,130.00

kg/year

 0.96

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 3.03

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 21.10

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 7.86

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 2.68

 
  1. aAnnual Report 2016

#25: ENGIE—EROI: NOT AVAILABLE

This is the only company that has both production and emissions values, but not useful to calculate the Eroi. Engie is involved in 70 countries and its business goes from the energy services supply to many and different energy resources (nuclear, NGL, oil, coal) management and production.

#26: STATOIL—EROI: 28.37

Statoil has the data in the SRFootnote 47: production on page 2 and emissions on page 17.

STATOIL

 

Oil

 

 787,935,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 108,128,320,050.00

kg/year

 108.12

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 339.52

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 285,065,000.00

boe/yeara

 137.23

barrels > kg

 39,119,469,950.00

kg/year

 39.12

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 122.84

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 462.36

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 16.30

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 28.37

 
  1. aAnnual Report 2015

#27: INDIAN OIL COMPANY—EROI: 3.70

This company, like others, is involved in many business field (refinery, sales of energy, and so on): we have choose only the refinery activities (p. 10 of SRFootnote 48). For those activities, the emissions are indicated on page 74.

INDIAN OIL COMPANY

 

Oil

 

 56.69

mtons/year

LNG

 

 1,920,000.00

tons/year

 17,088,000.00

mtons > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 2,344,986,240.00

kg/year

 2.34

mtons/year

Oil & LNG

 

 59.03

mtons/year

Emissions

 

 15.96

mtons/year

EROI

 

 3.70

 

#28: SONATRACH—EROI: 22.56

In the annual report,Footnote 49 we will find the production for 2014 (p. 11) and the only data retrieved about emissions are in the sentence on page 37: “Les Emissions atmosphériques: le volume de gaz torchés en 2014 au niveau des unités opérationnelles relevant de l’opérationel a atteint 4744 Millions m3.” If we can consider correct this value as “emissions,” the calculation is as follows:

SONATRACH

 

Oil

 

 50.70

mtons/year

Gas

 

 39.50

bcm/yeara

 1,394,929,465,000,000.00

bcm > btu

 237,138,009.05

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 32,542,448,981.93

kg/year

 32.54

mtons/year

Oil & gas

 

 83.24

mtons/year

Emissions

 

 4474.00

mcm/year

 157,997,833,580,000.00

mcm > btu

 26,859,631.71

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 3,685,947,259.37

kg/year

 3.69

mtons/year

EROI

 

 22.56

 
  1. a https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Algerian-Gas-Troubling-Trends-Troubled-Policies-NG-108.pdf

#29: RELIANCE INDUSTRIES—EROI: 28.58

This company is cited also in one of the last books by Alan Weisman, about overpopulation (Countdown): “Even the richest man in town, Mukesh Ambani, chairman of the energy and materials conglomerate Reliance Industries, who’s built a twenty-seven-floor, four-hundred-thousand-square-foot home for his family, doesn’t run off the neighbors living in the cracks between the surrounding buildings, because his mansion needs a staff of six hundred.” Trying to extrapolate two simple data like extraction/production of oil and emission, sometimes we need to face the complexity of those companies involved in many kinds of business and, above all, in parts of world where many stuffs are complex. So in this case, our analysis could be affected by some bias and the EROI in itself reveals its limit. However, values are in the SRFootnote 50: page 49 for production and 63 for GHG emissions. The EROI, in this case, is rather high.

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES

 

Oil

 

 0.16

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 0.50

mtCO2eq/year

Gas

 

 2678.00

mcm/year

 94,572,686,260,000.00

mcm > btu

 16,077,356.66

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 2,206,295,655.03

kg/year

 2.21

mtons/year

 3.14

CO2/CH2

 6.93

mtCO2eq/year

Oil & gas

 

 7.43

mtCO2eq/year

Emissions

 

 0.26

mtCO2eq/year

EROI

 

 28.58

 

#30: PERTAMINA—EROI: 8.04

Both production (p. 34) and emissions (p. 134) are available on the SR.Footnote 51

PERTAMINA

 

Oil

 

 101,600,000.00

boe/year

 137.23

barrels > kg

 13,942,165,664.00

kg/year

 13.94

mtons/year

Gas

 

 694.33

bcf/year

 694,330,000,000,000.00

bcf > btu

 118,036,100.00

btu > boe

 137.23

barrels > kg

 16,198,094,003.00

kg/year

 16.20

mtons/year

Oil & gas

 

 30.14

mtons/year

Emissions

 

 3.75

mtons/year

EROI

 

 8.04

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celi, L., Della Volpe, C., Pardi, L. et al. A New Approach to Calculating the “Corporate” EROI. Biophys Econ Resour Qual 3, 15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-018-0048-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-018-0048-1

Keywords

Navigation