Abstract
Climate change constitutes a threat for the sustainability of fodder crops production. With the aim of introducing vetiver grass as a resilient forage alternative in the Mediterranean basin, a field trial was set up at three-consecutive-year field experiments (2015, 2016, and 2017) in the North of Tunisia. The effects of irrigation regimes and planting density on the growth parameters, fodder yield, and quality of vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) ‘Sunshine’ were assessed.
The experiment was arranged in a split-plot factorial design with four irrigation regimes: optimum (Ir75), moderate (Ir100), severe (Ir125) and very severe (Ir150) combined with three plant densities (D1: 10,000, D2: 20,000 and D3: 40,000 plants ha−1).
The findings showed that a short (Ir75) and moderate (Ir100) irrigation intervals improved production mainly influenced by the number of tillers. Additionally, the medium (D2) and the highest (D3) densities gave the best results in terms of DMY (14.7 and 14.6 T ha−1) and PY (1638.3 and 1540.3 kg ha−1) for all water regimes. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that PY was explained by the DMY and crude protein content under Ir × D interaction. The optimal combination for maximizing PY (1978.46 kg ha−1) appears to be the result of the interaction between a moderate irrigation regime (Ir100) and average plant density (20,000 plants ha−1).These results highlight that the vetiver’s grass potential to cope with water scarcity conditions by enhancing the DMY and PY, might be provided by the use of a specific planting density and irrigation dose.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The original contributions generated for the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Abbreviations
- ADF:
-
Acid detergent fiber
- Ash:
-
Ashes
- Ca:
-
Calcium
- CFa:
-
Crude fat
- Ch:
-
Leaf chlorophyll content
- CP:
-
Crude protein
- D1:
-
10,000 Plants ha−1
- D2:
-
20,000 Plants ha−1
- D3:
-
40,000 Plants ha−1
- DMD:
-
Dry matter digestibility
- DMY:
-
Dry matter yield
- GS-1:
-
First growing season of 2015
- GS-2:
-
Second growing season of 2016
- GS-3:
-
Third growing season of 2017
- H:
-
Height
- Ir75 :
-
Optimum irrigation
- Ir100 :
-
Moderate irrigation
- Ir125 :
-
Severe irrigation
- Ir150 :
-
Very severe irrigation
- L/S:
-
Ratio of leaves fresh weight per stem fresh weight
- NDF:
-
Neutral detergent fiber
- Nt:
-
Number of tillers per plant
- OM:
-
Organic matter
- P:
-
Phosphorus
- PY:
-
Protein yield
- WSC:
-
Water soluble carbohydrates
References
Abhishek N, Basavanneppa MA (2020) Effect of plant densities and nitrogen levels on crop yield and quality parameters of sweet corn (Zea mays L. Saccharata) in irrigated ecosystems. Int J Chem Stud 8:2918–2921. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2as.9192
Akhzari D, Ildoromi A, Dashti Marvili M (2013) Effects of salinity and drought stress on the seedling growth and physiological traits of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides stapf). J Rangel Sci 1:339–352
Amaducci S, Amaducci MT, Benati R, Venturi G (2000) Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Ind Crops Prod 11:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00063-1
Balazadeh M, Zamanian M, Golzardi F, Torkashvand A (2021) Effects of limited irrigation on forage yield, nutritive value and water use efficiency of persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum) compared to berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 52:1927–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.1900228
Bahrani MJ, Deghani Ghenateghestani A (2004) Summer forage sorghum yield, protein and prussic acid contents as affected by plant density and nitrogen topdressing. J Agric Sci Technol 6:73–83
Ben Abdallah I (2012) Installation d’une culture de vétiver. Projet de fin d’étude en vue de l’obtention du diplôme d’ingénieur en production animale et fourragère. 75p
Ben Romdhane A, Boukef S, Dhane S, Harbaoui K, Tibaoui G, Karmous C (2022) Effect of nitrogen fertilization, cropping seasons and cutting on growth and nutritive value of vetiver Rom Biotechnol Lett. 27(2): 3331–3342. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25083/rbl/27.2/3331.3342
Berenguer MJ, Faci JM (2001) Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) yield compensation processes under different plant densities and variable water Supply. Eur J Agron 15:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00095-8
Borrajo CI, Sánchez-Moreiras AM, Reigosa MJ (2018) Morpho-physiological responses of tall wheatgrass populations to different levels of water stress. PLoS ONE 13(12):e0209281. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209281
Carraw R (1996) Drought resistance in turf grasses in the southeast: root-shoot responses. Crop Sci 36:687–694. https://doi.org/10.17660/eJHS.2022/034
Cavin L, Mountford E, Peterken G (2013) Extreme drought alters competitive dominance within and between tree species in a mixed forest stand. Funct Ecol 27:1424–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12126
Cusicanqui JA, Lauer JG (1999) Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agron J 91:911–915. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.916911x
Daneshnia F, Amini A, Chaichi MR (2015) Surfactant effect on forage yield and water use efficiency for berseem clover and basil in intercropping and limited irrigation treatments. Agric Water Manag 160:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.024
Deandreis C, Denis J, Ben souissi K, Tounsi M, Jouili RB, Zitouna-chebbi R, Simonet S (2021) Impacts des effets du changement climatique sur la sécurité alimentaire. Tunisie—contribution aux éléments de la phase préparatoire du processus du plan national d’adaptation (axe 2). livrable n°3/5 dcp-2017–060 czz2152 – ms-2019–08
D.G.P.A (2017) Direction Générale de la Production Agricole-Organisations—AgriDATA Agricole&page=2 (Accessed 6 July 23). [WWW Document]. URL http://www.agridata.tn/organization/direction-generale-de-la-production-agricole?organization=direction-generale-de-la-production
Fathalli B, Pohl B, Quintana-Seguí P (2023) Weather regimes and rainfall over Tunisia in a multi-model ensemble versus a multi-member ensemble. Clim Dyn 61:1783–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06656-9
Fariaszewska A, Aper J, Van Huylenbroeck J, Baert J, De Riek J, Staniak M, Pecio Ł (2017) Mild drought stress-induced changes in yield, physiological processes and chemical composition in festuca, lolium and festulolium. J Agron Crop Sci 203:103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12168
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185–212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
Ferreira G, Teets C (2017) Effect of planting density on yield, nutritional quality, and ruminal in vitro digestibility of corn for silage grown under on-farm conditions. Prof Anim Sci 33:420–425. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2017-01621
Fraser B (1993) Vetiver grass the hedge against erosion. The World Bank Publication, Washington, D.C., pp 1–48
Gebremedhin A, Badenhorst PE, Wang J, Spangenberg GC, Smith KF (2019) Prospects for measurement of dry matter yield in forage breeding programs using sensor technologies. Agronomy 9:65. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9020065
Gosavi SP, Bhagat SB (2009) Effect of nitrogen levels and spacing on yield attributes, yield and quality parameters of baby corn (Zea mays L.) Ann. Agric Res New Series 30:125–128. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v14i1.30595
Hofer D, Suter M, Buchmann N, Lüscher A (2017) Nitrogen status of functionally different forage species explains resistance to severe drought and post-drought overcompensation. Agric Ecosyst Amp Environ 236:312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.022
Huang Z, Dunkerley D, López-Vicente M, Wu GL (2020) Trade-offs of dryland forage production and soil water consumption in a semi-arid area. AgricWater Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106349
Islam M, Arif UA, Badhon F, Mallick S, Islam T (2016) Investigation of vetiver root growth in sandy soil open. J Civ Eng 34:978–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106349
Jafari AA, Connolly V, Walsh EJ (2003) Genetic analysis of yield and quality in full-sib families of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) under two cutting managements. Ir J Agric Food Res 42:275–292
Jahanzad E, Jorat M, Moghadam H, Sadeghpour A, Chaichi MR, Dashtaki M (2013) Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density. Agric Water Manag 117:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.001
Küchenmeister K, Küchenmeister F, Kayser M, Wrage-Mönnig N, Isselstein J (2013) Influence of drought stress on nutritive value of perennial forage legumes. Int J Plant Prod 7:693–710
Lal RK, Mishra A, Chanotiya CS, Gupta P, Srivastava S, Singh BP (2023) Biplot analysis in advanced generation lines for the nutritional quality of leaves and essential oil yield in vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides L. Roberty). Acta Ecol Sin 43:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.10.003
Liu Y, Wu Q, Ge G, Han G, Jia Y (2018) Influence of drought stress on afalfa yields and nutritional composition. BMC Plant Biol 18:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1226-9
Macedo-Barragán R, López-Poblete NI, Arredondo-Ruiz V, Rodríguez-Ramírez R (2011) Precision of an equation to estimate dry matter degradability of Clitoria ternatea. Trop Subtrop Agroecosystems 14:943–947
Machado L, Holanda FSR, da Silva VS, Maranduba AIA, Lino JB (2015) Contribution of the root system of vetiver grass towards slope stabilization of the São Francisco River. Semina Ciênc Agrár 36:2453. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n4p2453
Manaa A, Goussi R, Derbali W, Cantamessa S, Essemine J, Barbato R (2021) Photosynthetic performance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) after exposure to a gradual drought stress followed by a recovery period. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1862:148383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2021.148383
Munné-Bosch S, Alegre L (2004) Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. Funct Plant Biol 31:203–216. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP03236
Nakayama N, Saneoka H, Moghaieb REA, Premachandra GS, Fujita K (2007) Response of growth, photosynthetic gas exchange, translocation of 13C-labelled photosynthate and N accumulation in two soybean (Glycine max L.) Merrill) cultivars to drought stress. Int J Agric Biol 9:669–674. https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2014.087.022
Panada RK, Behera SK, Kashypa PS (2004) Effective management of irrigation water for maize under stressed conditions. Agric Water Manag 66:181–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2003.12.001
Qadir M, Bibi A, Sadaqat H, Awan F (2019) Physio-biochemical responses and defining selection criteria for drought tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Maydica 64:1–8
Rad R, Sharifabad H, Torabi M, Azizinejad R, Salemi H, Soltanabadi M (2021) Impact of drought stress on biochemical responses, energy, and water productivity on maize forage (Zea mays L.). SN Appl Sci 3:834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04813-z
Rossi R, Bochicchio R, Labella R, Bitella G, Amato M (2020) Fodder yield, quality and growth oh Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) as affected by sowing density and top-dressing nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy 10:1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121980
Rostamza M, Chaichi M, Jahansooz M, Mashhadi H, Sharifi HR (2011) Effects of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on multi-cut forage pearl millet yield, nitrogen, and water use efficiency. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:2427–2440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.609252
Sheaffer CC, Peterson PR, Hall MH, Stordahl JB (1992) Drought effects on yield and quality of perennial grasses in the North Central United States. J Prod Agric 5:556–561. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9060202
Staniak M (2016) The impact of drought stress on the yields and food value of selected forage grasses. Acta Agrobot. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1663
Staniak M, Harasim E (2018) Changes in nutritive value of alfalfa (Medicago × varia T. Martyn) and Festulolium (Festulolium braunii (K. Richt) A. Camus) under drought stress. J Agron Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12271
Staniak M, Kocoń A (2015) Forage grasses under drought stress in conditions of Poland. Acta Physiol Plant. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1864-1
Tang C, Sun C, Du F, Chen F, Ameen A, Fu T, Xie GH (2018) Effect of plant densities on sweet and biomass sorghum production on semiarid marginal land. Sugar Tech 20:312–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0553-3
Truong PN (2002) Vetiver grass technology. Vetiveria Massimo Maffei. Taylor & Francis, London, New York, pp 114–132
Truong P, Baker D, Christiansen I (1995) Stiff grass barrier with vetiver grass-a new approach to erosion and sediment control. In: proceedings of the third annual conference on soil and water management for urban development, Sydney, Australia
Volaire F, Thomas H, Lelievre F (1998) Survival and recovery of perennial forage grasses under prolonged Mediterranean drought. I. Growth, death, water relations and solute content in herbage and stubble. New Phytol 140:451–460
Wang R, Wu W, Cheng X, Peng W (2023) High plant density increases sunlight interception and yield of direct-seeded winter canola in China. Exp Agric 59:e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479722000564
Widdicombe WD, Thelen KD (2002) Row width and plant density effect on corn forage hybrids. Agron J 94:1020–1023. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0326
Yang GZ, Luo XJ, Nie YC, Zhang X (2014) Effects of plant density on yield and canopy micro environment in hybrid cotton. J Integr Agric 13:2154–2163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60727-3
Zarei G, Nazemi M, Zamani Ebrahimabadi E, Seyfi MH, Yazdani R, Sadeghi A (2017) The effects of drought stress and plant density on forage yield of artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.). Science arena publications specialty. J Agric Sci 3:14–18
Zhang Y, Yin J, Guo Z, Li J, Wang R (2022) Simulation of soil water balance and crop productivity of long-term continuous maize cropping under high planting density in rainfed agroecosystems. Agric for Meteorol 312:108740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108740
Zhou Q, Yu BJ (2009) Accumulation of inorganic and organic osmolytes and their role in osmotic adjustment in NaCl-stressed vetiver grass seedlings. Russ J Plant Physiol 56:678–685. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443709050148
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the technical staff of the Central Laboratory of Analyses of Ailments for the Cows.
Funding
This research was funded by North-west sylvo-pastoral development office (ODESYPANO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the implementation of the present research, read and approved the final manuscript, and consent to its publication. Data collection and methodological structure: AB, SD, CK and SB; analysis, validation and software: AB, SD and CK literature: AB and SD; writing, preparation, and editing of the original draft: AB, SD, SB, KB and CK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constituted as a conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Ethical approval
I assure you that this paper has not been previously published and the manuscript reflects my own work.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Olfa Hentati.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ben Romdhane, A., Dhane, S., Boukef, S. et al. Vetiver forage yield and nutritive value affected by water irrigation regimes and plant density under Mediterranean climate conditions. Euro-Mediterr J Environ Integr (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-024-00530-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-024-00530-2