Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of surfactants and oil-in-water emulsions on reverse osmosis membrane performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oily wastewater from various industries is a major source of pollution. Membrane-based separation is a promising technique for treating oil-in-water emulsions. However, membrane fouling remains a crucial drawback for wide application of membrane separation in oily wastewater treatment. This study was performed to gain a better understanding of the fouling of two commercial reverse osmosis membranes by oil-in-water emulsions. Cellulose acetate (CA) and polyamide (PA) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were used in the separation of olive oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by nonionic, cationic, and anionic surfactants in a dead-end separation configuration. Both membranes exhibited high total organic carbon (TOC) rejection. Analysis of the results indicated that the permeate flux from the cellulose acetate membrane did not depend on the surfactant type or oil concentration present, whereas the permeate flux from the polyamide membrane was influenced by the type of surfactant used in the oil-in-water emulsion. It appears that the surfactant was adsorbed onto the polyamide membrane surface due to electrostatic and hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions. The results of this study provide useful insights into membrane fouling during emulsion separation. The CA membrane exhibited less fouling than the PA membrane, making it a better candidate for oily wastewater treatment. The PA membrane was more effective at treating the emulsion stabilized by an anionic surfactant. Determining the feed composition and membrane properties before separation allows better fouling control, thus reducing treatment costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhter MS (1997) Effect of N-methyl acetamide on the critical micelle concentration of aqueous solutions of some surfactants. Colloids Surf 121(2):103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnot TC, Field RW, Koltuniewicz AB (2000) Cross-flow and dead-end microfiltration of oily-water emulsions. Part II. Mechanisms and modelling of flux decline. J Membr Sci 169(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal AK, Purkait MK (2008) Ultrafiltration of stable oil-in-water emulsion by polysulfone membrane. J Membr Sci 325(1):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan M, Rajagopalan N (1998) Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction. J Membr Sci 151(1):13–28

  • Childress AE, Elimelech M (1996) Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 119(2):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childress AE, Elimelech M (2000) Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ Sci Technol 34(17):3710–3716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhout JM, Moreno J, Biesheuvel PM, Boels L, Lammertink RGH, de Vos WM (2017) Produced water treatment by membranes: a review from a colloidal perspective. J Colloid Interface Sci 487:523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elimelech M, Zhu X, Childress AE, Hong S, Shi L, Huang J, Zeng G, Zhu L, Yanling Gu, Shi Y, Yi K, Li X (1997) Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 127(1):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebreslase GA (2018) Review on membranes for the filtration of aqueous based solution: oil in water emulsion. J Membr Sci Technol 8(2)

  • Henmi M, Fusaoka Y, Tomioka H, Kurihara M (2010) High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results. Water Sci Technol 62(9):2134–2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto N, Kimura H (2012) Fouling behaviour of a reverse osmosis membrane by three types of surfactants. J Water Reuse Desalin 2(1):40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koĺtuniewicz AB, Field RW (1996) Process factors during removal of oil-in-water emulsions with cross-flow microfiltration. Desalination 105(1–2):79–89

  • Kota AK, Kwon G, Choi W, Mabry JM, Tuteja A (2012) Hygro-responsive membranes for effective oil–water separation. Nat Commun 3:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurihara M, Sasaki T (2017) The pursuits of ultimate membrane technology including low pressure seawater reverse osmosis membrane developed by Mega-Ton Water System Project. J Membr Sci Res 3(3):157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin SH, Lan WJ (1998) Waste oil/water emulsion treatment by membrane processes. J Hazard Mater 59(2–3):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YM, Rutledge GC (2018) Separation of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by different types of surfactants using electrospun fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 563(February):247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp P, Lee CH, Fane AG, Fell CJD (1988) A fundamental study of the ultrafiltration of oil–water emulsions. J Membr Sci 36(3):161–177

  • Liu H, Gao Yu, Hu Z (2007) Determination of critical micelle concentration values by capillary electrophoresis. J Anal Chem 62(2):176–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majewska-Nowak K, Kowalska I, Kabsch-Korbutowicz M (2005) Ultrafiltration of SDS solutions using polymeric membranes. Desalination 184(1–3):415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos M, Gutiérrez G, Lobo A, Coca J, Pazos C, Benito JM (2016) Surfactant effect on the ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsions using ceramic membranes. J Membr Sci 520:749–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi T, Kazemimoghadam M, Saadabadi M (2003) Modeling of membrane fouling and flux decline in reverse osmosis during separation of oil in water emulsions. Desalination 157(1–3):369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J, Cen Y, Davis RH (1997) Crossflow microfiltration of oily water. J Membr Sci 129(2):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolay V (2013) Desalination engineering planning and design. McGraw Hill, New York

  • Padaki M, Surya Murali R, Abdullah MS, Misdan N, Moslehyani A, Kassim MA, Hilal N, Ismail AF (2015) Membrane technology enhancement in oil-water separation. A review. Desalination 357:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall CW, Lawrence RW (1982) Calculation of the expected performance of reverse osmosis plants. Desalination 42(3):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekikawa T, Toshiki K (2015) A new method for efficient detection of Cryptosporidium RNA by real-time reverse transcription-PCR with surfactants. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 15(5):1061–1068

  • Tanudjaja HJ, Tarabara VV, Fane AG, Chew JW (2017) Effect of cross-flow velocity, oil concentration and salinity on the critical flux of an oil-in-water emulsion in microfiltration. J Membr Sci 530:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanudjaja HJ, Hejase CA, Tarabara VV, Fane AG, Chew JW (2019) Membrane-based separation for oily wastewater: a practical perspective. Water Res 156:347–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummons EN, Chew JW, Fane AG, Tarabara VV (2017) Ultrafiltration of saline oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by an anionic surfactant: effect of surfactant concentration and divalent counterions. J Membr Sci 537(May):384–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virga E, Bernard Bos PM, Biesheuvel AN, de Vos WM (2020) Surfactant-dependent critical interfacial tension in silicon carbide membranes for produced water treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci 571:222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbert MC, Pellegrino J, Zydney A (1998) Bench-scale testing of surfactant-modified reverse osmosis/nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 115(1):15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Wang Z, Wei X, Yang S, Wang J, Wang S (2013) The chlorination process of crosslinked aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membrane: new insights from the study of self-made membrane. Desalination 313:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeom CK, Lee SH, Lee JM (2000) Effect of the ionic characteristics of charged membranes on the permeation of anionic solutes in reverse osmosis. J Membr Sci 169(2):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Dudchenko A, Xiaotian Gu, Jassby D (2017) Surfactant-stabilized oil separation from water using ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. J Membr Sci 529:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the ABE initiative program of JICA, Japan. The authors are grateful to Toray Industries, Inc., for donating the RO flat-sheet membranes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan

    Aymen Halleb & Marcos Antonio das Neves

  2. Alliance for Research on the Mediterranean and North Africa, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan

    Fumio Yokoyama, Marcos Antonio das Neves & Mitsutoshi Nakajima

Authors
  1. Aymen Halleb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fumio Yokoyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcos Antonio das Neves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mitsutoshi Nakajima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsutoshi Nakajima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest relating to the experimental results presented herein.

Additional information

Communicated by Mohamed Ksibi, Co-Editor in Chief.

This paper was selected from the Tunisia-Japan Symposium on Science, Society and Technology (TJASSST 2019), Sousse, Tunisia Communicated by M. Ksibi, co-Editor-in-Chief and M. Kefi, Guest Editor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halleb, A., Yokoyama, F., das Neves, M.A. et al. Effects of surfactants and oil-in-water emulsions on reverse osmosis membrane performance. Euro-Mediterr J Environ Integr 6, 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-00236-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-00236-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation