Advertisement

Chinese Political Science Review

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 349–374 | Cite as

Between Centrality and Re-scaled Identity: A New Role for the Chinese State in Shaping China’s Image Abroad

The Case of the Twitter Account of a Chinese Diplomat in Pakistan
  • Alessandra CappellettiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

China’s image abroad is not anymore shaped by Party bureaucrats with no knowledge of foreign contexts and languages, nor by ideologically driven old-fashioned officials, but by an increasingly diverse network of multiple actors partnering with new players, adopting new channels of communication and continuously adjusting to local contexts, as well as proposing more and more sophisticated messages about China as a country and as an ancient civilization. This paper is aimed at assessing the activities that Chinese actors have been recently engaging in while presenting the country and spreading its cultural messages abroad, with a particular focus on the role and identity of the Chinese state [for a conceptualization of the identity of the Chinese State, see Brødsgaard (China Int J 16(3):1–17, 2018) and Heilmann (Das politische System der Volksrepublik China. Springer, Heidelberg, 2016; Red swan how unorthodox policy-making facilitated China’s rise. Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, 2018)]. For instance, by highlighting the adoption of innovative channels in China’s diplomatic practices, it is possible to get an understanding of the new identity of the state in communicating Chinese society and culture abroad. The author provides a theoretical framework to understand the re-scaling of the Chinese state identity, by looking at the specific case of engagement using digital media—in particular the microblogging social network Twitter—by the commercial attaché at the Chinese Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. With the caveat that the empirical analysis is still preliminary, the author concludes that the role of the Chinese state in sponsoring the country’s image, or conducting “State branding”, abroad, albeit re-scaled, retains its centrality. The contribution of this paper consists in arguing that the identity of the State tends, thus, to take up different features and a more variegated character by playing at the intersection of traditional and non-traditional communication media, by increasingly relying on partnerships with local non-governmental actors, as well as by conquering different dimensions of “space” (in quantum physics, up to 11 dimensions of space (also called spacetime) have been conceived, while in bosonic string theory—a part of quantum physics—space is 26-dimensional. In this article, the understanding of “space” and its multiple declinations draws from conceptualizations proposed by quantum physicists. Spacetime as a concept has been explored by philosophers of science such as Hale (Philos Stud Int J Philos Anal Tradit 53(1):85–102, 1988), Healey (Erkenntnis 42(3):287–316, 1995), and Lam (Philos Sci 74:712–723, 2007). Brown (J Mod Lit 32(3):39–62, 2009), French and Krause (Erkenntnis 59(1):97–124, 2003), and Ney (Noûs 46(3):525–560, 2012) already worked on connections between the concept of spacetime in quantum physics and different disciplines in the humanities and social sciences.), namely a virtual space, an emotional space, a metaphorical space, an interactive space, and an informal space. This pragmatic approach does not mean that the state downsizes its role and that we should think the position of NGOs and non-state actors is more relevant, but it, instead, redefines its role and reframes its participation in activities abroad by re-thinking its involvement, occupying different spaces and communicating in a more sophisticated way. The novel contribution of this paper consists in framing a theoretical approach to analyze the Chinese state presence abroad, by linking of the concept of quantum spacetime and its dimensions to that of “state rescaling”.

Keywords

Space Spacetime State re-scaling Cultural diplomacy Digital diplomacy CPEC 

References

  1. Acharya, Amitav. 2014. Rethinking Power, Institutions and Ideas in World Politics: Whose IR?. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benner, Thorsten, Jan Gaspers, Mareike Ohlberg, Lucrezia Poggetti, and Kirstin Shi-Kupfer. 2018. Authoritarian Advance: Responding to China’s Growing Political Influence in Europe: Global Public Policy Institute and Mercator Institute for China Studies. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Bjola, Corneliu, and Marcus Holmes (eds.). 2015. Digital Diplomacy. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, Neil. 2004. New State Spaces—Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, Paul Tolliver. 2009. Relativity, Quantum Physics, and Consciousness in Virginia Woolf’s ‘To The Lighthouse’. Journal of Modern Literature 32 (3): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brødsgaard, Kjeld Erik. 2018. China’s Political Order under Xi Jinping: Concepts and Perspectives. China: An International Journal 16 (3): 1–17.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, Jason. 2015. The New Threat from Islamic Militancy. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  8. Cappelletti, Alessandra. 2017. The ‘Construction’ of Chinese culture in a globalized world and its importance for Beijing’s smart power: Notes and concepts on a narrative shift. Working Papers on East Asian Studies. 115/2017. University of Duisburg-Essen. Duisburg: Institute of East Asian Studies (IN-EAST).Google Scholar
  9. Jaffrelot, Christophe. 2015. The Pakistan Paradox: Instability and Resilience. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Sousa, Ronnie. 2007. Defining Emotional Space. Social Science Information: Information sur les Sciences Sociales 46 (3): 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. French, Steven, and Décio Krause. 2003. Quantum Vagueness. Erkenntnis 59 (1): 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. Haewoon, Kwak, Lee Changhyun, Park Hosung and Moon Sue. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. pp. 591–600, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, April 26–30, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Hale, Susan C. 1988. Spacetime and the Abstract/Concrete Distinction. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 53 (1): 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, Todd H. 2015. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Healey, Richard. 1995. Substance, Modality and Spacetime. Erkenntnis 42 (3): 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heilmann, Sebastian. 2016. Das politische System der Volksrepublik China. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heilmann, Sebastian. 2018. Red Swan. How Unorthodox Policy-Making Facilitated China’s Rise. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hevia, James Louis. 1995. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lam, Vincent. 2007. The Singular Nature of Spacetime. Philosophy of Science 74: 712–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lees, Loretta. 2016. Planetary Gentrification. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  23. LoPiano, James. 2018. Public Fora Purpose: Analyzing Viewpoint Discrimination on the President’s Twitter Account. Media and Entertainment Law Journal 28 (3): 511–570.Google Scholar
  24. 马卓敏,中巴经济走廊建设落地,《 中国城市报 》, 2015年04月27日 第13 版.Google Scholar
  25. Ma, Zhuomin. 2015a. Zhongba jingji zoulang jianshe luodi. Zhongguo chengshi bao. 04 yue 27 ri, di 13 ban.Google Scholar
  26. Ma, Zhuomin. 2015b. Explaining the origins of the construction of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor. The Journal of Chinese Cities. 13: 24–39.Google Scholar
  27. Ney, Alyssa. 2012. The Status of our Ordinary Three Dimensions in a Quantum Universe. Noûs 46 (3): 525–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pan, Su-Yan, and Joe Tin-Yau Lo. 2017. Re-conceptualizing China’s rise as a global power: a neo-tributary perspective. The Pacific Review 30 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandre, A. 2013. Twitter for Diplomats. Geneva: DiploFoundation and Istituto Diplomatico.Google Scholar
  30. Schildt, H., and Perkmann, M. 2016. Organizational settlements: theorizing how organizations respond to institutional complexity. Journal of Management Inquiry 26: 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmitt, Thomas. 2011. Cultural Governance as a conceptual framework. MMG Working Paper 11-02. Göttingen: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.Google Scholar
  32. Scholte, Jan Aart. 2008. From Government to Governance. In Global governance and diplomacy: worlds apart?, ed. Andrew Fenton Cooper, Brian Hocking, and William Maley, 39–62. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silber, Friedrich Ilana. 1995. Space, Fields, Boundaries: The Rise of Spatial Metaphors in Contemporary Sociological Theory. Social Research vole 62 (2): 323–355.Google Scholar
  34. Small, Andrew. 2015. The China-Pakistan Axis. London: C Hurst and Publishers Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, P. J. 1996. Embedded statism and the social sciences: opening up to new spaces. Environment and Planning A, 28 (11) : 1917–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 王惜梦, “中巴经济走廊2030年完工 翻开南亚新一页”, 参考消息网, 31/08/2016.Google Scholar
  37. Wang Ximen. 2016a. “Zhongba jingji zoulang 2030 nian wangong fankai Nanya xinyiye”, Cankao xiaoxi wang, 31/08/2016.Google Scholar
  38. Wang, Ximen. 2016b. The end of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor in 2030 means a new page for Southern Asia. Reference News Network, 31st August 2016.Google Scholar
  39. Yeste, Elena, and Pere Franch. 2018. Trump vs. media. Treatment of the press from the US president’s Twitter account. Profesional de la informacion 27 (5): 975–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zafiropoulos, Kostas, Konstantinos Antoniadis, and Vasiliki Vrana. 2014. Sharing Followers in e-Government Twitter Accounts: The Case of Greece. Future Internet 6 (2): 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zaidi, S. A. 2015. Issues in Pakistan's Economy: A Political Economy Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsXi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, Dushu Lake Higher Education TownSuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations