Abstract
Frailty models are used in the survival analysis to account for the unobserved heterogeneity in individual risks to disease and death. To analyze the bivariate data on related survival times (e.g. matched pairs experiments, twin or family data), the shared frailty models were suggested. These models are based on the assumption that frailty act multiplicatively to hazard rate. In this paper we assume that frailty acts additively to hazard rate. We introduce the shared gamma frailty models with two different baseline distributions namely, the generalized log logistic and the generalized Weibull. We introduce the Bayesian estimation procedure using Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique to estimate the parameters involved in these models. We apply these models to a real life bivariate survival data set of McGilchrist and Aisbett (Biometrics 47:461–466, 1991) related to the kidney infection data and a better model is suggested for the data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aalen OO (1980) A model for non-parametric regression analysis of counting processes. Lect Notes Stat 2:1–25
Aalen OO (1989) A linear regression model for the analysis of lifetimes. Stat Med 8(8):907–925
Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Academiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281
Bacon RW (1993) A note on the use of the log-logistic functional form for modeling saturation effects. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 55:355–361
Bin H (2010) Additive hazards model with time-varying regression coefficients. Acta Mathematica Scientia 30B(4):1318–1326
Clayton DG, Cuzick J (1985) Multivariate generalizations of the proportional hazards model (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc Ser A 148:82–117
Clayton’s DG (1978) A model for association in bivariate life tables and its applications to epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrica 65:141–151
Crowder M (1985) A distributional model for repeated failure time measurements. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B 47:447–452
Deshpande JV, Purohit SG (2005) life time data: statistical models and methods. World Scientific, New Jersey
Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) A single series from the Gibbs sampler provides a false sense of security. In: Bernardo JM, Berger J0, Dawid AP, Smith AFM (eds) Bayesian statistics 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 625–632
Genest C, Mackay J (1986) Joy of Copulas: bivariate distributions with uniform marginals. Am Stat 40(4):280–283
Geweke J (1992) Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In: Bernardo JM, Berger J, Dawid AP, Smith AFM (eds) Bayesian statistics 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 169–193
Mudholkar GS, Srivastava DK, Kollia GD (1995) The exponentiated Weibull family: a reanalysis of the bus-motor-failure data. Technometrics 37(4):436–445
Mudholkar GS, Srivastava DK, Kollia GD (1996) A generalization of the Weibull distribution with application to the analysis of survival data. J Am Stat Assoc 91(436):1575–1583
Mudholkar GS, Srivastava DK (1993) Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failure-rate data. IEEE Trans Reliab 42(2):299–302
Hanagal DD, Pandey A, Sankaran PG (2016) Shared frailty model based on reversed hazard rate for left censoring data. Commun Stat Simul Comput (to appear)
Hanagal DD (2006) A gamma frailty regression model in bivariate survival data. IAPQR Trans 31:73–83
Hanagal DD (2007) Gamma frailty regression models in mixture distributions. Econ Qual Control 22(2):295–302
Hanagal DD (2010) Modeling heterogeneity for bivariate survival data by the compound poisson distribution with random scale. Stat Probab Lett 80:1781–1790
Hanagal DD, Bhambure SM (2015) Comparison of shared gamma frailty models using Bayesian approach. Model Assist Stat Appl 10:25–41
Hanagal DD, Dabade AD (2013) Bayesian estimation of parameters and comparison of shared gamma frailty models. Commun Stat Simul Comput 42(4):910–931
Hanagal DD, Pandey A (2014) Gamma shared frailty model based on reversed hazard rate for bivariate survival data. Stat Probab Lett 88:190–196
Hanagal DD, Pandey A (2015a) Gamma frailty models for bivarivate survival data. J Stat Comput Simul 85(15):3172–3189
Hanagal DD, Pandey A (2015b) Gamma shared frailty model based on reversed hazard rate. Commun Stat Theory Methods 45(7):2071–2088
Hanagal DD, Sharma R (2013) Modeling heterogeneity for bivariate survival data by shared gamma frailty regression model. Model Assist Stat Appl 8:85–102
Hanagal DD, Sharma R (2015a) Comparisons of frailty models for acute leukemia data under Geompertz baseline distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44(7):1338–1350
Hanagal DD, Sharma R (2015b) Bayesian inference in Marshall–Olkin bivariate exponential shared gamma frailty regression model under random censoring. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44(1):24–47
Hosmer DW, Royston P (2002) Using Aalen’s linear hazards model to investigate time-varying effects in the proportional hazards regression model. Strata J 2(4):331–350
Hougaard P (1986) A class of multivariate failure time distributions. Biometrika 73:671–678
Hougard P (1987) Modelling multivariate survival. Scand J Stat 14(4):291–304
Ibrahim JG, Chen Ming-Hui, Sinha D (2001) Bayesian survival analysis. Springer, Berlin
Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kass RA, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes’ factor. J Am Stat Assoc 90:773–795
Kheiri S, Kimber A, Meshkani MR (2007) Bayesian analysis of an inverse Gaussian correlated frailty model. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:5317–5326
Lin DY, Ying Z (1994) Semiparametric analysis of the additive risk model. Biometrika 81(1):61–71
McGilchrist CA, Aisbett CW (1991) Regression with frailty in survival analysis. Biometrics 47:461–466
Nielsen GG, Gill RD, Andersen PK, Sorensen TIA (1992) A counting process approach to maximum likelihood estimation in frailty models. Scand J Stat 19:25–43
Oakes D (1982) A model for association in bivariate survival data. J Royal Stat Soc B 44:414–422
Oakes D (1989) Bivariate survival models induced by frailties. J Am Stat Assoc 84(406):487–493
O’Neill TJ (1986) Inconsistency of misspecified proportional hazards model. Stat Probab Lett 4:219–222
Raftey AE (1994) Approximate Bayes factors and accounting for model uncertainty in generalized linear models. Biometrika 83(2):251–266
Santos CA, Achcar JA (2010) A Bayesian analysis for multivariate survival data in the presence of covariates. J Stat Theory Appl 9:233–253
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals Stat 6(2):461–464
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measure of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc B 64:583–639
Vaupel JW, Yashin AI, Hauge M, Harvald B, Holm N, Liang X (1992) Strategies of modelling genetics in survival analysis. In: What Can We Learn From Twins Data?. Paper presented on PAA meeting in Denver, CO, April 30-May 2
Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallaed E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16:439–454
Vaupel JW (1991a) Relatives’ risks: frailty models of life history data. Theor Popul Biol 37(1):220–234
Vaupel JW (1991b) Kindred lifetimes: frailty models in population genetics. In: Adams Julian et al (eds) Convergent questions in genetics and demography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 155–170
Vaupel JW, Yashin AI, Hauge M, Harvald B, Holm N, Liang X (1991) Survival analysis in genetics: danish twins data applied to gerontological question. In: Klein JP, Goel PK (eds) Survival analysis: state of the art. Academic Publisher, Kluwer, pp 121–138
Xie X, Strickler HD, Xue X (2013) Additive hazard regression models: an application to the natural history of human papillomavirus. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:1–7
Yin G, Cai J (2004) Additive hazards model with multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 91(4):801–818
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanagal, D.D., Pandey, A. Shared Gamma Frailty Models Based on Additive Hazards. J Indian Soc Probab Stat 17, 161–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41096-016-0011-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41096-016-0011-7