Skip to main content
Log in

Decision making under measure-based granular uncertainty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In situations, where an uncertain variable takes its value in a large space, we can use granulation of the space to simplify the knowledge acquisition process. We observe, however, that this use of granulation can come at the price of introducing imprecision into the related decision process. We note that answers to questions about values related to the original space can often only be answered using interval values. We look at two classes of decision problems where uncertain information about relevant variables is expressed indirectly via information about the uncertainty on related granular objects. To make a precise decision, we require the decision maker to provide some subjective preference information to resolve the interval uncertainty induced by the granulation. In this paper, our major contribution is that we provide an approach to decision making in the face of uncertainty where the uncertain information is expressed on a space of granular objects and the underlying uncertainty is most generally represented by a measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad SSS, Pedrycz W (2017) The development of granular rule-based systems: a study in structural model compression. Granul Comput 2:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargiela A, Pedrycz W (2003) Granular computing: an introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calvo T (2007) Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners. Springer, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov G, Bustince H, Calvo T (2015) A practical guide to averaging functions. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aniello G, Gaeta A, Loia V, Orciuoli F (2017) A granular computing framework for approximate reasoning in situation awareness. Granul Comput 2:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Filev DP, Beliakov G. Yager (2017) Granular, soft and fuzzy approaches for intelligent systems: dedicated to Professor Ronald R. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ (2006) Uncertainty and information. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD, Raiffa H (1967) Games and decisions: introduction and critical survey. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó JM, Yager RR (2013) Generalized moving averages, distance measures and OWA operators. Int J Fuzz Uncertain Knowl Based Syst 21:533–559

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan M (1990) A fuzzy neuron based upon maximum entropy-ordered weighted averaging. In: Bouchon-Meunier B, Yager RR, Zadeh LA (eds) Uncertainty in knowledge bases. Springer, Berlin, pp 598–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W (2013a) Granular computing: analysis and design of intelligent systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W (2013b) Granular computing. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2011) Granular computing and intelligent systems: design with information granules of high order and high type. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015a) Information granularity, big data, and computational intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015b) Granular computing and decision-making: interactive and iterative approaches. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W, Gomide F (2007) Fuzzy Systems engineering: toward human-centric computing. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W, Skowron A, Kreinovich V (2008) Handbook of granular computing. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross TJ (2010) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smets P, Kennes R (1994) The transferable belief model. Artif Intell 66:191–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15:116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1986) A general approach to decision making with evidential knowledge. In: Kanal LN, Lemmer JL (eds) Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 317–330

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1992) Decision making under Dempster–Shafer uncertainties. Int J Gen Syst 20:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2000) Decision making under various types of uncertainty. In: Zanakis SH, Doukidis G, Zopounidis C (eds) Decision making: recent developments and worldwide applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 233–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2002) Using granular objects in multi-source data fusion. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, Philadelphia, pp 324–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2004) Generalized OWA aggregation operators. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 3:93–107

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2011) A measure based approach to the fusion of possibilistic and probabilistic uncertainty. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10:91–113

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2015) Golden rule and other representative values for intuitionistic membership grades. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23:2260–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2016) Uncertainty modeling using fuzzy measures. Knowl Based Syst 92:1–8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2017) Belief structures, weight generating functions and decision-making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 16:1–21

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Alajlan N (2014) Multi-criteria decision making with imprecise importance weights. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:882–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Filev DP (1994) Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Engemann K, Filev DP (1995) Toward a theory of immediate probabilities. In: Bouchon-Meunier B, Yager RR, Zadeh LA (eds) Fuzzy logic and soft computing. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 157–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1979) Fuzzy sets and information granularity. In: Gupta MM, Ragade RK, Yager RR (eds) Advances in fuzzy set theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (2005) From imprecise to granular probabilities. Fuzzy Sets Syst 154(3):370–374

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald R. Yager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yager, R.R. Decision making under measure-based granular uncertainty. Granul. Comput. 3, 345–353 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-017-0075-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-017-0075-0

Keywords

Navigation