Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 45))

Abstract

We focus on the problem of decision making in the face of uncertainty The issue of the representation of uncertain information is considered and a number of different frameworks are described: possibilistic, probabilistic, belief structures and graded possibilistic. We suggest methodologies for decision making in these different environments. The importance of decision attitude in the construction of decision functions is strongly emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J. and Hurwicz, L. (1972), “An optimality criterion for decision making under ignorance,” in Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics, edited by Carter, C. F. and Ford, J. L., Kelley: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P. (1967), “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping,” Ann. of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P. (1968), “A generalization of Bayesian inference,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1988), Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press: New York.Filev, D. P. and Yager, R. R. (1998), “On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 94, 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G. J. (1998), “Statistical modeling with imprecise probabilities,” Report # AFRL-IF-RSTR-1998–166, Air Force Research Laboratories, Rome, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, M. (1990), “Using maximum entropy-ordered weighted averaging to construct a fuzzy neuron,” Proceedings 24th Annual IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, 618–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process., McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. (1976), A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press: Princeton, N.J..

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. (1987), “Belief functions and possibility measures,” in Analysis of Fuzzy Information, Vol 1: Mathematics and Logic, edited by Bezdek, J. C., CRC Press: Boca Raton: Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1988), “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1992), “Decision making under Dempster-Shafer uncertainties,” International Journal of General Systems 20, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1997), “On the inclusion of importances in OWA aggregations,” in The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications, edited by Yager, R. R. and Kacprzyk, J., Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA, 41–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1999), “Including decision attitude in probabilistic decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 21, I - 21, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. and Kacprzyk, J. (1997), The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications, Kluwer: Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R., Kacprzyk, J. and Fedrizzi, M. (1994), Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, John Wiley & Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. and Kreinovich, V. (1999), “Decision making under interval probabilities,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 22, 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R., Ovchinnikov, S., Tong, R. and Nguyen, H. (1987), Fuzzy Sets and Applications: Selected Papers by L. A. Zadeh, John Wiley & Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965), “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1978), “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yager, R.R. (2000). Decision Making under Various Types of Uncertainty. In: Zanakis, S.H., Doukidis, G., Zopounidis, C. (eds) Decision Making: Recent Developments and Worldwide Applications. Applied Optimization, vol 45. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4919-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4919-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4839-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4919-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics