Abstract
Facilities management (FM) has many challenges related to facilities requirements, unique services, and a need for actions to achieve customer/end-user/clients’ expectations. There is poor communication among stakeholders, weaknesses, inflexibility in business realities, and difficulty engaging decision-makers and other key partners. Adopting an agile philosophy in facilities management can improve the value and achieve quality and stakeholder satisfaction. The main objective of this article is to explore a guideline on applying agile philosophy in facilities management to achieve flexibility in management and improve performance. The papers published between 2000 and 2022 had been selected. Content analysis was used.
to complement the qualitative findings. This article focuses on academic articles including subject areas: engineering, decision-making, and operations. The conceptual model is supported by current theories, literature and previous empirical studies from facilities management, agile philosophy, service quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. The major finding is the disclosure of a framework for evaluating agile philosophy in organizations by linking the agile mindset to facilities management practices. The results also revealed a conceptual framework for using agile philosophy in facilities management to achieve value and stakeholder satisfaction. This study is a review of theories and empirical studies. However, the previous studies were very limited and affected access to information widely. Therefore, it is preferable to conduct research and experimental studies on the application of agile philosophy in facilities management. Ultimately, using an agile philosophy in facilities management helps to achieve value and stakeholder satisfaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The field of facilities management (FM) has increased significantly since using the term in the 1970s. Although many practitioners worldwide in the field and a wide range of academic research support it, this type of management is still not well-known [1]. Effective facilities management strategies aim at the organization’s ability to achieve its business objectives [2]. Organizational needs vary in the pursuit of long-term goals. In addition, stakeholders and employees have different perceptions of the design of the facility that stem from different but consistent needs and interests [2,3,4]. MARTIN PICKARD, an expert in facilities management, noted in 2010 that facilities management has the longest stakeholder list of any part of an organization and any part of the building lifecycle [5]. This will be the most challenging when applying the agile method. Therefore, the key to an effective facility management strategy is the need to understand and align stakeholder needs with the organization’s culture and values [2, 3].
Several research studies (Nguyen et al. [6], Mashali et al. [7], Khodeir and Soliman [8], Othman et al. [9], Mohammed and Chambrelin [10]) agreed that there are weaknesses and lack of flexibility in the business reality and the ability to incorporate continuous feedback from internal and external stakeholders such as customers, designer, contractor, and end-users into the facility management processes.
The authors Khodeir and Ehab [11], Kumar and McArthur [12], Mohammed and Jasim [13], Paul and Eldhose [14], Streule et al. [15], Thesing et al. [16] stressed the need to conduct research on the importance of applying agile in the construction industry and how to use it. Using agile management enhances communication, teamwork, collaboration, and organizational change improves the adoption of higher-value products during the preliminary stages [17]. According to Kumara [18], agile methods have not been widely understood when they originated, their goals, and whether they have further applications.
Agile philosophy background
Recently, agile philosophy has been gaining a lot of momentum, and it is a new popular management approach to combat ambiguity and uncertainty in the project [19]. The operation phase is the longest in the project life cycle and involves multiple stakeholders. Facility management services often did not meet the expectations of stakeholders [20, 21]. This requires new management models, and this is what will be done by evaluating the agile philosophy in facility management. “Agile is about delivering business value quickly— quicker than needs change in business and market cycles—and about being adaptive and responsive to evolving customer needs and business circumstances” [22]. Agile is not only limited to the field of information technology/information systems but can include other industries and can be applied in construction projects and can include the entire organization [10, 19, 23].
Agile core values (Agile Manifesto)
Group 17, (who, in 2001, gathered in a resort setting in Snowbird, Utah, with a mission to find common ground among competing and untraditional methods to formally define Agile project management.), has created a statement on the development of the agile methodology referred to as (Agile Manifesto), which aims to achieve value, under the auspices of agile alliance (Fig. 1) [22, 24]:
-
1.
Individual and interactions over processes and tools.
-
•
Individual and interactions are most important.
-
•
Processes and tools will be needed on projects.
-
•
Projects are completed by people, not processes and tools.
-
•
Agile projects are people-driven.
-
•
Focus on people first.
-
2.
Working software (may called services) over comprehensive documentation.
-
•
Agile projects need to deliver value.
-
•
Value is about the purpose or business need the project aims to deliver.
-
•
Documentation is barely sufficient.
-
•
Documentation is done just in time – as the last responsible moment.
-
•
Documentation might also be just because (Industry requirement – Organizational requirements)
-
3.
Customer collaboration over contract negotiation.
-
•
Agile is flexible, accommodating, and willing to change.
-
•
Contracts are often rigid and uncooperative.
-
•
Agile contracts must accommodate change.
-
•
Difference between being right and doing the right thing.
-
4.
Responding to change over following a plan.
-
•
Agile welcomes change.
-
•
Predictive projects plan everything in advance.
-
•
Agile projects have lots and lots of changes.
-
•
Agile projects have uncertainty upfront.
Agile principles and the relation with facility management
After the Agile Manifesto was published by Group 17, the group continued communicating to support teams transitioning to agile methods. During this period, they developed 12 principles. These principles are used to achieve an Agile Manifesto (Fig. 2) [22, 24].
Research methodology
Selection of database, search strategy and eligibility
The papers published between 2000 and 2022 were searched with the help of titles, keywords, and abstracts using manual searches in databases of papers. These databases include: Web of Science, Science Direct, ResearchGate, and Scopus database. The keywords used for searching in the database are ‘‘FM”, “Facility management”, “Facilities management”, ‘‘Construction”, ‘‘operations”, “Agile” and ‘‘Agility”. After the search process, the identified papers were chosen based on the following criteria:
-
(A)
The papers were published between 2000 and 2022.
-
(B)
Availability of papers were online.
-
(C)
Written in English.
-
(D)
Title & abstract screening.
Content analysis
Content analysis was employed to examine the studies identified within the chosen documents. Content analysis entails a structured approach for evaluating written or recorded textual data, aiming to draw accurate deductions or conclusions based on its content [25]. This offered comprehensive and detailed elucidations of the concepts outlined in the literature review, in line with the consensus found in existing studies.
A detailed literature review was carried out regarding integrated agile in facility management. The relevant publications were chosen based on previous criteria, and their content was submitted to a critical analysis to extract the factors for applying agile philosophy in FM and a conceptual model of implementing agile in FM through linking agile value with FM value (Fig. 3).
There is little independent scientific research on the benefits of agile and its applicability in the building sector [26, 27]. A literature summary (Study purpose, Methodology, Building sector, KPIs, and Findings) is followed. By exploring the literature in the field of agile project management in operations (facility management), the extent to which this new methodology can be applied has been identified, and the obstacles to its implementation [10,11,12,13, 23, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
Findings
Operations phase (Facility management)
Among all the previous studies, there is a paucity of studies that examined the impact of agile in facilities management, due to the lack of awareness among professionals about the possibility of implementing agile in any industry other than the information industry [29]. Employing agile management facilitates better communication, teamwork, collaboration, and organizational adaptability, leading to increased acceptance of more valuable products both in the initial phases and throughout the project’s duration [34].
In a study conducted by Thenuwara and Sandanayake [28], the integration of agile with facility maintenance was investigated with the aim of proposing an agile integrated facilities maintenance (AFM) approach. The research confirmed that because of the unpredictable nature of maintenance operations and processes, there is a significant level of unpredictability. Therefore, the study concludes that the concept of agile and facility maintenance can be integrated in an effective way. However, industry practitioners do not apply the agile idea.
The research conducted by Ling and Tam [30], a recent study purpose to investigate the agility of facilities management during the Corona pandemic, examine successful strategies and extract lessons learned in order to manage the facility in the event of a pandemic. The study finds that agile can be combined with facility management to maximize value. The strategies that succeeded in managing the facility were as follows:
-
Responsiveness.
-
Flexibility.
-
Velocity.
-
Collaboration.
-
Visibility.
-
Competence.
Lessons learned for FM to manage future pandemics were crystallized:
-
Reducing reliance on manpower.
-
Boosting technology adoption.
-
Personalized employee engagement.
This agile approach has a conceptual structure consisting of five steps:
-
1.
Define project requirements and scopes.
-
2.
Integrate inputs and test the intermediate results.
-
3.
Invite and process feedback.
-
4.
Plan-do-check-act PDCA process.
-
5.
Record, and go through the cycle again
However, while certain construction projects have begun to adopt agile principles and practices to some extent, the utilization of agile philosophy in building adaptation remains a developing area [33].
Agile framework, tools, technique
The agile philosophy combines many practices and frameworks and provides guidance for creating agility in its application, and each framework is applied to a specific area. Agile frameworks can work under unclear changes, requirements, and strategies which can help the team reach clear goals through alliteration and innovation [35]. The basis of the agile methodology is the elimination of bureaucracy in processes and the involvement of all parties in the shaping of the final product or service to achieve maximum value [23]. Agile approaches are based on the interactions between the parties involved in the shaping of the final product or services, as shown in (Fig. 4).
Each framework has a specific goal to use: the goal of scrum is management, XP is technical, Kanban is visualization, and crystal is coordination. It turns out that all frameworks were derived from the Agile Manifesto and practices. As a result, several frameworks can be combined into a single work environment depending on their needs. However, for its application in facilities management, the SCRUM system proved effective since it is considered a "management tool" and therefore can be easily used in any other industries outside of information systems [10, 26, 29].
Factors for applying agile philosophy in FM model
The factors are based on the strategic importance of the application of agile facilities management. The stage is taken by deriving KPIs from the literature review and then combining them with an agile mindset to form the factors for applying agile philosophy in FM (Table 1).
Discussion
Thenuwara and Sandanayake [28], Ling and Tam [30], Chia et al. [32] noticed that a breakthrough in agile philosophy is still pending in the construction industry and facilities management. Nazali Mohd Noor and Pitt [43] stated that “FM is capable of contributing towards organizational success if it is given the opportunity to exploit new ideas and perform innovative activities”. The main objective of facility management is to support primary business processes by aligning physical resources (Supply) with organizational strategies (Demand) in order to add value to the organization and contribute to organizational performance [44].
To determine the opportunities of agile facility management, a good start is to identify the similarities between agile values and facility management. Guizzi et al. [45], Van Sprang and Drion [46] presented the most important basic pillars of facilities management according to their definition, which are summarized in 4 basic values, and they are professionals & multiple disciplines, workplace (service leadership), customer-oriented (customer intimacy), and process (operational excellence). Figure 5 shows the common goals between agile and FM, which aim to enhance organization value, increase interaction between stakeholders, and achieve satisfaction.
Guideline model of implementing agile in FM
The authors pinpointed primary agile practices that the information technology sector has embraced. These practices are detailed alongside their respective sources (Table 2).
Figure 6 provided an example of a modified agile approach for facility management. Finally, this study is a literature review that introduced the concept of integrated agile facility management as theoretical conceptual framework. Continuous dialog, more studies, refinement, and more validation of the framework are necessary to approach adequate representation for integrating agile facility management.
Effective participation of stakeholders and users achieve maximizing the enterprise’s performance. However, the concept of stakeholder and stakeholder analysis is crucial if one seeks to establish how stakeholder communication affects project quality. Agile philosophy are more flexible and responsive to change than Lean methods. In addition, agile philosophy can be applied effectively in facility management because of the unpredictable nature of maintenance operations and processes, there is a significant level of unpredictability (Fig. 7).
Conclusion
This study determines the basic factors for applying agile in facility management and finds the best methods to achieve maximum value and performance for the facility. This study proposes how to apply the agile philosophy in facilities management to achieve improving performance in construction projects. This research presents a comprehensive literature review that addresses the findings of agile application in the construction sector. In addition, the research presents ideas and methods on how to apply agile philosophy in facilities management.
Agile management is not a methodology, but it is a philosophy or a style of project management. The agile process is iterative and puts more responsibility on a client than a traditional approach. Flexibility and responsiveness to change are a core strength of agile philosophy and the foundation for the philosophy’s success. For agile to be successful, there must be mutual trust among all parties involved. Many frameworks can be created as long as they adhere to the mindset and values of the agile manifesto principles. On the other hand, organizations may not fully implement the agile mindset, as individuals may tailor them according to their needs and desires.
References
(2014) The Growth of Facility Management. Leader to Leader 2014(73):63–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.20142
Besiktepe D, Ozbek ME, Atadero RA (2020) Identification of the criteria for building maintenance decisions in facility management: First step to developing a multi-criteria decision-making approach. Buildings 10(9):166. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS10090166
Kok H, Mobach M, Omta O (2015) Facility design consequences of different employees’ quality perceptions. Serv Ind J 35(3):152–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2014.990003
Kotthaus D (2019) Economic, social and stakeholder-related analysis in sport facility management. Jyväskylän yliopisto, JYU dissertations
Zungu M (2014) The impact of stakeholder communication on the quality of facility management projects at a life assurance company in the Western Cape, South Africa. Cape Peninsula University of Technology
Nguyen TS, Mohamed S, Mostafa S (2021) Project stakeholder’s engagement and performance: a comparison between complex and non-complex projects using SEM. Built Environ Project Asset Manag. ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2020-0181
Mashali AE, Motawa IA, Elshikh M (2019) Stakeholder management: state of the art. Int J Sci Eng Res 10(1):1179–1187
Khodeir L, Soliman A (2016) Efficient stakeholders management: the impact of applying the integrated building information modeling/facility management approach, A literature review. Presented at the International Conference on Sustainable Mega Projects, The British University In Egypt
Othman I, Kineber AF, Oke AE, Zayed T, Buniya MK (2021) Barriers of value management implementation for building projects in Egyptian construction industry. Ain Shams Eng J 12(1):21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.004
Mohammed KN, Chambrelin KS (2020) An analytical approach in usage of agile methodologies in construction industries - a case study. Mater Today-Proc 33:475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.045
Khodeir L, Ehab N (2019) Impact of agile management on the optimization of change in construction projects: a literature review. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction and Project Management- Sustainable Infrastructure and Transportation for Future Cities (ICSCPM18) Aswan, Egypt
Kumar SS, McArthur JJ (2015) Streamlining Building Information Model creation using Agile project management. WIT Trans Built Environ 149:229–240. https://doi.org/10.2495/BIM150201
Mohammed SR, Jasim AJ (2018) Examining the values and principles of agile construction management in Iraqi construction projects. J Eng 24(7):114–133. https://doi.org/10.31026/J.ENG.2018.07.08
Paul AJ, Eldhose S (2020) Development of frame work for residential building construction using agile management. In: Dasgupta K, Sajith AS, Kartha GU, Joseph A, Kavitha PE, Praseeda KI (eds) Proceedings of Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Secon’19, vol. 46 (Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering). Springer International Publishing Ag, Cham, 2020, pp 725–737
Streule T, Miserini N, Bartlomé O, Klippel M, de Soto BG (2016) Implementation of scrum in the construction industry. Procedia Eng 164:269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.619
Thesing T, Feldmann C, Burchardt M (2021) Agile versus waterfall project management: decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project. Procedia Computer Sci 181:746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227
Pareliya M, Pandit D, Patel S (2018) Implementing Agile Project Management (SCRUM) approach in the development of Building Projects. CEPT University
Kumara P (2017) Applicability of agile project management for construction projects. University of Moratuwa
Naslund D, Kale R (2020) Is agile the latest management fad? A review of success factors of agile transformations. Int J Qual Serv Sci 12(4):489–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-12-2019-0142
Ogbeifun E, Mbohwa C, Pretorius JHC (2016) Facilities management unit: improving self-image before its customers. Facilities 34(13–14):956–975. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-05-2015-0035
Jumat AR, Coffey V, Skitmore M (2012) Stakeholder service delivery expectations of military facilities management. Built Environ Project Asset Manag 2(2):146–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441241211280891
Goodpasture JC (2015) Project management the agile way: making it work in the enterprise. J. Ross Publishing
Arefazar Y, Nazari A, Hafezi MR, Maghool SAH (2019) Prioritizing agile project management strategies as a change management tool in construction projects. Int J Construct Manage 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1644757
PMI (2017) Agile Practice Guide. Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, USA
John JDC, Creswell W (2018) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks
Owen RL, Koskela L (2006) Agile construction project management. In: 6th international postgraduate research conference in the built and human environment, 6(7):22–33
Albuquerque F, Tones AS, Berssaneti FT (2020) Lean product development and agile project management in the construction industry. REGE-Rev Gest 27(2):135–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/rege-01-2019-0021
Thenuwara C, Sandanayake YG (2018) Agile integrated facilities maintenance approach to apparel sector. Procedia Manufact 17:547–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.095
Sljivar I, Gunasekaran A (2018) Agile-scrum for facility design project management. SPE Western Regional Meeting Proceedings 2018-April. https://doi.org/10.2118/190080-ms
Ling FYY, Tam JY (2022) Agility of facilities management organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learnt for future pandemics. Facilities 40(13–14):862–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2022-0032
Carvalho H, Azevedo SG, Cruz-Machado V (2012) Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: influence on performance and competitiveness. Logist Res 4(1):49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0064-2
Chia FC, Tung YH, Yong FYY (2022) Examining the agile project management practices in the Malaysian construction industry. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1101(4):042041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/4/042041
Ng PL, Maqsood T, Khalfan M, Rahmani F (2023) AgiBuild: a scaled agile framework for building adaptation projects. Buildings 13(12):3019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/12/3019
Paul AJ, Eldhose S (2020) Development of frame work for residential building construction using agile management. Cham, pp 725–737
Mnqonywa S (2017) A systematic literature review of the agile methodology applied during construction project design. University of Johannesburg (South Africa)
Recker J, Holten R, Hummel M, Rosenkranz C (2017) How agile practices impact customer responsiveness and development success: a field study. Proj Manag J 48(2):99–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800208
Nuottila J, Aaltonen K, Kujala J (2022) Challenges of adopting agile methods in a public organization. Int J Inf Syst Project Manag 4(3):65–85. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040304
Ahimbisibwe A, Daellenbach U, Cavana RY (2017) Empirical comparison of traditional plan-based and agile methodologies. J Enterp Inf Manag 30(3):400–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2015-0056
Zakrzewska M, Jarosz S, Piwowar-Sulej K, Sołtysik M (2022) Enterprise agility – its meaning, managerial expectations and barriers to implementation – a survey of three countries. J Organ Chang Manag 35(3):488–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2021-0061
Sailer P (2019) Project management methods as a way to ambidexterity. Int J Manag Proj Bus 12(4):1061–1078. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2018-0094
Griffiths M (2018) PMI-ACP Exam Prep : a course in a book for passing the PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP) Exam. RMC Publications, Inc.
Ashworth S, Tucker M, Druhmann CK (2019) Critical success factors for facility management employer’s information requirements (EIR) for BIM. Facilities 37(1–2):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2018-0027
Nazali Mohd Noor M, Pitt M (2009) A critical review on innovation in facilities management service delivery. Facilities 27(5/6):211–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770910944943
van der Voordt T (2017) Facilities management and corporate real estate management: FM/CREM or FREM? J Facil Manag 15(3):244–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-05-2016-0018
Guizzi G, Miele D, Carlini R (2012) Facility Management: a literature review. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS European Computing Conference, pp 423–429
Van Sprang H, Drion B (2020) Introduction to facility management. Routledge, London, UK
Acknowledgements
We thank Egyptian Facility Management Association (EGYFMA) for providing us with their professional guidance and also for their contribution.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sedhom, I., Khodeir, L.M. & Fathy, F. Integrated agile facility management model for improving performance in construction projects. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9, 171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01475-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01475-9