Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A systematic approach for rework reduction in precast buildings in India

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, precast construction technology has increasingly replaced traditional cast-in-situ methods across various sectors, aligning with industrialization and energy-efficient practices in compliance with energy conservation and environmental protection policies. However, the industry still faces challenges, including rework, which hinders productivity and adherence to schedules. This study focuses on the use of rework reduction tools in the Indian precast industry. For this, a suitable rework reduction technique is identified through a detailed literature review. The study utilizes the Project Rework Reduction Tool (PRRT). Further, two real-life case studies were selected based on predefined criteria and PRRT implemented throughout the project construction life cycle. The Project Rework Reduction Indicator (PRRI) is obtained through analysis of PRRT to address challenges in precast technology and enhance project outcomes. Based on the results obtained, a standardized sequence of precast activities along with the application point of PRRT is provided at last. The case study results highlight the effectiveness of implementing PRRT, resulting in notable time savings (from 7.3 to 9.18%) for both buildings, respectively. This work intends to contribute in the domain of rework reduction specifically on Indian precast construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Abdullah MD, Mosheer KA-M (2022) Effect of stirrups on the behavior of semi-precast concrete slabs. Civ Eng J 8(8):1653–1664. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-08-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed A, Mandal AK (2020) Benefits and Challenges of precast construction in India—a review. Int J Civ Eng 7(7):7–10. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/ijce-v7i7p102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asamoah RO, Ankrah JS, Offei-Nyako K, Tutu EO (2016) Cost analysis of precast and cast-in-place concrete construction for selected public buildings in Ghana. J Constr Eng 2016:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8785129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chadee AA, Martin HH, Mwasha A, Otuloge F (2022) Rationalizing critical cost overrun factors on public sector housing programmes. Emerg Sci J 6(3):647–666. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-03-016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chadee A, Hernandez SR, Martin H (2021) The influence of optimism bias on time and cost on construction projects. Emerg Sci J 5(4):429–442. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho K, Ahn S, Park K, Kim TW (2021) Schedule delay leading indicators in precast concrete construction projects: qualitative comparative analysis of Korean cases. J Manag Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Desai TN, Prajapati SR, Patel HR (2016) Application of value engineering to rework reduction in ship building project. MATEC Web Conf 40:02008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164002008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elseufy SM, Hussein A, Badawy M (2022) A hybrid SEM-ANN model for predicting overall rework impact on the performance of bridge construction projects. Structures 46:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fayek AR, Dissanayake M, Campero O (2004) Developing a standard methodology for measuring and classifying construction field rework. Can J Civ Eng 31(6):1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1139/l04-068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamzeh F, Abdul Ghani O, Saleh Bacha MB, Abbas Y (2017) Modular concrete construction. Eng Constr Archit Manag 24(6):935–949. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2014-0148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang B-G, Thomas SR, Haas CT, Caldas CH (2009) Measuring the impact of rework on construction cost performance. J Constr Eng Manag 135(3):187–198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:3(187)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang B-G, Zhao X, Yang KW (2019) Effect of BIM on Rework in construction projects in Singapore: status Quo, magnitude, impact, and strategies. J Constr Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaja N, Jauswal A, Professor A (n.d.) Review of precast concrete technology in India. www.ijert.org

  14. Khalesi H, Balali A, Valipour A, Antucheviciene J, Migilinskas D, Zigmund V (2020) Application of hybrid SWARA–BIM in reducing reworks of building construction projects from the perspective of time. Sustainability 12(21):8927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, Shen GQ, Xue X (2014) Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction. Habitat Int 43:240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Love PED, Ackermann F, Carey B, Morrison J, Ward M, Park A (2016) Praxis of rework mitigation in construction. J Manag Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Love PED, Edwards DJ (2004) Determinants of rework in building construction projects. Eng Constr Archit Manag 11(4):259–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980410547612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Love PED, Irani Z, Edwards DJ (2004) A rework reduction model for construction projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 51(4):426–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2004.835092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Love PED, Li H (2000) Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Constr Manag Econ 18(4):479–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190050024897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Love PED, Matthews J, Fang W (2020) Rework in Construction: a focus on error and violation. J Constr Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nanyam VPSN, Basu R, Sawhney A, Vikram H, Lodha G (2017) Implementation of precast technology in India-opportunities and challenges. Proced Eng 196:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nwaki WN, Eze CE (2020) Lean construction as a panacea for poor construction projects performance. ITEGAM J Eng Technol Ind Appl (ITEGAM-JETIA). https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v6i26.723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patil J, Gosavi R, Minde P (2023) A comprehensive review of seismic response of cast-in-place and prefabricated underground metro station buildings. Asian J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00883-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pawar P, Minde P, Kulkarni M (2022) Analysis of challenges and opportunities of prefabricated sandwich panel system: a solution for affordable housing in India. Mater Today Proc 65:1946–1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qaidi S, Najm HM, Abed SM, Özkılıç YO, Al Dughaishi H, Alosta M, Sabri MMS, Alkhatib F, Milad A (2022) Concrete containing waste glass as an environmentally friendly aggregate: a review on fresh and mechanical characteristics. Materials 15(18):6222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rausch C, Edwards C, Haas C (2020) Benchmarking and improving dimensional quality on modular construction projects—a case study. Int J Ind Constr 1(1):2–21. https://doi.org/10.29173/ijic212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shen K, Li X, Cao X, Zhihui Z (2021) Research on the rework risk core tasks in prefabricated construction in China. Eng Constr Archit Manag 28(10):3299–3321. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-0521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tayeh BA, Akeed MH, Qaidi S, Bakar BHA (2022) Influence of the proportion of materials on the rheology and mechanical strength of ultrahigh-performance concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 17:e01433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trach R, Trach Y, Lendo-Siwicka M (2021) Using ANN to predict the impact of communication factors on the rework cost in construction projects. Energies 14(14):4376. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xian Y, Yang K, Wang K, Wei Y-M, Huang Z (2019) Cost-environment efficiency analysis of construction industry in China: a materials balance approach. J Clean Prod 221:457–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no funding or specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune, India

    Pravin Minde, Mrudula Kulkarni, Abhaysinha G. Shelake, Omkar Jadhav & Rahul Dandage

Authors
  1. Pravin Minde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mrudula Kulkarni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abhaysinha G. Shelake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Omkar Jadhav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rahul Dandage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pravin Minde.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this research paper was obtained from the review committee in accordance with their established guidelines and procedures, ensuring the protection and well-being of human subjects involved in this study.

Informed consent

All participants in this study provided informed consent, acknowledging their voluntary participation and understanding the purpose, procedures, and potential risks and benefits of the research, in accordance with established ethical guidelines. Their identities have been protected through anonymization.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minde, P., Kulkarni, M., Shelake, A.G. et al. A systematic approach for rework reduction in precast buildings in India. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 8, 294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01270-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01270-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation